Mitigating Identity Fraud Using a Fraud Risk Assessment

by Guest Contributor 6 min read January 13, 2025

With the rise of digital interactions, identity fraud has become an unassuming threat that impacts individuals, businesses, and institutions worldwide. According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), 5.4 million consumer reports regarding fraud and consumer protection were filed in 2023. Identity fraud, which is characterized as when an individual’s personal information is stolen and used without their consent for fraudulent purposes, has devastating consequences for consumers, including financial losses, damaged credit scores, legal issues, and emotional distress.

Financial institutions face damaging consequences beyond financial losses, including reputational damage, operational disruption, and regulatory scrutiny. As technology advances, so do fraudsters’ tactics, making it increasingly challenging to detect and prevent identity-related crimes. So, what are financial institutions to do? Industry-leading institutions apply a layered approach to solving fraud that starts with a fraud risk assessment.

What is a fraud risk assessment?

When opening a new account, banks typically conduct a fraud risk assessment to verify the identity of the individual or entity applying for the account and to assess the likelihood of fraudulent activity. Banks also assess the applicant’s credit history, financial background, and transaction patterns to identify red flags or suspicious activity. Advanced fraud detection tools and technologies are employed to monitor account opening activities in real-time and detect signs of fraudulent behavior. This assessment is crucial for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, mitigating the risk of financial loss, and safeguarding against identity theft.

Understanding the importance of fraud risk assessments

A fraud risk assessment is crucial for banks during account opening as it helps verify the identity of applicants and mitigate the risk of fraudulent activity. By assessing the likelihood and potential impact of identity fraud, banks can implement measures to protect customers’ assets and protect against losses in their portfolio. Additionally, conducting thorough risk assessments enables banks to comply with regulatory requirements, which mandate the verification of customer identities to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing. By adhering to these regulations and implementing effective fraud detection measures, banks can enhance trust and confidence among customers, regulators, and stakeholders, reinforcing the integrity and stability of the financial system.

10 tools to consider when building an effective fraud risk assessment

Several key factors should be carefully considered in an identity fraud risk assessment to ensure thorough evaluation and effective mitigation of identity fraud risks. Financial institutions should consider emerging threats and trends such as synthetic identity fraud, account takeover attacks, and social engineering scams when conducting a risk assessment. By staying abreast of evolving tactics used by fraudsters, organizations can proactively adapt their fraud prevention strategies and controls.

Here are 10 tools that can help catch red flags for fraud prevention:

  1. Identity verification: Identity verification is the first line of defense against identity theft, account takeover, and other fraudulent activities. By verifying the identities of individuals before granting access to services or accounts, organizations can ensure that only legitimate users are granted access. Effective identity verification methods, such as biometric authentication, document verification, and knowledge-based authentication, help mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Implementing robust identity verification measures protects organizations from financial losses and reputational damage and enhances trust and confidence among customers and stakeholders.
  2. Device intelligence: Device intelligence provides insights into the devices used in online transactions, enabling organizations to identify and mitigate fraudulent activities. Organizations can detect suspicious behavior indicative of fraudulent activity by analyzing device-related data such as IP addresses, geolocation, device fingerprints, and behavioral patterns. Device intelligence allows organizations to differentiate between legitimate users and fraudsters, enabling them to implement appropriate security measures, such as device authentication or transaction monitoring.
  3. Phone data: Phone and Mobile Network Operator (MNO) data offers valuable insights into the mobile devices and phone numbers used in transactions. By analyzing MNO data such as subscriber information, call records, and location data, organizations can verify the authenticity of users and detect suspicious activities. MNO data enables organizations to confirm the legitimacy of phone numbers, detect SIM swapping or account takeover attempts, and identify fraudulent transactions. Leveraging MNO data allows organizations to strengthen their fraud prevention measures, enhance customer authentication processes, and effectively mitigate the risk of fraudulent activities in an increasingly mobile-driven environment.
  4. Email attributes: Email addresses serve as a primary identifier and communication channel for users in digital transactions. Organizations can authenticate user identities, confirm account ownership, and detect suspicious activities such as phishing attempts or identity theft by verifying email addresses. Analyzing email addresses enables organizations to identify patterns of fraudulent behavior, block unauthorized access attempts, and enhance security measures. Furthermore, email address validation helps prevent fraudulent transactions, safeguard sensitive information, and protect against financial losses and reputational damage. Leveraging email addresses as part of fraud prevention strategies enhances trustworthiness in digital interactions.
  5. Address verification: Address verification provides essential information for authenticating user identities and detecting suspicious activities. By verifying addresses, organizations can confirm the legitimacy of user accounts, prevent identity theft, and detect fraudulent transactions. Address validation enables organizations to ensure that the provided address matches the user’s identity and reduces the risk of fraudulent activities such as account takeover or shipping fraud.
  6. Behavioral analytics: Behavioral analytics enables organizations to detect anomalies and patterns indicative of fraudulent activity. By analyzing user behavior, such as transaction history, navigation patterns, and interaction frequency, organizations can identify deviations from normal behavior and flag suspicious activities for further investigation. Behavioral analytics allows organizations to create profiles of typical user behavior and detect deviations that may signal fraud, such as unusual login times or transaction amounts.
  7. Consortia: Consortia facilitate collaboration and information sharing among organizations to combat fraudulent activities collectively. By joining forces through consortia, organizations can leverage shared data, insights, and resources to more effectively identify emerging fraud trends, patterns, and threats. Consortia enables participating organizations to benefit from a broader and more comprehensive view of fraudulent activities, enhancing their ability to detect and prevent fraud.
  8. Risk engines: Risk engines enable real-time analysis of transaction data and user behavior to detect and mitigate fraudulent activities. By leveraging advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques, risk engines assess the risk associated with each transaction and user interaction, flagging suspicious activities for further investigation or intervention. Risk engines help organizations identify anomalies, patterns, and trends indicative of fraudulent behavior, allowing for timely detection and prevention of fraud. Additionally, risk engines can adapt and evolve over time to stay ahead of emerging threats, enhancing their effectiveness in mitigating fraud.
  9. Orchestration streamlines and coordinates the various components of a fraud detection and prevention strategy. By orchestrating different fraud prevention tools, technologies, and processes, organizations can optimize their efforts to combat fraud effectively. Orchestration allows for seamless integration and automation of workflows, enabling real-time data analysis and rapid response to emerging threats.
  10. Step-up authentication: Step-up authentication provides an additional layer of security to verify users’ identities during high-risk transactions or suspicious activities. By requiring users to provide additional credentials or undergo further authentication steps, such as biometric verification or one-time passcodes, organizations can mitigate the risk of unauthorized access and fraudulent transactions. Step-up authentication allows organizations to dynamically adjust security measures based on the perceived risk level, ensuring that stronger authentication methods are employed when necessary.

By layering these tools effectively businesses remove gaps that fraudsters would typically exploit.

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee
Financial Institutions Are Rethinking Customer Acqusition

Customer acquisition strategies are constantly evolving toward more precise targeting. From a marketing lens, you can track every step, optimize communication channels and still miss the person most likely to convert. Attribution can tell us which channels work and automation can make marketing spend more efficient. But both assume we know who is actually on the other end. Financial institutions are learning that finding audiences and targeting them is no longer the biggest challenge. As acquisition optimization marketing becomes more sophisticated, teams can measure and act on more signals than before. What they can't always know is whether the person on the receiving end is real. Customer acquisition has evolved into an identity problem. The challenge is not that every questionable signal represents malicious activity. It's that acquisition systems must make increasingly intelligent decisions with an imperfect understanding of who they're actually engaging. When identities are fragmented, duplicated, temporary or synthetic, optimization becomes a question of trust as much as targeting. When your signals don't reliably identify customers The customer journey often includes searching, filling out a form, creating an account, requesting a quote and subscribing. All of these signals work well when identity is relatively stable.  However, financial institutions are finding that these signals are becoming less reliable. A single person can operate across multiple personas, devices, browsers, aliases, accounts and intermediaries while several apparent “people” may actually represent one underlying actor. Financial instituions are finding: Fragmented customer signals Difficulty distinguishing an old account from a new one Different digital pathways associated with the same individual Signals that are generated by automation Real customers getting flagged because signals are too thin to evaluate confidently Legacy signals continue to be challenged Marketing has historically treated intent as a valuable signal because intent was relatively difficult to produce. A search required human intent. A form required someone to fill it out. An inquiry implied a meaningful amount of human effort. Financial institutions are already combating AI-enabled fraud, and now marketing teams are starting to face it on a massive scale. AI can mimic human behavior by researching products, comparing prices, filling out forms, creating accounts and signing up for services. A valid email address is no longer enough. Marketers need to know: How long has it existed? How recently has it been active? Does its activity appear consistent or suddenly anomalous? Has it gone dormant and returned? Is it associated with patterns that suggest stability or unusual behavior? How to build on your strongest signal Email remains one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce, following people across devices, platforms, transactions, subscriptions, accounts and years of activity. For over two decades, this has shaped how AtData thinks about identity. Now, as part of Experian, it’s shaping how an entire platform and team approach identity. A marketer doesn’t need every prospect to have existed online for twenty years. But understanding whether a newly acquired prospect has meaningful identity context can dramatically improve the quality of the decision being made around it. Better identity intelligence can help organizations reduce unnecessary friction by improving their ability to recognize legitimate customers. With a strong identity foundation, marketing teams can better address: Which audiences are more likely to convert? Which leads are high quality? Which channels are driving incremental growth? What do the best prospects look like? The value isn't simply having an email address. It's understanding the history and behavioral context associated with it. That context can provide a stronger digital identity signal, helping marketers understand how long they have been active, whether its behavior is consistent with that of a real person and whether current activity aligns with past patterns. It continues to be one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce. An infrastructure built for what's coming The acquisition of AtData by Experian reflects a fundamental shift in how identity infrastructure needs to work. Experian's scale and decisioning capabilities, combined with AtData's real-time email intelligence, create a strong platform. Read more about the why behind the acquisition and see how email works as an identity anchor for fraud prevention. Contact us to learn about our customer acquisition solutions

September 15, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
As Electric Vehicle Adoption Eases, Dealers Can Find New Opportunities To Reach Consumers

After years of rapid growth, new electric vehicle (EV) registrations have moderated, and the EV market has entered a new chapter. But slower growth shouldn’t be mistaken for disappearing demand, with data suggesting the reality is much more nuanced. According to Experian Automotive’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026, battery EVs accounted for 8.21% of new retail registrations in the last 12 months, down from 9.23% a year earlier. However, consumers aren’t simply walking away from electrification. In fact, more than one million new EVs were registered during the past 12 months and the used EV market recorded more than 540,000 registrations over the same period. The opportunity may be less about waiting for the EV market to grow and more about understanding where EV demand is present, who is driving them, and how to reach those consumers more effectively. Who is likely to purchase an EV and what vehicle types are they interested in? Understanding who’s in the market for an EV can allow dealers to position themselves around consumers’ needs as they choose a vehicle that fits their everyday lifestyle. In the second quarter of 2026, Millennials and Gen X accounted for 67.83% of new EV registrations, nearly 10 percentage points above their combined share of all new, retail registrations. Millennials were also the largest generational audience across both new and used EV market share, coming in at 35.76% and 38.42%, respectively. It’s important to consider that the EV shopper isn’t necessarily looking for an unfamiliar or new type of vehicle. In many cases, they’re seemingly looking for an electric version of the practical vehicle they already know. For instance, SUVs accounted for 77.47% of new EV registrations in Q2 2026, which was similar to SUVs’ 63.49% share of all new retail registrations. For these shoppers, creating messaging around value, practicality, and available choices may resonate differently than premium technology messaging aimed at some new-EV prospects. The more precisely dealers can identify those audiences, the less they need to depend on broad EV market momentum to generate demand. To learn more about EV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation.

September 15, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe