Real Time Payments: Does Instant Payment mean Instant Fraud?

by Alex Lvoff 6 min read September 12, 2023

The Federal Reserve (Fed) took a big step towards revolutionizing the U.S. payment landscape with the official launch of FedNow, a new instant payment service, on July 20, 2023. While the new payment network offers advantages, there are concerns that fraudsters may be quick to exploit the new real-time technology with fraud schemes like automated push payment (APP) fraud.

How is FedNow different from existing payment networks?

To keep pace with regions across the globe and accelerate innovation, the U.S. created a alternative to the existing payment network known as The Clearing House (TCH) Real-Time Payment Network (RTP).

Fraudsters can use the fact that real-time payments immediately settle to launder the stolen money through multiple channels quickly. The potential for this kind of fraud has led financial regulators to consider measures to better protect against it.

While both FedNow and RTP charge a comparable fee of 4.5 cents per originated transaction, the key distinction lies in their governance. RTP is operated by a consortium of large banks, whereas FedNow falls under the jurisdiction of the Federal Reserve Bank. This distinction could give FedNow an edge in the market.

One of the advantages of FedNow is its integration with the extensive Federal Reserve network, allowing smaller local banks across the country to access the service. RTP estimates accessibility to institutions holding approximately 90% of U.S. demand deposit accounts (DDAs), but currently only reaches 62% of DDAs due to limited participation from eligible institutions.

What are real-time payments?

Real-time payments refer to transactions between bank accounts that are initiated, cleared, and settled within seconds, regardless of the time or day. This immediacy enhances transparency and instills confidence in payments, which benefits consumers, banks and businesses.Image sourced from JaredFranklin.com

Real-time payments have gained traction globally, with adoptions from over 70 countries on six continents. In 2022 alone, these transactions amounted to a staggering $195 billion, representing a remarkable year-over-year growth of 63%. India leads the pack with its Unified Payments Interface platform, processing a massive $89.5 billion in transaction volume. Other significant markets include Brazil, China, Thailand, and South Korea.

The fact that real-time payments cannot be reversed promotes trust and ensures that contracts are upheld. This also encourages the development of new methods to make processes more efficient, like the ability to pay upon receiving the goods or services. These advancements are particularly crucial for small businesses, which disproportionately bear the burden of delayed payments, amounting to a staggering $3 trillion globally at any given time.

The launch of FedNow marks a significant milestone in the U.S. financial landscape, propelling the country towards greater efficiency, transparency, and innovation in payments. However, it also brings a fair share of challenges, including the potential for increased fraud.

Are real-time payments a catalyst for fraud?

As the financial landscape evolves with the introduction of real-time payment systems, fraudsters are quick to exploit new technologies. One particular form of fraud that has gained prominence is authorized push payment (APP) fraud.

APP fraud is a type of scam where fraudsters trick individuals or businesses into authorizing the transfer of funds from their bank accounts to accounts controlled by the fraudsters. The fraudster poses as a legitimate entity and deceives the victim into believing that there is an urgent need to transfer money. They gain the victim’s trust and provide instructions for the transfer, typically through online or telephone banking channels. The victim willingly performs the payment, thinking it is legitimate, but realizes they have been scammed when communication halts. APP fraud is damaging as victims authorize the payments themselves, making it difficult for banks to recover the funds. To protect against APP fraud, it’s important to be cautious, verify the legitimacy of requests independently, and report any suspicious activity promptly.

Fraud detection and prevention with real-time payments

Advances in fraud detection software, including machine learning and behavioral analytics, make unusual urgent requests and fake invoices easier to spot — in real time — but some governments are considering legislation to ensure more support for victims.

For example, in the U.K., frameworks like Confirmation of Payee have rolled out instant account detail checks against the account holder’s name to help prevent cases of authorized push payment fraud. The U.K.’s real-time payments scheme Pay.UK also introduced the Mule Insights Tactical Solution (MITS), which tracks the flow of fraudulent transactions used in money laundering through bank and credit union accounts. It identifies these accounts and stops the proceeds of crimes from moving deeper into the system – and can help victims recover their funds.

While fraud levels related to traditional payments have slowly come down, real-time payment-related fraud has recently skyrocketed. India, one of the primary innovators in the space, recorded a 23% rise in fraud related to its real-time payments system in 2022.

The same ACI report stated that the U.S., making up only 1.2% of all real-time payment transactions in 2022, had, for now, avoided the effects. However, “there is no reason to assume that without action, the U.S. will not follow the path to crisis levels of APP scams as seen in other markets.”

FedNow currently has no specific plans to bake fraud detection into their newly launched technology, meaning the response is left to financial institutions.

Fight instant fraud with instant answers

Artificial Intelligence (AI) holds tremendous potential in combating the ever-present threat of fraud. With AI technologies, financial institutions can process vast amounts of data points faster and enhance their fraud detection capabilities. This enables them to identify and flag suspicious transactions that deviate from the norm, mitigating identity risk and safeguarding customer accounts.

The ability of AI-powered systems to ingest and analyze real-time information empowers institutions to stay one step ahead in the battle against account takeover fraud. This type of fraud, which poses a significant challenge to real-time payment systems, can be better addressed through AI-enabled tools. With ongoing monitoring of account behavior, such as the services provided by FraudNet, financial institutions gain a powerful weapon against APP fraud.

In addition to behavioral analysis, location data has emerged as an asset in the fight against fraud. Incorporating location-based information into fraud detection algorithms has proven effective in pinpointing suspicious activities and reducing fraudulent incidents.

As the financial industry continues to grapple with the constant evolution of fraud techniques, harnessing the potential of AI, coupled with comprehensive data analysis and innovative technologies, becomes crucial for securing the integrity of financial transactions.

Taking your next step in the fight against fraud

Ultimately, the effectiveness of fraud prevention measures depends on the implementation and continuous improvement of security protocols by financial institutions, regulators, and technology providers. By staying vigilant and employing appropriate safeguards, fraud risks in real-time payment systems, such as FedNow, can be minimized.

To learn more about how Experian can help you leverage fraud prevention solutions, visit us online or request a call. 

*This article leverages/includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee
Financial Institutions Are Rethinking Customer Acqusition

Customer acquisition strategies are constantly evolving toward more precise targeting. From a marketing lens, you can track every step, optimize communication channels and still miss the person most likely to convert. Attribution can tell us which channels work and automation can make marketing spend more efficient. But both assume we know who is actually on the other end. Financial institutions are learning that finding audiences and targeting them is no longer the biggest challenge. As acquisition optimization marketing becomes more sophisticated, teams can measure and act on more signals than before. What they can't always know is whether the person on the receiving end is real. Customer acquisition has evolved into an identity problem. The challenge is not that every questionable signal represents malicious activity. It's that acquisition systems must make increasingly intelligent decisions with an imperfect understanding of who they're actually engaging. When identities are fragmented, duplicated, temporary or synthetic, optimization becomes a question of trust as much as targeting. When your signals don't reliably identify customers The customer journey often includes searching, filling out a form, creating an account, requesting a quote and subscribing. All of these signals work well when identity is relatively stable.  However, financial institutions are finding that these signals are becoming less reliable. A single person can operate across multiple personas, devices, browsers, aliases, accounts and intermediaries while several apparent “people” may actually represent one underlying actor. Financial instituions are finding: Fragmented customer signals Difficulty distinguishing an old account from a new one Different digital pathways associated with the same individual Signals that are generated by automation Real customers getting flagged because signals are too thin to evaluate confidently Legacy signals continue to be challenged Marketing has historically treated intent as a valuable signal because intent was relatively difficult to produce. A search required human intent. A form required someone to fill it out. An inquiry implied a meaningful amount of human effort. Financial institutions are already combating AI-enabled fraud, and now marketing teams are starting to face it on a massive scale. AI can mimic human behavior by researching products, comparing prices, filling out forms, creating accounts and signing up for services. A valid email address is no longer enough. Marketers need to know: How long has it existed? How recently has it been active? Does its activity appear consistent or suddenly anomalous? Has it gone dormant and returned? Is it associated with patterns that suggest stability or unusual behavior? How to build on your strongest signal Email remains one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce, following people across devices, platforms, transactions, subscriptions, accounts and years of activity. For over two decades, this has shaped how AtData thinks about identity. Now, as part of Experian, it’s shaping how an entire platform and team approach identity. A marketer doesn’t need every prospect to have existed online for twenty years. But understanding whether a newly acquired prospect has meaningful identity context can dramatically improve the quality of the decision being made around it. Better identity intelligence can help organizations reduce unnecessary friction by improving their ability to recognize legitimate customers. With a strong identity foundation, marketing teams can better address: Which audiences are more likely to convert? Which leads are high quality? Which channels are driving incremental growth? What do the best prospects look like? The value isn't simply having an email address. It's understanding the history and behavioral context associated with it. That context can provide a stronger digital identity signal, helping marketers understand how long they have been active, whether its behavior is consistent with that of a real person and whether current activity aligns with past patterns. It continues to be one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce. An infrastructure built for what's coming The acquisition of AtData by Experian reflects a fundamental shift in how identity infrastructure needs to work. Experian's scale and decisioning capabilities, combined with AtData's real-time email intelligence, create a strong platform. Read more about the why behind the acquisition and see how email works as an identity anchor for fraud prevention. Contact us to learn about our customer acquisition solutions

September 15, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
As Electric Vehicle Adoption Eases, Dealers Can Find New Opportunities To Reach Consumers

After years of rapid growth, new electric vehicle (EV) registrations have moderated, and the EV market has entered a new chapter. But slower growth shouldn’t be mistaken for disappearing demand, with data suggesting the reality is much more nuanced. According to Experian Automotive’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026, battery EVs accounted for 8.21% of new retail registrations in the last 12 months, down from 9.23% a year earlier. However, consumers aren’t simply walking away from electrification. In fact, more than one million new EVs were registered during the past 12 months and the used EV market recorded more than 540,000 registrations over the same period. The opportunity may be less about waiting for the EV market to grow and more about understanding where EV demand is present, who is driving them, and how to reach those consumers more effectively. Who is likely to purchase an EV and what vehicle types are they interested in? Understanding who’s in the market for an EV can allow dealers to position themselves around consumers’ needs as they choose a vehicle that fits their everyday lifestyle. In the second quarter of 2026, Millennials and Gen X accounted for 67.83% of new EV registrations, nearly 10 percentage points above their combined share of all new, retail registrations. Millennials were also the largest generational audience across both new and used EV market share, coming in at 35.76% and 38.42%, respectively. It’s important to consider that the EV shopper isn’t necessarily looking for an unfamiliar or new type of vehicle. In many cases, they’re seemingly looking for an electric version of the practical vehicle they already know. For instance, SUVs accounted for 77.47% of new EV registrations in Q2 2026, which was similar to SUVs’ 63.49% share of all new retail registrations. For these shoppers, creating messaging around value, practicality, and available choices may resonate differently than premium technology messaging aimed at some new-EV prospects. The more precisely dealers can identify those audiences, the less they need to depend on broad EV market momentum to generate demand. To learn more about EV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation.

September 15, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe