Mitigating Identity Fraud Using a Fraud Risk Assessment

by Guest Contributor 6 min read January 13, 2025

With the rise of digital interactions, identity fraud has become an unassuming threat that impacts individuals, businesses, and institutions worldwide. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), 5.4 million consumer reports regarding fraud and consumer protection were filed in 2023. Identity fraud, which is characterized as when an individual’s personal information is stolen and used without their consent for fraudulent purposes, has devastating consequences for consumers, including financial losses, damaged credit scores, legal issues, and emotional distress.

Financial institutions face damaging consequences beyond financial losses, including reputational damage, operational disruption, and regulatory scrutiny. As technology advances, so do fraudsters’ tactics, making it increasingly challenging to detect and prevent identity-related crimes. So, what are financial institutions to do? Industry-leading institutions apply a layered approach to solving fraud that starts with a fraud risk assessment.

What is a fraud risk assessment?

When opening a new account, banks typically conduct a fraud risk assessment to verify the identity of the individual or entity applying for the account and to assess the likelihood of fraudulent activity. Banks also assess the applicant’s credit history, financial background, and transaction patterns to identify red flags or suspicious activity. Advanced fraud detection tools and technologies are employed to monitor account opening activities in real-time and detect signs of fraudulent behavior. This assessment is crucial for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, mitigating the risk of financial loss, and safeguarding against identity theft.

Understanding the importance of fraud risk assessments

A fraud risk assessment is crucial for banks during account opening as it helps verify the identity of applicants and mitigate the risk of fraudulent activity. By assessing the likelihood and potential impact of identity fraud, banks can implement measures to protect customers’ assets and protect against losses in their portfolio. Additionally, conducting thorough risk assessments enables banks to comply with regulatory requirements, which mandate the verification of customer identities to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. By adhering to these regulations and implementing effective fraud detection measures, banks can enhance trust and confidence among customers, regulators, and stakeholders, reinforcing the integrity and stability of the financial system.

10 tools to consider when building an effective fraud risk assessment

Several key factors should be carefully considered in an identity fraud risk assessment to ensure thorough evaluation and effective mitigation of identity fraud risks. Financial institutions should consider emerging threats and trends such as synthetic identity fraud, account takeover attacks, and social engineering scams when conducting a risk assessment. By staying abreast of evolving tactics used by fraudsters, organizations can proactively adapt their fraud prevention strategies and controls.

Here are 10 tools that can help catch red flags for fraud prevention:

  1. Identity verification: Identity verification is the first line of defense against identity theft, account takeover, and other fraudulent activities. By verifying the identities of individuals before granting access to services or accounts, organizations can ensure that only legitimate users are granted access. Effective identity verification methods, such as biometric authentication, document verification, and knowledge-based authentication, help mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Implementing robust identity verification measures protects organizations from financial losses and reputational damage and enhances trust and confidence among customers and stakeholders.
  2. Device intelligence: Device intelligence provides insights into the devices used in online transactions, enabling organizations to identify and mitigate fraudulent activities. Organizations can detect suspicious behavior indicative of fraudulent activity by analyzing device-related data such as IP addresses, geolocation, device fingerprints, and behavioral patterns. Device intelligence allows organizations to differentiate between legitimate users and fraudsters, enabling them to implement appropriate security measures, such as device authentication or transaction monitoring.
  3. Phone data: Phone and Mobile Network Operator (MNO) data offers valuable insights into the mobile devices and phone numbers used in transactions. By analyzing MNO data such as subscriber information, call records, and location data, organizations can verify the authenticity of users and detect suspicious activities. MNO data enables organizations to confirm the legitimacy of phone numbers, detect SIM swapping or account takeover attempts, and identify fraudulent transactions. Leveraging MNO data allows organizations to strengthen their fraud prevention measures, enhance customer authentication processes, and effectively mitigate the risk of fraudulent activities in an increasingly mobile-driven environment.
  4. Email attributes: Email addresses serve as a primary identifier and communication channel for users in digital transactions. Organizations can authenticate user identities, confirm account ownership, and detect suspicious activities such as phishing attempts or identity theft by verifying email addresses. Analyzing email addresses enables organizations to identify patterns of fraudulent behavior, block unauthorized access attempts, and enhance security measures. Furthermore, email address validation helps prevent fraudulent transactions, safeguard sensitive information, and protect against financial losses and reputational damage. Leveraging email addresses as part of fraud prevention strategies enhances trustworthiness in digital interactions.
  5. Address verification: Address verification provides essential information for authenticating user identities and detecting suspicious activities. By verifying addresses, organizations can confirm the legitimacy of user accounts, prevent identity theft, and detect fraudulent transactions. Address validation enables organizations to ensure that the provided address matches the user’s identity and reduces the risk of fraudulent activities such as account takeover or shipping fraud.
  6. Behavioral analytics: Behavioral analytics enables organizations to detect anomalies and patterns indicative of fraudulent activity. By analyzing user behavior, such as transaction history, navigation patterns, and interaction frequency, organizations can identify deviations from normal behavior and flag suspicious activities for further investigation. Behavioral analytics allows organizations to create profiles of typical user behavior and detect deviations that may signal fraud, such as unusual login times or transaction amounts.
  7. Consortia: Consortia facilitate collaboration and information sharing among organizations to combat fraudulent activities collectively. By joining forces through consortia, organizations can leverage shared data, insights, and resources to more effectively identify emerging fraud trends, patterns, and threats. Consortia enables participating organizations to benefit from a broader and more comprehensive view of fraudulent activities, enhancing their ability to detect and prevent fraud.
  8. Risk engines: Risk engines enable real-time analysis of transaction data and user behavior to detect and mitigate fraudulent activities. By leveraging advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques, risk engines assess the risk associated with each transaction and user interaction, flagging suspicious activities for further investigation or intervention. Risk engines help organizations identify anomalies, patterns, and trends indicative of fraudulent behavior, allowing for timely detection and prevention of fraud. Additionally, risk engines can adapt and evolve over time to stay ahead of emerging threats, enhancing their effectiveness in mitigating fraud.
  9. Orchestration streamlines and coordinates the various components of a fraud detection and prevention strategy. By orchestrating different fraud prevention tools, technologies, and processes, organizations can optimize their efforts to combat fraud effectively. Orchestration allows for seamless integration and automation of workflows, enabling real-time data analysis and rapid response to emerging threats.
  10. Step-up authentication: Step-up authentication provides an additional layer of security to verify users’ identities during high-risk transactions or suspicious activities. By requiring users to provide additional credentials or undergo further authentication steps, such as biometric verification or one-time passcodes, organizations can mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Step-up authentication allows organizations to dynamically adjust security measures based on the perceived risk level, ensuring that stronger authentication methods are employed when necessary.

By layering these tools effectively businesses remove gaps that fraudsters would typically exploit.

Related Posts

How Terrace Finance Uses NeuroID to Respond to Fraud Faster and Smarter

Learn how Terrace Finance used NeuroID behavioral analytics to detect fraud faster, respond to attacks, and strengthen risk management.

Published: June 29, 2026 by Scarlet.Nickel@experian.com
Ask the Expert: A Closer Look at Modern Lending with Jeff Hops and Erin Haselkorn

