Tag: loan originations

In the dynamic consumer credit landscape, understanding emerging trends is paramount for fintechs to thrive. Experian's latest fintech trends report provides deep insights into the evolving market, shedding light on crucial areas such as origination volumes, average loan balances, and delinquency trends. Let's delve into some key findings and their implications for fintech lenders. Fintech lending origination volume trends The report reveals intriguing shifts in origination volumes for unsecured personal loans and credit cards. While overall origination amounts dipped, fintechs experienced a notable decrease, signaling potential challenges in funding availability and economic uncertainties. Despite this, the total origination volume for fintechs remains robust, underlining their continued significance in the market. Fintech market share versus traditional lenders Fintechs, known for their agility and digital prowess, witnessed fluctuations in market share, particularly in the unsecured personal loan segment. While digital loans continue to drive a significant portion of originations, there's a discernible shift in market dynamics, urging fintech lenders to explore diversification strategies, including expanding into credit card offerings. Fintech lending average loan balance trends Amidst changing economic landscapes, average loan balances for both unsecured personal loans and credit cards exhibited intriguing patterns. Fintech lenders, although maintaining a competitive edge in average balances, face the challenge of balancing risk and profitability, especially amidst rising delinquency levels. Fintech lending delinquency trends One of the most critical aspects highlighted in the report is the uptick in delinquency levels for unsecured personal loans and credit cards. While fintechs navigate through economic uncertainties, there's a growing imperative to enhance risk management strategies and focus on prime and above credit tiers to mitigate potential risks. Understanding the digital borrower As digital borrowing continues to gain prominence, it's essential for fintechs to grasp the nuances of the digital borrower. With millennials emerging as key players in the digital lending landscape, fintechs must tailor their offerings to cater to the unique preferences and behaviors of this demographic segment. Looking ahead to 2024 for fintech lenders As we look to the future, data-driven decision-making and strategic portfolio management are more important than ever for fintechs. With economic uncertainties still in the mix, fintechs must leverage data and analytics to fuel growth while safeguarding against potential risks. Experian's fintech trends report serves as a guiding beacon, equipping fintechs with the knowledge and strategies needed to navigate through uncertainties and unlock opportunities for sustainable growth. The report offers actionable insights, including the imperative to conduct periodic portfolio reviews, retool data analytics and models, and remodel lending criteria to stay ahead in the competitive landscape. Learn more about our fintech solutions and how we can work together to drive profitable growth for your company. Learn more Download the report About the report: Experian's Fintech Trends Report 2024 offers a comprehensive analysis of credit trends, leveraging data from January 2019 to November 2023. The report provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of unsecured personal loans and credit cards, empowering fintechs with actionable intelligence to thrive in a competitive market environment.

Evolving technologies and rising consumer expectations for fast, frictionless experiences highlight an opportunity for credit unions to advance their decisioning and stand out in a crowded market. How a credit union is optimizing their decision-making process With over $7.2 billion in assets and 330,000 members, Michigan State University Federal Credit Union (MSUFCU) aims to provide superior service to their members and employees. Initially reliant on manual reviews, the credit union needed a well-designed decisioning strategy that could help them grow their loan portfolio, increase employee efficiency, and reduce credit risk. The credit union implemented Experian’s decisioning platform, PowerCurve® Originations, to make faster, more accurate credit decisions on their secured and unsecured personal loans, leading to increased approvals and an exceptional member experience. “Day one of using PowerCurve produced a 49% automation rate! We have received amazing feedback from our teams about what a great product was chosen,” said Blake Johnson, Vice President of Lending, Michigan State University Federal Credit Union. After implementing PowerCurve Originations, MSUFCU saw an average monthly automation rate of more than 55% and decreased their application processing time to less than 24 hours. Read the full case study for more insight on how Experian can help power your decisioning to grow your business and member relationships. Download case study

  In today’s evolving and competitive market, the stakes are high to deliver both quantity and quality. That is, to deliver growth goals while increasing customer satisfaction. OneAZ Credit Union is the second largest credit union in Arizona, serving over 157,000 members across 21 branches. Wanting to fund more loans faster and offer a better member experience through their existing loan origination system (LOS), OneAZ looked to improve their decisioning system and long-standing underwriting criteria. They partnered with Experian to create an automated underwriting strategy to meet their aggressive approval rate and loss rate goals. By implementing an integrated decisioning system, OneAZ had flexible access to data credit attributes and scores, resulting in increased automation through their existing LOS – meaning they didn’t have to completely overhaul their decisioning systems. Additionally, they leveraged software that enabled champion/challenger strategies and the flexibility to manage their decision criteria. Within one month of implementation, OneAZ saw a 26% increase in loan funding rates and a 25% decrease in manual reviews. They can now pivot quickly to respond to continuously evolving conditions. “The speed at which we can return a decision and our better understanding of future performance has really propelled us in being able to better serve our members,” said John Schooner, VP Credit Risk Management at OneAZ. Read our case study for more insight on how automation and PowerCurve Originations Essentials can move the needle for your organization, including: Streamlined strategy development and execution to minimize costly customizations and coding Comprehensive data assets across multiple sources to ensure ID verification and a holistic view of your prospect Proactive monitoring and real-time visibility to challenge and rapidly adjust strategies as needed Download the full case study

At some point a lender may need to issue an RFI or an RFP for a credit decisioning system. In this latest installment of “working with vendors” let’s dive into some best practices for writing RFIs and RFPs that will help you more quickly and efficiently understand the capabilities of a vendor. First, have one person (or at most a very small group) review the document before it goes out to vendors. Too often these kinds of documents seem like they’re just cut and pasted together without any concern if they paint a coherent picture. If it’s worth the time to write an RFI/RFP, then it’s worth the time to get it right so that the vendor responses make sense. If your document paints an inconsistent picture, a vendor may not know what products will best serve your requirements. In turn, precious time will be wasted in discussions around what’s being proposed. Here are some things to make clear in the document: For what part of the credit life cycle does this RFI/RFP apply (prospecting, origination, account management or collections)? If the request covers more than one part of the life cycle, make clear which questions apply to which part of the life cycle. Do you need a system that processes in batch or real-time requests (or both)? For example, a credit card account management solution can process accounts in batch (for proactive line management), in real time (for reactive requests) or possibly even both. Let the vendor know what it is you’re trying to do, as there may be different systems involved in processing these requests. Do you want this system hosted at the vendor, a third party (like AWS, Azure, etc.) or installed on premises? If you have a preference, let the vendor know. If you have no preference, ask the vendor what they can support. In general, consider playing down or skip detailed pricing questions. There’s nothing wrong with asking for a price range. For credit decisioning systems, detailed pricing is difficult for the vendor since there are often high levels of unknown customization to do. A better question might be, “What things will the vendor have to know in order to accurately price the solution? What are the logical next steps to get more accurate pricing? What’s the typical range of pricing in a solution such as this and what drives that range?” Will you be acting as an aggregator? Sometimes systems are created as front ends to several lenders. For example, a client may want to create a website where a borrower can “shop” among several lenders. This is certainly doable but carries with it a whole host of legal, compliance, business and technical questions. In my opinion, I’d skip the RFI/RFP in this situation and have a robust sit down directly with the vendors. This option will likely be far more productive. Ask more open-ended questions. “How does the solution perform task X?” as opposed to, “Do you support Y?” Often, there’s more than one way to accomplish a task. Asking more open-ended questions will yield a more comprehensive answer from the vendor rather than a simple yes or no response. It also gives you the opportunity to learn about the latest decisioning techniques. Be careful that you have not copied old RFP questions that are no longer relevant. I’ve had clients ask if we support Bernoulli Boxes (a mid-80s kind of floppy disk), or whether we support OS/2, etc. I’ve even had questions about supporting a particular printer. These kinds of questions are centered on the support of the operating system and not a particular vendor’s credit decisioning software. Instead of asking yes/no technology questions, ask for a typical sample architecture. Ask what kinds of APIs are supported (REST, SOAP/XML, etc.). Ask about the solution’s capabilities to call third-party systems (both internal and external). Ask fewer, but more in-depth questions. If the solution needs screens, be clear which screens you’re talking about. Do you need screens to make rule adjustments or configuration changes? Do you need screens for manual review or some sort of case management? Do you need consumer-facing screens where borrowers can type in their application data? If you need screens, be clear on the task the screens should perform. If you have particular concerns, ask them in an open-ended way. For example, “The solution will have to exchange file-based data with a mainframe. How can your solution best satisfy this requirement?” In general, state your requirement not the technology to use. A preamble or brief executive summary is useful to get the big picture across before the vendor delves into any questions. A paragraph or two can go a long way to help the vendor better assess your requirements and provide more meaningful answers to you. This works well because it’s easier to give the big picture in a few paragraphs as opposed to sprinkled around in multiple questions. To summarize, be clear on your requirements and provide a more open-ended format for the vendor to respond. This will save both you and the vendor a lot of time. In section three, I’ll cover evaluating vendors.

Perhaps your loan origination system (LOS) doesn’t have the flexibility that you require. Perhaps the rules editor can’t segment variables in the manner that you need. Perhaps your account management system can’t leverage the right data to make decisions. Or perhaps your existing system is getting sunset. These are just some of the many reasons a company may want to investigate the marketplace for new credit decisioning software. But RFIs and RFPs aren’t the only way to find new decisioning software. After working in credit services decisioning for over 20 years — and seeing hundreds of RFPs and presenting thousands of solutions and proposed architectures — I’ve formed a few opinions about how I would go about things if I were in the customer’s seat and have broken that into a three-part series. Part 1 will cover everything up to issuing an RFI or RFP. Part 2 will discuss writing an RFP or RFI. Part 3 will cover evaluating vendors. Let’s go. If you’re looking to buy new decisioning software, your first inclination might be to issue an RFI or an RFP. However, that may not be the best idea. Here’s an issue that I frequently see. Vendors are constantly evolving their products. How a product did feature X two years ago might be completely different now. The terminology that the industry uses might have changed, and new capabilities (like machine learning) might have come about and changed whole sets of functionalities. The first decision point is to ask yourself a question, “Do I know exactly what I want or am I trying to generally learn what is out there?” An RFI or RFP isn’t always the greatest way to exchange information about a product. From a vendor’s standpoint, a feature-rich, complex system has to be reduced down to a few text answers or (worst yet) a series of yes or no answers. It all boils down to nuance. On many occasions, I’ve faced a dilemma when answering an RFP question, “This question is unclear; if the customer means X, the answer is yes; if they mean Y, the answer is no.” If I were in a room with the customer, I could ask them the question, they could provide clarification and I could then provide the accurate answer. There would be more opportunity to have a back and forth, “Oh when you said X, this is what you meant ….” All of that back and forth is lost with an RFI or RFP, or at least delayed until the (hopefully selected) vendor gets a chance to present in front of a live audience. Also, consider that vendors are eager to educate you about their product. They know exactly how the product works and they’re happy to answer your questions. It’s perfectly reasonable to go to a vendor with prewritten questions and thoughts and to pose those questions during a call or demonstration with the vendor. Nothing would prevent a customer from using the same questions for each vendor and evaluating them based on their answers. All of this can be done without issuing an RFI or RFP. In conclusion, I’d offer the following points to think about before issuing an RFI or RFP: A customer can provide questions that they want answered during a demonstration of a credit decisioning product. These same questions can be used to provide an initial assessment of several vendors. A customer’s understanding of a vendor’s capabilities is likely 10x faster and deeper with an interactive session versus reading the answers in a questionnaire. Nuanced and follow-up questions can be asked to gather a complete understanding. Alternative solutions can be explored. This exercise doesn’t have to replace an RFP but instead can better inform the customer about the questions they need answered in order to issue an RFP. Don’t be afraid to talk to a vendor, even if you’re not sure what you want in a new product. In fact, talk to several vendors. More than likely, you’ll learn a lot more via a discussion than you will via an RFI questionnaire. What’s good about an RFI or RFP is coming in with prepared questions. That way, you can judge each vendor using the same criteria but, if possible, get the answers to those questions via an interactive session with the vendors. Next: How to write an effective RFP or RFI.

According to Experian’s Q3 2019 State of the Automotive Finance Market report, used vehicle financing increased across all credit tiers.

Time – it’s the only resource we can’t get more of, which is why we tend to obsess over saving it. Despite this obsession, it can be hard for us to identify time-wasting activities. From morning habits to credit decisioning, processes and routines that seem, well, routine, can get in the way of maximizing how we use our time. Identifying the Problem Every morning, I used to turn on my coffee maker, walk to the bathroom to take my multivitamin, then walk back into the kitchen to finish making my coffee. This required maybe twenty steps to the bathroom and twenty steps back, and while this isn’t a huge amount of time—half a minute at best—it’s not insignificant, especially in the morning when time feels particularly precious. One day, I realized I could eliminate the waste by moving my multivitamin to the cabinet above my coffeemaker. What if we could all make minor changes to enhance our efficiency both at home and at work? Imagine how much time we could save by cutting out unnecessary steps. And how saving that time could help drive significant revenue increases. Time Equals Money When businesses waste time with unnecessary steps, that’s money from their bottom line, and out of the pockets of people who are connected to them. Over the last several years, a new time saver has emerged – Application Programming Interface (API). APIs allow application programs to communicate with other operating systems or control programs through a series of server requests or API calls, enabling seamless interaction, data sharing and decisioning. Experian’s partners utilize our ever-growing suite of APIs to quickly access better data, making existing processes more effective and routines more efficient. In the past, banks and other partners had to send files back and forth to Experian when they needed decisioning on a customer’s credit-worthiness prior to approving a new loan or extending a credit limit increase. Now, partners can have their origination system call an Experian API and send their data through that. Our system processes it and sends it back in milliseconds, giving the lenders real-time decisioning rather than shuttling information back and forth unnecessarily. Instead of effectively walking away from one process (assisting the customer/making coffee) to start another (retrieving credit info/walking down the hall to take the multivitamin), our partners are able to link these processes up and save time, allowing them to capitalize on the presence and interest of their customer. The Proof When Washington State Employees Credit Union, the second-largest credit union in the state, realized they needed to make a change to keep pace with increasing competition, they turned to Experian. With our solution, the credit union is now able to provide its members with instant credit decisioning through their online banking platform. This real-time decisioning at the point of member-initiated contact increased the credit union’s loan and credit applications by 25%. Additionally, member satisfaction increased, with 90% of members finding the simplified prequalification process to be more efficient. By accessing Experian’s decisioning services through your existing connection, lenders can to save time and match consumers with the products that match their credit profile before they apply – increasing approval rates once the application is submitted. Best of all, the entire process with the consumers is completed within seconds. Find out how Experian’s solutions can help you improve your existing processes and cut out unnecessary steps. Get started

With the new year just days behind us, and as the uptick in holiday spending comes back down, debt consolidation will take precedence along with the making (and breaking) of new year’s resolutions. Personal loans were the fastest growing unsecured lending product for much of last year. From debt consolidation to major purchases, consumers are increasingly choosing these flexible, easy-access loans over credit cards throughout the course of the year. Recent Experian research highlighted the trends around this fast-paced lending product: Previously, while industry experts had predicted a leveling off of personal loans originations, Experian data shows steady growth. Additionally, there were 35.7 million personal loan trades in the second quarter, the highest number to date since Q1 of 2007. What is driving this growth? Observations suggest growth trends across the industry as a whole – not just in the personal loans segment. And the numbers prove it. Growth is occurring across the board. Experian statistics show: Consumer confidence is up 5.6% year over year Investor confidence remains high – up 18% year over year since 1987 Unemployment remains low and continued decrease is forecasted in the near future With increased confidence and increased spending often comes increased personal loans. More financial institutions are bringing personal loans under their roofs. As many consumers enter each new year as part of a “debt consolidation nation” per se, focus for many will be on personal loans as they seek to consolidate revolving debt. Since this is a known trend, lenders across the board – from traditional financial institutions to fintechs – need to be strategic with their marketing efforts in order to reach the right consumers with the right products at the right time. Consumers consider important factors in choosing the lender(s) for their personal loans including interest rate and the ability to apply online among others. These factors see differences across generations as well. These factors and others should influence lenders’ marketing strategies, on top of their best practices. Experian partnered with Mintel Group for their insights on the 2019 trends and best practices for digital credit marketing. Register for our upcoming webinar to learn more about Digital Credit Marketing 2019 Trends and Best Practices. Register for the Webinar

Delinquency rates for auto loans moved up slightly in the last quarter of 2013, with the 30 to 59 days past due (DPD), 60 to 89 DPD and 90 to 180 DPD delinquency rates at 2.18 percent, 0.56 percent and 0.24 percent, respectively.