Four capabilities to consider for improved coverage and customer experience. Identity verification during account opening is the foundation for building trust between consumers and businesses. Consumers expect a seamless and convenient experience, and with the ease and optionality of online banking, are willing to look for alternatives that offer less friction. According to Experian research, 92% of consumers feel it's important for the businesses they deal with online to identify or recognize them on a repeated basis accurately, but only 16% have high confidence that this is happening. The disconnect between consumers’ expectations for online identity verification and the digital experiences they encounter is leading to reduced satisfaction and increased abandonment during new account opening processes. According to recent research by Experian, 38% of consumers surveyed considered ending a new account opening mid-way through the process due to poor experience. In addition, the same research found that nearly one-fifth of consumers had moved their business elsewhere because of this. Amidst the quest for convenience lies a pressing concern: ensuring the integrity of accounts being opened and protecting against fraud. Businesses continue to experience increasing fraud losses, Juniper Research forecasts that merchant losses from online payment fraud will exceed $362 billion globally between 2023 and 2028, with losses of $91 billion alone in 2028. Identity verification serves as the first line of defense in protecting both financial institutions and consumers. By verifying the identities of individuals before granting them access to services, businesses can mitigate the risk of identity theft, account takeover, and other forms of fraud. Four capabilities to consider when building out an identity verification strategy Personally Identifiable Information (PII) dataComparing consumer input data to a comprehensive data set helps effectively validate the consumer without disrupting customer experience. Details like name, address, date of birth, and social security number provide valuable identity information to verify identities quickly and accurately. Identity graphUsing an identity graph leveraging advanced analytics and data linking techniques helps prevent synthetic IDs from getting through. By mapping relationships between identity attributes, you can easily identify patterns and connections within the data and detect anomalies or inaccuracies in the information provided. Alternative data“Thin file” consumers are often rejected due to a lack of traditional data. Using alternative data like phone ownership and email data helps not only verify that the identity is real but also improves coverage, so you are not rejecting good customers. Document verificationHaving a document verification provider that seamlessly integrates into your identity verification workflow is essential for robust identity verification. Validating good users early in the account opening process helps keep fraudsters out so good users are not subject to stringent identity checks later on during onboarding. Next steps A strong identity verification process builds trust by demonstrating a commitment to protecting and safeguarding consumer data. A proper identity verification workflow would minimize the impact of friction for consumers and help organizations manage fraud and regulatory compliance by examining specific business needs on a case-by-case basis. Identifying the right mix of capabilities through analytics and feedback while utilizing the best data reduces the cost of manual verification and helps onboard good customers faster. Learn more Research conducted in March 2024 by Experian in North America
In today’s digital landscape, where data breaches and cyberattacks are rampant, businesses face increasing security challenges. One of the most prevalent threats is credential stuffing—a cyberattack in which malicious actors use stolen username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access to user accounts. As more personal and financial data gets leaked or sold on the dark web, these attacks become more sophisticated, and the consequences for businesses and consumers alike can be devastating.But there are ways to proactively fight credential stuffing attacks and protect your organization and customers. Solutions like our identity protection services and behavioral analytics capabilities powered by NeuroID, a part of Experian, are helping businesses prevent fraud and ensure a safer user experience. What is credential stuffing? Credential stuffing is based on the simple premise that many people reuse the same login credentials across multiple sites and platforms. Once cybercriminals can access a data breach, they can try these stolen usernames and passwords across many other sites, hoping that users have reused the same credentials elsewhere. This form of attack is highly automated, leveraging botnets to test vast numbers of combinations in a short amount of time. If an attacker succeeds, they can steal sensitive information, access financial accounts, or carry out fraudulent activities. While these attacks are not new, they have become more effective with the proliferation of stolen data from breaches and the increased use of automated tools. Traditional security methods—such as requiring complex passwords or multi-factor authentication (MFA)—are useful but not enough to prevent credential stuffing fully. How we can help protect against credential stuffing We offer comprehensive fraud prevention tools and multi-factor authentication solutions to help you identify and mitigate credential stuffing threats. We use advanced identity verification and fraud detection technology to help businesses assess and authenticate user identities in real-time. Our platform integrates with existing authentication and risk management solutions to provide layered protection against credential stuffing, phishing attacks, and other forms of identity-based fraud. Another key element in our offering is behavioral analytics, which goes beyond traditional methods of fraud detection by focusing on users' data entry patterns and interactions. NeuroID and Experian partner to combat credential stuffing We recently acquired NeuroID, a company specializing in behavioral analytics for fraud detection, to take the Experian digital identity and fraud platform to the next level. Advanced behavioral analytics is a game-changer for preventing credential-stuffing attacks. While biometrics track characteristics, behavioral analytics track distinct actions. For example, with behavioral analytics, every time a person inputs information, clicks in a box, edits a field, and even hovers over something before clicking on it or adding the information to it, those actions are tracked. However, unlike biometrics, this data isn’t used to connect to a single identity. Instead, it’s information businesses can use to learn more about the experience and the intentions of someone on the site. NeuroID and Experian’s paired fraud detection capabilities offer several distinct advantages in preventing credential stuffing attacks: Real-time threat detection: Analyze thousands of behavioral signals in real-time to detect user behavior that suggests bots, fraud rings, credential stuffing attempts, or any number of other cybercriminal attack strategies. Fraud risk scoring: Based on behavioral patterns, assign a fraud risk score to each user session. High-risk sessions can trigger additional authentication steps, such as CAPTCHA or step-up authentication, helping to stop credential stuffing before it occurs. Invisible to the user: Unlike traditional authentication methods, behavioral analytics work seamlessly in the background. Users do not need to take extra steps—such as answering additional security questions or entering one-time passwords. Adaptive and self-learning: As users interact with your website or app, our system continuously adapts to their unique behavior patterns. Over time, the system becomes even more effective at distinguishing between legitimate and malicious users without collecting any personally identifiable information (PII). Why behavioral data is critical in combating credential stuffing Credential stuffing attacks rely on the ability to mimic legitimate login attempts using stolen credentials. Behavioral analytics, however, can spot the subtle differences between human and bot behavior, even if the attacker has the correct credentials. By integrating behavioral analytics, you can: Prevent automated attacks: Bots often interact with websites in unnatural ways—speeding through form fields, using erratic mouse movements, or attempting logins from unusual or spoofed geographic locations. Behavioral analytics can flag these behaviors before an account is compromised. Detect account takeovers early: If a legitimate user’s account is taken over, behavioral analytics can detect the change in interactions. By monitoring behavior, businesses can detect account takeover attempts much earlier than traditional methods. Lower false positive rates: Traditional fraud prevention tools often rely on rigid rule-based systems that can block legitimate users, especially if their login patterns slightly differ from the norm. On the other hand, behavioral analytics analyzes a user's real-time behavioral data without relying on traditional static data such as passwords or personal information. This minimizes unnecessary flags on legitimate customers (while still detecting suspicious activity). Improve customer experience: Since behavioral analytics is invisible to users and requires no extra friction (like answering security questions), the login and transaction verification process is much smoother. Customers are not inconvenienced, and businesses can reduce the risk of fraud without annoying their users. The future of credential stuffing prevention Credential stuffing is a growing threat in today’s interconnected world, but with the right solutions, businesses can significantly reduce the risk of these attacks. By integrating our fraud prevention technologies and behavioral analytics capabilities, you can stay ahead of the curve in securing user identities and preventing unauthorized access. The key benefits of combining traditional identity verification methods with behavioral analytics are higher detection rates, reduced friction for legitimate users, and an enhanced user experience overall. In an era of increasingly sophisticated cybercrime, using data-driven behavioral insights to detect user riskiness is no longer just a luxury—it’s a necessity. Learn more Watch webinar
The credit card market is rapidly evolving, driven by technological advancements, economic volatility, and changing consumer behaviors. Our new 2025 State of Credit Card Report provides an in-depth analysis of the credit card landscape and strategy considerations for financial institutions. Findings include: Credit card debt reached an all-time high of $1.17 trillion in Q3 2024. About 19 million U.S. households were considered underbanked in 2023. Bot-led fraud attacks doubled from January to June 2024. Read the full report for critical insights and strategies to navigate a shifting market. Access report
Bots have been a consistent thorn in fraud teams’ side for years. But since the advent of generative AI (genAI), what used to be just one more fraud type has become a fraud tsunami. This surge in fraud bot attacks has brought with it: A 108% year-over-year increase in credential stuffing to take over accounts1 A 134% year-over-year increase in carding attacks, where stolen cards are tested1 New account opening fraud at more than 25% of businesses in the first quarter of 2024 While fraud professionals rush to fight back the onslaught, they’re also reckoning with the ever-evolving threat of genAI. A large factor in fraud bots’ new scalability and strength, genAI was the #1 stress point identified by fraud teams in 2024, and 70% expect it to be a challenge moving forward, according to Experian’s U.S. Identity and Fraud Report. This fear is well-founded. Fraudsters are wasting no time incorporating genAI into their attack arsenal. GenAI has created a new generation of fraud bot tools that make bot development more accessible and sophisticated. These bots reverse-engineer fraud stacks, testing the limits of their targets’ defenses to find triggers for step-ups and checks, then adapt to avoid setting them off. How do bot detection solutions fare against this next generation of bots? The evolution of fraud bots The earliest fraud bots, which first appeared in the 1990s2 , were simple scripts with limited capabilities. Fraudsters soon began using these scripts to execute basic tasks on their behalf — mainly form spam and light data scraping. Fraud teams responded, implementing bot detection solutions that continued to evolve as the threats became more sophisticated. The evolution of fraud bots was steady — and mostly balanced against fraud-fighting tools — until genAI supercharged it. Today, fraudsters are leveraging genAI’s core ability (analyzing datasets and identifying patterns, then using those patterns to generate solutions) to create bots capable of large-scale attacks with unprecedented sophistication. These genAI-powered fraud bots can analyze onboarding flows to identify step-up triggers, automate attacks at high-volume times, and even conduct “behavior hijacking,” where bots record and replicate the behaviors of real users. How next-generation fraud bots beat fraud stacks For years, a tried-and-true tool for fraud bot detection was to look for the non-human giveaways: lightning-fast transition speeds, eerily consistent keystrokes, nonexistent mouse movements, and/or repeated device and network data were all tell-tale signs of a bot. Fraud teams could base their bot detection strategies off of these behavioral red flags. Stopping today’s next-generation fraud bots isn’t quite as straightforward. Because they were specifically built to mimic human behavior and cycle through device IDs and IP addresses, today’s bots often appear to be normal, human applicants and circumvent many of the barriers that blocked their predecessors. The data the bots are providing is better, too3, fraudsters are using genAI to streamline and scale the creation of synthetic identities.4 By equipping their human-like bots with a bank of high-quality synthetic identities, fraudsters have their most potent, advanced attack avenue to date. Skirting traditional bot detection with their human-like capabilities, next-generation fraud bots can bombard their targets with massive, often undetected, attacks. In one attack analyzed by NeuroID, a part of Experian, fraud bots made up 31% of a business's onboarding volume on a single day. That’s nearly one-third of the business’s volume comprised of bots attempting to commit fraud. If the business hadn’t had the right tools in place to separate these bots from genuine users, they wouldn’t have been able to stop the attack until it was too late. Beating fraud bots with behavioral analytics: The next-generation approach Next-generation fraud bots pose a unique threat to digital businesses: their data appears legitimate, and they look like a human when they’re interacting with a form. So how do fraud teams differentiate fraud bots from an actual human user? NeuroID’s product development teams discovered key nuances that separate next-generation bots from humans, and we’ve updated our industry-leading bot detection capabilities to account for them. A big one is mousing patterns: random, erratic cursor movements are part of what makes next-generation bots so eerily human-like, but their movements are still noticeably smoother than a real human’s. Other bot detection solutions (including our V1 signal) wouldn’t flag these advanced cursor movements as bot behavior, but our new signal is designed to identify even the most granular giveaways of a next-generation fraud bot. Fraud bots will continue to evolve. But so will we. For example, behavioral analytics can identify repeated actions — down to the pixel a cursor lands on — during a bot attack and block out users exhibiting those behaviors. Our behavior was built specifically to combat next-gen challenges with scalable, real-time solutions. This proactive protection against advanced bot behaviors is crucial to preventing larger attacks. For more on fraud bots’ evolution, download our Emerging Trends in Fraud: Understanding and Combating Next-Gen Bots report. Learn more Sources 1 HUMAN Enterprise Bot Fraud Benchmark Report 2 Abusix 3 NeuroID 4 Biometric Update
Today’s fast-paced, digital-first hiring environment calls for a more comprehensive approach to pre-employment screening. With growing pressure on employers and HR teams to make swift, accurate, and secure hiring decisions, having access to the tools and data to enhance efficiency and security is more important than ever. By evolving beyond traditional screening methods, background screeners can better meet these needs and deliver added value to their clients. Fraud remains a significant challenge. In fact, fraud scams resulted in a staggering $485.6 billion in losses in 20231 — and hiring teams aren’t exempt from these risks. Fraudulent resumes, synthetic identities, and the risk of non-compliance with evolving regulations create a challenging landscape for pre-employment verifications. What if there was a way to make smarter, faster, and more secure hiring decisions? This article explores how background screeners can optimize pre-employment verification processes, reduce fraud risks, and ensure compliance — all while delivering a positive candidate experience. What is pre-employment screening? Employers conduct pre-employment screenings to thoroughly evaluate job candidates and make informed hiring decisions. It’s designed to verify key details about candidates, such as their identity, employment history, and references among others to assess their suitability for a role and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Enhancing traditional screening processes For decades, pre-employment background checks have been a cornerstone of the hiring process. While effective, many traditional methods face challenges in keeping up with the evolving demands of modern hiring. Delays in hiring: Background checks can oftentimes rely on manual processes, which could extend timelines leading to delays of days or even weeks. This not only slows down hiring cycles but can make it harder for employers to compete for top talent in a tight labor market. Errors and inaccuracies: Human errors, incomplete data, and inconsistencies across systems can lead to missed insights or red flags. Fraudulent activity: As hiring becomes increasingly digital, identity theft and synthetic identities present growing challenges to verifying candidate-provided data. Regulatory challenges: With regulations like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), companies must navigate complex compliance requirements to avoid legal and financial repercussions. 1 in 3 HR professionals report losing top candidates due to slow pre-employment screening processes.2 These challenges highlight the opportunity to build on existing screening practices with tools that enhance speed, provide actionable insights and prevent fraud. Adapting to the evolving fraud landscape Employment fraud is becoming increasingly sophisticated, fueled by trends like the rise of remote work and digital applications. In fact, the employment sector accounted for 45% of all false document submissions in 2023, making it the most targeted industry for fraud.3 From fake references and degrees to synthetic identities created using stolen personal information, the risks are higher than ever. Synthetic identity fraud: This form of fraud — where fake identities are created by combining real and fabricated data — makes up more than 80% of all new account fraud.4 Fake credentials: Many candidates falsify qualifications or work histories to enhance their chances of securing a role. Compliance risks: Failure to verify candidate information accurately can result in legal penalties, brand reputation damage, or internal security breaches. Modernizing pre-employment screening The good news? Experian offers advanced solutions that complement existing screening processes, empowering background screeners to deliver more efficient, secure and reliable results for their clients looking to higher faster, and with greater confidence. Gain a more holistic view of a candidate’s risk profile: Experian’s nationwide database contains files on more than 245 million credit-active consumers, providing the most current, accurate, and comprehensive information available in the industry. Conduct real-time identity verification: Leverage a range of identity verification solutions to authenticate and verify a candidate’s identity by accessing a breadth set of non-credit and credit data sources to create a robust social footprint that defines each consumer as unique individuals. Integrate advanced fraud detection: Powered by purpose-built analytics and machine learning algorithms, Experian’s fraud detection tools can detect synthetic identities, inconsistencies, and other red flags while ensuring a seamless candidate experience. Enhance compliance efforts: Experian’s solutions are designed to help businesses navigate complex compliance requirements with ease. Fraud prevention playbook in preemployment Uncover essential strategies for fraud prevention and identity verification in employment screening. Download now The pre-employment screening landscape is evolving, and staying ahead requires tools that enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of your processes. Experian’s advanced solutions are designed to complement your existing screening services, helping you reduce fraud risks, maintain compliant, and deliver data-driven insights that empower smarter hiring decisions. Get started today Ready to transform your pre-employment verification process with fraud mitigation and identity verification solutions? Explore our innovative solutions today. Learn more 1 Nasdaq finds scams led to $486 billion in losses in 2023, 2024. 2 Research reveals Candidates’ Frustrations with Hiring Process, 2024. 3 Employment Identity Fraud: Do You Know Who You’re Hiring, 2024. 4 Report: Synthetic identity fraud is growing, 2024.
Protecting consumer information is paramount in today’s digital age, especially for financial institutions. With cyber threats on the rise, robust user authentication methods are essential to safeguard sensitive data. This guide will walk you through the various user authentication types and methods, focusing on solutions that can help financial institutions enhance their security measures and protect consumers’ personal information. Understanding user authentication types Single-factor authentication (SFA) Single-factor authentication is the most basic form of authentication, requiring only one piece of information, such as a password. While it's easy to implement, SFA has significant drawbacks, particularly in the financial sector where security is critical. Passwords can be easily compromised through phishing or brute force attacks, making SFA insufficient on its own. Two-factor authentication (2FA) Two-factor authentication uses two different factors to verify a user's identity. For example, a bank might require a consumer to enter their password and then confirm their identity with a code sent to their mobile device. This method enhances security without overcomplicating the user experience. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) Multi-factor authentication adds an extra layer of security by requiring two or more verification factors. These factors typically include something you know (a password), something you have (a token or smartphone), and something you can present with your body, such as a fingerprint or facial scan (biometric data). MFA significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access, making it a crucial component for financial institutions. Common authentication methods Password-based authentication Passwords are the most common form of authentication. However, they come with challenges, especially in the financial sector. Weak or reused passwords can be easily exploited. Financial institutions should enforce strong password policies and educate consumers on creating secure passwords. Biometric authentication Biometric authentication uses unique biological characteristics, such as fingerprints, facial recognition, or iris scans to verify identity. This method is becoming increasingly popular in banking due to its convenience and high level of security. However, a potential drawback is that it also raises privacy concerns. Token-based authentication Token-based authentication involves the use of physical or software tokens. Physical tokens, like smart cards, generate a one-time code for login. Software tokens, such as mobile apps, provide similar functionality. This method is highly secure and is often used in financial transactions. Certificate-based authentication Certificate-based authentication uses digital certificates to establish a secure connection. This method is commonly used in secure communications within financial systems. While it offers robust security, implementing and managing digital certificates can be complex. Two-factor authentication (2FA) solutions 2FA is a practical and effective way to enhance security. Popular methods include SMS-based codes, app-based authentication, and email-based verification. Each method has its pros and cons, but all provide an additional layer of security that is vital for protecting financial data. Many financial institutions have successfully implemented two factor authentication solutions. For example, a bank might use SMS-based 2FA to verify transactions, significantly reducing fraud. Another institution might adopt app-based 2FA, offering consumers a more secure and convenient way to authenticate their identity. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) solutions MFA is essential for financial institutions aiming to enhance security. Multifactor authentication solutions can provide multiple layers of protection and ensure that even if one factor is compromised, unauthorized access is still prevented. Implementing MFA requires careful planning. Financial institutions should start by assessing their current security measures and identifying areas for improvement. It's crucial to choose MFA solutions that integrate seamlessly with existing systems. Training staff and educating consumers on the importance of MFA can also help ensure a smooth transition. Knowledge-based authentication (KBA) solutions What is KBA? Knowledge-based authentication relies on information that only the user should know, such as answers to security questions. There are two types: static KBA, which uses pre-set questions, and dynamic KBA, which generates questions based on the user's transaction history or other data. Effectiveness of KBA While KBA can be effective, it has its limitations. Static KBA is vulnerable to social engineering attacks, where fraudsters gather information about the user to answer security questions. Dynamic KBA offers more security but can be more complex to implement. Financial institutions should weigh the pros and cons of KBA and consider combining it with other methods for enhanced security. Enhancing KBA security To improve KBA security, financial institutions can combine it with other user authentication types, such as MFA or 2FA. This layered approach ensures that even if one method is compromised, additional layers of security are in place. Best practices for knowledge based authentication solutions include regularly updating security questions and using questions that are difficult for others to guess. Using authentication methods to protect consumer information Choosing the right authentication methods is crucial for financial institutions to protect consumer information and maintain trust. By understanding and implementing robust authentication solutions like MFA, 2FA, and KBA, banks and financial services can significantly enhance their security posture. As cyber threats continue to evolve, staying ahead with advanced authentication methods will be key to safeguarding sensitive data and ensuring consumer confidence. Experian’s multifactor authentication solutions can enhance your existing authentication process while reducing friction, using risk-assessment tools to apply the appropriate level of security. Learn how your organization can provide faster, more agile mobile transactions, risk protection for your business, and security and peace of mind for your consumers. Visit our website to learn more This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.
There’s a common saying in the fraud prevention industry: where there’s opportunity, fraudsters are quick to follow. Recent advances in technology are providing ample new opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit. One of the most prevalent techniques being observed today is password spraying. From email to financial and health records, consumers and businesses are being impacted by this pervasive form of fraud. Password spraying attacks often fly under the radar of traditional security measures, presenting a unique and growing threat to businesses and individuals. What is password spraying? Also known as credential guessing, password spraying involves an attacker applying a list of commonly used passwords against a list of accounts in order to guess the correct password. When password spraying first emerged, an individual might hand key passwords to try to gain access to a user’s account or a business’s management system. Credential stuffing is a similar type of fraud attack in which an attacker gains access to a victim’s credentials in one system (e.g., their email, etc.) and then attempts to apply those known credentials via a script/bot to a large number of sites in order to gain access to other sites where the victim might be using the same credentials. Both are brute-force attack vectors that eventually result in account takeover (ATO), compromising sensitive data that is subsequently used to scam, blackmail, or defraud the victim. As password spraying and other types of fraud evolved, fraud rings would leverage “click farms” or “fraud farms” where hundreds of workers would leverage mobile devices or laptops to try different passwords in order to perpetrate fraud attacks on a larger scale. As technology has advanced, bot attacks fueled by generative AI (Gen AI) have taken the place of humans in the fraud ring. Now, instead of hand-keying passwords into systems, workers at fraud farms are able to deploy hundreds or thousands of bots that can work exponentially faster. The rise and evolution of bots Bots are not necessarily new to the digital experience — think of the chatbot on a company’s support page that helps you find an answer more quickly. These automated software applications carry out repetitive instructions mimicking human behavior. While they can be helpful, they can also be leveraged by fraudsters, to automate fraud on a brute-force attack, often going undetected resulting in substantial losses. Generation 4 bots are the latest evolution of these malicious programs, and they’re notoriously hard to detect. Because of their slow, methodical, and deliberate human-like behavior, they easily bypass network-level controls such as firewalls and popular network-layer security. Stopping Gen4 bots For any company with a digital presence or that leverages digital networks as part of doing business, the threat from Gen AI enabled fraud is paramount. The traditional stack for fighting fraud including firewalls, CAPTCHA and block lists are not enough in the face of Gen4 bots. Companies at the forefront of fighting fraud are leveraging behavioral analytics to identify and mitigate Gen AI-powered fraud. And many have turned to industry leader, Neuro ID, which is now part of Experian. Watch our on-demand webinar: The fraud bot future-shock: How to spot & stop next-gen attacks Behavioral analytics is a key component of passive and continuous authentication and has become table stakes in the fraud prevention space. By measuring how a user interacts with a form field (e.g., a website, mobile app, etc.) our behavioral analytics solutions can determine if the user is: a potential fraudster, a bot, or a genuine user familiar with the PII entered. Because it’s available at any digital engagement, behavioral data is often the most consistent signal available throughout the customer lifecycle and across geographies. It allows risky users to be rejected or put through more rigorous authentication, while trustworthy users get a better experience, protecting businesses and consumers from Gen AI-enabled fraud. As cyber threats evolve, so must our defenses. Password spraying exemplifies the sophisticated methods and technologies attackers now employ to scale their fraud efforts and gain access to sensitive information. To fight next-generation fraud, organizations must employ next-generation technologies and techniques to better defend themselves against this and other types of cyberattacks. Experian’s approach embodies a paradigm shift where fraud detection increases efficiency and accuracy without sacrificing customer experience. We can help protect your company from bot attacks, fraudulent accounts and other malicious attempts to access your sensitive data. Learn more about behavioral analytics and our other fraud prevention solutions. Learn more
Dormant fraud, sleeper fraud, trojan horse fraud . . . whatever you call it, it’s an especially insidious form of account takeover fraud (ATO) that fraud teams often can’t detect until it’s too late. Fraudsters create accounts with stolen credentials or gain access to existing ones, onboard under the fake identity, then lie low, waiting for an opportunity to attack. It takes a strategic approach to defeat the enemy from within, and fraudsters assume you won’t have the tools in place to even know where to start. Dormant fraud uncovered: A case study NeuroID, a part of Experian, has seen the dangers of dormant fraud play out in real time. As a new customer to NeuroID, this payment processor wanted to backtest their user base for potential signs of fraud. Upon analyzing their customer base’s onboarding behavioral data, we discovered more than 100K accounts were likely to be dormant fraud. The payment processor hadn’t considered these accounts suspicious and didn’t see any risk in letting them remain active, despite the fact that none of them had completed a transaction since onboarding. Why did we flag these as risky? Low familiarity: Our testing revealed behavioral red flags, such as copying and pasting into fields or constant tab switching. These are high indicators that the applicant is applying with personally identifiable information (PII) that isn’t their own. Fraud clusters: Many of these accounts used the same web browser, device, and IP address during sign-up, suggesting that one fraudster was signing up for multiple accounts. We found hundreds of clusters like these, many with 50 or more accounts belonging to the same device and IP address within our customer’s user base. It was clear that this payment processor’s fraud stack had gaps that left them vulnerable. These dormant accounts could have caused significant damage once mobilized: receiving or transferring stolen funds, misrepresenting their financial position, or building toward a bust-out. Dormant fraud thrives in the shadows beyond onboarding. These fraudsters keep accounts “dormant” until they’re long past onboarding detection measures. And once they’re in, they can often easily transition to a higher-risk account — after all, they’ve already confirmed they’re trustworthy. This type of attack can involve fraudulent accounts remaining inactive for months, allowing them to bypass standard fraud detection methods that focus on immediate indicators. Dormant fraud gets even more dangerous when a hijacked account has built trust just by existing. For example, some banks provide a higher credit line just for current customers, no matter their activities to date. The more accounts an identity has in good standing, the greater the chance that they’ll be mistaken for a good customer and given even more opportunities to commit higher-level fraud. This is why we often talk to our customers about the idea of progressive onboarding as a way to overcome both dormant fraud risks and the onboarding friction caused by asking for too much information, too soon. Progressive onboarding, dormant fraud, and the friction balance Progressive onboarding shifts from the one-size-fits-all model by gathering only truly essential information initially and asking for more as customers engage more. This is a direct counterbalance to the approach that sometimes turns customers off by asking for too much too soon, and adding too much friction at initial onboarding. It also helps ensure ongoing checks that fight dormant fraud. We’ve seen this approach (already growing popular in payment processing) be especially useful in every type of financial business. Here’s how it works: A prospect visits your site to explore options. They may just want to understand fees and get a feel for your offerings. At this stage, you might ask for minimal information — just a name and email — without requiring a full fraud check or credit score. It’s a low commitment ask that keeps things simple for casual prospects who are just browsing, while also keeping your costs low so you don’t spend a full fraud check on an uncommitted visitor. As the prospect becomes a true customer and begins making small transactions, say a $50 transfer, you request additional details like their date of birth, physical address, or phone number. This minor step-up in information allows for a basic behavioral analytics fraud check while maintaining a low barrier of time and PII-requested for a low-risk activity. With each new level of engagement and transaction value, the information requested increases accordingly. If the customer wants to transfer larger amounts, like $5,000, they’ll understand the need to provide more details — it aligns with the idea of a privacy trade-off, where the customer’s willingness to share information grows as their trust and need for services increase. Meanwhile, your business allocates resources to those who are fully engaged, rather than to one-time visitors or casual sign-ups, and keeps an eye on dormant fraudsters who might have expected no barrier to additional transactions. Progressive onboarding is not just an effective approach for dormant fraud and onboarding friction, but also in fighting fraudsters who sneak in through unseen gaps. In another case, we worked with a consumer finance platform to help identify gaps in their fraud stack. In one attack, fraudsters probed until they found the product with the easiest barrier of entry: once inside they went on to immediately commit a full-force bot attack on higher value returns. The attack wasn’t based on dormancy, but on complacency. The fraudsters assumed this consumer finance platform wouldn’t realize that a low controls onboarding for one solution could lead to ease of access to much more. And they were right. After closing that vulnerability, we helped this customer work to create progressive onboarding that includes behavior-based fraud controls for every single user, including those already with accounts, who had built that assumed trust, and for low-risk entry-points. This weeded out any dormant fraudsters already onboarded who were trying to take advantage of that trust, as they had to go through behavioral analytics and other new controls based on the risk-level of the product. Behavioral analytics gives you confidence that every customer is trustworthy, from the moment they enter the front door to even after they’ve kicked off their shoes to stay a while. Behavioral analytics shines a light on shadowy corners Behavioral analytics are proven beyond just onboarding — within any part of a user interaction, our signals detect low familiarity, high-risk behavior and likely fraud clusters. In our experience, building a progressive onboarding approach with just these two signal points alone would provide significant results — and would help stop sophisticated fraudsters from perpetrating dormant fraud, including large-scale bust outs. Want to find out how progressive onboarding might work for you? Contact us for a free demo and deep dive into how behavioral analytics can help throughout your user journey. Contact us for a free demo
A tale of synthetic ID fraud Synthetic ID fraud is an increasing issue and affects everyone, including high-profile individuals. A notable case from Ohio involved Warren Hayes, who managed to get an official ID card in the name of “Santa Claus” from the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles. He also registered a vehicle, opened a bank account, and secured an AAA membership under this name, listing his address as 1 Noel Drive, North Pole, USA. This elaborate ruse unraveled after Hayes, disguised as Santa, got into a minor car accident. When the police requested identification, Hayes presented his Santa Claus ID. He was subsequently charged under an Ohio law prohibiting the use of fictitious names. However, the court—presided over by Judge Thomas Gysegem—dismissed the charge, arguing that because Hayes had used the ID for over 20 years, "Santa Claus" was effectively a "real person" in the eyes of the law. The judge’s ruling raised eyebrows and left one glaring question unanswered: how could official documents in such a blatantly fictitious name go undetected for two decades? From Santa Claus to synthetic IDs: the modern-day threat The Hayes case might sound like a holiday comedy, but it highlights a significant issue that organizations face today: synthetic identity fraud. Unlike traditional identity theft, synthetic ID fraud does not rely on stealing an existing identity. Instead, fraudsters combine real and fictitious details to create a new “person.” Think of it as an elaborate game of make-believe, where the stakes are millions of dollars. These synthetic identities can remain under the radar for years, building credit profiles, obtaining loans, and committing large-scale fraud before detection. Just as Hayes tricked the Bureau of Motor Vehicles, fraudsters exploit weak verification processes to pass as legitimate individuals. According to KPMG, synthetic identity fraud bears a staggering $6 billion cost to banks.To perpetrate the crime, malicious actors leverage a combination of real and fake information to fabricate a synthetic identity, also known as a “Frankenstein ID.” The financial industry classifies various types of synthetic identity fraud. Manipulated Synthetics – A real person’s data is modified to create variations of that identity. Frankenstein Synthetics – The data represents a combination of multiple real people. Manufactured Synthetics – The identity is completely synthetic. How organizations can combat synthetic ID fraud A multifaceted approach to detecting synthetic identities that integrates advanced technologies can form the foundation of a sound fraud prevention strategy: Advanced identity verification tools: Use AI-powered tools that cross-check identity attributes across multiple data points to flag inconsistencies. Behavioral analytics: Monitor user behaviors to detect anomalies that may indicate synthetic identities. For instance, a newly created account applying for a large loan with perfect credit is a red flag. Digital identity verification: Implement digital onboarding processes that include online identity verification with real-time document verification. Users can upload government-issued IDs and take selfies to confirm their identity. Collaboration and data sharing: Organizations can share insights about suspected synthetic identities to prevent fraudsters from exploiting gaps between industries. Ongoing employee training: Ensure frontline staff can identify suspicious applications and escalate potential fraud cases. Regulatory support: Governments and regulators can help by standardizing ID issuance processes and requiring more stringent checks. Closing thoughts The tale of Santa Claus’ stolen identity may be entertaining, but it underscores the need for vigilance against synthetic ID fraud. As we move into an increasingly digital age, organizations must stay ahead of fraudsters by leveraging technology, training, and collaboration. Because while the idea of Spiderman or Catwoman walking into your branch may seem amusing, the financial and reputational cost of synthetic ID fraud is no laughing matter. Learn more
The digital domain is rife with opportunities, but it also brings substantial risks, especially for organizations. Among the innovative tools that have risen to prominence for fraud detection and online security is browser fingerprinting. Whether you're looking to minimize security gaps or bolster your fraud prevention strategy, understanding how this technology works can provide a significant advantage in today’s ever-evolving fraud and identity landscape. This article explores the concept, functionality, and applications of browser fingerprinting while also examining its benefits and relevance for organizations. How does browser fingerprinting work? Browser fingerprinting is a powerful technology designed to collect unique identifying information about a user’s web browser and device. By compiling data points such as browser type, operating system, time zone, and installed plugins, browser fingerprinting creates a distinct profile — or "fingerprint"— that allows websites to recognize returning users without relying on cookies. Here’s a breakdown of its key steps: Data collection: When a user visits a website, their browser sends information, such as user-agent strings or metadata, to the website's servers. This data provides insights about their browser, device, and system. Fingerprint creation: The collected information is processed to generate a unique ID or fingerprint, representing the user's specific configuration. Tracking and analyzing: These fingerprints enable websites to track and analyze user behavior, detect anomalies, and identify users without relying on traditional tracking mechanisms like cookies. For organizations, employing technology that leverages such fingerprints adds an additional layer to identity verification, detecting discrepancies that may indicate fraud attempts. What are the different techniques? Not all browser fingerprinting methods are identical; varying approaches offer different strengths. The most common techniques used today include: Canvas fingerprinting: This method utilizes the "Canvas" element in HTML5. When a website sends a command to draw a hidden image on a user's device, the way the image is rendered reveals unique characteristics about the device's graphics hardware and software. Font fingerprinting: Font fingerprinting involves analyzing the fonts installed on a user's system. Since computers and browsers render text in slightly different ways based on their configurations, the resulting variations aid in identifying users. Plugin enumeration: Browsers and devices often come equipped with plugins or extensions like Flash or Java. Analyzing which plugins are installed, their versions, and their order helps websites build unique fingerprints. What are the benefits of browser fingerprinting? For organizations, browser fingerprinting is not just a technical marvel — it’s a strategic asset. Benefits include: Enhanced fraud detection: Browser fingerprinting detects inconsistencies within user accounts, flagging unauthorized logins, synthetic identity fraud, or account takeover fraud without introducing significant friction for legitimate users. By identifying patterns that deviate from the norm, organizations can better prepare for malicious activities. Learn more about addressing account takeover fraud. Supports multi-layered security: A single security measure often isn't enough to combat advanced fraudulent schemes. Browser fingerprinting pairs seamlessly with other fraud management tools, such as behavioral analytics and risk-based authentication, to provide robust security. See how behavioral analytics can help organizations spot and stop next-generation fraud bots. Seamless user experience: Unlike cookies or authentication codes, browser fingerprinting operates passively in the background. Users remain unaware of the process, ensuring their experience is unaffected while still maintaining security. Level up with Experian's fraud prevention tools Browser fingerprinting offers organizations a game-changing tool to secure online interactions. However, given the growing complexity of fraud threats, organizations will need additional layers of insights and protection. Experian offers integrated, AI-driven fraud prevention solutions tailor-made to tackle challenges in the digital space. By leveraging advanced technologies like browser fingerprinting alongside Experian’s solutions, organizations can safeguard their operations and uphold customer trust while maintaining a frictionless user experience. Learn more about our fraud prevention solutions This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.
We are squarely in the holiday shopping season. From the flurry of promotional emails to the endless shopping lists, there are many to-dos and even more opportunities for financial institutions at this time of year. The holiday shopping season is not just a peak period for consumer spending; it’s also a critical time for financial institutions to strategize, innovate, and drive value. According to the National Retail Federation, U.S. holiday retail sales are projected to approach $1 trillion in 2024, , and with an ever-evolving consumer behavior landscape, financial institutions need actionable strategies to stand out, secure loyalty, and drive growth during this period of heightened spending. Download our playbook: "How to prepare for the Holiday Shopping Season" Here’s how financial institutions can capitalize on the holiday shopping season, including key insights, actionable strategies, and data-backed trends. 1. Understand the holiday shopping landscape Key stats to consider: U.S. consumers spent $210 billion online during the 2022 holiday season, according to Adobe Analytics, marking a 3.5% increase from 2021. Experian data reveals that 31% of all holiday purchases in 2022 occurred in October, highlighting the extended shopping season. Cyber Week accounted for just 8% of total holiday spending, according to Experian’s Holiday Spending Trends and Insights Report, emphasizing the importance of a broad, season-long strategy. What this means for financial institutions: Timing is crucial. Your campaigns are already underway if you get an early start, and it’s critical to sustain them through December. Focus beyond Cyber Week. Develop long-term engagement strategies to capture spending throughout the season. 2. Leverage Gen Z’s growing spending power With an estimated $360 billion in disposable income, according to Bloomberg, Gen Z is a powerful force in the holiday market. This generation values personalized, seamless experiences and is highly active online. Strategies to capture Gen Z: Offer digital-first solutions that enhance the holiday shopping journey, such as interactive portals or AI-powered customer support. Provide loyalty incentives tailored to this demographic, like cash-back rewards or exclusive access to services. Learn more about Gen Z in our State of Gen Z Report. To learn more about all generations' projected consumer spending, read new insights from Experian here, including 45% of Gen X and 52% of Boomers expect their spending to remain consistent with last year. 3. Optimize pre-holiday strategies Portfolio Review: Assess consumer behavior trends and adjust risk models to align with changing economic conditions. Identify opportunities to engage dormant accounts or offer tailored credit lines to existing customers. Actionable tactics: Expand offerings. Position your products and services with promotional campaigns targeting high-value segments. Personalize experiences. Use advanced analytics to segment clients and craft offers that resonate with their holiday needs or anticipate their possible post-holiday needs. 4. Ensure top-of-mind awareness During the holiday shopping season, competition to be the “top of wallet” is fierce. Experian’s data shows that 58% of high spenders shop evenly across the season, while 31% of average spenders do most of their shopping in December. Strategies for success: Early engagement: Launch educational campaigns to empower credit education and identity protection during this period of increased transactions. Loyalty programs: Offer incentives, such as discounts or rewards, that encourage repeat engagement during the season. Omnichannel presence: Utilize digital, email, and event marketing to maintain visibility across platforms. 5. Combat fraud with multi-layered strategies The holiday shopping season sees an increase in fraud, with card testing being the number one attack vector in the U.S. according to Experian’s 2024 Identity and Fraud Study. Fraudulent activity such as identity theft and synthetic IDs can also escalate. Fight tomorrow’s fraud today: Identity verification: Use advanced fraud detection tools, like Experian’s Ascend Fraud Sandbox, to validate accounts in real-time. Monitor dormant accounts: Watch these accounts with caution and assess for potential fraud risk. Strengthen cybersecurity: Implement multi-layered strategies, including behavioral analytics and artificial intelligence (AI), to reduce vulnerabilities. 6. Post-holiday follow-up: retain and manage risk Once the holiday rush is over, the focus shifts to managing potential payment stress and fostering long-term relationships. Post-holiday strategies: Debt monitoring: Keep an eye on debt-to-income and debt-to-limit ratios to identify clients at risk of defaulting. Customer support: Offer tailored assistance programs for clients showing signs of financial stress, preserving goodwill and loyalty. Fraud checks: Watch for first-party fraud and unusual return patterns, which can spike in January. 7. Anticipate consumer trends in the New Year The aftermath of the holidays often reveals deeper insights into consumer health: Rising credit balances: January often sees an uptick in outstanding balances, highlighting the need for proactive credit management. Shifts in spending behavior: According to McKinsey, consumers are increasingly cautious post-holiday, favoring savings and value-based spending. What this means for financial institutions: Align with clients’ needs for financial flexibility. The holiday shopping season is a time that demands precise planning and execution. Financial institutions can maximize their impact during this critical period by starting early, leveraging advanced analytics, and maintaining a strong focus on fraud prevention. And remember, success in the holiday season extends beyond December. Building strong relationships and managing risk ensures a smooth transition into the new year, setting the stage for continued growth. Ready to optimize your strategy? Contact us for tailored recommendations during the holiday season and beyond. Download the Holiday Shopping Season Playbook
Despite being a decades-old technology, behavioral analytics is often still misunderstood. We’ve heard from fraud, identity, security, product, and risk professionals that exploring a behavior-based fraud solution brings up big questions, such as: What does behavioral analytics provide that I don’t get now? (Quick answer: a whole new signal and an earlier view of fraud) Why do I need to add even more data to my fraud stack? (Quick answer: it acts with your stack to add insights, not overload) How is this different from biometrics? (Quick answer: while biometrics track characteristics, behavioral analytics tracks distinct actions) These questions make sense — stopping fraud is complex, and, of course, you want to do your research to fully understand what ROI any tool will add. NeuroID, now part of Experian, is one of the only behavioral analytics-first businesses built specifically for stopping fraud. Our internal experts have been crafting behavioral-first solutions to detect everything from simple script fraud bots through to generative AI (genAI) attacks. We know how behavioral analytics works best within your fraud stack, and how to think strategically about using it to stop fraud rings, bot fraud, and other third-party fraud attacks. This primer will provide answers to the biggest questions we hear, so you can make the most informed decisions when exploring how our behavioral analytics solutions could work for you. Q1. What is behavioral analytics and how is it different from behavioral biometrics? A common mistake is to conflate behavioral analytics with behavioral biometrics. But biometrics rely on unique physical characteristics — like fingerprints or facial scans — used for automated recognition, such as unlocking your phone with Face ID. Biometrics connect a person’s data to their identity. But behavioral analytics? They don’t look at an identity. They look at behavior and predict risk. While biometrics track who a person is, behavioral analytics track what they do. For example, NeuroID’s behavioral analytics observes every time someone clicks in a box, edits a field, or hovers over a section. So, when a user’s actions suggest fraudulent intent, they can be directed to additional verification steps or fully denied. And if their actions suggest trustworthiness? They can be fast-tracked. Or, as a customer of ours put it: "Using NeuroID decisioning, we can confidently reject bad actors today who we used to take to step-up. We also have enough information on good applicants sooner, so we can fast-track them and say ‘go ahead and get your loan, we don’t need anything else from you.’ And customers really love that." - Mauro Jacome, Head of Data Science for Addi (read the full Addi case study here). The difference might seem subtle, but it’s important. New laws on biometrics have triggered profound implications for banks, businesses, and fraud prevention strategies. The laws introduce potential legal liabilities, increased compliance costs, and are part of a growing public backlash over privacy concerns. Behavioral signals, because they don’t tie behavior to identity, are often easier to introduce and don’t need the same level of regulatory scrutiny. The bottom line is that our behavioral analytics capabilities are unique from any other part of your fraud stack, full-stop. And it's because we don’t identify users, we identify intentions. Simply by tracking users’ behavior on your digital form, behavioral analytics powered by NeuroID tells you if a user is human or a bot; trustworthy or risky. It looks at each click, edit, keystroke, pause, and other tiny interactions to measure every users’ intention. By combining behavior with device and network intelligence, our solutions provide new visibility into fraudsters hiding behind perfect PII and suspicious devices. The result is reduced fraud costs, fewer API calls, and top-of-the-funnel fraud capture with no tuning or model integration on day one. With behavioral analytics, our customers can detect fraud attacks in minutes, instead of days. Our solutions have proven results of detecting up to 90% of fraud with 99% accuracy (or <1% false positive rate) with less than 3% of your population getting flagged. Q2. What does behavioral analytics provide that I don’t get now? Behavioral analytics provides a net-new signal that you can’t get from any other tools. One of our customers, Josh Eurom, Manager of Fraud for Aspiration Banking, described it this way: “You can quantify some things very easily: if bad domains are coming through you can identify and stop it. But if you see things look odd, yet you can’t set up controls, that’s where NeuroID behavioral analytics come in and captures the unseen fraud.” (read the full Aspiration story here) Adding yet another new technology with big promises may not feel urgent. But with genAI fueling synthetic identity fraud, next-gen fraud bots, and hyper-efficient fraud ring attacks, time is running out to modernize your stack. In addition, many fraud prevention tools today only focus on what PII is submitted — and PII is notoriously easy to fake. Only behavioral analytics looks at how the data is submitted. Behavioral analytics is a crucial signal for detecting even the most modern fraud techniques. Watch our webinar: The Fraud Bot Future-Shock: How to Spot and Stop Next-Gen Attacks Q3. Why do I need to add even more data to my fraud stack? Balancing fraud, friction, and financial impact has led to increasingly complex fraud stacks that often slow conversions and limit visibility. As fraudsters evolve, gaps grow between how quickly you can keep up with their new technology. Fraudsters have no budget constraints, compliance requirements, or approval processes holding them back from implementing new technology to attack your stack, so they have an inherent advantage. Many fraud teams we hear from are looking for ways to optimize their workflows without adding to the data noise, while balancing all the factors that a fraud stack influences beyond overall security (such as false positives and unnecessary friction). Behavioral analytics is a great way to work smarter with what you have. The signals add no friction to the onboarding process, are undetectable to your customers, and live on a pre-submit level, using data that is already captured by your existing application process. Without requiring any new inputs from your users or stepping into messy biometric legal gray areas, behavioral analytics aggregates, sorts, and reviews a broad range of cross-channel, historical, and current customer behaviors to develop clear, real-time portraits of transactional risks. By sitting top-of-funnel, behavioral analytics not only doesn’t add to the data noise, it actually clarifies the data you currently rely on by taking pressure off of your other tools. With these insights, you can make better fraud decisions, faster. Or, as Eurom put it: “Before NeuroID, we were not automatically denying applications. They were getting an IDV check and going into a manual review. But with NeuroID at the top of our funnel, we implemented automatic denial based on the risky signal, saving us additional API calls and reviews. And we’re capturing roughly four times more fraud. Having behavioral data to reinforce our decision-making is a relief.” The behavioral analytics difference Since the world has moved online, we’re missing the body language clues that used to tell us if someone was a fraudster. Behavioral analytics provides the digital body language differentiator. Behavioral cues — such as typing speed, hesitation, and mouse movements — highlight riskiness. The cause of that risk could be bots, stolen information, fraud rings, synthetic identities, or any combination of third-party fraud attack strategies. Behavioral analytics gives you insights to distinguish between genuine applicants and potentially fraudulent ones without disrupting your customer’s journey. By interpreting behavioral patterns at the very top of the onboarding funnel, behavior helps you proactively mitigate fraud, reduce false positives, and streamline onboarding, so you can lock out fraudsters and let in legitimate users. This is all from data you already capture, simply tracking interactions on your site. Stop fraud, faster: 5 simple uses where behavioral analytics shine While how you approach a behavioral analytics integration will vary based on numerous factors, here are some of the immediate, common use cases of behavioral analytics. Detecting fraud bots and fraud rings Behavioral analytics can identify fraud bots by their frameworks, such as Puppeter or Stealth, and through their behavioral patterns, so you can protect against even the most sophisticated fourth-generation bots. NeuroID provides holistic coverage for bot and fraud ring detection — passively and with no customer friction, often eliminating the need for CAPTCHA and reCAPTCHA. With this data alone, you could potentially blacklist suspected fraud bot and fraud ring attacks at the top of the fraud prevention funnel, avoiding extra API calls. Sussing out scams and coercions When users make account changes or transactions under coercion, they often show unfamiliarity with the destination account or shipping address entered. Our real-time assessment detects these risk indicators, including hesitancy, multiple corrections, and slow typing, alerting you in real-time to look closer. Stopping use of compromised cards and stolen IDs Traditional PII methods can fall short against today’s sophisticated synthetic identity fraud. Behavioral analytics uncovers synthetic identities by evaluating how PII is entered, instead of relying on PII itself (which is often corrupted). For example, our behavioral signals can assess users’ familiarity with the billing address they’re entering for a credit card or bank account. Genuine account holders will show strong familiarity, while signs of unfamiliarity are indicators of an account under attack. Detecting money mules Our behavioral analytics solutions track how familiar users are with the addresses they enter, conducting a real-time, sub-millisecond familiarity assessment. Risk markers such as hesitancy, multiple corrections, slow typing speed raise flags for further exploration. Stopping promotion and discount abuse Our behavioral analytics identifies risky versus trustworthy users in promo and discount fields. By assessing behavior, device, and network risk, we help you determine if your promotions attract more risky than trustworthy users, preventing fraudsters from abusing discounts. Learn more about our behavioral analytics solutions. Learn more Watch webinar
With cyber threats intensifying and data breaches rising, understanding how to respond to incidents is more important than ever. In this interview, Michael Bruemmer, Head of Global Data Breach Resolution at Experian, is joined by Matthew Meade, Chair of the Cybersecurity, Data Protection & Privacy Group at Eckert Seamans, to discuss the realities of data breach response. Their session, “Cyber Incident Response: A View from the Trenches,” brings insights from the field and offers a preview of Experian's 2025 Data Breach Industry Forecast, including the role of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in data breaches. From the surge in business email compromises (BEC) to the relentless threat of ransomware, Bruemmer and Meade dive into key issues facing organizations big and small today. Drawing from Experian's experience handling nearly 5,000 breaches this year, Bruemmer sheds light on effective response practices and reveals common pitfalls. Meade, who served as editor-in-chief for the Sedona Conference’s new Model Data Breach Notification Law, explains the implications of these regulatory updates for organizations and highlights how standardized notification practices can improve outcomes. Bruemmer and Meade’s insights offer a proactive guide to tackling tomorrow’s cyber threats, making it a must-listen for anyone aiming to stay one step ahead. Listen to the full interview for a valuable look at both the current landscape and what's next. Click here for more insight into safeguarding your organization from emerging cyber threats.
As online accounts become essential for activities ranging from shopping and social media to banking, "account farming" has emerged as a significant fraud risk. This practice involves creating fake or unauthorized accounts en masse, often for malicious purposes. Understanding how account farming works, why it’s done and how businesses can protect themselves is crucial for maintaining data integrity, safeguarding customer trust and protecting your bottom line. How does account farming work? Account farming is the process of creating and cultivating multiple user accounts, often using fake or stolen identities. These accounts may look like legitimate users, but they’re controlled by a single entity or organization, usually with fraudulent intent. Here’s a breakdown of the typical steps involved in account farming: Identity generation: Account farmers start by obtaining either fake or stolen personal information. They may buy these datasets on the dark web or scrape publicly available information to make each account seem legitimate. Account creation: Using bots or manual processes, fraudsters create numerous accounts on a platform. Often, they’ll employ automated tools to expedite this process, bypassing CAPTCHA or reCAPTCHA systems or using proxy servers to mask their IP addresses and avoid detection. Warm-up phase: After initial creation, account farmers often let the accounts sit for a while, engaging in limited, non-suspicious activity to avoid triggering security alerts. This “warming up” process helps the accounts seem more authentic. Activation for fraudulent activity: Once these accounts reach a level of credibility, they’re activated for the intended purpose. This might include spamming, fraud, phishing, fake reviews or promotional manipulation. Why is account farming done? There are several reasons account farming has become a widespread problem across different industries. Here are some common motivations: Monetary gain: Fraudsters use farmed accounts to commit fraudulent transactions, like applying for loans and credit products, accessing promotional incentives or exploiting referral programs. Spam and phishing: Fake accounts enable widespread spam campaigns or phishing attacks, compromising customer data and damaging brand reputation. Data theft: By creating and controlling multiple accounts, fraudsters may access sensitive data, leading to further exploitation or resale on the dark web. Manipulating metrics and market perception: Some industries use account farming to boost visibility and credibility falsely. For example, on social media, fake accounts can be used to inflate follower counts or engagement metrics. In e-commerce, fraudsters may create fake accounts to leave fake reviews or upvote products, falsely boosting perceived popularity and manipulating purchasing decisions. How does account farming lead to fraud risks? Account farming is a serious problem that can expose businesses and their customers to a variety of risks: Financial loss: Fake accounts created to exploit promotional offers or referral programs can cause victims to experience significant financial losses. Additionally, businesses can incur costs from chargebacks or fraudulent refunds triggered by these accounts. Compromised customer experience: Legitimate customers may suffer from poor experiences, such as spam messages, unsolicited emails or fraudulent interactions. This leads to diminished brand trust, which is costly to regain. Data breaches and compliance risks: Account farming often relies on stolen data, increasing the risk of data breaches. Businesses subject to regulations like GDPR or CCPA may face hefty fines if they fail to protect consumer information adequately. READ MORE: Our Data Breach Industry Forecast predicts what’s in store for the coming year. How can businesses protect themselves from account farming fraud? As account farming tactics evolve, businesses need a proactive and sophisticated approach to detect and prevent these fraudulent activities. Experian’s fraud risk management solutions provide multilayered and customizable solutions to help companies safeguard themselves against account farming and other types of fraud. Here’s how we can help: Identity verification solutions: Experian’s fraud risk and identity verification platform integrates multiple verification methods to confirm the authenticity of user identities. Through real-time data validation, businesses can verify the legitimacy of user information provided at the account creation stage, detecting and blocking fake identities early in the process. Its flexible architecture allows companies to adapt their identity verification process as new fraud patterns emerge, helping them stay one step ahead of account farmers. Behavioral analytics: One effective way to identify account farming is to analyze user behavior for patterns consistent with automated or scripted actions (AKA “bots”). Experian’s behavioral analytics solutions, powered by NeuroID, use advanced machine learning algorithms to identify unusual behavioral trends among accounts. By monitoring how users interact with a platform, we can detect patterns common in farmed accounts, like uniform interactions or repetitive actions that don’t align with human behavior. Device intelligence: To prevent account farming fraud, it’s essential to go beyond user data and examine the devices used to create and access accounts. Experian’s solutions combine device intelligence with identity verification to flag suspicious devices associated with multiple accounts. For example, account farmers often use virtual machines, proxies or emulators to create accounts without revealing their actual location or device details. By identifying and flagging these high-risk devices, we help prevent fraudulent accounts from slipping through the cracks. Velocity checks: Velocity checks are another way to block fraudulent account creation. By monitoring the frequency and speed at which new accounts are created from specific IP addresses or devices, Experian’s fraud prevention solutions can identify spikes indicative of account farming. These velocity checks work in real-time, enabling businesses to act immediately to block suspicious activity and minimize the risk of fake account creation. Continuous monitoring and risk scoring: Even after initial account creation, continuous monitoring of user activity helps to identify accounts that may have initially bypassed detection but later engage in suspicious behavior. Experian’s risk scoring system assigns a fraud risk score to each account based on its behavior over time, alerting businesses to potential threats before they escalate. Final thoughts: Staying ahead of account farming fraud Preventing account farming is about more than just blocking bots — it’s about safeguarding your business and its customers against fraud risk. By understanding the mechanics of account farming and using a multi-layered approach to fraud detection and identity verification, businesses can protect themselves effectively. Ready to take a proactive stance against account farming and other evolving fraud tactics? Explore our comprehensive solutions today. Learn More This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information.
The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly transforming the landscape of real estate fraud, enabling criminals to execute complex schemes like deed theft with greater ease. A notable case involves Spelling Manor, a $137.5 million mansion in Los Angeles, where the owner alleges they are entangled in deed fraud. Scammers reportedly filed fraudulent documents that have prevented the owner from selling the estate, thwarting offers from buyers, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Understanding deed/title fraud Deed fraud, also known as title or property fraud, occurs when someone illegally transfers ownership of a property without the owner’s knowledge or consent. Typically, fraudsters create fake documents or forge the owner’s signature on a deed to make it look like the property has been legally transferred to them. Once the title is in their name, they may try to sell or mortgage the property, leaving the original owner unaware until it’s too late. How deed fraud works Identify a target: Fraudsters often look for properties that appear vulnerable, such as vacant land, unoccupied homes, or properties owned by elderly individuals who may not check their records frequently. Forge documentation: Using fake IDs and forged signatures, scammers create documents that appear to show a legitimate transfer of ownership. With modern technology, these documents can look highly convincing. Record the fake deed: Fraudsters then file these documents with the local county clerk or recorder’s office. This officially changes the ownership records, making it seem as if the scammer is the legitimate owner. Exploit the ownership: Once listed as the owner, the fraudster may sell the property to an unsuspecting buyer, take out loans against it, or even rent it out. The impact on victims In the summer of 2024, Elvis Presley’s family got confronted to a forged deed scam. A fake firm, Naussany Investments, falsely claimed Lisa Marie Presley owed millions and used Graceland as collateral. They placed a foreclosure notice and attempted to auction the estate. Riley Keough filed a lawsuit, exposing the firm as fraudulent and halting the foreclosure through a judge’s injunction. Lisa Jeanine Findley, who forged documents and posed as firm employees, was arrested and charged with deed forgery fraud and identity theft. She faces up to 22 years in prison if convicted. The FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center does not specifically monitor deed fraud. However, in 2023, it processed a total of 9,521 real estate-related complaints defined as the loss of funds from a real estate investment, resulting in more than $145 million in losses. Victims of deed fraud can face severe financial and legal issues. They may discover the fraud only when trying to sell, refinance, or even pay taxes on the property. Reversing deed fraud typically requires a costly and time-consuming legal process, as courts must determine that the transfer was fraudulent and restore the original owner’s rights. Prevention and safeguards There are several preventive measures and fraud prevention solutions that can be established to help mitigate the risks associated with deed/title fraud. These include: For lending institutions: Enhanced ID verification: Implement multi-factor identity checks at the loan approval stage. Regular portfolio audits: Conduct periodic audits to detect unusual property transfers and title changes in their loan portfolios. For title companies: AI-driven document verification tools: Use machine learning algorithms to identify inconsistencies in deed and ownership documents. Real-time fraud monitoring: Employ analytics to track suspicious behavior patterns, such as rapid ownership changes. Seller authentication: Require biometric or multi-step identity verification for anyone claiming ownership or initiating sales. For realtors: Training and awareness: Educate realtors on how to spot warning signs of fraudulent listings and seller impersonations. Pre-transaction verification: Collaborate with title companies to validate ownership early in the listing process. Acting with the right solution Mortgage fraud is a constant threat that demands ongoing vigilance and adaptability. As fraudsters evolve their tactics, the mortgage industry must stay one step ahead to safeguard homeowners and lenders alike. With concerns over deed/title-related fraud rising, it is vital to raise awareness, strengthen preventive measures, and foster collaboration to protect the integrity of the mortgage market. By staying informed and implementing robust safeguards, we can collectively combat and prevent mortgage fraud from disrupting the financial security of individuals and the industry. Experian mortgage powers advanced capabilities across the mortgage lifecycle by gaining market intelligence, enhancing customer experience to remove friction and tapping into industry leading data sources to gain a complete view of borrower behavior. Visit our website to see how these solutions can help your business prevent deed fraud. Learn more