Solving the Fraud Problem: What is First-Party Fraud?

Updated: October 21, 2026 by Chris Ryan 5 min read October 31, 2023

At A Glance

First-party fraud refers to instances in which an individual intentionally misrepresents their identity in exchange for goods or services. Borrowers may falsify income, misrepresent employment or exploit credit systems without the intention of repaying. In the financial services industry, it's often miscategorized as credit loss and written off as bad debt, which masks true fraud exposure and distorts credit risk forecasting.

First-party fraud can take many forms and occur at different stages of the customer lifecycle, from application and account opening to transactions, repayments and disputes. Understanding the most common types of first-party fraud can help organizations recognize suspicious behaviors, identify emerging risks and strengthen their fraud prevention strategies. Common types of first-party fraud include:

  • Chargeback fraud: Also known as “friendly fraud,” chargeback fraud occurs when an individual knowingly makes a purchase with their credit card and then requests a chargeback from the issuer, claiming they didn’t authorize the purchase.
  • Application fraud: This takes place when an individual uses stolen or manipulated information to apply for a loan, credit card or job. First-Party fraud comprised of 29% of application fraud cases in 2025,
  • Fronting:Done to get cheaper rates, this form of insurance fraud happens when a young or inexperienced individual is deliberately listed as a named driver, when they’re actually the main driver of the vehicle.
  • Goods lost in transit fraud (GLIT): This occurs when an individual claims the goods they purchased online did not arrive. To put it simply, the individual is getting a refund for something they actually already received.
  • Bust-out: This occurs when an individual builds what appears to be good credit behavior over time, making small purchases and on-time payments, and then suddenly maxes out their credit lines or abandons repayment entirely. The account looks legitimate until the “bust-out,” making it one of the hardest forms of first-party fraud to detect.
  • Credit washing: This happens when an individual falsely disputes legitimate accounts or debts to have them removed from their credit report. By portraying valid obligations as fraudulent, the individual can temporarily improve their credit standing or access new credit they wouldn’t otherwise qualify for.

A first-party fraudster can also recruit “money mules”, individuals who are persuaded to use their own information to obtain credit or merchandise on behalf of a larger fraud ring. This type of fraud has become especially prevalent as more consumers are active online, with money mule transfers accounting for an estimated $3 billion annually in financial losses in the U.S. alone.

How it impacts your organization

Firstly, first-party fraud can cause significant losses. According to our latest study, first-party fraud costs an average of $36.7 million annually.

An imperfect first-party fraud solution can also strain relationships with good customers and hinder growth. When lenders have to interpret actions and behavior to assess customers, there’s a lot of room for error and losses. Those same losses hinder growth when misclassification inflates credit-risk estimates and masks true fraud exposure.

This type of fraud isn’t a single-time event, and it doesn’t occur at just one point in the customer lifecycle. It occurs when good customers develop fraudulent intent, when new applicants who have positive history with other lenders have recently changed circumstances or when seemingly good applicants have manipulated their identities to mask previous defaults.

Finally, misclassified first-party fraud losses can impact how your organization categorizes and manages risk, and that’s something that touches every department.

AI-assisted first-party fraud

Artificial intelligence (AI) is making first-party fraud more sophisticated, scalable and difficult to detect. AI-assisted first-party fraud accounts for 51% of AI-enabled fraud.

Fraudsters can use generative AI and other automated tools to create convincing supporting documents, manipulate application information, fabricate employment or income details and generate realistic communications that help false claims appear legitimate. AI can also enable individuals and organized fraud rings to test different identities, applications or behaviors at greater speed and scale, while adapting their tactics to avoid traditional fraud controls. Because first-party fraud often involves a real person using their own identity or a mixture of genuine and manipulated information, AI-enhanced activity can be particularly challenging to distinguish from legitimate customer behavior.

As these capabilities become more accessible, organizations may need to combine identity, device, behavioral and credit insights to identify patterns and connections that individual transactions or applications may not reveal.

Solving the first-party fraud problem

First-party fraud detection requires a shift in how we think about the problem of fraud. It starts with the ability to separate first-party fraud and credit risk, since they are often indiscernible at origination.

To effectively combat first-party fraud, businesses should consider the following actions:

  • Define first-party fraud as its own risk: Don’t blend it into credit loss. Build targeted models that use behavioral, identity and activity signals. Start with first-payment default as a key indicator.
  • Use a longer risk window: A 12-month view helps surface early fraud patterns and supports stronger credit and fraud analysis.
  • Unify fraud, credit and compliance decisions: Coordinated strategies reduce blind spots and improve customer experience.
  • Upgrade your models: Apply machine learning and segment by factors like credit age or product type to better detect bust-outs and early defaults.
  • Combine credit and non-credit data: Use device intelligence, identity velocity and behavioral data to help separate fraud from financial hardship.
  • Benchmark against peers: Regular comparisons help assess exposure, validate performance and refine strategies.

How we can help

The fraud problem is complex. However, by leveraging fraud risk management strategies, you can better distinguish among types of fraud and determine the best course of action going forward.

Our robust fraud management solutions can be used for synthetic identity fraud and account takeover fraud prevention, which can help you minimize customer friction to improve and deepen your relationships while preventing fraud.

Connect with us to learn more about using our identity expertise, data and analytics to improve identity resolution and detect and prevent all types of fraud.

Related Posts

One Platform, Fewer Handoffs, Faster Decisions

The average credit union manages between 100-300 vendor relationships, and nearly a third have no dedicated staff managing them. What was supposed to drive efficiency is stunting growth and compromising the member experience. Application volume is continuing to rise, and consumers expect a loan decision at digital speed. But for credit unions, meeting that expectation isn't the only goal. They must also continue to make the right lending decisions while also prioritizing risk management. The institutions pulling ahead aren't the ones with the most tools. They're the ones that have turned credit, fraud and decisioning into a single, coordinated system. A single loan decision touches: Credit data Identity verification Fraud signals Decisioning logic Reporting Rarely does all of that live in one place. More often, it’s stitched together across separate platforms, each with its own contract and its own support line. When a credit view and a fraud view are generated separately, they must be reconciled instead of read together in the same instant. Every handoff is a place where a decision slows down and a signal gets missed. It's why a fraud pattern that would be obvious next to the credit file often surfaces only after the funds are already gone. Fragmentation also makes it harder to optimize lending strategies over time. When data, analytics and decisioning are disconnected, credit unions have less visibility into what's working, what's changing and where strategies need to be adjusted. An integrated decisioning ecosystem closes those seams by design, with credit, fraud and lending strategy running on one platform and accessed through a single Application Programming Interface (API). Identity and compliance capabilities can be an integrated decisioning flow. The data doesn't need to be reconciled after the fact because it was never separated in the first place. Stop overengineering, start removing friction When decisioning underperforms, the instinct is to build something more custom: a proprietary model, tighter segmentation, more configuration.  Custom modeling has its place for institutions with the scale and data to justify it. But often, for small or mid-sized credit unions, the bigger opportunity is a flexible decisioning strategy that uses a strong, continuously refreshed model. This shouldn't be either/or. The right approach gives credit unions a strong decisioning strategy today, with the ability to introduce more customized analytics and modeling as their needs evolve.  The same principle applies to strategy management: credit unions can gain greater control through self-service capabilities as they build a more sophisticated data science team.   That kind of flexibility is important as credit unions modernize their decisioning infrastructure. Research surveying more than 2,000 senior credit risk and fraud decision-makers across 11 countries found that organizations investing in unified platforms and modern infrastructure are moving faster and realizing the greatest Return on Investment (ROI).   As their needs evolve, credit unions can adjust decisioning strategies without introducing another layer of technology or relying on third parties to make every change. Until self-service is the right fit, choose a partner that understands what makes your credit union’s membership and risk appetite different from others.  Same member, same afternoon, faster answer Consider a credit union growing its auto and personal loan originations.  A member applies for an auto loan on Saturday afternoon. Credit data, identity and fraud signals are read together in a single real-time pass instead of separate reviews:  Most applications resolve immediately, approved or declined based on a more comprehensive view of the applicant. A smaller number are flagged for quick step-up verification and cleared within minutes. Only genuinely ambiguous cases reach an underwriter, who is working from one complete picture instead of reconciling multiple signals. The member has an answer before the weekend is over. The credit union books the loan before competitors even open on Monday. Built to scale This kind of process holds up today. However, the better test is whether it holds up eighteen months from now when application volume has grown, new products are live and the data flowing through the system looks nothing like it does right now. Future-proofing isn't only about handling more volume. It's about having room to be nimbler and make adjustments as quickly as the market changes. A credit union that relies on standard models within a decisioning strategy may want more customized analytics and greater control over its strategies tomorrow. Connect with us With more than three decades of credit expertise and one of the industry's largest data footprints, Experian helps credit unions do more than solve this year's friction. We're helping to build a decisioning foundation that scales, so growth becomes something the system absorbs, rather than something it must be rebuilt around. Explore More

October 21, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
Cash Flow Insights: Powering the Next Evolution in Lending

For decades, credit data has given lenders a trusted foundation for assessing risk. Now, consumer-permissioned cash flow data is adding another layer of insight into consumers’ financial lives, including income, spending, liquidity and changing financial obligations. The opportunity is significant. Nearly one in five consumers lacks access to or has damaged credit. New Experian research also shows that 60% of consumers who have previously been denied credit or received less favorable terms than expected believe the outcome would have been different if lenders had considered their recent income and banking activity alongside their credit history. 1,2 For lenders, cash flow insights can provide additional context about a consumer’s financial capacity and support more informed underwriting decisions. The next challenge is making those insights easier to use consistently and responsibly at scale. What are cash flow insights? Cash flow insights are derived from consumer-permissioned banking data and provide visibility into how money moves into and out of a consumer’s accounts. Depending on the information available, cash flow data can provide insight into financial behaviors such as: Income and income stability: Regular and irregular income streams and changes over time Spending and recurring expenses: Everyday spending patterns and ongoing financial obligations Account balances and liquidity: Available funds and changes in account balances Debt obligations: Loan payments and other recurring debt commitments Cash flow patterns: How money moves into and out of accounts over time Traditional credit information provides a rich history of how consumers have managed credit. Cash flow insights add context about their current financial activity and capacity, providing lenders with a more complete view of financial health. Cash flow insights can also add predictive value to risk assessment. Experian analysis shows Cashflow Score can deliver up to a 25% lift in predictive performance over conventional credit scores when tailored to targeted risk tiers.3 How lenders can put cash flow insights to work at scale As interest in cash flow insights grows, the conversation is moving beyond what the data can reveal to how financial institutions can use it consistently and responsibly. That requires standardized consumer reporting, clear governance and decision-ready insights that can work within established lending processes. The launch of Experian Cashflow Data Bureau at Vision 2026 reflects this shift from access to adoption. The new consumer reporting agency operates under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and is designed to help financial institutions adopt consumer-permissioned cash flow insights at scale. A key part of that foundation is the cash flow consumer report, which organizes consumer-permissioned banking information into a standardized consumer report regulated under the FCRA. This gives lenders a consistent foundation for incorporating cash flow information into lending decisions while providing consumers with access to the information in their report. Turning greater visibility into better decisions The next evolution in credit isn’t about choosing between traditional credit and cash flow data. Each provides a different perspective. Traditional credit information offers deep insight into how consumers have managed credit over time. Cash flow insights can add context about financial activity and capacity. Bringing those perspectives together can give lenders greater visibility into consumers’ financial health and help them better distinguish between risk and resilience, support more informed decisions and identify opportunities to responsibly expand access to credit. As cash flow adoption continues to grow, its value will come from how effectively it complements the information lenders already use. The opportunity isn't simply to see more data. It's to turn that additional visibility into smarter, more informed decisions. Explore how Experian Cashflow Data Bureau is helping financial institutions put consumer-permissioned cash flow insights into practice at scale. Learn more [1] Federal Reserve Bank of New York, The Market for Credit Building: Demand, Product Characteristics and Consumer Uses, 2026. [2] Experian commissioned Atomik Research to conduct an online survey of 2,000 U.S. adults age 18+. Fieldwork took place July 16–21, 2026. Margin of error: +/- 2.2 percentage points at a 95% confidence level. [3] Based on Experian analysis when Cashflow Score is compared with conventional credit scores, tailored to targeted risk tiers. Predictability based on KS.

October 14, 2026 by Julie Lee
The Three Onboarding Fraud Pain Points That Slow Growth (And How to Solve Them) 

Effective fraud prevention is critical to balancing security and customer experience during onboarding. Learn more!

October 12, 2026 by Charles Hunter

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe