How to Prevent New Account Fraud

by Julie Lee 6 min read March 7, 2024

Two men looking at a piece of paper with one of the men's account information to check for account fraud.

Finding a reliable, customer-friendly way to protect your business against new account fraud is vital to surviving in today’s digital-driven economy. Not only can ignoring the problem cause you to lose valuable money and client goodwill, but implementing the wrong solutions can lead to onboarding issues that drive away potential customers.

The Experian® Identity and Fraud Report revealed that nearly 60 percent of U.S. businesses reported higher fraud losses in 2025, with many of these involving new account fraud. At the same time, problems with onboarding caused 52 percent of consumers to drop off and take their business elsewhere.

In other words, your customers want protection, but they aren’t willing to compromise their digital experience to get it. You need to find a way to meet both these needs when combating new account fraud.

What is new account fraud?

New account fraud occurs any time a bad actor creates an account in your system utilizing a fake or stolen identity. This process is referred to by different names, such as account takeover fraud, account creation fraud, or account opening fraud.

Examples of some of the more common types of new account fraud include:

  • Synthetic identity (ID) fraud: This type of fraud occurs when the scammer uses a real, stolen credential combined with fake credentials. For example, they might use someone’s real Social Security number combined with a fake email.
  • Identity theft: In this case, the fraudster uses personal information they stole to create a new scam account.
  • Fake identity: With this type of fraud, scammers create an account with wholly fake credentials that haven’t been stolen from any particular person.

New account fraud may target individuals, but the repercussions spill over to impact entire organizations. In fact, many scammers utilize bots to attempt to steal information or create fake accounts en masse, upping the stakes even more.

How does new account fraud work?

New account fraud begins at a single weak security point, such as:

  • Data breaches: A survey revealed that 61% of Americans have received at least one data breach notification in the past two years.1
  • Phishing scams: The fraudster creates an email or social media account that pretends to be from a legitimate organization or person to gain confidential information.2
  • Skimmers: These are put on ATMs or fuel pumps to steal credit or debit card information.2
  • Bot scrapers: These tools scrape information posted publicly on social media or on websites.2
  • Synthetic ID fraud: 80 percent of new account fraud is linked to synthetic ID fraud.3 The scammer just needs one piece of legitimate information. If they have a real Social Security number, they might combine it with a fake name and birth date (or vice versa).

After the information is stolen, the rest of the fraud takes place in steps. The fake or stolen identity might first be used to open a new account, like a credit card or a demand deposit account. Over time, the account establishes a credit history until it can be used for higher-value targets, like loans and bank withdrawals.

How can organizations prevent new account fraud?

Some traditional methods used to combat new account fraud include:

  • Completely Automated Public Turing Tests (CAPTCHAs): These tests help reduce bot attacksthat lead to data breaches and ensure that individuals logging into your system are actual people.
  • Multifactor authentication (MFA): MFA bolsters users’ password protection and helps guard against account takeover. If a scammer tries to take over an account, they won’t be able to complete the process.
  • Password protection: Robust password managers can help ensure that one stolen password doesn’t lead to multiple breaches.
  • Knowledge-based authentication: Knowledge-based authentication can be combined with MFA solutions, providing an additional layer of identity verification.
  • Know-your-customer (KYC) solutions: Businesses may utilize KYC to verify customers via government IDs, background checks, ongoing monitoring, and the like.
  • Additional protective measures may involve more robust identity verification behind the scenes. Examples include biometric verification, government ID authentication, public records analysis, and more.

Unfortunately, these traditional protective measures may not be enough, for many reasons:

  • New account fraud is frequently being perpetrated by bots, which can be tougher to keep up with and might overwhelm systems.
  • Institutions might use multiple security solutions that aren’t built to work together, leading to overlap and inefficiency.
  • Security measures may create so much friction in the account creation process that potential new customers are turned away.

How we can help

Experian’s fraud management services provide a multi-layered approach that lets businesses customize solutions to their particular needs. Advanced machine learning analytics utilizes extensive, proprietary data to provide a unique experience that not only protects your company, but it also protects your customers’ experience.

  • Customer identification program (CIP): Experian’s KYC solutions allow you to confidently identify your customers via a low-friction experience. The tools start with onboarding, but continue throughout the customer journey, including portfolio management. The tools also help your company comply with relevant KYC regulations.
  • Cross-industry analysis of identity behavior: Experian has created an identity graph that aggregates consumer information in a way that gives companies access to a cross-industry view of identity behavior as it changes over time. This means that when a new account is opened, your company can determine behind the scenes if any part of the identity is connected to instances of fraud or presents actions not normally associated with the customer’s identity. It’s essentially a new paradigm that works faster behind the scenes and is part of Experian’s Ascend Fraud Platform™.
  • Multifactor authentication solutions: Experian’s MFA solutions utilize low-friction techniques like two-factor authentication, knowledge-based authentication, and unique one-time password authentication during remote transactions to guard against hacking.
  • Synthetic ID fraud protection: Experian’s fraud management solutions include robust protection against synthetic ID fraud. Our groundbreaking technology detects and predicts synthetic identities throughout the customer lifecycle, utilizing advanced analytics capabilities.
  • CrossCore®: CrossCore combines risk-based authentication, identity proofing, and fraud detection into one cloud platform, allowing for real-time decisions to be made with flexible decisioning workflows and advanced analytics.
  • Precise ID®: The Precise ID platform lets customers choose the combination of fraud analytics, identification verification, and workflows that best meet their business needs. This includes machine-learned fraud risk models, robust consumer data assets, one-time passwords (OTPs), knowledge-based authentication (KBAs), and powerful insights via the Identity Element Network®.

Interactive infographic: Building a multilayered fraud and identity strategy

Account takeover fraud represents a significant threat to your business that you can’t ignore. But with Experian’s broad range of solutions, you can keep your systems secure while not sacrificing customer experience.

Experian can keep your business secure from new account fraud

Experian’s innovative approach can streamline your new account fraud protection. Learn more about how our fraud management solutions can help you.


References

1. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/americans-are-on-high-alert-as-data-breach-fears-reach-a-breaking-point-302392550.html

2. “Identity Theft.” USA.gov, December 6, 2023. https://www.usa.gov/identity-theft

3. Purcell, Michael. “Synthetic Identity Fraud: What is It and How to Combat It.” Thomson Reuters, April 28, 2023. https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/blog/synthetic-identity-fraud-what-is-it-and-how-to-combat-it/

Related Posts

How Consumer Vehicle Choices Are Shaping Automotive Loan Trends

Conversations about rising auto loan balances and higher monthly payments has often centered around increasing vehicle prices and elevated interest rates; and while those factors have undoubtedly played a role, another important piece of the puzzle is the type of vehicles consumers are choosing to purchase. According to Experian’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026, consumers are continuing to opt for SUVs over other vehicle types, a trend that may be contributing to higher average loan amounts and monthly payments. SUVs accounted for 63.5% of all new retail vehicle registrations over the last 12 months, up from 62.8% a year ago. Additionally, more than 117 million SUVs were in operation across the United States in the first quarter of 2026, making up 42.2% of the market share. At the same time, traditional passenger cars continue to fall in share, coming in at 16.5%, a decrease from 18.4% last year. As consumers increasingly gravitate towards the larger vehicle segment, it reflects the ongoing desire for versatility, cargo capacity, and family-friendly functionality. Electrification’s growing role in consumer purchasing behavior Interestingly, electrified SUVs continue to gain traction, representing 27.7% of all new SUV registrations, these vehicles include battery-electric, hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and other alternative fuel types. Diving a bit deeper, the Tesla Model Y was the market share leader for new, retail electrified SUV registrations in the last 12 months, coming in at 15.8%. Rounding out the top five were Honda CR-V (9.6%), Toyota RAV4 (7.2%), Chevrolet Trax (7.2%), and Toyota Grand Highlander (3.4%). As model availability and familiarity with the electrification segment grows, the broader adoption of these vehicles are playing an increasingly important role in vehicle pricing and overall consumer demand. While average loan amounts and monthly payments are being driven by a combination of factors such as financing costs and consumer purchasing behavior, data in Q1 2026 demonstrates the continued interest in SUVs. This suggests that the industry’s shift toward larger vehicles is likely playing a meaningful role in today’s financing environment. To learn more about SUV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026 presentation.

Published: June 17, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch
When New Data Impacts MBS Pricing: Student Loan Debt

In our previous post, we described the Current Second Lien Balance field, which is one of over 2,000 fields in the new Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset. We showed that the Current Second Lien Balance field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery: New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data). Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe. Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions. In this article, we discuss another field that satisfies the above criteria: Student Loan Balance.  We evaluate this field in the context of these criteria. First, however, we provide a summary of the MLP dataset and how it compares to standard GSE loan-level data available today. Standard GSE Data vs. Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) Data The MLP dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance, filed junior liens, and AVM values).  MLP differs from loan-level data provided byFreddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae, which the vast majority of market participants solely rely on, in a number of ways: Standard data provided by the GSEs and GNMA does not contain all the information necessary for accurate forecasting of mortgage prepayment and credit performance. Basic, critical fields like borrower’s current credit score and current junior liens on the property are missing. The new Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset from Experian contains borrower, loan, and property data fields covering the entire mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), both securitized and non-securitized. MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle. New, Material and Significant Field:  Student Loan Debt MLP contains a number of fields describing each mortgage borrower’s student debt load, including amounts in repayment, forbearance and collections; estimated interest rate, time remaining until forbearance expiration, and more. In the interest of simplicity, for this article we’ll focus on a single student loan-related field within MLP: Student Loans Balance, which is defined as the total balance on open non-deferred student trades reported in the last 3 months. Is Information Regarding Student Loans New to Markets? Standard loan-level data disclosed by the GSEs and GNMA contain no student-loan-specific fields. Theoretically, fields related to DTI at origination might capture some aspect of student loan debt. So, in the best case scenario for an investor relying solely on standard disclosure, a DTI value as of origination is provided -- yet is never updated as the loan seasons and the borrower’s debt and income change (see more here).  But in the case of federal student loan debt attached to mortgages originated from early 2020 to late 2023, the level of detail provided by disclosure may be even more unknown due to COVID-era repayment and reporting moratoriums. The student loan repayment moratorium was a temporary federal policy that paused required payments, set interest rates to 0%, and suspended collections on most federally-held student loans. The moratorium began in March 2020, with payments resuming in October 2023, making it approximately 3.5 years in duration—the longest consumer credit payment pause in U.S. history. (Source: NCUA ) During the moratorium, student loan-related debt loads may have been understated as federal loans were in a temporary state of $0 repayment.  As an alternative to leaving student loan debt completely out of DTI calculations, an imputed payment equal to only 0.50% of the outstanding balance was often used as a placeholder for a borrower’s DTI calculation. As a result, mortgages originated during the moratorium may have artificially low reported DTIs for borrowers with student loan debt, materially understating true post-moratorium debt .  Accordingly, prepayment risk for these loans is likely overstated in mainstream market models. Standard data only reports information related to the primary mortgage and does not include any details on the borrower’s other debts with the exception of DTI at origination, which is never updated throughout the life of the loan. In contrast, MLP provides a comprehensive view of the borrower’s full credit profile, including other obligations such as credit cards, mortgages on other properties, student loan balances, and much more. Is Student Loan debt material to the residential mortgage market? Approximately $11 trillion of residential mortgage loans were originated during the student loan payment moratorium (Source: Experian MLP Dataset), a period marked by historically low mortgage rates during the COVID era.  As discussed above, DTI data contained in standard market disclosure may be particularly inaccurate for these loans. As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, a new report from the Federal Reserve of New York shows a rise in student loan default rates by age group.  Student l Of today’s $13 trillion in outstanding mortgage debt, more than 10% of that debt ($1.5 trillion) is associated with borrowers who carry student loan debt.  For these borrowers, the average amount of student loan debt outstanding is approximately $50,000, versus a mortgage balance of approximately ~$289,000. In other words, the average student loan debt balance is almost 20% of the mortgage balance for the average borrower who carries both. For this set of borrowers, the average monthly payment is approximately $400 for student loan vs. approximately $2,200 for 1st lien mortgage—so that monthly student loan payments are a significant debt load, approximately 20% of the monthly mortgage payment.  (Source:  Experian MLP Dataset) Is the effect of student loan debt a significant driver of performance? Figure 1 illustrates prepayments by student loan balance for a sample of loans drawn from MLP. The chart illustrates that borrowers with larger student loan balances prepay much more slowly, likely because some are effectively locked out of refinancing once student loan payments resume due to elevated DTI. The debt-to-income (DTI) ratio calculated using actual student loan payments may be significantly higher than the DTI calculated during the moratorium, in some cases exceeding GSE eligibility thresholds. As illustrated in Figure 1, for in-the-money (ITM) collateral, the differential between loans with material student loan balances (greater than $200,000) and loans with no student debt can reach up to 5 CPR. Notably, even for out-of-the-money (OTM) collateral, loans with student debt prepay 1 to 3 CPR slower, likely reflecting reduced mobility due to tighter financing constraints when purchasing a new home. Pools with otherwise similar prepayment characteristics may exhibit different prepayment behavior depending on the distribution of student loan exposure within their collateral. In addition, because loans with student debt tend to prepay more slowly, this effect increases over time due to burnout: loans without student debt prepay and exit the pools more quickly, leaving a higher concentration of slower-paying loans behind.  Given that 10% of the $13 trillion outstanding mortgage market is associated with borrowers who have student loans (Source:  Experian MLP dataset)—and that student loans have a meaningful impact on prepayments—many pools issued between March 2020 and October 2023 may be subject to this student loan debt CPR throttle, and therefore mispriced by investors relying exclusively on standard market data. Fig 1. Prepayment S-Curve: Student Loans Balance Source:  Experian MLP dataset hosted on IVolatility Data-Driven Platform   _____________________________________________________ Michael Pyatski advises MBS traders, portfolio managers, quants, risk managers, loan originators, and technology professionals on making informed, data-driven business decisions that drive revenue growth, enhance risk management, and reduce trading costs. With more than 15 years of experience as an Agency RMBS trader—including serving as Head of the Proprietary Trading Desk at BNP Paribas—Michael developed and successfully implemented relative-value, data-driven profitable trading strategies to capture market opportunities embedded in data but not fully priced by the market. His trading experience, combined with a Ph.D. in econometrics, led him to found the Data-Driven Portal (https://datadrivenportal.com/), a platform that provides advanced technology for MBS trading and risk management. The platform’s No-Model Data-Driven technology leverages big data, econometric analysis, and AI to help traders identify relative-value opportunities in RMBS markets and generate above-market, risk-adjusted returns. _____________________________________________________

Published: June 17, 2026 by Perry DeFelice
Empowering merchants to reduce first-party fraud and chargebacks

Reduce first-party fraud and chargebacks with data-driven strategies that help merchants prevent disputes, protect revenue and improve customer trust.

Published: June 15, 2026 by Charles Hunter