In this first episode of Ask the Expert, Experian's Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product, and Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director of Analyst Relations, explore how broader data and new signals can help lenders better understand today’s consumers, while maintaining responsible decisioning. Lending is changing  Interest rates, regulation, embedded finance and AI are reshaping the lending landscape. Consumer behavior is evolving just as quickly. But the core job hasn’t changed. Lenders are still making decisions about people they don’t fully know, and that makes data more important than ever. "There are periods where nothing changes, and periods where it seems like everything changes. We’re in the latter … but the core premise hasn’t changed. You’re still trying to lend to somebody you don’t know."Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product To make those decisions with confidence, lenders need a strong foundation of identity, history and reliable signals. In a period of rapid change, the quality and completeness of that data become even more critical. A more complex view of today’s consumer What has changed is the consumer. Traditional credit data is foundational but can be further enhanced with visibility on how people earn, manage and move money. Income may come from multiple sources, and financial activity often spans bank accounts, applications (apps) and digital channels. Cash flow data, for example, can provide a clearer view of what’s actually coming into a consumer’s account, beyond what traditional records may show.These additional signals can help lenders better understand: Income variability across multiple earning sources Current financial behavior through cash flow activity Digital and identity-linked activity across channels These signals don’t replace traditional data; they expand it. The result is a more complete and current view of the consumer. From exploration to real-world application The conversation around broader data signals has moved beyond theory. Lenders are no longer just asking whether these signals are useful. They’re asking where, how and under what governance they can be applied across the lending lifecycle. Lenders are actively researching, testing and implementing new data sources across the lending lifecycle. What was once experimental is now operational. Institutions are progressing through a clear path: Research Understanding available signals and use cases Testing Evaluating performance in controlled environments Implementation Applying insights in production Today, alternative data is being used in areas like analytics, channel scoring and decisioning, often within governed environments that allow for safe testing and validation. AI may accelerate this shift by helping institutions identify patterns at scale, but its value depends on the strength of the underlying data: quality, governance, context and clear business use cases. More signal, more responsibility As data availability expands, lenders have access to more granular insights than ever before. That creates opportunity, but also responsibility. The institutions that lead won’t be the ones that use the most data. They’ll be the ones that know which signals to use, how to validate them and how to apply them in ways that are fair, explainable and aligned to consumer outcomes. “Institutions can unlock more granular and powerful decisions, but they have to do it responsibly.”Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director, Analyst Relations The future of lending will be shaped not just by how much data is available, but by how thoughtfully it’s applied. Keeping the consumer at the center of decisioning is essential to building trust and long-term success. Explore alternative data with us A more complete understanding of today’s consumers starts with better data. We help lenders responsibly incorporate broader data signals and advanced analytics into decisioning strategies, enhancing visibility into today’s consumers while strengthening risk assessment and expanding access to credit. Let’s work together to build more confident, more responsible lending decisions. Learn more Contact us About our experts Jeff Hops Senior Director, Data Platform and Product, Experian Jeff Hops is a Senior Director in Experian’s Financial Services and Data business with over eight years of experience driving innovation in credit and data solutions. He has led product development for Experian’s Credit Report and played a key role in launching Ascend Identity Platform™, a leading identity resolution platform. Erin Haselkorn Senior Director, Analyst Relations, Experian Erin Haselkorn is responsible for analyst relations for Experian. She has developed an understanding of key marketing trends across a broad range of verticals. Her market research around data strategy, AI, fraud, identity and data management, paired with her broad Experian product knowledge, gives her a unique understanding of business automation and data trends. Erin is a frequent spokesperson and guest blogger.

Published: June 22, 2026 by Julie Lee
How Consumer Vehicle Choices Are Shaping Automotive Loan Trends

Conversations about rising auto loan balances and higher monthly payments has often centered around increasing vehicle prices and elevated interest rates; and while those factors have undoubtedly played a role, another important piece of the puzzle is the type of vehicles consumers are choosing to purchase. According to Experian’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026, consumers are continuing to opt for SUVs over other vehicle types, a trend that may be contributing to higher average loan amounts and monthly payments. SUVs accounted for 63.5% of all new retail vehicle registrations over the last 12 months, up from 62.8% a year ago. Additionally, more than 117 million SUVs were in operation across the United States in the first quarter of 2026, making up 42.2% of the market share. At the same time, traditional passenger cars continue to fall in share, coming in at 16.5%, a decrease from 18.4% last year. As consumers increasingly gravitate towards the larger vehicle segment, it reflects the ongoing desire for versatility, cargo capacity, and family-friendly functionality. Electrification’s growing role in consumer purchasing behavior Interestingly, electrified SUVs continue to gain traction, representing 27.7% of all new SUV registrations, these vehicles include battery-electric, hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and other alternative fuel types. Diving a bit deeper, the Tesla Model Y was the market share leader for new, retail electrified SUV registrations in the last 12 months, coming in at 15.8%. Rounding out the top five were Honda CR-V (9.6%), Toyota RAV4 (7.2%), Chevrolet Trax (7.2%), and Toyota Grand Highlander (3.4%). As model availability and familiarity with the electrification segment grows, the broader adoption of these vehicles are playing an increasingly important role in vehicle pricing and overall consumer demand. While average loan amounts and monthly payments are being driven by a combination of factors such as financing costs and consumer purchasing behavior, data in Q1 2026 demonstrates the continued interest in SUVs. This suggests that the industry’s shift toward larger vehicles is likely playing a meaningful role in today’s financing environment. To learn more about SUV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026 presentation.

Published: June 17, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch