Financial Services
Preventing chargeback fraud is critical to protecting your organization. Learn how you can leverage fraud prevention solutions. Read more!
The world of finance can be a dangerous place, where cunning schemes lurk in the shadows, ready to pounce on unsuspecting victims. In the ever-evolving landscape of financial crime, the insidious ‘pig butchering’ scam has emerged as a significant threat, targeting both financial institutions and their clients. What is a ‘pig butchering’ scam? ‘Pig butchering’ scams are named after the practice of farmers fattening up their livestock before “butchering” them. This comparison describes the core of ‘pig butchering’ scams, where criminals entice victims to participate in investment schemes and cryptocurrency fraud. Originating in Southeast Asia and now rampant in the United States, these scams often start with online interactions via social media or dating applications. Scammers build trust with the victim, eventually gaining access to their online accounts. They "fatten the pig" by enticing more cryptocurrency investments and then make off with their ill-gotten gains. The repercussions are staggering, with reported losses exceeding $3.5 billion in 2023 alone according to an AP News article, and around 40,000 victims in the United States, including cases of losses as massive as $4 million. The real-life impact The story of “RB,” a San Francisco man who engaged with a scammer named "Janey Lee," serves as a stark warning. Through social media, Janey orchestrated an elaborate scheme, promising "RB” substantial returns in cryptocurrency investment. Seduced by false promises, “RB” emptied his life savings into the scam, only to be rescued by a Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) intervention, narrowly avoiding financial ruin.1 Malicious actors are improving their targeting skills, and often pursue executives and victims with a large sum of money, such as C-level officials from financial institutions. This past February, a $50 million pig slaughtering fraud incident caused the CEO of a local bank in Kansas to lose all his funds and the bank to collapse a few months later. FinCEN's vigilance and updates The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) remains vigilant, issuing advisories to financial institutions to combat ‘pig butchering’ scams. Their latest advisory highlights evolving scam tactics, including aggressive promotions, using money mules for illegal fund transfers, and leveraging new financial products like decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms to obfuscate transactions. FinCEN also warns about red flags such as large and sudden investments from older customers, quick fund withdrawals after big deposits, and the frequent use of coins or mixers that hide transactions. Financial institutions are encouraged to: Report any suspicious activities by using specific terms like "pig butchering fraud advisory" in their reports to make analysis and response easier. File suspicious activity reports (SARs) using the key term “FIN-2023-PIGBUTCHERING.” Guide potential victims to report to the FBI’s IC3 or the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC’s) reporting system. A call to action for financial institutions The fight against ‘pig butchering’ scams requires proactive measures from financial institutions: Enhance fraud detection and anti-money laundering (AML) programs: Implement robust systems compliant with regulatory guidelines, conduct thorough customer enhanced due diligence, and leverage fraud detection software to spot anomalies and red flags., and leverage fraud detection software to spot anomalies and red flags. Leverage data analytics: Utilize data analytics tools to monitor customer behavior, identify irregular patterns, and swiftly detect potential ‘pig butchering’ activities. Employee training: Educate employees on scam risks, fraud detection techniques, and FinCEN red flags to empower them as the first line of defense., and FinCEN red flags to empower them as the first line of defense. Community education: Educate customers on recognizing and avoiding investment scams, promoting awareness, and safeguarding their assets. Navigating challenges with effective solutions ‘Pig butchering’ scams cause not only money losses but also personal troubles and reputational harm. Awareness, learning, and cooperation are essential in protecting from these complex financial fraudsters, securing the safety and confidence of your institutions and stakeholders. By combining the best data with our automated identification verification processes, you can protect your business and onboard new talents efficiently. Our industry-leading solutions employ device recognition, behavioral biometrics, machine learning, and global fraud databases to spot and block suspicious activity before it becomes a problem. Learn more 1San Francisco Chronical (2023). Crypto Texting Scam *This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.
Check out April's report for a deep dive into the latest economic trends and market insights, including those around income and originations.
Learn about the misconceptions of income and employment verifications and what lenders can do to improve their strategies.
For lenders, mitigating first payment default requires data, advanced analytics, customer engagement, and agile risk management.
Anti-money laundering and fraud prevention have historically been separated, but here's why that might not be a good idea.
In March's State of the Economy report, we provide insights into consumer spending, the housing market, originations, and more.
To better understand a consumer's credit behavior over time, financial institutions must leverage trended data.
This article was updated on March 7, 2024. Like so many government agencies, the U.S. military is a source of many acronyms. Okay, maybe a few less, but there really is a host of abbreviations and acronyms attached to the military – and in the regulatory and compliance space, that includes SCRA and MLA. So, what is the difference between the two? And what do financial institutions need to know about them? Let’s break it down in this basic Q&A. SCRA and MLA: Who is covered and when are they covered? The Servicemember Civil Relief Act (SCRA) protects service members and their dependents (indirectly) on existing debts when the service member becomes active duty. In contrast, the Military Lending Act (MLA) protects service members, their spouses and/or covered dependents at point of origination if they are on active duty at that time. For example, if a service member opens an account with a financial institution and then becomes active military, SCRA protections will apply. On the other hand, if the service member is of active duty status when the service member or dependent is extended credit, then MLA protections will apply. Both SCRA and MLA protections cease to apply to a credit transaction when the service member ceases to be on active duty status. What is covered? MLA protections apply to all forms of payday loans, vehicle title loans, refund anticipation loans, deposit advance loans, installment loans, unsecured open-end lines of credit, and credit cards. However, MLA protections exclude loans secured by real estate and purchase-money loans, including a loan to finance the purchase of a vehicle. What are the interest rate limitations for SCRA and MLA? The SCRA caps interest rate charges, including late fees and other transaction fees, at 6 percent. The MLA limits interest rates and fees to 36 percent Military Annual Percentage Rate (MAPR). The MAPR is not just the interest rate on the loan, but also includes additional fees and charges including: Credit insurance premiums/fees Debt cancellation contract fees Debt suspension agreement fees and Fees associated with ancillary products. Although closed-end credit MAPR will be a one-time calculation, open-end credit transactions will need to be calculated for each covered billing cycle to affirm lender compliance with interest rate limitations. Are there any lender disclosure requirements? There is only one set of circumstances that triggers SCRA disclosures. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires that SCRA disclosures be provided by mortgage servicers on mortgages at 45 days of delinquency. This disclosure must be provided in written format only. For MLA compliance, financial institutions must provide the following disclosures: MAPR statement Payment obligation descriptions Other applicable Regulation Z disclosures. For MLA, it is also important to note that disclosures are required both orally and in a written format the borrower can keep. How Experian can help Experian's solutions help you comply with the Department of Defense's (DOD's) final amendment rule. We can access the DOD's database on your behalf to identify MLA-covered borrowers and provide a safe harbor for creditors ascertaining whether a consumer is covered by the final rule's protection. Visit us online to learn more about our SCRA and military lending act compliance solutions. Learn more
New account fraud can pose a serious risk to your business, and your current security methods might be hurting your customers' experience.
A multilayered defense can help detect and prevent synthetic ID fraud, one of the fastest-growing types of fraud. Read more!
This report provides a snapshot of the top monthly economic and credit data, including inflation, the housing marketing, and card balances.
Seamless financial services onboarding requires organizations to enhance their identity verification methods.
Almost every business that has an online presence will have to face and counter bot attacks. Read more to learn how.
Data-driven marketing insights can help your organization target more accurately and create a better customer experience.