FinCEN and Customer Due Diligence requirements

by Keir Breitenfeld 2 min read November 15, 2016

Fincen

How will the FinCEN revisions impact your business? (Part 1)

Some recently published FinCEN revisions and advisories are causing a stir. First, let’s look at revisions to Customer Due Diligence that require compliance by May 2018.

Under the updated requirements for Customer Due Diligence, covered financial institutions must expand programs, including Customer Identification Programs (CIP), to include Beneficial Owners of Legal Entity customers. Under the new rule, financial institutions must collect and verify identity information (name, address, date of birth, Social Security number or passport number for foreign individuals):

  •  For each Natural Person with at least 25% ownership in the Legal entity

and

  •  For an individual with significant responsibility for managing or controlling the business — for example, a chief executive officer, a chief financial officer, a chief operating officer, a managing member, a general partner, a president, a vice president or a treasurer

The U.S. Treasury estimates that illicit proceeds generated in the United States alone total $400 billion annually. These requirements are intended to prevent anonymous access to financial systems through shielded or minority ownership. While the effort to stem the tide of illicit proceeds is laudable, the impact to business may be significant. Most organizations will need to audit their data collection practices, and many will need to make changes to either data collection or workflow processes to ensure compliance.

While quite simple and straightforward on paper, the standardization of additional CIP policies and procedures tend to create substantive impact to the customer experience as well as operational resource allocations and utilization. Covered financial institutions should already be discussing with their current or prospective fraud risk and identity management vendors to ensure that:

  • There is a clear path to altering both data collection and verification of these additional identity elements.
  • Clear and accurate benchmarking around expected verification rates is available ahead of the compliance date to allow for operational workflow design to accommodate both ‘verifications’ and ‘referrals stemming from lack of full verification.’
  • Service providers are granting access to best-in-class data assets and search & match logic related to identity element verification and risk assessment, along with multi-layered options to reconcile those initial verification ‘fails.’
  • Full business reviews and strategy design sessions are underway or being scheduled to align and document overall objectives of the program, benchmarking of leading industry practices, current and future state gaps, near- and long-term initiatives and a prioritized roadmap, a viable business case toward additional investment in services and resources, and a plan of execution.

Will this impact your business? Will you need to make any changes?

Click here to read part two – FinCEN and email-compromise fraud.

Related Posts

How Union Credit Expands Access to Credit Unions with Experian

Discover how Union Credit and Experian help credit unions reach younger consumers through personalized digital lending experiences.

Published: July 1, 2026 by Scarlet.Nickel@experian.com
Faster Decisions, Better Outcomes: Experian Verify™ Now Available Through Centro, Mezzo’s Orchestration Engine 

Explore how Experian Verify™ and Mezzo’s Centro orchestration engine are helping mortgage lenders modernize income and employment verification, reduce workflow complexity, and make faster, more confident lending decisions at scale.

Published: July 1, 2026 by Lizel Ferrer
Used EV Growth Signals a New Phase of Consumer Purchasing Behavior

The electric vehicle (EV) revolution isn’t slowing down, it’s changing lanes. While recent conversations have seemingly focused on softening demand for new EVs, the used segment has been gaining momentum. According to Experian Automotive’s 2025 EV Year in Review Report, new retail individual EV registrations fell 35.9% year-over-year. Meanwhile, the used retail individual EV registrations grew 25.4% from a year ago. As affordability and growing model availability reshapes consumer behavior, buyers are increasingly turning to pre-owned EVs, which has shown an interesting market divergence that is redefining how consumers are adopting this segment and what it can mean for automakers, dealers, and the overall industry. Key players behind rising used EV demand Notably, Tesla accounted for over half (60.5%) of used retail individual EV registrations in 2025, followed by Chevrolet at 6.4% and Nissan (5.5%). Diving a bit deeper, Tesla made up the top three models of the used individual registrations last year, with the Model 3 coming in at 27.2%, Model Y at 21.7%, and Model S (6.6%). The Chevrolet Bolt EV followed at 4.8% and the Nissan Leaf was at 4%. Tesla’s position as the leading make in the used EV market is a natural extension of its long-standing dominance in new EV sales. The brand’s leadership over the years created a large fleet of vehicles that are now entering the pre-owned market. What the used EV boom means for automotive professionals The growing demand for used EVs can present more opportunities for automotive professionals. Dealers that provide a healthy supply of pre-owned EVs can increase accessibility and play a role in adoption for consumers who are actively looking to purchase, while marketers can emphasize value and ownership benefits. As the market continues to evolve, automotive professionals who understand and respond to these changing dynamics will be best positioned to capitalize on the expanding pool of used EV shoppers. To learn more about EV insights, visit Experian Automotive’s EV Resource Center.

Published: June 30, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch