AML Fraud Detection: Staying Ahead of an Evolving Threat

by Julie Lee 4 min read March 27, 2024

Financial institutions have long relied on anti-money laundering (AML) and anti-fraud systems to protect themselves and their customers. These departments and systems have historically operated in siloes, but that’s no longer best practice.

Now, a new framework that integrates fraud and AML, or FRAML, is taking hold as financial institutions see the value of sharing resources to fight fraud and other financial crimes.

You don’t need to keep them separated

For fraudsters, fraud and money laundering go hand-in-hand. By definition, someone opening an account and laundering money is committing a crime. The laundered funds are also often from illegal activity — otherwise, they wouldn’t need to be laundered.

For financial institutions, different departments have historically owned AML and anti-fraud programs. In part, because AML and fraud prevention have different goals:

  • AML is about staying compliant: AML is often owned by an organization’s compliance department, which ensures the proper processes and reporting are in place to comply with relevant regulations.
  • Fraud is about avoiding losses: The fraud department identifies and stops fraudulent activity to help protect the organization from reputational harm and fraud losses.

As fraudsters’ operations become more complex, the traditional separation of the two departments may be doing more harm than good.

Common areas of focus

There has always been some overlap in AML and fraud prevention. After all, an AML program can stop criminals from opening or using accounts that could lead to fraud losses. And fraud departments might stop suspicious activity that’s a criminal placing or layering funds.

While AML and fraud both involve ongoing account monitoring, let’s take a closer look at similarities during the account creation:

  • Verifying identities: Financial institutions’ AML programs must include know your customer (KYC) procedures and a Customer Identification Program (CIP). Being able to verify the identity of a new customer can be important for tracing transactions back to an individual or entity later. Similarly, fraud departments want to be sure there aren’t any red flags when opening a new account, such as a connection between the person or entity and previous fraudulent activity.
  • Preventing synthetic identity fraud: Criminals may try to use synthetic identities to avoid triggering AML or fraud checks. Synthetic identity fraud has been a growing problem, but the latest solutions and tools can help financial institutions stop synthetic identity fraud across the customer lifecycle.
  • Detecting money mules: Some criminals recruit money mules rather than using their own identity or creating a synthetic identity. The mules are paid to use their legitimate bank account to accept and transfer funds on behalf of the criminal. In some cases, the mule is an unwitting victim of a scam and an accomplice in money laundering. 

Although the exact requirements, tools, processes, and reports for AML and fraud differ, there’s certainly one commonality — identify and stop bad actors.

Interactive infographic: Building a multilayered fraud and identity strategy

The win-win of the FRAML approach

Aligning AML and fraud could lead to cost savings and benefits for the organization and its customers in many ways.

  • Save on IT costs: Fraud and AML teams may benefit from similar types of advanced analytics for detecting suspicious activity. In 2023, around 60 percent of businesses were using or trying to use machine learning (ML) in their fraud strategies, but a quarter said cost was impeding implementation.1 If fraud and AML can share IT resources and assets, they might be able to better afford the latest ML and AI solutions.
  • Avoid duplicate work: Cost savings can also happen if you can avoid having separate AML and fraud investigations into the same case. The diverse backgrounds and approaches to investigations may also lead to more efficient and successful outcomes.
  • Get a holistic view of customers: Sharing information about customers and accounts also might help you more accurately assess risk and identify fraud groups.
  • Improve your customer experience: Shared data can also reduce customer outreach for identity or transaction verifications. Creating a single view of each account or customer can also improve customer onboarding and account monitoring, leading to fewer false positives and a better customer experience.

Some financial institutions have implemented collaboration with the creation of a new team, sometimes called the financial crimes unit (FCU). Others may keep the departments separate but develop systems for sharing data and resources.

Watch the webinar: Fraud and identity challenges for Fintechs

How Experian can help

Creating new systems and changing company culture doesn’t happen overnight, but the shift toward collaboration may be one of the big trends in AML and fraud for 2024. As a leader in identity verification and fraud prevention, Experian can offer the tools and strategies that organizations need to update their AML and fraud processes across the entire customer lifecycle. 

CrossCore® is our integrated digital identity and fraud risk platform which enables organizations to connect, access, and orchestrate decisions that leverage multiple data sources and services. CrossCore cloud platform combines risk-based authentication, identity proofing and fraud detection, which enables organizations to streamline processes and quickly respond to an ever-changing environment. In its 2023 Fraud Reduction Intelligence Platforms (FRIP), Kuppinger Cole wrote, “Once again, Experian is a Leader in Fraud Reduction Intelligence Platforms. Any organizations looking for a full-featured FRIP service with global support should consider Experian CrossCore.” 

Learn more about Experian’s AML and fraud solutions

1. Experian (2023). Experian’s 2023 Identity and Fraud Report

Related Posts

Rewriting the Road Ahead with Longer Loan Terms and Increased Refinancing Options

The automotive market is entering a new phase defined not just by what consumers are buying, but by how they’re choosing to finance it. According to Experian Automotive’s State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026, nearly one-third (35.55%) of all new vehicle loans now stretch more than six years, up from 30.83% in Q1 2025. Similarly on the used side, 31.54% of loans extended more than six years, an increase from 28.60% last year. The shift highlights why affordability is reshaping how consumers are financing their vehicles, particularly in larger and higher-priced vehicles. Refinancing gains traction as interest rates stabilize In addition to longer-term loans, consumers are becoming increasingly deliberate with their financing decisions and managing monthly payments as refinancing activity has gained momentum. For instance, consumers who refinanced this quarter lowered their interest rate by 2.2% and saved an average of $81 on their monthly payment. Credit unions, in particular, continued to play a major role in helping consumers secure more affordable payment options. In Q1 2025, credit unions accounted for the lion’s share of automotive refinancing at 63.43%, from 62.31% a year ago. By comparison, banks went from 23.51% to 22.59% year-over-year. Furthermore, those who refinanced with a credit union saved an average of $101 this quarter, whereas those who refinanced with banks saved $60. Expanding credit access through flexible financing Another notable trend this quarter was the incessant growth in subprime financing as credit accessibility across the market continues to increase. In the first quarter of this year, subprime borrowers made up 15.75% of total vehicle financing, from 14.40% last year. For new vehicles in particular, the subprime market went from 5.61% to 6.88% year-over-year, while subprime in used vehicle financing grew to 20.60% this quarter, from 19.36% a year ago. Increased activity in the subprime segment highlights continued confidence in the automotive market and underscores the importance of expanded financing options. As consumers seek greater flexibility with financing decisions that fit their lifestyle, lenders and dealers have the opportunity to approach them with more personalized solutions. These trends are helping keep both new and used vehicle markets moving forward, while creating new opportunities for consumers to manage payments and purchase confidently. To learn more about automotive finance trends, view the full State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026 presentation on demand.

Published: June 2, 2026 by Melinda Zabritski
Staying Competitive After Trigger Leads Evolve: A Roadmap For Lenders

Trigger leads have long been the preferred solution for identifying high-intent mortgage borrowers. But with the implementation of the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (HPPA), which introduces new limitations and consumer protections around trigger leads, that playbook will need to shift. Now, lenders are quickly facing a pivotal shift in how they discover, engage, and convert prospective borrowers into customers. The industry now stands at a crossroads. Lenders who adapt early—leaning into predictive tools, consent-based engagement, and smarter prescreening—will redefine borrower acquisition in a more privacy-centric era.  HPPA: A structural change to mortgage marketing  The HPPA amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act by significantly restricting the use of mortgage inquiries for prescreen purposes. As of March 5, 2026, credit bureaus may only provide or utilize mortgage inquiries to:  End users with explicit borrower consent  The originator of the consumer’s current mortgage  The servicer of the consumer’s current mortgage  An insured depository institution or credit union where the consumer has an existing account  While these exemptions may provide continuity for banks and credit unions, many mortgage brokers and nonbank lenders will need to overhaul their prescreen practices—or risk being cut off entirely from a previously high-performing acquisition channel.  Why this isn’t just a compliance shift—It’s a strategic recalibration  Mortgage triggers in prescreen allow lenders to react instantly to consumer intent. Lenders rely on a prompt and convincing narrative to entice applicants to switch lenders. Mortgage inquiry triggers are effective and were, therefore, a prospecting strategy for many lenders. Recent legislative changes significantly restrict the availability of these inquiry triggers, and impacted lenders are focusing on a more intentional prospecting strategy to compete.   Without these mortgage triggers in prescreen, lenders need to ask:  Who are we trying to reach?  What early signals can we act on?  How do we earn permission and attention before a mortgage inquiry ever happens?  Transforming the funnel: From reaction to anticipation  The shift in mortgage inquiry-based prescreen isn’t the end of high-intent lead targeting. It’s the beginning of a more strategic and intentional approach—one that leverages earlier indicators of mortgage readiness and focuses on building relationships, not just closing transactions.  Here’s where the momentum is evolving, creating a new and smarter funnel:  Prescreen marketing: Using credit and behavioral attributes to help identify consumers who meet specific lending criteria before they signal active intent.  Predictive modeling: Leveraging propensity scores or custom models to prioritize outreach based on conversion likelihood.  Consent-based engagement: Implementing compliant mechanisms to capture and manage borrower opt-ins at scale.  The power of predictive modeling  According to recent industry interviews, propensity modeling is emerging as one of the most effective replacements for trigger-based prescreen. These models analyze hundreds of credit attributes—such as utilization, account mix, account age, and depth—to help identify consumers statistically more likely to seek a mortgage.  For lenders just beginning to use predictive modeling, off-the-shelf models can be a quick way to identify potential borrowers. For example, when layering propensity scores on top of credit eligibility, which can improve borrower targeting, many lenders see an increase in open mortgage loan rates.  Meanwhile, custom-built models, which analyze a lender’s own campaign performance over time, offer the highest level of precise targeting. These models isolate the attributes most predictive of conversions within a specific product mix—optimizing not just volume, but fit.  Speed without traditional triggers? It’s possible  One of the biggest concerns among lenders is maintaining the speed historically enabled by trigger leads. But that concern may be overblown.  Self-service prescreen platforms now allow marketers to generate qualified lead lists in as little as 24 hours, enabling rapid response during rate drops, competitive shifts, or seasonal demand spikes.   For those new to prescreening, batch campaigns still offer value, especially with analyst support.   Don’t overlook retention  In an era of intense acquisition competition, retention becomes a key differentiator.  Lenders who monitor property status, cash flow, and consumer credit behavior can proactively identify when an existing borrower is likely to list, refinance, or exit. Armed with that intelligence, lenders can re-engage with the borrower at the right moment—sometimes before a competitor is considered or contacted.  This level of behavioral intelligence may soon separate proactive lenders from reactive ones.  Actions instead of reactions  The evolution of trigger-based prescreen doesn’t just require new tools; it demands new thinking. Lenders should begin by auditing their current pipelines and determining:  What percentage of our acquisition is dependent on triggers?  What share of our book falls under the HPPA exemptions?  How will we scale compliant opt-in collection?  Are our current prescreen or modeling capabilities future-ready?  Those who answer these questions today—and act on them—won’t just be in compliance with the new laws, they’ll lead in a transformed market. Lenders should also be asking:   Do we have the infrastructure to collect and act on borrower consent?  Are our acquisition teams equipped to run prescreen campaigns — both batch and self-service?  What predictive models are we using (or could we use) to prioritize leads?  Are we proactively monitoring our portfolio to catch retention risks early?  How are we preparing our sales teams for longer, more consultative buying journeys?  Conclusion  The HPPA signals a shift away from relying on passive, inquiry-based prescreen acquisition and the beginning of smarter, more strategic engagement with potential borrowers. Lenders who embrace this transition early will find themselves not just compliant, but competitive—with deeper borrower insights, better conversion rates, and stronger long-term customer relationships.  The market is moving. The only question is: will you lead the change or chase it?  Citation  Experian. (2025, November). Interview: How the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act is reshaping mortgage marketing—and what lenders should do now [transcript]. Experian Mortgage Insights. Insights based on lender feedback, campaign performance data, and analysis of prescreen marketing strategies and predictive modeling outcomes were gathered from Experian client engagements and internal mortgage analytics between May and October 2025. Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act timeline and legal context referenced from legislation signed September 5, 2025, with implementation beginning March 5, 2026.   

Published: April 22, 2026 by Ivan Ahmed