Credential Stuffing Prevention: How Experian’s Behavioral Analytics Solutions Can Help

by Laura Burrows 5 min read December 18, 2024

In today’s digital landscape, where data breaches and cyberattacks are rampant, businesses face increasing security challenges. One of the most prevalent threats is credential stuffing—a cyberattack in which malicious actors use stolen username and password combinations to gain unauthorized access to user accounts. As more personal and financial data gets leaked or sold on the dark web, these attacks become more sophisticated, and the consequences for businesses and consumers alike can be devastating.

But there are ways to proactively fight credential stuffing attacks and protect your organization and customers. Solutions like our identity protection services and behavioral analytics capabilities powered by NeuroID, a part of Experian, are helping businesses prevent fraud and ensure a safer user experience.

What is credential stuffing?

Credential stuffing is based on the simple premise that many people reuse the same login credentials across multiple sites and platforms. Once cybercriminals can access a data breach, they can try these stolen usernames and passwords across many other sites, hoping that users have reused the same credentials elsewhere.

This form of attack is highly automated, leveraging botnets to test vast numbers of combinations in a short amount of time. If an attacker succeeds, they can steal sensitive information, access financial accounts, or carry out fraudulent activities.

While these attacks are not new, they have become more effective with the proliferation of stolen data from breaches and the increased use of automated tools. Traditional security methods—such as requiring complex passwords or multi-factor authentication (MFA)—are useful but not enough to prevent credential stuffing fully.

How we can help protect against credential stuffing

We offer comprehensive fraud prevention tools and multi-factor authentication solutions to help you identify and mitigate credential stuffing threats.

We use advanced identity verification and fraud detection technology to help businesses assess and authenticate user identities in real-time. Our platform integrates with existing authentication and risk management solutions to provide layered protection against credential stuffing, phishing attacks, and other forms of identity-based fraud.

Another key element in our offering is behavioral analytics, which goes beyond traditional methods of fraud detection by focusing on users’ data entry patterns and interactions.

NeuroID and Experian partner to combat credential stuffing

We recently acquired NeuroID, a company specializing in behavioral analytics for fraud detection, to take the Experian digital identity and fraud platform to the next level. 

Advanced behavioral analytics is a game-changer for preventing credential-stuffing attacks. While biometrics track characteristics, behavioral analytics track distinct actions. For example, with behavioral analytics, every time a person inputs information, clicks in a box, edits a field, and even hovers over something before clicking on it or adding the information to it, those actions are tracked. However, unlike biometrics, this data isn’t used to connect to a single identity. Instead, it’s information businesses can use to learn more about the experience and the intentions of someone on the site.

NeuroID and Experian’s paired fraud detection capabilities offer several distinct advantages in preventing credential stuffing attacks:

  1. Real-time threat detection: Analyze thousands of behavioral signals in real-time to detect user behavior that suggests bots, fraud rings, credential stuffing attempts, or any number of other cybercriminal attack strategies.
  2. Fraud risk scoring: Based on behavioral patterns, assign a fraud risk score to each user session. High-risk sessions can trigger additional authentication steps, such as CAPTCHA or step-up authentication, helping to stop credential stuffing before it occurs.
  3. Invisible to the user: Unlike traditional authentication methods, behavioral analytics work seamlessly in the background. Users do not need to take extra steps—such as answering additional security questions or entering one-time passwords.
  4. Adaptive and self-learning: As users interact with your website or app, our system continuously adapts to their unique behavior patterns. Over time, the system becomes even more effective at distinguishing between legitimate and malicious users without collecting any personally identifiable information (PII).

Why behavioral data is critical in combating credential stuffing

Credential stuffing attacks rely on the ability to mimic legitimate login attempts using stolen credentials. Behavioral analytics, however, can spot the subtle differences between human and bot behavior, even if the attacker has the correct credentials. By integrating behavioral analytics, you can:

  • Prevent automated attacks: Bots often interact with websites in unnatural ways—speeding through form fields, using erratic mouse movements, or attempting logins from unusual or spoofed geographic locations. Behavioral analytics can flag these behaviors before an account is compromised.
  • Detect account takeovers early: If a legitimate user’s account is taken over, behavioral analytics can detect the change in interactions. By monitoring behavior, businesses can detect account takeover attempts much earlier than traditional methods.
  • Lower false positive rates: Traditional fraud prevention tools often rely on rigid rule-based systems that can block legitimate users, especially if their login patterns slightly differ from the norm. On the other hand, behavioral analytics analyzes a user’s real-time behavioral data without relying on traditional static data such as passwords or personal information. This minimizes unnecessary flags on legitimate customers (while still detecting suspicious activity).
  • Improve customer experience: Since behavioral analytics is invisible to users and requires no extra friction (like answering security questions), the login and transaction verification process is much smoother. Customers are not inconvenienced, and businesses can reduce the risk of fraud without annoying their users.

The future of credential stuffing prevention

Credential stuffing is a growing threat in today’s interconnected world, but with the right solutions, businesses can significantly reduce the risk of these attacks. By integrating our fraud prevention technologies and behavioral analytics capabilities, you can stay ahead of the curve in securing user identities and preventing unauthorized access.

The key benefits of combining traditional identity verification methods with behavioral analytics are higher detection rates, reduced friction for legitimate users, and an enhanced user experience overall. In an era of increasingly sophisticated cybercrime, using data-driven behavioral insights to detect user riskiness is no longer just a luxury—it’s a necessity.

Related Posts

How Consumer Vehicle Choices Are Shaping Automotive Loan Trends

Conversations about rising auto loan balances and higher monthly payments has often centered around increasing vehicle prices and elevated interest rates; and while those factors have undoubtedly played a role, another important piece of the puzzle is the type of vehicles consumers are choosing to purchase. According to Experian’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026, consumers are continuing to opt for SUVs over other vehicle types, a trend that may be contributing to higher average loan amounts and monthly payments. SUVs accounted for 63.5% of all new retail vehicle registrations over the last 12 months, up from 62.8% a year ago. Additionally, more than 117 million SUVs were in operation across the United States in the first quarter of 2026, making up 42.2% of the market share. At the same time, traditional passenger cars continue to fall in share, coming in at 16.5%, a decrease from 18.4% last year. As consumers increasingly gravitate towards the larger vehicle segment, it reflects the ongoing desire for versatility, cargo capacity, and family-friendly functionality. Electrification’s growing role in consumer purchasing behavior Interestingly, electrified SUVs continue to gain traction, representing 27.7% of all new SUV registrations, these vehicles include battery-electric, hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and other alternative fuel types. Diving a bit deeper, the Tesla Model Y was the market share leader for new, retail electrified SUV registrations in the last 12 months, coming in at 15.8%. Rounding out the top five were Honda CR-V (9.6%), Toyota RAV4 (7.2%), Chevrolet Trax (7.2%), and Toyota Grand Highlander (3.4%). As model availability and familiarity with the electrification segment grows, the broader adoption of these vehicles are playing an increasingly important role in vehicle pricing and overall consumer demand. While average loan amounts and monthly payments are being driven by a combination of factors such as financing costs and consumer purchasing behavior, data in Q1 2026 demonstrates the continued interest in SUVs. This suggests that the industry’s shift toward larger vehicles is likely playing a meaningful role in today’s financing environment. To learn more about SUV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026 presentation.

Published: June 17, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch
When New Data Impacts MBS Pricing: Student Loan Debt

In our previous post, we described the Current Second Lien Balance field, which is one of over 2,000 fields in the new Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset. We showed that the Current Second Lien Balance field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery: New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data). Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe. Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions. In this article, we discuss another field that satisfies the above criteria: Student Loan Balance.  We evaluate this field in the context of these criteria. First, however, we provide a summary of the MLP dataset and how it compares to standard GSE loan-level data available today. Standard GSE Data vs. Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) Data The MLP dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance, filed junior liens, and AVM values).  MLP differs from loan-level data provided byFreddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae, which the vast majority of market participants solely rely on, in a number of ways: Standard data provided by the GSEs and GNMA does not contain all the information necessary for accurate forecasting of mortgage prepayment and credit performance. Basic, critical fields like borrower’s current credit score and current junior liens on the property are missing. The new Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset from Experian contains borrower, loan, and property data fields covering the entire mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), both securitized and non-securitized. MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle. New, Material and Significant Field:  Student Loan Debt MLP contains a number of fields describing each mortgage borrower’s student debt load, including amounts in repayment, forbearance and collections; estimated interest rate, time remaining until forbearance expiration, and more. In the interest of simplicity, for this article we’ll focus on a single student loan-related field within MLP: Student Loans Balance, which is defined as the total balance on open non-deferred student trades reported in the last 3 months. Is Information Regarding Student Loans New to Markets? Standard loan-level data disclosed by the GSEs and GNMA contain no student-loan-specific fields. Theoretically, fields related to DTI at origination might capture some aspect of student loan debt. So, in the best case scenario for an investor relying solely on standard disclosure, a DTI value as of origination is provided -- yet is never updated as the loan seasons and the borrower’s debt and income change (see more here).  But in the case of federal student loan debt attached to mortgages originated from early 2020 to late 2023, the level of detail provided by disclosure may be even more unknown due to COVID-era repayment and reporting moratoriums. The student loan repayment moratorium was a temporary federal policy that paused required payments, set interest rates to 0%, and suspended collections on most federally-held student loans. The moratorium began in March 2020, with payments resuming in October 2023, making it approximately 3.5 years in duration—the longest consumer credit payment pause in U.S. history. (Source: NCUA ) During the moratorium, student loan-related debt loads may have been understated as federal loans were in a temporary state of $0 repayment.  As an alternative to leaving student loan debt completely out of DTI calculations, an imputed payment equal to only 0.50% of the outstanding balance was often used as a placeholder for a borrower’s DTI calculation. As a result, mortgages originated during the moratorium may have artificially low reported DTIs for borrowers with student loan debt, materially understating true post-moratorium debt .  Accordingly, prepayment risk for these loans is likely overstated in mainstream market models. Standard data only reports information related to the primary mortgage and does not include any details on the borrower’s other debts with the exception of DTI at origination, which is never updated throughout the life of the loan. In contrast, MLP provides a comprehensive view of the borrower’s full credit profile, including other obligations such as credit cards, mortgages on other properties, student loan balances, and much more. Is Student Loan debt material to the residential mortgage market? Approximately $11 trillion of residential mortgage loans were originated during the student loan payment moratorium (Source: Experian MLP Dataset), a period marked by historically low mortgage rates during the COVID era.  As discussed above, DTI data contained in standard market disclosure may be particularly inaccurate for these loans. As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, a new report from the Federal Reserve of New York shows a rise in student loan default rates by age group.  Student l Of today’s $13 trillion in outstanding mortgage debt, more than 10% of that debt ($1.5 trillion) is associated with borrowers who carry student loan debt.  For these borrowers, the average amount of student loan debt outstanding is approximately $50,000, versus a mortgage balance of approximately ~$289,000. In other words, the average student loan debt balance is almost 20% of the mortgage balance for the average borrower who carries both. For this set of borrowers, the average monthly payment is approximately $400 for student loan vs. approximately $2,200 for 1st lien mortgage—so that monthly student loan payments are a significant debt load, approximately 20% of the monthly mortgage payment.  (Source:  Experian MLP Dataset) Is the effect of student loan debt a significant driver of performance? Figure 1 illustrates prepayments by student loan balance for a sample of loans drawn from MLP. The chart illustrates that borrowers with larger student loan balances prepay much more slowly, likely because some are effectively locked out of refinancing once student loan payments resume due to elevated DTI. The debt-to-income (DTI) ratio calculated using actual student loan payments may be significantly higher than the DTI calculated during the moratorium, in some cases exceeding GSE eligibility thresholds. As illustrated in Figure 1, for in-the-money (ITM) collateral, the differential between loans with material student loan balances (greater than $200,000) and loans with no student debt can reach up to 5 CPR. Notably, even for out-of-the-money (OTM) collateral, loans with student debt prepay 1 to 3 CPR slower, likely reflecting reduced mobility due to tighter financing constraints when purchasing a new home. Pools with otherwise similar prepayment characteristics may exhibit different prepayment behavior depending on the distribution of student loan exposure within their collateral. In addition, because loans with student debt tend to prepay more slowly, this effect increases over time due to burnout: loans without student debt prepay and exit the pools more quickly, leaving a higher concentration of slower-paying loans behind.  Given that 10% of the $13 trillion outstanding mortgage market is associated with borrowers who have student loans (Source:  Experian MLP dataset)—and that student loans have a meaningful impact on prepayments—many pools issued between March 2020 and October 2023 may be subject to this student loan debt CPR throttle, and therefore mispriced by investors relying exclusively on standard market data. Fig 1. Prepayment S-Curve: Student Loans Balance Source:  Experian MLP dataset hosted on IVolatility Data-Driven Platform   _____________________________________________________ Michael Pyatski advises MBS traders, portfolio managers, quants, risk managers, loan originators, and technology professionals on making informed, data-driven business decisions that drive revenue growth, enhance risk management, and reduce trading costs. With more than 15 years of experience as an Agency RMBS trader—including serving as Head of the Proprietary Trading Desk at BNP Paribas—Michael developed and successfully implemented relative-value, data-driven profitable trading strategies to capture market opportunities embedded in data but not fully priced by the market. His trading experience, combined with a Ph.D. in econometrics, led him to found the Data-Driven Portal (https://datadrivenportal.com/), a platform that provides advanced technology for MBS trading and risk management. The platform’s No-Model Data-Driven technology leverages big data, econometric analysis, and AI to help traders identify relative-value opportunities in RMBS markets and generate above-market, risk-adjusted returns. _____________________________________________________

Published: June 17, 2026 by Perry DeFelice
Empowering merchants to reduce first-party fraud and chargebacks

Reduce first-party fraud and chargebacks with data-driven strategies that help merchants prevent disputes, protect revenue and improve customer trust.

Published: June 15, 2026 by Charles Hunter

Subscribe to our thought leadership

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our thought leadership

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe