Generative AI Adoption and Impact on Fraud

by Alex Lvoff, Janine Movish 6 min read August 24, 2023

“Grandma, it’s me, Mike.”

Imagine hearing the voice of a loved one (or what sounds like it) informing you they were arrested and in need of bail money.

Panicked, a desperate family member may follow instructions to withdraw a large sum of money to provide to a courier. Suspicious, they even make a video call to which they see a blurry image on the other end, but the same voice.

When the fight or flight feeling settles, reality hits.

Sadly, this is not the scenario of an upcoming Netflix movie. This is fraud – an example of a new grandparent scam/family emergency scam happening at scale across the U.S.

While generative AI is driving efficiencies, personalization and improvements in multiple areas, it’s also a technology being adopted by fraudsters. Generative AI can be used to create highly personalized and convincing messages that are tailored to a specific victim. By analyzing publicly available social media profiles and other personal information, scammers can use generative AI to create fake accounts, emails, or phone calls that mimic the voice and mannerisms of a grandchild or family member in distress. The use of this technology can make it particularly difficult to distinguish between real and fake communication, leading to increased vulnerability and susceptibility to fraud.

Furthermore, generative AI can also be used to create deepfake videos or audio recordings that show the supposed family member in distress or reinforce the scammer’s story. These deepfakes can be incredibly realistic, making it even harder for victims to identify fraudulent activity.

What is Generative AI?

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) describes algorithms that can be used to create new content, including audio, code, images, text, simulations, and videos. Generative AI has the potential to revolutionize many industries by creating new and innovative content, but it also presents a significant risk for financial institutions. Cyber attackers can use generative AI to produce sophisticated malware, phishing schemes, and other fraudulent activities that can cause data breaches, financial losses, and reputational damage.

This poses a challenge for financial organizations, as human error remains one of the weakest links in cybersecurity. Fraudsters capitalizing on emotions such as fear, stress, desperation, or inattention can make it difficult to protect against malicious content generated by generative AI, which could be used as a tactic to defraud financial institutions.

Four types of Generative AI used for Fraud:

Fraud automation at scale
Fraudulent activities often involve multiple steps which can be complex and time-consuming. However, GenAI may enable fraudsters to automate each of these steps, thereby establishing a comprehensive framework for fraudulent attacks. The modus operandi of GenAI involves the generation of scripts or code that facilitates the creation of programs capable of autonomously pilfering personal data and breaching accounts. Previously, the development of such codes and programs necessitated the expertise of seasoned programmers, with each stage of the process requiring separate and fragmented development. Nevertheless, with the advent of GenAI, any fraudster can now access an all-encompassing program without the need for specialized knowledge, amplifying the inherent danger it poses. It can be used to accelerate fraudsters techniques such as credential stuffing, card testing and brute force attacks.

Text content generation
In the past, one could often rely on spotting typos or errors as a means of detecting such fraudulent schemes. However, the emergence of GenAI has introduced a new challenge, as it generates impeccably written scripts that possess an uncanny authenticity, rendering the identification of deceit activities considerably more difficult. But now, GenAI can produce realistic text that sounds as if it were from a familiar person, organization, or business by simply feeding GenAI prompts or content to replicate. Furthermore, the utilization of innovative Language Learning Model (LLM) tools enables scammers to engage in text-based conversations with multiple victims, skillfully manipulating them into carrying out actions that ultimately serve the perpetrators’ interests.

Image and video manipulation
In a matter of seconds, fraudsters, regardless of their level of expertise, are now capable of producing highly authentic videos or images powered by GenAI. This innovative technology leverages deep learning techniques, using vast amounts of collected datasets to train artificial intelligence models. Once these models are trained, they possess the ability to generate visuals that closely resemble the desired target. By seamlessly blending or superimposing these generated images onto specific frames, the original content can be replaced with manipulated visuals. Furthermore, the utilization of AI text-to-image generators, powered by artificial neural networks, allows fraudsters to input prompts in the form of words. These prompts are then processed by the system, resulting in the generation of corresponding images, further enhancing the deceptive capabilities at their disposal.

Human voice generation
The emergence of AI-generated voices that mimic real people has created new vulnerabilities in voice verification systems. Firms that rely heavily on these systems, such as investment firms, must take extra precautions to ensure the security of their clients’ assets.

Criminals can also use AI chatbots to build relationships with victims and exploit their emotions to convince them to invest money or share personal information. Pig butchering scams and romance scams are examples of these types of frauds where AI chatbots can be highly effective, as they are friendly, convincing, and can easily follow a script.

In particular, synthetic identity fraud has become an increasingly common tactic among cybercriminals. By creating fake personas with plausible social profiles, hackers can avoid detection while conducting financial crimes.

It is essential for organizations to remain vigilant and verify the identities of any new contacts or suppliers before engaging with them. Failure to do so could result in significant monetary loss and reputational damage.

Leverage AI to fight bad actors

In today’s digital landscape, businesses face increased fraud risks from advanced chatbots and generative technology. To combat this, businesses must use the same weapons than criminals, and train AI-based tools to detect and prevent fraudulent activities.

Fraud prediction: Generative AI can analyze historical data to predict future fraudulent activities. By analyzing patterns in data and identifying potential risk factors, generative AI can help fraud examiners anticipate and prevent fraudulent behavior. Machine learning algorithms can analyze patterns in data to identify suspicious behavior and flag it for further investigation.

Fraud Investigation: In addition to preventing fraud, generative AI can assist fraud examiners in investigating suspicious activities by generating scenarios and identifying potential suspects. By analyzing email communications and social media activity, generative AI can uncover hidden connections between suspects and identify potential fraudsters.

To confirm the authenticity of users, financial institutions should adopt sophisticated identity verification methods that include liveness detection algorithms and document-centric identity proofing, and predictive analytics models.

These measures can help prevent bots from infiltrating their systems and spreading disinformation, while also protecting against scams and cyberattacks.

In conclusion, financial institutions must stay vigilant and deploy new tools and technologies to protect against the evolving threat landscape. By adopting advanced identity verification solutions, organizations can safeguard themselves and their customers from potential risks.

To learn more about how Experian can help you leverage fraud prevention solutions, visit us online or request a call

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: A Closer Look at Modern Lending with Jeff Hops and Erin Haselkorn

In this first episode of Ask the Expert, Experian's Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product, and Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director of Analyst Relations, explore how broader data and new signals can help lenders better understand today’s consumers, while maintaining responsible decisioning. Lending is changing  Interest rates, regulation, embedded finance and AI are reshaping the lending landscape. Consumer behavior is evolving just as quickly. But the core job hasn’t changed. Lenders are still making decisions about people they don’t fully know, and that makes data more important than ever. "There are periods where nothing changes, and periods where it seems like everything changes. We’re in the latter … but the core premise hasn’t changed. You’re still trying to lend to somebody you don’t know."Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product To make those decisions with confidence, lenders need a strong foundation of identity, history and reliable signals. In a period of rapid change, the quality and completeness of that data become even more critical. A more complex view of today’s consumer What has changed is the consumer. Traditional credit data is foundational but can be further enhanced with visibility on how people earn, manage and move money. Income may come from multiple sources, and financial activity often spans bank accounts, applications (apps) and digital channels. Cash flow data, for example, can provide a clearer view of what’s actually coming into a consumer’s account, beyond what traditional records may show.These additional signals can help lenders better understand: Income variability across multiple earning sources Current financial behavior through cash flow activity Digital and identity-linked activity across channels These signals don’t replace traditional data; they expand it. The result is a more complete and current view of the consumer. From exploration to real-world application The conversation around broader data signals has moved beyond theory. Lenders are no longer just asking whether these signals are useful. They’re asking where, how and under what governance they can be applied across the lending lifecycle. Lenders are actively researching, testing and implementing new data sources across the lending lifecycle. What was once experimental is now operational. Institutions are progressing through a clear path: Research Understanding available signals and use cases Testing Evaluating performance in controlled environments Implementation Applying insights in production Today, alternative data is being used in areas like analytics, channel scoring and decisioning, often within governed environments that allow for safe testing and validation. AI may accelerate this shift by helping institutions identify patterns at scale, but its value depends on the strength of the underlying data: quality, governance, context and clear business use cases. More signal, more responsibility As data availability expands, lenders have access to more granular insights than ever before. That creates opportunity, but also responsibility. The institutions that lead won’t be the ones that use the most data. They’ll be the ones that know which signals to use, how to validate them and how to apply them in ways that are fair, explainable and aligned to consumer outcomes. “Institutions can unlock more granular and powerful decisions, but they have to do it responsibly.”Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director, Analyst Relations The future of lending will be shaped not just by how much data is available, but by how thoughtfully it’s applied. Keeping the consumer at the center of decisioning is essential to building trust and long-term success. Explore alternative data with us A more complete understanding of today’s consumers starts with better data. We help lenders responsibly incorporate broader data signals and advanced analytics into decisioning strategies, enhancing visibility into today’s consumers while strengthening risk assessment and expanding access to credit. Let’s work together to build more confident, more responsible lending decisions. Learn more Contact us About our experts Jeff Hops Senior Director, Data Platform and Product, Experian Jeff Hops is a Senior Director in Experian’s Financial Services and Data business with over eight years of experience driving innovation in credit and data solutions. He has led product development for Experian’s Credit Report and played a key role in launching Ascend Identity Platform™, a leading identity resolution platform. Erin Haselkorn Senior Director, Analyst Relations, Experian Erin Haselkorn is responsible for analyst relations for Experian. She has developed an understanding of key marketing trends across a broad range of verticals. Her market research around data strategy, AI, fraud, identity and data management, paired with her broad Experian product knowledge, gives her a unique understanding of business automation and data trends. Erin is a frequent spokesperson and guest blogger.

Published: June 22, 2026 by Julie Lee
How Consumer Vehicle Choices Are Shaping Automotive Loan Trends

Conversations about rising auto loan balances and higher monthly payments has often centered around increasing vehicle prices and elevated interest rates; and while those factors have undoubtedly played a role, another important piece of the puzzle is the type of vehicles consumers are choosing to purchase. According to Experian’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026, consumers are continuing to opt for SUVs over other vehicle types, a trend that may be contributing to higher average loan amounts and monthly payments. SUVs accounted for 63.5% of all new retail vehicle registrations over the last 12 months, up from 62.8% a year ago. Additionally, more than 117 million SUVs were in operation across the United States in the first quarter of 2026, making up 42.2% of the market share. At the same time, traditional passenger cars continue to fall in share, coming in at 16.5%, a decrease from 18.4% last year. As consumers increasingly gravitate towards the larger vehicle segment, it reflects the ongoing desire for versatility, cargo capacity, and family-friendly functionality. Electrification’s growing role in consumer purchasing behavior Interestingly, electrified SUVs continue to gain traction, representing 27.7% of all new SUV registrations, these vehicles include battery-electric, hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and other alternative fuel types. Diving a bit deeper, the Tesla Model Y was the market share leader for new, retail electrified SUV registrations in the last 12 months, coming in at 15.8%. Rounding out the top five were Honda CR-V (9.6%), Toyota RAV4 (7.2%), Chevrolet Trax (7.2%), and Toyota Grand Highlander (3.4%). As model availability and familiarity with the electrification segment grows, the broader adoption of these vehicles are playing an increasingly important role in vehicle pricing and overall consumer demand. While average loan amounts and monthly payments are being driven by a combination of factors such as financing costs and consumer purchasing behavior, data in Q1 2026 demonstrates the continued interest in SUVs. This suggests that the industry’s shift toward larger vehicles is likely playing a meaningful role in today’s financing environment. To learn more about SUV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026 presentation.

Published: June 17, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch
When New Data Impacts MBS Pricing: Student Loan Debt

In our previous post, we described the Current Second Lien Balance field, which is one of over 2,000 fields in the new Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset. We showed that the Current Second Lien Balance field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery: New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data). Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe. Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions. In this article, we discuss another field that satisfies the above criteria: Student Loan Balance.  We evaluate this field in the context of these criteria. First, however, we provide a summary of the MLP dataset and how it compares to standard GSE loan-level data available today. Standard GSE Data vs. Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) Data The MLP dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance, filed junior liens, and AVM values).  MLP differs from loan-level data provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae, which the vast majority of market participants solely rely on, in a number of ways: Standard data provided by the GSEs and GNMA does not contain all the information necessary for accurate forecasting of mortgage prepayment and credit performance. Basic, critical fields like borrower’s current credit score and current junior liens on the property are missing. The new Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset from Experian contains borrower, loan, and property data fields covering the entire mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), both securitized and non-securitized. MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle. New, Material and Significant Field:  Student Loan Debt MLP contains a number of fields describing each mortgage borrower’s student debt load, including amounts in repayment, forbearance and collections; estimated interest rate, time remaining until forbearance expiration, and more. In the interest of simplicity, for this article we’ll focus on a single student loan-related field within MLP: Student Loans Balance, which is defined as the total balance on open non-deferred student trades reported in the last 3 months. Is Information Regarding Student Loans New to Markets? Standard loan-level data disclosed by the GSEs and GNMA contain no student-loan-specific fields. Theoretically, fields related to DTI at origination might capture some aspect of student loan debt. So, in the best-case scenario for an investor relying solely on standard disclosure, a DTI value as of origination is provided -- yet is never updated as the loan seasons and the borrower’s debt and income change (see more here).  But in the case of federal student loan debt attached to mortgages originated from early 2020 to late 2023, the level of detail provided by disclosure may be even more unknown due to COVID-era repayment and reporting moratoriums. The student loan repayment moratorium was a temporary federal policy that paused required payments, set interest rates to 0%, and suspended collections on most federally-held student loans. The moratorium began in March 2020, with payments resuming in October 2023, making it approximately 3.5 years in duration—the longest consumer credit payment pause in U.S. history. (Source: NCUA ) During the moratorium, student loan-related debt loads may have been understated as federal loans were in a temporary state of $0 repayment.  As an alternative to leaving student loan debt completely out of DTI calculations, an imputed payment equal to only 0.50% of the outstanding balance was often used as a placeholder for a borrower’s DTI calculation. As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, a new report from the Federal Reserve of New York shows a rise in student loan default rates by age group.  Student loan delinquencies have been broadly trending higher across all age groups.  Also, the average age of a borrower in default has risen to 40, and borrowers age 50 and older are now at a higher risk of default than younger groups. This 40 to 50-year-old age group represents prime home ownership years. Defaulted borrowers are also struggling to make other debt payments, too. The same report stated that almost 40% of past due student loan borrowers with auto loans are past due, 56% have at least one credit card past due, and 20% have a past due mortgage.  In addition to increased delinquency risk on their mortgage, borrowers with student loan debt also have fewer mortgage refinance options, as their elevated DTI may prevent qualification for a refinance, or increase the offered rate of a refinance and thereby reduce their incentive.  These dampening effects of student loan debt on mortgage CPR are clearly evident in the data, as described further below. Standard data only reports information related to the primary mortgage and does not include any details on the borrower’s other debts, with the exception of DTI at origination, which is never updated throughout the life of the loan. In contrast, MLP provides a comprehensive view of the borrower’s full credit profile, including other obligations such as credit cards, mortgages on other properties, student loan balances, and much more. Is Student Loan debt material to the residential mortgage market? Approximately $11 trillion of residential mortgage loans were originated during the student loan payment moratorium (Source: Experian MLP Dataset), a period marked by historically low mortgage rates during the COVID era.  As discussed above, DTI data contained in standard market disclosure may be particularly inaccurate for these loans.   As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, a new report from the Federal Reserve of New York shows a rise in student loan default rates by age group.  Student loan delinquencies have been broadly trending higher across all age groups.  Also, the average age of a borrower in default has risen to 40, and borrowers aged 50 and older are now at a higher risk of default than younger groups. This 40 to 50-year-old age group represents prime home ownership years.  Defaulted borrowers are also struggling to make other debt payments, too.   The same report stated that almost 40% of past due student loan borrowers with auto loans are past due, 56% have at least one credit card past due, and 20% have a past due mortgage.  In addition to increased delinquency risk on their mortgage, borrowers with student loan debt also have fewer mortgage refinance options, as their elevated DTI may prevent qualification for a refinance, or increase the offered rate of a refinance and thereby reduce their incentive.  These dampening effects of student loan debt on mortgage CPR are clearly evident in the data, as described further below.  Of today’s $13 trillion in outstanding mortgage debt, more than 10% of that debt ($1.5 trillion) is associated with borrowers who carry student loan debt.  For these borrowers, the average amount of student loan debt outstanding is approximately $50,000, versus a mortgage balance of approximately ~$289,000. In other words, the average student loan debt balance is almost 20% of the mortgage balance for the average borrower who carries both. For this set of borrowers, the average monthly payment is approximately $400 for student loan vs. approximately $2,200 for 1st lien mortgage—so that monthly student loan payments are a significant debt load, approximately 20% of the monthly mortgage payment.  (Source:  Experian MLP Dataset)  Is the effect of student loan debt a significant driver of performance? Figure 1 illustrates prepayments by student loan balance for a sample of loans drawn from MLP. The chart illustrates that borrowers with larger student loan balances prepay much more slowly, likely because some are effectively locked out of refinancing once student loan payments resume due to elevated DTI. The debt-to-income (DTI) ratio calculated using actual student loan payments may be significantly higher than the DTI calculated during the moratorium, in some cases exceeding GSE eligibility thresholds. As illustrated in Figure 1, for in-the-money (ITM) collateral, the differential between loans with material student loan balances (greater than $200,000) and loans with no student debt can reach up to 5 CPR. Notably, even for out-of-the-money (OTM) collateral, loans with student debt prepay 1 to 3 CPR slower, likely reflecting reduced mobility due to tighter financing constraints when purchasing a new home. Pools with otherwise similar prepayment characteristics may exhibit different prepayment behavior depending on the distribution of student loan exposure within their collateral. In addition, because loans with student debt tend to prepay more slowly, this effect increases over time due to burnout: loans without student debt prepay and exit the pools more quickly, leaving a higher concentration of slower-paying loans behind.  Given that 10% of the $13 trillion outstanding mortgage market is associated with borrowers who have student loans (Source:  Experian MLP dataset)—and that student loans have a meaningful impact on prepayments—many pools issued between March 2020 and October 2023 may be subject to this student loan debt CPR throttle, and therefore mispriced by investors relying exclusively on standard market data. Fig 1. Prepayment S-Curve: Student Loans Balance Source:  Experian MLP dataset hosted on IVolatility Data-Driven Platform _____________________________________________________ Michael Pyatski advises MBS traders, portfolio managers, quants, risk managers, loan originators, and technology professionals on making informed, data-driven business decisions that drive revenue growth, enhance risk management, and reduce trading costs. With more than 15 years of experience as an Agency RMBS trader—including serving as Head of the Proprietary Trading Desk at BNP Paribas—Michael developed and successfully implemented relative-value, data-driven profitable trading strategies to capture market opportunities embedded in data but not fully priced by the market. His trading experience, combined with a Ph.D. in econometrics, led him to found the Data-Driven Portal (https://datadrivenportal.com/), a platform that provides advanced technology for MBS trading and risk management. The platform’s No-Model Data-Driven technology leverages big data, econometric analysis, and AI to help traders identify relative-value opportunities in RMBS markets and generate above-market, risk-adjusted returns. _____________________________________________________

Published: June 17, 2026 by Perry DeFelice, Michael Pyatski