The days of managing credit risk, fraud prevention, and compliance in silos are over. As fraud threats evolve, regulatory scrutiny increases, and economic uncertainty persists, businesses need a more unified risk strategy to stay ahead. Our latest e-book, Navigating the intersection of credit, fraud, and compliance, explores why 94% of forward-looking companies expect credit, fraud, and compliance to converge within the next three years — and what that means for your business.1 Key insights include: The line between fraud and credit risk is blurring. Many organizations classify first-party fraud losses as credit losses, distorting the true risk picture. Fear of fraud is costing businesses growth. 68% of organizations say they’re denying too many good customers due to fraud concerns. A unified approach is the future. Integrating risk decisioning across credit, fraud, and compliance leads to stronger fraud detection, smarter credit risk assessments, and improved compliance. Read the full e-book to explore how an integrated risk approach can protect your business and fuel growth. Download e-book 1Research conducted by InsightAvenue on behalf of Experian
With the rise of digital interactions, identity fraud has become an unassuming threat that impacts individuals, businesses, and institutions worldwide. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), 5.4 million consumer reports regarding fraud and consumer protection were filed in 2023. Identity fraud, which is characterized as when an individual's personal information is stolen and used without their consent for fraudulent purposes, has devastating consequences for consumers, including financial losses, damaged credit scores, legal issues, and emotional distress. Financial institutions face damaging consequences beyond financial losses, including reputational damage, operational disruption, and regulatory scrutiny. As technology advances, so do fraudsters' tactics, making it increasingly challenging to detect and prevent identity-related crimes. So, what are financial institutions to do? Industry-leading institutions apply a layered approach to solving fraud that starts with a fraud risk assessment. What is a fraud risk assessment? When opening a new account, banks typically conduct a fraud risk assessment to verify the identity of the individual or entity applying for the account and to assess the likelihood of fraudulent activity. Banks also assess the applicant's credit history, financial background, and transaction patterns to identify red flags or suspicious activity. Advanced fraud detection tools and technologies are employed to monitor account opening activities in real-time and detect signs of fraudulent behavior. This assessment is crucial for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, mitigating the risk of financial loss, and safeguarding against identity theft. Understanding the importance of fraud risk assessments A fraud risk assessment is crucial for banks during account opening as it helps verify the identity of applicants and mitigate the risk of fraudulent activity. By assessing the likelihood and potential impact of identity fraud, banks can implement measures to protect customers' assets and protect against losses in their portfolio. Additionally, conducting thorough risk assessments enables banks to comply with regulatory requirements, which mandate the verification of customer identities to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. By adhering to these regulations and implementing effective fraud detection measures, banks can enhance trust and confidence among customers, regulators, and stakeholders, reinforcing the integrity and stability of the financial system. 10 tools to consider when building an effective fraud risk assessment Several key factors should be carefully considered in an identity fraud risk assessment to ensure thorough evaluation and effective mitigation of identity fraud risks. Financial institutions should consider emerging threats and trends such as synthetic identity fraud, account takeover attacks, and social engineering scams when conducting a risk assessment. By staying abreast of evolving tactics used by fraudsters, organizations can proactively adapt their fraud prevention strategies and controls. Here are 10 tools that can help catch red flags for fraud prevention: Identity verification: Identity verification is the first line of defense against identity theft, account takeover, and other fraudulent activities. By verifying the identities of individuals before granting access to services or accounts, organizations can ensure that only legitimate users are granted access. Effective identity verification methods, such as biometric authentication, document verification, and knowledge-based authentication, help mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Implementing robust identity verification measures protects organizations from financial losses and reputational damage and enhances trust and confidence among customers and stakeholders. Device intelligence: Device intelligence provides insights into the devices used in online transactions, enabling organizations to identify and mitigate fraudulent activities. Organizations can detect suspicious behavior indicative of fraudulent activity by analyzing device-related data such as IP addresses, geolocation, device fingerprints, and behavioral patterns. Device intelligence allows organizations to differentiate between legitimate users and fraudsters, enabling them to implement appropriate security measures, such as device authentication or transaction monitoring. Phone data: Phone and Mobile Network Operator (MNO) data offers valuable insights into the mobile devices and phone numbers used in transactions. By analyzing MNO data such as subscriber information, call records, and location data, organizations can verify the authenticity of users and detect suspicious activities. MNO data enables organizations to confirm the legitimacy of phone numbers, detect SIM swapping or account takeover attempts, and identify fraudulent transactions. Leveraging MNO data allows organizations to strengthen their fraud prevention measures, enhance customer authentication processes, and effectively mitigate the risk of fraudulent activities in an increasingly mobile-driven environment. Email attributes: Email addresses serve as a primary identifier and communication channel for users in digital transactions. Organizations can authenticate user identities, confirm account ownership, and detect suspicious activities such as phishing attempts or identity theft by verifying email addresses. Analyzing email addresses enables organizations to identify patterns of fraudulent behavior, block unauthorized access attempts, and enhance security measures. Furthermore, email address validation helps prevent fraudulent transactions, safeguard sensitive information, and protect against financial losses and reputational damage. Leveraging email addresses as part of fraud prevention strategies enhances trustworthiness in digital interactions. Address verification: Address verification provides essential information for authenticating user identities and detecting suspicious activities. By verifying addresses, organizations can confirm the legitimacy of user accounts, prevent identity theft, and detect fraudulent transactions. Address validation enables organizations to ensure that the provided address matches the user's identity and reduces the risk of fraudulent activities such as account takeover or shipping fraud. Behavioral analytics: Behavioral analytics enables organizations to detect anomalies and patterns indicative of fraudulent activity. By analyzing user behavior, such as transaction history, navigation patterns, and interaction frequency, organizations can identify deviations from normal behavior and flag suspicious activities for further investigation. Behavioral analytics allows organizations to create profiles of typical user behavior and detect deviations that may signal fraud, such as unusual login times or transaction amounts. Consortia: Consortia facilitate collaboration and information sharing among organizations to combat fraudulent activities collectively. By joining forces through consortia, organizations can leverage shared data, insights, and resources to more effectively identify emerging fraud trends, patterns, and threats. Consortia enables participating organizations to benefit from a broader and more comprehensive view of fraudulent activities, enhancing their ability to detect and prevent fraud. Risk engines: Risk engines enable real-time analysis of transaction data and user behavior to detect and mitigate fraudulent activities. By leveraging advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques, risk engines assess the risk associated with each transaction and user interaction, flagging suspicious activities for further investigation or intervention. Risk engines help organizations identify anomalies, patterns, and trends indicative of fraudulent behavior, allowing for timely detection and prevention of fraud. Additionally, risk engines can adapt and evolve over time to stay ahead of emerging threats, enhancing their effectiveness in mitigating fraud. Orchestration streamlines and coordinates the various components of a fraud detection and prevention strategy. By orchestrating different fraud prevention tools, technologies, and processes, organizations can optimize their efforts to combat fraud effectively. Orchestration allows for seamless integration and automation of workflows, enabling real-time data analysis and rapid response to emerging threats. Step-up authentication: Step-up authentication provides an additional layer of security to verify users' identities during high-risk transactions or suspicious activities. By requiring users to provide additional credentials or undergo further authentication steps, such as biometric verification or one-time passcodes, organizations can mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Step-up authentication allows organizations to dynamically adjust security measures based on the perceived risk level, ensuring that stronger authentication methods are employed when necessary. By layering these tools effectively businesses remove gaps that fraudsters would typically exploit. Learn more
Do you know where your customers stand? Not literally, of course, but do you know how recent macroeconomic changes and their personal circumstances are currently affecting your portfolio? While refreshing your customers’ credit data quarterly works for some aspects of portfolio management, you need more frequent access to fresh data to quickly respond to risky customer behavior and new credit needs before your portfolio takes a hit. Use triggers to improve portfolio management Event-based credit triggers provide daily or real-time alerts about important changes in your customers’ financial situations. You can use these to manage risk by promptly responding to signs of changing creditworthiness or to prevent attrition by proactively reaching out to customers who are shopping for credit. Risk Triggers℠ and Retention Triggers℠ offer a real-time solution that can be customized to fit your needs for daily portfolio management. What are Risk Triggers? Experian’s Risk Triggers alert you of notable information, such as unfavorable utilization rate changes, delinquencies with other lenders and recent activity with high-interest, short-term loan products. This solution allows you to monitor how your customers manage accounts with other lenders to get ahead of potential risk on your book. You can use Risk Triggers to get daily insights into your customers’ activity — allowing you to quickly identify potentially risky behavior and take appropriate action to limit your exposure and losses. Types of Risk Triggers Choose from a defined Risk Triggers package that could help you identify high-risk customers, including: New trades Increasing credit utilization or balances over limit New collection accounts An account is charged-off A credit grantor closes an account New delinquency statuses (30 to 180 days past due) Consumers seeking access to short-term, high-risk financing options Bankruptcy and deceased events How to use Risk Triggers You can use the daily alerts from Risk Triggers to help inform your account management strategy. Depending on the circumstances, you might: Decrease credit limits Close or freeze accounts Accelerate payment requests Continue monitoring accounts for other signs of risk Spotlight on Experian’s Clarity Services events Included in Risk Triggers are events from Experian’s Clarity Services, which draw on expanded FCRA-regulated data* from a leading source of alternative financial credit data. For example, you could get an alert when someone has a new inquiry from non-traditional loans. These triggers provide a broader view of the customer – offering added protection against risky behavior. What are Retention Triggers? Experian’s Retention Triggers can alert you when a customer improves their creditworthiness, is shopping for new credit, opens a new tradeline or lists property. Proactively responding to these daily alerts can help you retain and strengthen relationships with your customers — which is often less expensive than acquiring new customers. Types of Retention Triggers Choose from over 100 Retention Triggers to bundle, including: New trades New inquiries Credit line increases Property listing statuses Improving delinquency status Past-due accounts are brought current or paid off How to use Retention Triggers You can use Retention Triggers to increase lifetime customer value by proactively responding to your customers’ needs and wants. You might: Increase credit limits Offer promotional financing, such as balance transfers Introduce perks or rewards to strengthen the relationship Append attributes for improved decisioning By appending credit attributes to Risk and Retention Trigger outputs, you can gain greater insight into your accounts. Premier AttributesSM is Experian's core set of 2,100-plus attributes. These can quickly summarize data from consumers' credit reports, allowing you to more easily segment accounts to make more strategic decisions across your portfolio. Trended 3DTM attributes can help you spot and understand patterns in a customer's behavior over time. Integrating trended attributes into a triggers program can help you identify risk and determine the next best action. Trended 3D includes more than 2,000 attributes and provides insights into industries such as bankcard, mortgage, student loans, personal loans, collections and much more. By working with both triggers and attributes, you'll proactively review an account, so you can then take the next best action to improve your portfolio's profits. Customize your trigger strategy When you partner with Experian, you can bundle and choose from hundreds of Risk and Retention Triggers to focus on risk, customer retention or both. Additionally, you can work with Experian’s experts to customize your trigger strategy to minimize costs and filter out repetitive or unneeded triggers: Use cool-off periods Set triggering thresholds Choose which triggers to monitor Establish hierarchies for which triggers to prioritize Create different strategies for segments of your portfolio Learn more about Risk and Retention Triggers. Learn more *Disclaimer: “Alternative Financial Credit Data” refers to the use of alternative data and its appropriate use in consumer credit lending decisions, as regulated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Hence, the term “Expanded FCRA-Regulated Data” may also apply in this instance, and both can be used interchangeably.
At Experian, we believe in fostering innovation and collaboration to solve complex challenges. Recently, Ivan Ahmed, one of our talented product management leaders at Experian Housing, had the opportunity to participate in the FHFA 2024 TechSprint, where his team won the award for the best Risk Management and Compliance idea. In this article, we share Ivan's experience as he reflects on the TechSprint, the inspiration behind his team's project, and the valuable lessons learned. Can you share your experience participating in the FHFA 2024 TechSprint? What was the atmosphere like, and how did it feel to be recognized for the best Risk Management and Compliance idea? Let me start by explaining what a TechSprint is. It is a fast-paced, high-energy collaborative workshop where diverse experts and stakeholders come together to design technological solutions to complex problems. Each team is given a high-level problem and use case. From there, stakeholders and domain experts must develop a proof of concept within 3 days to best address the problem. On the last and final day, called the “Demo Day,” teams must showcase their solution in front of a panel of judges. It’s a fun, high-energy, challenging, and rewarding experience. A TechSprint is a convergence of everything I love – technology, business, and design and I think FHFA did a wonderful job orchestrating the event. Each team consisted of representatives from different functions in the housing ecosystem, including lenders, technologists, product managers, and regulators. We were given access to a room, whiteboards, and, most importantly, delicious snacks. We were also given access to industry subject matter experts outside our teams, including representatives from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, FHFA, and leaders from top companies. What I found the most impactful was the ability to pressure test our ideas and solutions against these industry subject matter experts. Ideating in a vacuum can be challenging, so being able to stress test things rapidly with these experts allowed us to change course quickly as new information was introduced. Winning the best Risk Management and Compliance idea award was rewarding, especially as we were able to ideate a solution to such a critical accessibility issue. Ultimately, our goal was to help create a fairer, more equitable, and inclusive housing finance system. A big shoutout to my teammates, Wemimo Abbey, Joseph Karbowski, Will Regenauer, and Eddy Atkins. What inspired Team Arsenal to focus on identifying potential gaps in ADA compliance within multifamily buildings, and what were some of the key challenges your team faced during the process? My mother has suffered from several disabilities most of her life. With age, she has become more wheelchair-dependent, and traveling has become a major challenge. On a recent family trip, the entry to our hotel building wasn’t ADA-compliant, and I had to carry her up a flight of stairs. It was frustrating to deal with. I later went down a rabbit hole around ADA compliance and, much to my surprise, learned that only 0.15% of all homes in the U.S. are wheelchair accessible! As we explored the problem space further as a team, we learned how difficult it is to ensure that new and existing rental homes are ADA-compliant. We hypothesized that a solution is needed to establish incentives for borrowers, lenders, and GSEs to meet compliance. A technological solution could more easily enable multi-family lenders and builders to identify rental units that are non-ADA compliant and could provide ways to address the gaps. We noticed two primary challenges: an enforcement gap and an incentive gap. We learned that agency loans (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) account for most multi-family home loan originations. If we could tackle the enforcement challenge at the GSE level, we could set up the proper incentives for all players in the multi-family lending process. By providing tools to both the borrower and the GSE’s, we could help foster a more inclusive and accessible rental housing market. How do you envision your AI-driven solution impacting the rental housing market and improving ADA compliance for multifamily buildings? We wanted to ensure that we leveraged the true power of Generative AI, which meant that our solution could take multimodal inputs and produce multimodal outputs. For example, we could train the Generative AI model on photos of interior multi-family rental units and structured or unstructured text like building sketches, site layouts, and local building codes. We could then incorporate ADA design requirements and analyze discrepancies. The result would be a compliance report or tool outlining the adherence level to ADA design requirements and providing tips and recommendations on remediation. The solution could be delivered as a free tool by the GSEs, who could incentivize its usage by offering price concessions to borrowers. Developers could also use the tool to evaluate whether new or existing builds were ADA-compliant. How did your background and experience with Experian contribute to developing your team's winning idea at the FHFA TechSprint? Much of my role at Experian has involved exploring ways to leverage proprietary and public record property data for marketing, account review, and analytical use cases. I work very closely with property data at Experian, so I was very familiar with the types of input fields of property data that would be the most relevant to improving a generative AI model output. Specifically, in our use case, we wanted to train the model to better identify homes and features that were non-compliant with ADA and provide clear remediation steps. We knew that public record property information was available from various sources and could be leveraged as additional third-party input data to improve our model accuracy. What advice would you give to other teams or individuals looking to participate in future TechSprint events, especially those aiming to tackle complex issues like risk management and compliance? It’s important to remember that an ideal solution is both impactful and practical. Practicality is achieved when the solution has both business and technical viability. Therefore, it’s crucial to carefully vet problems and solutions by understanding their viability. Working as a team to solve the problem means leveraging the expertise of subject matter experts around you. Each team member should draw on their strengths, making the collective effort stronger than individual contribution. Most importantly, fairness, inclusivity, and accessibility matter. An effective solution should strive to have a positive social impact in addition to other considerations. Winning with purpose Ivan’s journey through the FHFA 2024 TechSprint exemplifies the innovative and collaborative spirit that drives our team at Experian. His reflections highlight the impact of well-designed technological solutions on critical issues like ADA-compliance in multifamily housing. We hope Ivan’s experience inspires others to explore their potential in solving complex problems and to participate in future TechSprints, where innovative thinking and a commitment to social good can lead to meaningful change.
“Learn how to learn.” One of Zack Kass’, AI futurist and one of the keynote speakers at Vision 2024, takeaways readily embodies a sentiment most of us share — particularly here at Vision. Jennifer Schulz, CEO of Experian, North America, talked about AI and transformative technologies of past and present as she kicked off Vision 2024, the 40th Vision. Keynote speaker: Dr. Mohamed El-Erian Dr. Mohamed El-Erian, President of Queens’ College, Cambridge and Chief Economic Advisor at Allianz, returned to the Vision stage to discuss the labor market, “sticky” inflation and the health of consumers. He emphasized the need to embrace and learn how to talk to AI engines and that AI can facilitate content, creation, collaboration and community Keynote speaker: Zack Kass Zack Kass, AI futurist and former Head of Go-To-Market at OpenAI, spoke about the future of work and life and artificial general intelligence. He said AI is aiding in our entering of a superlinear trajectory and compared the thresholds of technology versus those of society. Sessions – Day 1 highlights The conference hall was buzzing with conversations, discussions and thought leadership. Some themes definitely rose to the top — the increasing proliferation of fraud and how to combat it without diminishing the customer experience, leveraging AI and transformative technology in decisioning and how Experian is pioneering the GenAI era in finance and technology. Transformative technologiesAI and emerging technologies are reshaping the finance sector and it's the responsibility of today's industry leaders to equip themselves with cutting-edge strategies and a comprehensive understanding to master the rapidly evolving landscape. That said, transformation is a journey and aligning with a partner that's agile and innovative is critical. Holistic fraud decisioningGenerative AI, a resurgence of bank branch transactions, synthetic identity and pig butchering are all fraud trends that today's organizations must be acutely aware of and armed to protect their businesses and customers against. Leveraging a holistic fraud decisioning strategy is important in finding the balance between customer experience and mitigating fraud. Unlocking cashflow to grow, protect and reduce riskCash flow data can be used not only across the lending lifecycle, but also as part of assessing existing portfolio opportunities. Incorporating consumer-permissioned data into models and processes powers predicatbility and can further assess risk and help score more consumers. Navigating the economyAmid a slowing economy, consumers and businesses continue to struggle with higher interest rates, tighter credit conditions and rising delinquencies, creating a challenging environment for lenders. Experian's experts outlined their latest economic forecasts and provided actionable insights into key consumer and commercial credit trends. More insights from Vision to come. Follow @ExperianVision and @ExperianInsights to see more of the action.
For lenders, first payment default (FPD) is more than just financial jargon; it's a crucial metric in assessing credit risk. This blog post will walk you through the essentials of FPD, from defining the term to exploring how you can prevent and mitigate its potential impact. Understanding first payment default FPD occurs when a consumer fails to make their initial payment on a loan or credit agreement, which is often perceived as an early signal of a potential cascade of risky behavior. Recognizing FPD is the starting point for lenders to address potential issues with new borrowers before they escalate. One important aspect to grasp is the timeline of FPD. It’s not just about missing the first payment; it's about "early" missing. The timing of defaults is often critical in assessing the overall risk profile of a borrower or group of borrowers. The earlier a borrower starts to miss payments, the riskier they tend to be. Examining the causes of FPD The roots of FPD are diverse and can be classified into two broad categories: External factors: These include sudden financial crises, changes in employment status, or unforeseen expenses. Such factors are often beyond the borrower's immediate control. Internal factors: This category covers more deliberate or chronic financial habits, such as overspending, lack of savings, or overleveraging on credit. It's often indicative of longer-term financial instability. Understanding the causes of early payment default is the first step in effective risk management and customer engagement strategies. Implications of FPD for lenders FPD doesn't just signal immediate financial loss for lenders in terms of the missed installment. It sets off a cascade of consequences that affect the bottom line and the reputation of the institution. Financial loss. Lenders incur direct financial losses when a payment is missed, but the implications go beyond the missed payment amount. There are immediate costs associated with servicing, collections, and customer support. In the longer term, repeated defaults can lead to write-offs, impacting the institution's profitability and regulatory standing. Regulatory scrutiny. Repeated instances of FPD can also draw the attention of regulators, leading to scrutiny and potentially increased compliance costs. Mitigating first payment default Mitigating FPD requires a multifaceted approach that blends data, advanced analytics, customer engagement, and agile risk management. Lenders need to adopt strategies that can detect early signs of potential FPD and intervene preemptively. Data-driven decision-making. Leveraging advanced analytics and credit risk modeling is crucial. By incorporating transactional and behavioral data, lenders can make more accurate assessments of a borrower's risk profile. Utilizing predictive models can help forecast which borrowers are likely to default on their first payment, allowing for early intervention. Proactive customer engagement. Initiatives that revolve around education, personalized financial planning advice, and flexible payment arrangements can help borrowers who might be at risk of FPD. Proactive outreach can engage customers before a default occurs, turning a potential negative event into a positive experience. Agile risk management. Risk management strategies should be dynamic and responsive to changing market and customer conditions. Regularly reviewing and updating underwriting criteria, credit policies, and risk assessment tools ensures that lenders are prepared to tackle FPD challenges as they arise. Using FPD as a customer management tool Lastly, and perhaps most importantly, lenders can use FPD as a tool to foster better customer management. Every FPD is a data point that can provide insights into customer behavior and financial trends. By studying the causes and outcomes of FPD, lenders can refine their risk mitigation tools and improve their customer service offerings. Building trust through handling defaults. How lenders handle defaults, specifically the first ones, can significantly impact customer trust. Transparent communication, fair and considerate policies, and supportive customer service can make a difference in retaining customers and improving the lender's brand image. Leveraging data for personalization. The increasing availability of data means lenders can offer more personalized services. By segmenting customers based on payment behavior and response to early interventions, lenders can tailor offerings that meet the specific financial needs and challenges of individual borrowers. How Experian® can help First payment default is a critical aspect of credit risk management that requires attention and proactive strategies. By understanding the causes, implications, and mitigation strategies associated with FPD, financial institutions can not only avoid potential losses but also build stronger, more enduring relationships with their customers. Learn more about Experian’s credit risk modeling solutions. Learn more This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.
In the ever-expanding financial crime landscape, envision the most recent perpetrator targeting your organization. Did you catch them? Could you recover the stolen funds? Now, picture that same individual attempting to replicate their scheme at another establishment, only to be thwarted by an advanced system flagging their activity. The reason? Both companies are part of an anti-fraud data consortium, safeguarding financial institutions (FIs) from recurring fraud. In the relentless battle against fraud and financial crime, FIs find themselves at a significant disadvantage due to stringent regulations governing their operations. Criminals, however, operate without boundaries, collaborating across jurisdictions and international borders. Recognizing the need to level the playing field, FIs are increasingly turning to collaborative solutions, such as participation in fraud consortiums, to enhance their anti-fraud and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) efforts. Understanding consortium data for fraud prevention A fraud consortium is a strategic alliance of financial institutions and service providers united in the common goal of comprehensively understanding and combatting fraud. As online transactions surge, so does the risk of fraudulent activities. However, according to Experian’s 2023 U.S. Identity and Fraud Report, 55% of U.S. consumers reported setting up a new account in the last six months despite concerns around fraud and online security. The highest account openings were reported for streaming services (43%), social media sites and applications (40%), and payment system providers (39%). Organizations grappling with fraud turn to consortium data as a robust defense mechanism against evolving fraud strategies. Consortium data for fraud prevention involves sharing transaction data and information among a coalition of similar businesses. This collaborative approach empowers companies with enhanced data analytics and insights, bolstering their ability to combat fraudulent activities effectively. The logic is simple: the more transaction data available for analysis by artificial-intelligence-powered systems, the more adept they become at detecting and preventing fraud by identifying patterns and anomalies. Advantages of data consortiums for fraud and AML teams Participation in an anti-fraud data consortium provides numerous advantages for a financial institution's risk management team. Key benefits include: Case management resolution: Members can exchange detailed case studies, sharing insights on how they responded to specific suspicious activities and financial crime incidents. This collaborative approach facilitates the development of best practices for incident handling. Perpetrator IDs: Identifying repeat offenders becomes more efficient as consortium members share data on suspicious activities. Recognizing patterns in names, addresses, device fingerprints, and other identifiers enables proactive prevention of financial crimes. Fraud trends: Consortium members can collectively analyze and share data on the frequency of various fraud attempts, allowing for the calibration of anti-fraud systems to effectively combat prevalent types of fraud. Regulatory changes: Staying ahead of evolving financial regulations is critical. Consortiums enable FIs to promptly share updates on regulatory changes, ensuring quick modifications to anti-fraud/AML systems for ongoing compliance. Who should join a fraud consortium? A fraud consortium can benefit any organization that faces fraud risks and challenges, especially in the financial industry. However, some organizations may benefit more, depending on their size, type, and fraud exposure. Some of the organizations that should consider joining a fraud consortium are: Financial institutions: Banks, credit unions, and other financial institutions are prime targets for fraudsters, who use various methods such as identity theft, account takeover, card fraud, wire fraud, and loan fraud to steal money and information from them. Fintech companies: Fintech companies are innovative and disruptive players in the financial industry, who offer new and alternative products and services such as digital payments, peer-to-peer lending, crowdfunding, and robot-advisors. Online merchants: Online merchants are vulnerable to fraudsters, who use various methods such as card-not-present fraud, friendly fraud, and chargeback fraud to exploit their online transactions and payment systems. Why partner with Experian? What companies need is a consortium that allows FIs to collaboratively research anti-fraud and AML information, eliminating the need for redundant individual efforts. This approach promotes tighter standardization of anti-crime procedures, expedited deployment of effective anti-fraud/AML solutions, and a proactive focus on preventing financial crime rather than reacting to its aftermath. Experian Hunter is a sophisticated global application fraud and risk management solution. It leverages detection rules to screen incoming application data for identifying and preventing fraudulent activities. It matches incoming application data against multiple internal and external data sources, shared fraud databases and dedicated watch lists. It uses client-flexible matching rules to crossmatch data sources for highlighting data anomalies and velocity attempts. In addition, it looks for connections to previous suspected and known fraudulent applications. Hunter generates a fraud score to indicate a fraud risk level used to prioritize referrals. Suspicious applications are moved into the case management tool for further investigation. Overall, Hunter prevents application fraud by highlighting suspicious applications, allowing you to investigate and prevent fraud without inconveniencing genuine customers. To learn more about our fraud management solutions, visit us online or request a call. Learn more This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.
Today's lenders use expanded data sources and advanced analytics to predict credit risk more accurately and optimize their lending and operations. The result may be a win-win for lenders and customers. What is credit risk? Credit risk is the possibility that a borrower will not repay a debt as agreed. Credit risk management encompasses the policies, tools and systems that lenders use to understand this risk. These can be important throughout the customer lifecycle, from marketing and sending preapproved offers to underwriting and portfolio management. Poor risk management can lead to unnecessary losses and missed opportunities, especially because risk departments need to manage risk with their organization's budgetary, technical and regulatory constraints in mind. How is it assessed? Credit risk is often assessed with credit risk analytics — statistical modeling that predicts the risk involved with credit lending. Lenders may create and use credit risk models to help drive decisions. Additionally (or alternatively), they rely on generic or custom credit risk scores: Generic scores: Analytics companies create predictive models that rank order consumers based on the likelihood that a person will fall 90 or more days past due on any credit obligation in the next 24 months. Lenders can purchase these risk scores to help them evaluate risk. Custom scores: Custom credit risk modeling solutions help organizations tailor risk scores for particular products, markets, and customers. Custom scores can incorporate generic risk scores, traditional credit data, alternative credit data* (or expanded FCRA-regulated data), and a lender's proprietary data to increase their effectiveness. About 41 percent of consumer lending organizations use a model-first approach, and 55 percent use a score-first approach to credit decisioning.1 However, these aren't entirely exclusive groupings. For example, a credit score may be an input in a lender's credit risk model — almost every lender (99 percent) that uses credit risk models for decisioning also uses credit scores.2 Similarly, lenders that primarily rely on credit scores may also have business policies that affect their decisions. What are the current challenges? Risk departments and teams are facing several overarching challenges today: Staying flexible: Volatile market conditions and changing consumer preferences can lead to unexpected shifts in risk. Organizations need to actively monitor customer accounts and larger economic trends to understand when, if, and how they should adjust their risk policies. Digesting an overwhelming amount of data: More data can be beneficial, but only if it offers real insights and the organization has the resources to understand and use it efficiently. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are often important for turning raw data into actionable insights. Retaining IT talent: Many organizations are trying to figure out how to use vast amounts of data and AI/ML effectively. However, 82 percent of lenders have trouble hiring and retaining data scientists and analysts.3 Separating fraud and credit losses: Understanding a portfolio's credit losses can be important for improving credit risk models and performance. But some organizations struggle to properly distinguish between the two, particularly when synthetic identity fraud is involved. Best practices for credit risk management Leading financial institutions have moved on from legacy systems and outdated risk models or scores. And they're looking at the current challenges as an opportunity to pull away from the competition. Here's how they're doing it: Using additional data to gain a holistic picture: Lenders have an opportunity to access more data sources, including credit data from alternative financial services and consumer-permissioned data. When combined with traditional credit data, credit scores, and internal data, the outcome can be a more complete picture of a consumer's credit risk. Implementing AI/ML-driven models: Lenders can leverage AI/ML to analyze large amounts of data to improve organizational efficiency and credit risk assessments. 16 percent of consumer lending organizations expect to solely use ML algorithms for credit decisioning, while two-thirds expect to use both traditional and ML models going forward.4 Increasing model velocity: On average, it takes about 15 months to go from model development to deployment. But some organizations can do it in less than six.5 Increasing model velocity can help organizations quickly respond to changing consumer and economic conditions. Even if rapid model creation and deployment isn't an option, monitoring model health and recalibrating for drift is important. Nearly half (49 percent) of lenders check for model drift monthly or quarterly — one out of ten get automated alerts when their models start to drift.6 WATCH: Accelerating Model Velocity in Financial Institutions Improving automation and customer experience Lenders are using AI to automate their application, underwriting, and approval processes. Often, automation and ML-driven risk models go hand-in-hand. Lenders can use the models to measure the credit risk of consumers who don't qualify for traditional credit scores and automation to expedite the review process, leading to an improved customer experience. Learn more by exploring Experian's credit risk solutions. Learn more * When we refer to “Alternative Credit Data," this refers to the use of alternative data and its appropriate use in consumer credit lending decisions as regulated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Hence, the term “Expanded FCRA Data" may also apply in this instance and both can be used interchangeably. 1-6. Experian (2023). Accelerating Model Velocity in Financial Institutions
In a series of articles, we talk about different types of fraud and how to best solve for them. This article will explore first-party fraud and how it's similar to biting into a cookie you think is chocolate chip, only to find that it’s filled with raisins. The raisins in the cookie were hiding in plain sight, indistinguishable from chocolate chips without a closer look, much like first-party fraudsters. What is first-party fraud? First-party fraud refers to instances when an individual purposely misrepresents their identity in exchange for goods or services. In the financial services industry, it's often miscategorized as credit loss and written off as bad debt, which causes problems when organizations later try to determine how much they’ve lost to fraud versus credit risk. Common types of first-party fraud include: Chargeback fraud: Also known as "friendly fraud," chargeback fraud occurs when an individual knowingly makes a purchase with their credit card and then requests a chargeback from the issuer, claiming they didn't authorize the purchase. Application fraud: This takes place when an individual uses stolen or manipulated information to apply for a loan, credit card or job. In 2023, the employment sector accounted for 45% of all false document submissions — 70% of those who falsified their resumes still got hired. Fronting: Done to get cheaper rates, this form of insurance fraud happens when a young or inexperienced individual is deliberately listed as a named driver, when they're actually the main driver of the vehicle. Goods lost in transit fraud (GLIT): This occurs when an individual claims the goods they purchased online did not arrive. To put it simply, the individual is getting a refund for something they actually already received. A first-party fraudster can also recruit “money mules” — individuals who are persuaded to use their own information to obtain credit or merchandise on behalf of a larger fraud ring. This type of fraud has become especially prevalent as more consumers are active online. Money mules constitute up to 0.3% of accounts at U.S. financial institutions, or an estimated $3 billion in fraudulent transfers. How does it impact my organization? Firstly, there are often substantial losses associated with first-party fraud. An imperfect first-party fraud solution can also strain relationships with good customers and hinder growth. When lenders have to interpret actions and behavior to assess customers, there’s a lot of room for error and losses. Those same losses hinder growth when, as mentioned before, businesses anticipate credit losses that aren’t actually credit losses. This type of fraud isn’t a single-time event, and it doesn’t occur at just one point in the customer lifecycle. It occurs when good customers develop fraudulent intent, when new applicants who have positive history with other lenders have recently changed circumstances or when seemingly good applicants have manipulated their identities to mask previous defaults. Finally, first-party fraud impacts how your organization categorizes and manages risk – and that’s something that touches every department. Solving the first-party fraud problem First-party fraud detection requires a change in how we think about the fraud problem. It starts with the ability to separate first- and third-party fraud to treat them differently. Because first-party fraud doesn’t have a victim, you can’t work with the person whose information was stolen to confirm the fraud. Instead, you’ll have to implement a consistent monitoring system and make a determination internally when fraud is suspected. As we’ve already discussed, the fraud problem is complex. However with a partner like Experian, you can leverage the fraud risk management strategies required to perform a closer examination and the ability to differentiate between the types of fraud so you can determine the best course of action moving forward. Additionally, our robust fraud management solutions can be used for synthetic identity fraud and account takeover fraud prevention, which can help you minimize customer friction to improve and deepen your relationships while preventing fraud. Contact us if you’d like to learn more about how Experian is using our identity expertise, data and analytics to improve identity resolution and detect and prevent all types of fraud. Contact us
Changes in your portfolio are a constant. To accelerate growth while proactively identifying risk, you’ll need a well-informed portfolio risk management strategy. What is portfolio risk management? Portfolio risk management is the process of identifying, assessing, and mitigating risks within a portfolio. It involves implementing strategies that allow lenders to make more informed decisions, such as whether to offer additional credit products to customers or identify credit problems before they impact their bottom line. Leveraging the right portfolio risk management solution Traditional approaches to portfolio risk management may lack a comprehensive view of customers. To effectively mitigate risk and maximize revenue within your portfolio, you’ll need a portfolio risk management tool that uses expanded customer data, advanced analytics, and modeling. Expanded data. Differentiated data sources include marketing data, traditional credit and trended data, alternative financial services data, and more. With robust consumer data fueling your portfolio risk management solution, you can gain valuable insights into your customers and make smarter decisions. Advanced analytics. Advanced analytics can analyze large volumes of data to unlock greater insights, resulting in increased predictiveness and operational efficiency. Model development. Portfolio risk modeling methodologies forecast future customer behavior, enabling you to better predict risk and gain greater precision in your decisions. Benefits of portfolio risk management Managing portfolio risk is crucial for any organization. With an advanced portfolio risk management solution, you can: Minimize losses. By monitoring accounts for negative performance, you can identify risks before they occur, resulting in minimized losses. Identify growth opportunities. With comprehensive consumer data, you can connect with customers who have untapped potential to drive cross-sell and upsell opportunities. Enhance collection efforts. For debt portfolios, having the right portfolio risk management tool can help you quickly and accurately evaluate collections recovery. Maximize your portfolio potential Experian offers portfolio risk analytics and portfolio risk management tools that can help you mitigate risk and maximize revenue with your portfolio. Get started today. Learn more
It's no secret that the banking industry is essential to a thriving economy. However, the nature of the industry makes it prone to various risks that can have significant consequences. Therefore, effective and efficient risk management is vital for mitigating these risks and enhancing the stability of the banking sector. This is where risk management in banking comes in. Let’s look at the importance of risk management in banking and its role in mitigating risks in the industry. What is risk management in banking? Risk management in banking is an approach used by financial institutions to manage risks associated with banking operations. Establishing a structured risk management process is essential to identifying, evaluating and controlling risks that could affect your operations. The process involves developing and implementing a comprehensive risk management framework consisting of several components, including risk assessment, mitigation, monitoring and reporting. Importance of banking risk management Banks face risks from every angle – changing customer behaviors, fraud, uncertain markets, and regulatory compliance, making banking risk management critical for the stability of financial institutions. There are various risks associated with the industry, including: Credit risk: The probability of a financial loss resulting from a borrower's failure to repay a loan, which results in an interruption of cash flows and increased costs for collection. How to mitigate: Leverage advanced analytics, data attributes, and predictive models to improve predictability, manage portfolio risk, make better decisionsand acquire the best customers. Market risk:The likelihood of an investment decreasing in value because of market factors (I.e., changes in interest rates, geopolitical events or recessions). How to mitigate: While it is impossible to eliminate market risk, you can diversify your assets, more accurately determine your risk threshold and stay informed on economic and market conditions. Liquidity risk:The risk that an organization cannot meet its short-term liabilities and financial payment obligations. How to mitigate: More regularly forecast your cash flow and conduct stress tests to determine potential risk scenarios that would cause a loss of liquidity and how much liquidity would be lost in each instance. Operational risk:Potential sources of losses that result from inadequate or failed internal processes (I.e., poorly trained employees, a technological breakdown, or theft of information). How to mitigate: Hire the right staff and adequately train them, stay up to date with cybersecurity threats and automate processes to reduce human error. Reputational risk: The potential that negative publicity regarding business practices, whether true or not, will cause a decline in the customer base, costly litigation or revenue reductions. How to mitigate: Define your bank’s core ethical values and relay them to stakeholders and employees. You should also develop a reputational management strategy and contingency plan in case a reputation-affecting incident occurs. Risk management in banking best practices Successful banks embrace risks while developing powerful mechanisms to prevent or manage them and stay ahead. By taking a proactive approach and leveraging risk management tools, you can minimize losses, enhance stability and grow responsibly. The steps for implementing a banking risk management plan, include: Risk identification and assessment: Financial institutions need to identify potential risks associated with their operations and assess the severity and impact of these risks. Risk mitigation: Once risks have been identified and assessed, financial institutions can implement strategies to mitigate the effects of these risks. There are several strategies for risk mitigation, including risk avoidance, reduction, acceptance and transfer. Risk monitoring and reporting: One of the fundamental principles of a banking risk management strategy is ongoing monitoring and reporting. Financial institutions should continually monitor their operations to identify evolving risks and develop mitigation strategies. Generating reports about the progress of the risk management program gives a dynamic view of the bank’s risk profile and the plan’s effectiveness. Several challenges may arise when implementing a risk management strategy. These include new regulatory rules or amendments, cybersecurity and fraud threats, increased competition in the sector, and inefficient resources and processes. An effective risk management plan serves as a roadmap for improving performance and allows you to better allocate your time and resources toward what matters most. Benefits of implementing a risk management strategy Banks must prioritize risk management to stay on top of the various critical risks they face every day. There are several benefits of taking a proactive approach to banking risk management, including:Improved efficiency: Enhance efficiency and deploy more reliable operations by identifying areas of weakness or inefficiencies in operational processes.Confident compliance: Ensure you comply with new and amended regulatory requirements and avoid costly fines. Enhanced customer confidence: Foster customer confidence to increase customer retention and mitigate reputational risk. Partnering to reduce risk and maximize growth Effective risk management is crucial for mitigating risks in the banking industry. By implementing a risk management framework, financial institutions can minimize losses, enhance efficiency, ensure compliance and foster confidence in the industry. At Experian, we have a team of experts dedicated to supporting our banking partners. Our team’s expertise paired with our innovative solutions can help you implement a powerful risk management process, as well as: Leverage data to reach company-wide business goals. Lower the cost of funds by attracting and retaining deposits. Protect your business against fraud and risk. Create less friction through automated decisioning. Grow your business portfolio and increase profitability. Learn more about our risk management solutions for banks and fraud risk solutions.
The rise of the digital channel lead to a rise in new types of fraud – like cryptocurrency and buy now, pay later scams. While the scams themselves are new, they’re based on tried-and-true schemes like account takeover and synthetic identity fraud that organizations have been working to thwart for years, once again driving home the need for a robust fraud solution. While the digital channel is extremely attractive to many consumers due to convenience, it represents a balancing act for organizations – especially those with outdated fraud programs who are at increased risk for fraud. As organizations look for ways to keep themselves and the consumers they serve safe, many turn to fraud risk mitigation. What are fraud risk management strategies? Fraud risk management is the process of identifying, understanding, and responding to fraud risks. Proper fraud risk management strategies involve creating a program that detects and prevents fraudulent activity and reduces the risks associated with fraud. Many fraud risk management strategies are built on five principles: Fraud Risk AssessmentFraud Risk GovernanceFraud PreventionFraud DetectionMonitoring and Reporting By understanding these principles, you can build an effective strategy that meets consumer expectations and protects your business. Fraud risk assessment Fraud protection begins with an understanding of your organization’s vulnerabilities. Review your top risk areas and consider the potential losses you could face. Then look at what controls you currently have in place and how you can dial those up or down to impact both risk and customer experience. Fraud risk governance Fraud risk governance generally takes the form of a program encompassing the structure of rules, practices, and processes that surround fraud risk management. This program should include the fraud risk assessment, the roles and responsibilities of various departments, procedures for fraud events, and the plan for on-going monitoring. Fraud prevention “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.” This adage certainly rings true when it comes to fraud risk management. Having the right controls and procedures in place can help organizations stop a multitude of fraud types before they even get a foot in the door. Account takeover fraud prevention is an ideal example of how organizations can keep themselves and consumers safe. Fraud detection The only way to stop 100% of fraud is to stop 100% of interactions. Since that’s not a sustainable way to run a business, it’s important to have tools in place to detect fraud that’s already entered your ecosystem so you can stop it before damage occurs. These tools should monitor your systems to look for anomalies and risky behaviors and have a way to flag and report suspicious activity. Monitoring and reporting Once your fraud detection system is in place, you need active monitoring and reporting set up. Some fraud detection tools may include automatic next steps for suspicious activity such as step-up authentication or another risk mitigation technique. In other cases, you’ll need to get a person involved. In these cases it’s critical to have documented procedure and routing in place to ensure that potential fraud is assessed and addressed in a timely fashion. How to implement fraud risk management By adhering to the principles above, you can gain a holistic view of your current risk level, determine where you want your risk level to be, and what changes you’ll need to make to get there. While you might already have some of the necessary tools in place, the right next step is usually finding a trusted partner who can help you review your current state and help you use the right fraud prevention services that fit your risk tolerance and customer experience goals. To learn more about how Experian can help you leverage fraud prevention solutions, visit us or request a call. Learn more
Reports of romance scams have spiked in the past two years, partly due to the rise in popularity of online dating and social apps while Americans were isolated at home. With more consumers looking for love online, fraudsters have jumped on the chance to build intimate, trusted relationships without the immediate pressure to meet in person. And these shams seemingly paid off: from January 1 to July 31, 2021, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Internet Crime Complaint Center received over 1,800 complaints related to an online romance scam, resulting in losses of approximately $133 million. These romance scams carry financial and security risks that impact both the targets of the fraud and the businesses with which they interact. Experian predicts that romance scams will continue to rise in 2022, leaving consumers and businesses vulnerable to attacks and theft. What is a romance scam? According to the FBI, a romance scam occurs when “a criminal adopts a fake online identity to gain a victim's affection and trust." Typically, fraudsters seek out their marks in dating or socializing settings, such as online apps, and strive to build intimacy and trust as quickly as possible. To avoid suspicion, they may claim that they travel frequently for work or give other excuses about why they can't meet in person. Their attentions are in the context of love and dating, so it's not uncommon for romance scammers to offer marriage proposals or other commitments to intensify the relationship, but the whole point of this fraud is to get their targets to send money. Sometimes fraudsters simply ask for a “loan" to cover medical expenses, an unforeseen shortfall or even travel costs to see the victim in person. Other times, they might ask for gifts or gift cards. Requests for money – whether through direct deposit, gift cards or credit card payments – are all red flags. Increasingly, romance scammers have tried to lure people into investment deals, including cryptocurrency. Romance scams predate the internet by centuries, but the emergence of digital technologies has made them easier to accomplish – and easier to get away with, too. Romance scams are increasing In 2020, there were around 44 million users of online dating services in the United States and this increased to 49 million users in 2021, according to Statista Research Department. By 2022, two years into the COVID-19 pandemic, that number jumped to more than 50 million, and it's projected to rise to 53.3 million by 2025. More users mean more potential targets. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), romance scams hit a record high in 2021, with consumers reporting $547 million in losses that year – up 80 percent from 2020. The median individual loss reported to the FTC from romance scams was $2,400. With the help of modern technologies, romance scammers have added new tactics to their grift. For example, in addition to usual requests for money, a target might be asked to participate in bogus investment schemes involving cryptocurrency. In these cases, the median loss was $10,000. According to the FTC, romance scammers have conned Americans out of an estimated $1.3 billion over the past five years. Worryingly, romance scams also present a serious data risk. Damage could spread beyond financial losses into even more hazardous territory if the scammer can gain access to a target's personally identifiable information (PII) or financial data. In these cases, fraudsters might engage in identity theft to create new accounts or take over existing ones. Breaking up with romance scammers Businesses may not be susceptible to the lure of love, but they're still vulnerable when it comes to the fallout from romance scams. Companies must ensure they have a layered solution that seamlessly recognizes returning customers, while monitoring for indicators that the user presenting an identity is not actually the owner of that identity. Some warning signs include logins from a new IP address nowhere near the user's registered physical address; unusual types or frequencies of transactions; and the addition of a suspicious new authorized user to a credit card account. Businesses also have access to fraud prevention help. Using vast data resources, decades of identity and credit risk management, consumer-permissioned data and industry-leading analytics, Experian enables businesses to detect and prevent fraud by identifying credible customers. This empowers businesses to apply the appropriate amount of friction to each interaction to protect their customers, their data and themselves. To learn more about how Experian is assisting businesses with their fraud prevention efforts, visit us or request a call. And keep an eye out for additional in-depth explorations of our Future of Fraud Forecast. Future of Fraud Forecast Fraud Prevention
Even as 75% of large and mid-sized U.S. e-commerce marketplace merchants predict continued double-digit online sales growth rates through the end of 2022,1 their success is hampered by unnecessary friction driven by concerns of card-not-present fraud and additional fraud risks in an online world. Compared to the 96% approval rate for point-of-sale purchases, card-not-present transactions yield a surprisingly low 81% approval rate. According to a survey conducted by Aite Novarica,1 the difference stems from reviewing up to 16% of attempted transactions for possible fraud. Even more surprising is that many of the respondents report that more than two-thirds of these reviews are later found to be unwarranted. Current transaction processing and risk capabilities are impeding growth and creating friction that damages e-commerce marketplace brands. What do we mean when we talk about online card-not-present transaction friction? Much of the success or failure of e-commerce depends on how easy merchants make it for consumers to complete a transaction. Effective identity resolution, fraud mitigation and risk solutions can lead to increased sales, while unrefined solutions and unnecessary friction will run merchants the risk of denying a legitimate customer purchase at checkout because they have been incorrectly labeled a fraudster–a ‘false positive’ or ‘false decline.’ These solutions leave room for improvement based on several key factors–the limited amount of data that passes through the authorization stream from the merchant to the issuer is a key contributor. According to Aite-Novarica Group’s The E-Commerce Fraud Enigma: The Quest to Maximize Revenue While Minimizing Fraud Report, “This reinforces the importance for merchants to augment the decisioning on their side with a wide variety of data sources that can help inform them regarding the risk profile of both the customer and the transaction.” Challenges with current transaction processing and verification tools Today, merchants leverage email address data, device information and other technologies to augment their address verification capabilities. The challenge is that these tools each judge the risk of a specific component of the transaction or the individual. Where integration is lacking, false positives are amplified and that is exactly what the data1 says is happening. Different tools working in isolation all catch the same fraud but flag different false positives—dragging down overall performance. The result is that 75% of e-commerce merchants place maximizing sales, minimizing friction and reducing false declines at the top of their to-do list. 88% say they are ready for a change to achieve these goals.1 Fast Facts 16% of all attempted online transactions experience friction for suspected fraud. 70% of this number is unnecessary, and upon manual review, are ultimately approved.1 78% of e-commerce merchants report friction driven by suspected fraud is increasing. 78% of merchants report increasing declines due to suspected fraud over the last two years. 46% indicate an increase of more than 5%.1 81% of consumers say that a positive online experience makes them think more highly of a brand.2 The longer it takes for banks and issuers to process new account, the higher the rate of abandonment, which reaches 40% when the process takes longer than 10 minutes.3 The friction that consumers encounter throughout their buying journey and the expenses associated with merchant and issuer manual reviews can be costly. It is estimated that 70% of unwarranted friction is costing businesses ~$11B in false decline losses and sales annually.1 That number is expected to increase. And, beyond profit losses incurred from the order that was declined, merchants risk damaging brand reputation because of poor customer/buying experiences, and in some cases, the loss of the customer relationship as well. Reducing friction and providing a positive shopping experience is increasingly important to business success Businesses looking to address this and limit false declines should not allow this to come at the expense completing transactions for legitimate customers. Experian can help. By leveraging our multidimensional data, technical expertise and advanced analytics capabilities, we can help businesses authenticate valid customers without unnecessary friction, thus increasing revenue by increased approval rates, without increasing fraud or operating expenses. Get started with Experian Link™ - our frictionless credit card owner verification solution. Learn more. Experian Link 1"E-Commerece Fraud Enigma: The Quest to Maximize Revenue While Minimizing Fraud Report" Aite-Novarica Group, July 2022 2"Global Insights Report: The Evolving Expectations and Experience of the New Digital Customer" Experian, April 2022 3"Capturing the Digital Identity Evolution Through a Layered Approach" Liminal, June 2021
This post was updated in 2022. Fraud prevention can seem like a moving target. Criminals often shift from one scheme to the next, forcing organizations to play catch up to protect consumers’ identities and funds. But with the right technology, it’s possible to implement a fraud solution that provides protection and enhances the consumer journey. The pandemic fraud boom Government stimulus funds, COVID-19 testing and the loosening of business controls were a boon for criminals and levied an immense cost against businesses and consumers. Consumer fraud losses rose to $3.3 billion in 2020, up from $1.8 billion in 2019. The rapid increase in digital activity had two significant impacts. First, it shifted new account applications to the digital channel, where increased anonymity favors fraudsters by creating an environment where identity thieves could hide among the immense volume of applicants and monetize stolen personally identifiable information (PII). Second, it fueled account takeover (ATO) attacks by introducing digital “newbies” with unsophisticated password habits and limited ability to recognize and protect themselves from malware or social engineering, making them easy targets for credential theft. The return of old-school fraud Now that businesses and consumers are growing wise to some of the fraud schemes brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, criminals are turning to new avenues, including tried-and-true methods like account opening and ATO fraud. New account fraud is expected to cost U.S. financial institutions $3.5 billion in 2021 alone. Fraud organizations will take the PII available and match it with automated tools to increase their efficiency and success rates while continuing with phishing and other schemes to gain new information that can fuel further attacks. Building a fraud solution Staying ahead of fraudsters may feel like a losing proposition but equipped with the proper fraud controls, you can enhance the customer experience, increase operational efficiency and protect against developing fraud schemes. With a fraud solution that uses multiple tools in concert, it’s possible to recognize, verify and holistically risk assess most consumers that pass through your portfolio. The right platform — ideally one that can call upon different services to perform each job — will enable your organization to flag suspicious activity, increase insight into large-scale attacks, track risky users and break down traditional internal silos. By coordinating efforts and adding multiple touchpoints to run both in the foreground and background, you can ensure the right friction is applied at the right time without diminishing the end-user experience. In fact, by improving your recognition tools, you can make the experience for recognized, legitimate customers even easier. To learn more about the potential impacts of traditional fraud and how your organization can leverage a fraud prevention solution to achieve your retention and growth goals, read our latest white paper or request a call. Read white paper Schedule a call