Search Results for: synthetic id

The sharp uptick in fraud made it clear that banks, credit unions, and fintechs need to invest in a strategy that utilizes identity layers.

Learn about some specific Experian solutions that are especially timely for lenders strategizing their response to the COVID Recession.

Pre COVID-19, operations functions for retailers and banks had not consisted of a remote workforce. Now retail and banking have changed for good.

Combating fraud requires that you differentiate between first and third party fraud so you can determine the best treatment.

Criminals constantly search and exploit weaknesses. In this digital age, protecting people fuels our commitment to identity protection and fraud prevention.

Implement identity management and account management procedures that are effective and don't affect user experience

Despite rising concerns about identity theft, most Americans aren’t taking basic steps to make it harder for their information to be stolen, according to a survey Experian conducted in August 2017.

To improve the customer experience during the busy holiday shopping season many businesses loosen their fraud criteria.

Experian recently contributed to a TSYS whitepaper focused on the various threats associated with first party fraud. I think the paper does a good job at summarizing the problem, and points out some very important strategies that can be employed to help both prevent first party fraud losses and detect those already in an institution’s active and collections account populations. I’d urge you to have a look at this paper as you begin asking the right questions within your own organization. Watch here The bad news is that first party fraud may currently account for up to 20 percent of credit charge-offs. The good news is that scoring models (using a combination of credit attributes and identity element analysis) targeted at various first party fraud schemes such as Bust Out, Never Pay, and even Synthetic Identity are quite effective in all phases of the customer lifecycle. Appropriate implementation of these models, usually involving coordinated decisioning strategies across both fraud and credit policies, can stem many losses either at account acquisition, or at least early enough in an account management stage, to substantially reduce average fraud balances. The key is to prevent these accounts from ending up in collections queues where they’ll never have any chance of actually being collected upon. A traditional customer information program and identity theft prevention program (associated, for example with the Red Flags Rule) will often fail to identify first party fraud, as these are founded in identity element verification and validation, checks that often ‘pass’ when applied to first party fraudsters.

Fintech growth is returning, but growth alone is no longer enough to separate market leaders from the rest. The next stage of fintech will be shaped by how well organizations understand the consumers they serve, how accurately they assess risk and how consistently they make decisions across the customer lifecycle. That requires more than speed, more data or a single new model. It requires a unified view of the consumer that brings together identity, credit and behavioral signals into one decisioning strategy. Experian’s 2026 State of Fintech Report identifies partnerships, data and fraud as three forces shaping the next phase of fintech growth. The report also makes a clear point: institutions that integrate these forces into cohesive strategies will be better positioned to grow with confidence. For many fintechs, the challenge is not a lack of innovation. It is the increasing complexity of turning innovation into scalable, explainable and profitable growth. Fintech organizations span a wide range of maturity, from early-stage startups to scaled lenders, and many are experimenting with new products, technologies and customer engagement models at the same time. That creates opportunity, but it also creates pressure to make more disciplined decisions. The market is rewarding institutions that connect product strategy, risk management and customer experience in a more coordinated way. This is why the unified consumer view is becoming so important. It helps fintechs turn fragmented signals into consistent decisions that support both growth and resilience. Why a unified consumer view matters now A unified consumer view means bringing together the signals that define a customer’s identity, credit behavior, financial capacity and risk profile. It moves fintechs away from isolated decision points and toward a more connected picture of the customer across origination, account management and servicing. This matters because consumer behavior is becoming more fluid, fraud is becoming more sophisticated and product strategies are becoming more specialized. A customer may appear strong through one lens and risky through another. An application may pass an onboarding check, but later show behavior that suggests emerging fraud or repayment stress. Without a connected view, those signals may stay trapped in different systems or teams. The 2026 State of Fintech Report highlights this shift across several areas. Fintechs are managing credit cards and unsecured personal loans with greater precision, recognizing that each product requires different strategies and risk controls. Credit cards require ongoing account management because exposure continues after origination. Unsecured personal loans follow a fixed repayment structure, which makes underwriting precision especially important at the point of origination. These differences show why a one-size-fits-all strategy cannot support modern fintech growth. A unified consumer view helps lenders apply the right data, risk framework and customer strategy to the right product at the right time. Siloed decisions create blind spots Many fintechs already use multiple sources of data. They may rely on traditional credit data, alternative data, fraud tools, cash flow information, identity verification and internal account performance data. If those signals are managed separately, the organization may still lack a clear view of the customer. Data can become fragmented. Risk teams can reach different conclusions than fraud teams. Product teams can pursue growth without a full understanding of emerging portfolio pressure. The State of Fintech Report points out that fintech competition is increasingly defined by the ability to align data strategies with decision frameworks. That means data is not just a support function. It is becoming central to growth, risk management and customer experience. Organizations are investing in richer datasets and more advanced analytics, but the differentiator is how effectively those inputs are operationalized. This is where many fintechs still have work to do. The value comes not from any single dataset, but from how signals are layered, interpreted and applied together. For example, a lender may understand a consumer’s credit score, but that does not always reveal broader financial behavior. Cash flow data may add insight into income and expenses, but it needs to be categorized and normalized to support reliable decisions. Identity signals may help detect fraud, but they become more powerful when combined with credit and behavioral data. A unified view brings these inputs together so fintechs can better determine whether a customer represents a growth opportunity, a fraud risk, an emerging credit risk or a borrower who needs a different product experience. Product complexity requires better decisioning The need for a unified consumer view becomes even clearer when looking at how fintechs manage different credit products. Fintech lenders continue to originate approximately 1.5 unsecured personal loans for every one credit card, which reinforces the importance of both products within portfolio strategy. Credit card originations continue to grow moderately while unsecured personal loan originations have slowed after tighter lending standards. These patterns suggest that fintechs are not simply shifting from one product to another. They are becoming more mature in how they manage each product based on its structure, risk profile and consumer use case. Credit cards and installment loans behave differently. Credit cards introduce ongoing exposure and require active account management, line management and monitoring of utilization behavior. Unsecured personal loans carry fixed terms and structured repayment schedules, which makes origination quality especially important. For fintechs, this means product strategy and risk strategy must be tightly connected. The same consumer may need to be evaluated differently depending on the product, loan amount, repayment expectations and observed behavior. A unified consumer view gives lenders the context needed to make those differences actionable. This is also where segmentation becomes more sophisticated. The State of Fintech Report’s loan segmentation framework connects strategy, risk and data advantage across small-dollar, mid-tier and large-ticket loans. Small-dollar lending can support thin-file acquisition, but may require alternative data and stronger identity visibility. Mid-tier lending may involve debt consolidation and cash flow pressure, where transaction insights and trended data can be particularly useful. Large-ticket lending can support higher-value growth, but it also creates greater exposure and may require a fuller combination of credit, fraud and identity signals. This kind of framework helps fintechs align product strategy with risk and data strategy in a more deliberate way. Fraud is making the unified view even more urgent Fraud is another reason fintechs need to move beyond siloed decisioning. Fraud is becoming more complex across the customer lifecycle. Synthetic identities, first-party misuse and AI-driven threats are reshaping the risk landscape. Traditional controls that focus primarily on onboarding are no longer enough. Effective strategies now require continuous monitoring across account access, transactions and servicing. That shift changes how fintechs should think about customer intelligence. Fraud is no longer something that only happens at the point of application. It can emerge later through account behavior, suspicious activity or patterns that look normal when viewed in isolation. Advanced identity signals, including email intelligence, are becoming more central to fraud prevention because they add context that traditional data may not capture. The report also highlights Experian’s acquisition of AtData as part of a broader recognition that email-based identity signals represent a critical layer in digital identity and fraud detection.   The takeaway for fintech leaders is clear. Identity, fraud and credit risk cannot be treated as separate problems. A customer who appears creditworthy may still present identity risk. A fraud signal may also influence credit exposure. A repayment pattern may reflect financial stress, misuse or both. A unified view helps lenders evaluate these signals together so they can make decisions with more confidence and less friction for legitimate customers. Trust is becoming a growth strategy Trust has always mattered in financial services, but fintechs now need to think about trust as a measurable part of decisioning. Customers expect fast applications, seamless experiences and fair outcomes. Regulators and internal governance teams expect transparency, explainability and consistency. Business leaders expect growth without unnecessary exposure. These expectations are difficult to meet when data and decisions are fragmented. The State of Fintech Report’s 2026 action playbook identifies trust as a function of decision accuracy, identity confidence and customer transparency. That framing is important because it moves the conversation beyond speed alone. A fast decision is not valuable if it approves the wrong customer, declines a good customer or creates unnecessary friction in the wrong place. Fintechs should evaluate where friction improves outcomes, such as preventing fraud or identifying risk, and where it creates unnecessary loss of good customers. For many lenders, the path forward is not removing friction everywhere. It is applying the right level of friction at the right moment based on a clearer view of the consumer. This is where unified decisioning becomes a competitive advantage. It allows fintechs to create experiences that feel faster and more relevant while still protecting the portfolio. It supports better segmentation, more informed offers and more consistent risk treatment. It also gives teams a shared understanding of why decisions are made, which is essential as AI and automation become more embedded in lending workflows. What should fintech leaders do next? A unified view of the consumer is not built by adding one more tool or one more dataset. It requires a decisioning strategy that connects data, analytics, fraud, identity and product objectives. Fintech leaders should start by evaluating where their current decisioning frameworks fall short. Are credit and fraud signals looked at together? Are cash flow insights being used consistently? Are identity signals monitored after account opening? Are decisions explainable across teams and channels? The 2026 State of Fintech Report recommends prioritizing experimentation tied to measurable decision lift and model performance. This means testing combinations of credit, alternative, cash flow and identity signals to determine where incremental data improves response rates, approval rates, early-loss reduction and fraud mitigation. It also means treating data and decisioning as connected priorities, with a focus on signal quality, integration and measurable impact. The goal is not to collect more inputs for the sake of volume. The goal is to understand which signals improve outcomes and how those signals should be applied at scale. For fintechs, this is the next competitive frontier. Growth will continue to depend on product innovation, customer acquisition and speed to market. But the lenders that separate themselves will be the ones that can connect those growth priorities to a stronger decisioning foundation. That requires a consumer view that is broader than a credit profile, deeper than a fraud check and more actionable than a data warehouse. It requires a unified framework that helps lenders understand who the customer is, how the customer behaves and how risk may change over time. Download the 2026 State of Fintech Report The next phase of fintech will not be defined by a single innovation. It will be defined by the ability to connect identity, credit and behavioral data into more confident decisions across the full customer lifecycle. Fintechs that build this unified view will be better positioned to grow, manage risk and strengthen customer trust in a more complex market. To explore the trends shaping fintech growth and decisioning in 2026, download Experian’s 2026 State of Fintech Report. Read now To learn more about how Experian partners with fintechs, visit www.experian.com/fintech. Learn more

Learn how to navigate e-commerce merchant challenges in part one of a collaborative two-part series by Experian & Mastercard.

U.S. rental housing market outlook 2026: Analyze elevated mortgage rates, rental supply constraints, affordability pressure, and rising fraud risk. Discover how data analytics, rent reporting, and digital income and employment verification help property managers reduce risk, improve screening accuracy, and make smarter, faster leasing decisions.

Explore energy and utilities industry trends 2026, focusing on digital services and evolving customer demands in the sector.

For lenders, the job has never been more complex. You’re expected to protect portfolio performance, meet regulatory expectations, and support growth, all while fraud tactics evolve faster than many traditional risk frameworks were designed to handle. One of the biggest challenges of the job? The line between credit loss and fraud loss is increasingly blurred, and misclassified losses can quietly distort portfolio performance. First-party fraud can look like standard credit risk on the surface and synthetic identity fraud can be difficult to identify, allowing both to quietly slip through decisioning models and distort portfolio performance. That’s where fraud risk scores come into play. Used correctly, they don’t replace credit models; they strengthen them. And for credit risk teams under pressure to approve more genuine customers without absorbing unnecessary losses, understanding how fraud risk scores fit into modern decisioning has become essential. What is a fraud risk score (and what isn’t it) At its core, a fraud risk score is designed to assess the likelihood that an applicant or account is associated with fraudulent behavior, not simply whether they can repay credit. That distinction matters. Traditional credit scores evaluate ability to repay based on historical financial behavior. Fraud risk scores focus on intent and risk signals, patterns that suggest an individual may never intend to repay, may be manipulating identity data, or may be building toward coordinated abuse. Fraud risk scores are not: A replacement for credit scoring A blunt tool designed to decline more applicants A one-time checkpoint limited to account opening Instead, they provide an additional lens that helps credit risk teams separate true credit risk from fraud that merely looks like credit loss. How fraud scores augment decisioning Credit models were never built to detect fraud masquerading as legitimate borrowing behavior. Consider common fraud scenarios facing lenders today: First-payment default, where an applicant appears creditworthy but never intends to make an initial payment Bust-out fraud, where an individual builds a strong credit profile over time, then rapidly maxes out available credit before disappearing Synthetic identity fraud, where criminals blend real and fabricated data to create identities that mature slowly and evade traditional checks In all three cases, the applicant may meet credit criteria at the point of decision. Losses can get classified as charge-offs rather than fraud, masking the real source of portfolio degradation. When credit risk teams rely solely on traditional models, the result is often an overly conservative response: tighter credit standards, fewer approvals, and missed growth opportunities. How fraud risk scores complement traditional credit decisioning Fraud risk scores work best when they augment credit decisioning. For credit risk officers, the value lies in precision. Fraud risk scores help identify applicants or accounts where behavior, velocity or identity signals indicate elevated fraud risk — even when credit attributes appear acceptable. When integrated into decisioning strategies, fraud risk scores can: Improve confidence in approvals by isolating high-risk intent early Enable adverse-actionable decisions for first-party fraud, supporting compliance requirements Reduce misclassified credit losses by clearly identifying fraud-driven outcomes Support differentiated treatment strategies rather than blanket declines The goal isn’t to approve fewer customers. It’s to approve the right customers and to decline or treat risk where intent doesn’t align with genuine borrowing behavior. Fraud risk across the credit lifecycle One of the most important shifts for credit risk teams is recognizing that fraud risk is not static. Fraud risk scores can deliver value at multiple stages of the credit lifecycle: Marketing and prescreen: Fraud risk insights help suppress high-risk identities before offers are extended, ensuring marketing dollars are maximized by targeting low risk consumers. Account opening and originations: Real-time fraud risk scoring supports early detection of first-party fraud, synthetic identities, and identity misuse — before losses are booked. Prequalification and instant decisioning: Fraud risk scores can be used to exclude high-risk applicants from offers while maintaining speed and customer experience. Account management and portfolio review: Fraud risk doesn’t end after onboarding. Scores applied in batch or review processes help identify accounts trending toward bust-out behavior or coordinated abuse, informing credit line management and treatment strategies. This lifecycle approach reflects a broader shift: fraud prevention is no longer confined to front-end controls — it’s a continuous risk discipline. What credit risk officers should look for in a fraud risk score Not all fraud risk scores are created equal. When evaluating or deploying them, credit risk officers should prioritize: Lifecycle availability, so fraud risk can be assessed beyond originations Clear distinction between intent and ability to repay, especially for first-party fraud Adverse-action readiness, including explainability and reason codes Regulatory alignment, supporting fair lending and compliance requirements Seamless integration alongside existing credit and decisioning frameworks Increasingly, credit risk teams also value platforms that reduce operational complexity by enabling fraud and credit risk assessment through unified workflows rather than fragmented point solutions. A more strategic approach to fraud and credit risk The most effective credit risk strategies today are not more conservative, they’re more precise. Fraud risk scores give credit risk officers the ability to stop fraud earlier, classify losses accurately and protect portfolio performance without tightening credit across the board. When fraud and credit insights work together, teams can gain a clearer view of risk, stronger decision confidence and more flexibility to support growth. As fraud tactics continue to evolve, the organizations that succeed will be those that can effectively separate fraud from credit loss. Fraud risk scores are no longer a nice-to-have. They’re a foundational tool for modern credit risk strategies. How credit risk teams can operationalize fraud risk scores For credit risk officers, the challenge isn’t just understanding fraud risk, it’s operationalizing it across the credit lifecycle without adding friction, complexity or compliance risk. Rather than treating fraud as a point-in-time decision, credit risk teams should assess fraud risk where it matters most, from acquisition through portfolio management. Fraud risk scores are designed to complement credit decisioning by focusing on intent to repay, helping teams distinguish fraud-driven behavior from traditional credit risk. Key ways Experian supports credit risk teams include: Lifecycle coverage: Experian award-winning fraud risk scores are available across marketing, originations, prequalification, instant decisioning and ongoing account review. This allows organizations to apply consistent fraud strategies beyond account opening. First-party and synthetic identity fraud intelligence: Experian’s fraud risk scoring addresses first-payment default, bust-out behavior and synthetic identity fraud, which are scenarios that often bypass traditional credit models because they initially appear creditworthy. Converged fraud and credit decisioning: By delivering fraud and credit insights together, often through a single integration, Experian can help reduce operational complexity. Credit risk teams can assess fraud and credit risk simultaneously rather than managing disconnected tools and workflows. Precision over conservatism: The emphasis is not on declining more applicants, but on approving more genuine customers by isolating high-risk intent earlier. This precision helps protect portfolio performance without sacrificing growth. For lenders navigating increasing fraud pressure, Experian’s approach reflects a broader shift in the industry: fraud prevention and credit risk management are no longer separate disciplines; they are most effective when aligned. Explore our fraud solutions Contact us

Financial services leaders are dealing with numerous pressures at the same time. These growing challenges for financial services organizations include sophisticated fraud, rapid Artificial Intelligence (AI) adoption without clear regulatory direction, rising customer expectations and the need for compliant, sustainable growth. Businesses are rethinking how they manage risk, growth and customer trust. These financial industry challenges are no longer confined to internal risk teams. They directly impact long-term customer loyalty. How organizations navigate these challenges will determine how effectively they deliver value to their customers. We’ve outlined the six challenges for financial services oranizations that consistently rank highest among industry leaders today. Challenge 1: Fraud is becoming harder to detect and eroding customer trust 72% of business leaders expect AI-generated fraud and deepfakes to be major challenges by 20261 As fraud tactics evolve quickly, driven in part by AI, customers are being targeted through identity-based attacks from account takeovers to synthetic identities and misuse of personal information. When these threats go undetected, or when legitimate activity is incorrectly flagged, the result isn’t just financial loss. It’s a breakdown of trust. Organizations that want to stay ahead must move beyond isolated fraud controls. By embedding identity management and monitoring into the customer experience, organizations can move from reactive fraud response to proactive identity protection. Identity theft protection and monitoring help organizations turn fraud prevention into a visible, trust-building experience for customers — offering early alerts, guidance, and peace of mind when identity risks arise. Challenge 2: AI decisions must be trusted by customers, not just regulators 76% of businesses say implementing responsible AI is one of their biggest challenges2 As AI becomes more embedded in financial services, it shapes the experiences customers see every day. From credit decisions to eligibility outcomes and personalized offers. While AI can drive faster and more inclusive decisions, it also introduces a new expectation: customers want to understand why a decision was made. Responsible AI is no longer just about regulatory compliance. It’s about delivering outcomes that feel fair, consistent and easy to understand. When decisions appear unclear, confidence erodes. When organizations can clearly explain outcomes, not just internally, they build confidence across regulators, partners and customers. This allows AI to scale responsibly while reinforcing trust in every interaction. Financial wellness tools such as credit scores, reports and education help make AI-driven decisions more transparent, giving customers clarity into outcomes and confidence in how their financial health is assessed. Challenge 3: Digital experiences are failing to deliver clarity and confidence 57% of U.S. consumers remain concerned about conducting activities online3 Customer confidence is affected by day-to-day interactions such as onboarding, payments and issue resolution. Inconsistent decisions, unclear outcomes and friction in digital journeys can quickly erode confidence and increase confusion, disengagement and abandonment. Financial services leaders will need to rebuild and strengthen confidence. Improving key decision points with better data and analytics helps ensure customers receive timely insights, understandable outcomes and meaningful guidance, turning everyday interactions into opportunities to build stronger relationships. By delivering ongoing financial wellness insights and education, organizations can replace confusion with clarity — helping consumers better understand their financial standing and stay engaged over time. Challenge 4: Gen Z continues to raise the bar It's no secret that Gen Z stands out for its strong preference for digital financial services and digital interactions, but Gen Z is also pushing the envelope on financial wellness. 48% of Gen Z report that they do not feel financially secure, indicating strong demand for financial support and tools4 Their expectations for instant decisions, seamless digital experiences, transparency and tools that help them manage their financial lives are quickly becoming the baseline. To meet and exceed these expectations, financial institutions will need to support real-time, data-driven decisioning that adapt to individual needs. Delivering modern, app-like financial experiences, without compromising risk management. Increasingly, organizations are meeting Gen Z expectations by offering financial wellness and protection tools through employee benefits, supporting everyday financial confidence beyond traditional compensation. Challenge 5: Limited data limits meaningful consumer engagement 62 million U.S. consumers are thin-file or credit invisible under traditional credit scoring.5 Growth will always be a priority, but it must be responsible and inclusive. Traditional credit data alone often provides an incomplete picture of consumer financial behavior, limiting visibility and making it harder to confidently expand access. By incorporating alternative and expanded data, organizations can gain a more holistic view of consumers. This broader perspective supports smarter decisions, personalized insights and more inclusive engagement, which enables growth while maintaining compliance and managing risk responsibly. Expanded data supports more personalized financial wellness experiences, enabling organizations to provide relevant insights, responsible access and guidance tailored to individual consumer needs. Challenge 6: Disconnected decisions create inconsistent customer experiences Increasingly, fintech leaders are moving toward unified risk and decisioning strategies to deliver more personalized experiences6 While customers interact with a single institution, decisions are often made across disconnected data sources, systems and teams. These silos create inconsistent experiences, slow responses and operational complexities that customers feel directly through conflicting messages and uneven outcomes. Experian helps organizations break down these silos by unifying data, analytics and decisioning across the enterprise. When data incidents occur, integrated experiences enable faster data breach resolution, helping consumers understand what happened, take action, and recover with confidence. Looking ahead These challenges for financial services organizations are not emerging; they’re already here and reshaping how financial institutions engage with consumers. Leaders who proactively address financial industry challenges by connecting data, analytics, and responsible AI are better positioned to deliver trusted, transparent and meaningful experiences. Learn More References:1. https://www.experian.com/blogs/insights/2025-identity-fraud-report2. https://www.techradar.com/pro/businesses-are-struggling-to-implement-responsible-ai-but-it-could-make-all-the-difference3. https://www.experian.com/blogs/insights/2025-identity-fraud-report4. https://www.deloitte.com/global/en/issues/work/genz-millennial-survey.html5. https://www.experian.com/thought-leadership/business/the-roi-of-alternative-data6. https://us-go.experian.com/2025-state-of-fintech-report?cmpid=IM-2025-state-of-fintech-report-livesocial-share