Survey: Most Companies Ill-Prepared for a Global Data Breach

by Michael Bruemmer 5 min read June 27, 2017

Most companies aren’t prepared to respond to a global data breach, and aren’t yet ready to comply with the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), even though it takes effect in less than a year, according to the latest Ponemon Institute report sponsored by Experian® Data Breach Resolution.

Nearly a third of the 588 information security and compliance professionals interviewed for the survey said their organizations had no global incident response plan in place, and 38 percent have a single plan that’s applied around the world. Just 27 percent reported having separate plans at the country or regional level, but even those who had a plan weren’t confident about its efficacy.

The global scope of data breaches

The number of data breaches reached a record high in 2016 — 4,149 incidents in 102 countries around the world exposed more than 4.2 billion records, according to cybersecurity company Risk Based Security. Ponemon’s survey underscores the scope of global data breaches; 51 percent of respondents reported their companies experienced a global data breach in the past five years, and 56 percent of breached companies had more than one incident.

When the GDPR goes into effect in May 2018, any company that processes and/or holds the personal data of European Union consumers will be required to comply with the regulation, regardless of where the company is located. Failure to comply can lead to fines ranging from 2 percent to 4 percent of a company’s annual global turnover.

Despite the escalating risks of falling victim to a global data breach and the possible repercussions of not complying with the GDPR, Ponemon’s survey shows a widespread lack of preparedness among companies.

Levels of unpreparedness

When it comes to preventing and responding to a global data breach, and ensuring they comply with the GDPR’s strict notification rules, many survey respondents expressed significant shortfalls in preparedness:

  • Outdated and inadequate security solutions would hinder the ability of 49 percent to cope with a global data breach.
  • Just 40 percent of respondents felt confident their organizations’ security technologies would adequately protect information assets and IT infrastructures overseas, and only 39 percent said they had the right policies and procedures to do so.
  • Slightly more than a third thought their companies could successfully manage cultural differences and privacy and data security expectations in different areas of the world.

A majority of respondents (89 percent) predicted the GDPR will significantly affect their data protection practices, and 69 percent felt non-compliance would hinder their companies’ ability to do business globally. Yet only a quarter said their companies were ready to comply with the new regulation.

While most understand GDPR is something they need to worry about, many aren’t sure what to do. The survey reveals some companies may be feeling desperate enough about the looming regulation to take drastic measures; 34 percent said their preparations include closing operations in countries with high non-compliance rates.

Timely notification of regulators and EU citizens affected by a data breach is a key component of the GDPR, yet the majority of our survey respondents (69 percent) said they would have trouble meeting the time limitations. The GDPR requires breached companies to notify regulators within 72 hours of discovering a breach, and affected consumers “without undue delay.” Half of our survey respondents said they experienced a global breach that required notification of victims. Only 10 percent were able to do so within the GDPR’s 72-hour window; 38 percent reported notification took two to five months to complete.

Obstacles to preparedness

The years-long evolution of the GDPR, which will replace older regulations, is evidence that world governments are taking data breach risks seriously. Unfortunately, our study indicates not all C-suite decision-makers are as concerned about global data breach risks as they should be and their antipathy is impairing their organizations’ ability to prepare for a global data breach.

While the security professionals surveyed cited high-volume breaches (65 percent) and breaches involving high-value information (50 percent) as the data risks that concern them the most, only 30 percent said their organization’s C-suite was fully aware of the company’s compliance status. Further, just 38 percent said their executives viewed global data regulations as a top priority.

Technology limitations and lack of executive support are significant obstacles to preparedness and compliance, but they’re not the only ones. Additionally, survey respondents cited:

  • Reluctance to make needed comprehensive changes in business practices (60 percent)
  • Not enough budget to hire staff (37 percent)
  • Unrealistic demands from regulators/regulations (35 percent)
  • Not enough money for appropriate security technology (34 percent)
  • Lack of knowledge about global data breach response (29 percent)

What companies must do

Some survey respondents indicated their organizations are taking the right steps toward preparedness and compliance. They are putting in place security technologies to quickly detect a data breach (48 percent), have tested and proven response plans (44 percent), can quickly identify whether a breach will require notification (15 percent) and are prepared to notify regulators within 72 hours of breach discovery (13 percent).

However, many organizations could be doing more to prepare for a global data breach and to comply with the GDPR. Global data breach risks continue to increase in number, scope and impact, and the potential loss of business and financial impact of a breach could prove catastrophic for affected companies. With less than a year to go until the GDPR takes effect, any company that conducts business internationally needs to act now to ensure it will be ready to deal with a global data breach when it occurs.

Related Posts

Customer Spotlight: How Matrix Rental Solutions Strengthens Trust in Affordable Housing

Learn how Matrix continues to deliver a secure, trusted rental experience as fraud tactics evolve. Read more!

July 31, 2026 by Laura Burrows
What Is AI Decisioning?

Every business makes decisions about people and transactions all day long. Should we approve this loan? Is this purchase fraud? Which customer should get this offer, and what should it be? For a long time, those decisions were made in one of two ways: a person reviewed each case by hand, or the company wrote fixed rules, like "approve anyone with a credit score above 700." Both work. Both also leave value on the table. The manual review is slow and hard to scale. The fixed rule can turn away good applicants and is slow to adapt when the market shifts. AI decisioning is a third way. What makes AI decisioning work Instead of relying on a single reviewer or a rigid rule, automated decisioning uses models that learn from data — studying how thousands of past cases turned out, finding the patterns that predict an outcome, and applying them to each new decision, often in real time. The result is faster, more consistent decisions. But a model on its own isn't the whole story. Getting real value from AI decisioning takes good data to learn from, AI analytics to generate insights, the tools to act on it and the governance to keep it compliant. What we've found is that the pieces only pay off when they work together, and that is where we're built differently. A model is only as good as what it learns from, and we pair your data with one of the deepest views of consumer and commercial credit: decades of full-file history and vetted attributes. Then we give you the tools to act on it. Use cases across your business Whether you're trying to grow your customer base, reduce fraud, manage lending risk, or improve collections, automated decisioning brings all the pieces together to make more accurate, consistent and explainable decisions at scale. Fraud and Identity A fraudulent transaction that slips through costs money and erodes trust. Rules are static, and fraudsters move fast. They'll probe boundaries, find the blind spots and move to the next scheme. By the time the rules are updated, they're already three steps ahead. How AI decisioning changes this: AI fraud detection with real-time risk scoring and decisioning across transactions and customer interactions Intelligence that continuously learns from results to help adapt fraud strategies as threats evolve Reduced false positives and less friction for customers at account opening and checkout Identity verification tools that confirm someone is who they say they are without slowing down the experience Credit and Lending Loan approval is where the relationship begins. Credit risk decisioning helps lenders find that delicate balance between approving enough people to grow, but carefully enough to manage risk. Missing that balance means turning away good customers or taking on losses that are difficult to absorb. How AI decisioning changes this: Increased approval opportunities for creditworthy applicants without increasing overall risk Models you can update and deploy quickly as market conditions change, rather than waiting months Ability to run "what-if" scenarios to test how a new strategy would have performed on your historical data before putting it live Collections Which customer should your team reach out to today? Through which channel? What kind of message? If you reach out too aggressively, you push someone who might have recovered into default. If you wait too long, you lose them. If you call someone at work, they resent you; if you text, they might ignore it. If you offer a payment plan, they might accept it, but only if the terms make sense to their financial situation. How AI decisioning changes this: Optimized next-best-action and contact-channel strategies for each individual customer Improved recovery potential through better targeting Less time spent on accounts with a lower propensity to pay, freeing your team for higher-impact cases Ability to segment and test new strategies before rollout Customer Acqusition Finding the right customers is about reaching the right people with the right offer at the right time. To stay competitive, it’s now a requirement to balance growth with risk while creating a seamless experience converting prospects into customers. How AI decisioning changes this: More precise prospect targeting using credit, behavioral, and alternative data, where permitted, to identify consumers most likely to respond Personalized offers delivered in real time Dynamic decision strategies that can be updated quickly as market conditions and customer behavior change Ongoing testing and optimization of acquisition strategies to improve campaign performance and support customer lifetime value Driving results with AI decisioning Every customer interaction is a decision. Businesses that can adapt quickly will be better positioned to grow, manage risk, and deliver the experiences customers expect. The technology will continue to evolve, but the goal remains the same: making informed decisions that balance business objectives, risk, and customer experience. Learn more about our decisioning software

July 27, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
Why Innovation Matters for Members First Credit Union

Learn how Members First Credit Union uses innovation and data-driven insights to better serve members and expand financial opportunity.

July 24, 2026 by Scarlet Nickel

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe