Fraud Mitigation: Best Practices for the Digital Economy 2.0

by Chris Ryan 4 min read September 19, 2022

two coworkers looking at a computer

External fraud generally results from deceptive activity intended to produce financial gain that is carried out by an individual, a group of people or an entire organization. Fraudsters may prey on any organization or individual, regardless of the size or nature of their activities. The tactics used are becoming increasingly sophisticated, requiring a multilayered fraud mitigation strategy.

Fraud mitigation involves using tools to reduce the frequency or severity of these risks, ultimately protecting the bottom line and the future of the organization.

Fraud impacts the bottom line and so much more

According to the Federal Trade Commission, consumers reported losing more than $10 billion to fraud in 2023, a 14% increase over the previous year and the highest dollar amount ever reported.

These costs extend beyond the face value of the theft to include fees and interest incurred, fines and legal fees, labor and investigation costs and external recovery expenses.

Aside from dollar losses and direct costs, fraud can also pose legal risks that lead to fines and other legal actions and diminish credibility with regulators. Word of deceptive activities can also create risk for the brand and reputation. These factors can, in turn, result in a loss of market confidence, making it difficult to retain clients and engage new business.

Leveraging fraud mitigation best practices

As the future unfolds, three things are fairly certain: 1) The future is likely to bring more technological advances and, thereby, new ways of working and creating. 2) Fraudsters will continue to look for ways to exploit those opportunities. 3) The future is here, today. Organizations that want to remain competitive in the digital economy should make fraud mitigation and prevention an integral part of their operational strategy.

Assess the risk environment

While enhancing revenue opportunities, the global digital economy has increased the complexity of risk management. Be aware of situations that require people to enforce fraud risk policies. While informed, experienced people are powerful resources, it is important to automate routine decisions where you can and leverage people on the most challenging cases.

It is also critical to consider that not every fraud risk aligns directly to losses. Consider touchpoints where information can be exposed that will later be used to commit fraud. Information that crooks attempt to glean from idle chatter during a customer service call can be a source of unexpected vulnerability. These activities can benefit from greater transparency and automated oversight.

Create a tactical plan to prevent and handle fraud

Leverage analytics wherever possible to streamline decisions and choose the right level of friction that’s appropriate for the risk, and palatable for good customers. Consumers and small businesses have come to expect a customized and frictionless experience. Employee productivity, and ultimately revenue growth, requires the ability to operate with speed and informed confidence. A viable fraud mitigation strategy should incorporate these goals seamlessly with operational objectives. If not, prevention and mitigation controls may be sidelined to get legitimate business done, creating inroads for fraudsters.

Look for a partner who can apply the right friction to situations depending on your risk appetite and use existing data (including your internal data and their own data resources) to better identify individual consumers. This identification process can actually smooth the way for known consumers while providing the right protection against fraudsters and giving consumers who are new to your organization a sense of safety and security when logging in for the first time.

It’s equally important that everyone in your organization is working together to prevent fraud. Establish and document best practices and controls, beginning with fostering a workplace culture in which fraud mitigation is part of everyone’s job. Empower and train all staff to identify and report suspicious activity and ensure they know how to raise concerns. Consider implementing ways to encourage open and swift communication, such as anonymous or confidential reporting channels.

Stay vigilant and tap into resources for managing risks

It is likely impossible to think of every threat your organization might face. Instead, think of fraud mitigation as an ongoing process to identify and isolate any suspected fraud fast — before the activity can develop into a major threat to the bottom line — and manage any fallout. Incorporating technology and robust data collection can fortify governance best practices.

Technology can also help you perform the due diligence faster, ensuring compliance with Know Your Customer (KYC) and other regulations. As necessary, work with risk assessment consultants to get an objective, experienced view.

Learn more about fraud risk mitigation and fraud prevention services.

Related Posts

Are Fraudsters Building Better Identities Than Your Customers?

Fraudsters are getting surprisingly good at onboarding. Sometimes, better than your customers. Legitimate customers treat onboarding like an errand. They start an application between other tasks, get distracted, forget a password, switch devices, upload a document or come back later to finish. Their digital lives aren’t always linear, because real life isn’t either. Fraudsters approach onboarding differently. For them, opening an account is the objective. Every interaction is designed to increase the odds of success. The difference raises an uncomfortable question hanging over onboarding: What exactly are we rewarding? When smooth becomes suspicious Digital onboarding has traditionally rewarded experiences that feel smooth, consistent and complete. The challenge is that legitimate customers rarely behave that way. Most people approach onboarding somewhere between mildly distracted and mildly annoyed. They pause halfway through because dinner is burning. They reopen an old account only to realize everything is attached to an email they made in college and, somehow, still use for airline receipts. Digital life accumulates history unevenly, because ordinary life does too. Fraudsters have every reason to eliminate those inconsistencies. Applications may be rehearsed. Identity attributes are assembled deliberately. Contact points are prepared in advance. Every interaction is optimized to make the application appear credible. Ironically, the qualities organizations often associate with confidence — clean submissions, steady progression and few corrections — can also describe applications that have been carefully engineered to pass inspection. The challenge isn't that smooth onboarding is meaningless. It's that smooth onboarding, by itself, doesn't tell the whole story. Context changes interpretation A smooth onboarding experience should be the beginning of the evaluation, not the end. Behavior provides important context. How someone moves through an application can reveal whether the experience feels naturally human or unusually orchestrated. Do they interact naturally? Do they hesitate, correct mistakes or navigate in ways that resemble ordinary human behavior? Or does the session appear unusually scripted, automated or repetitive? Identity verification adds another layer. Matching information across trusted sources, validating identity details and strengthening confidence in account creation remain important, particularly when onboarding decisions carry financial, fraud or customer experience consequences. But verification largely answers a point-in-time question: Does this information match right now? A third layer comes from digital history. An inbox attached to years of airline receipts, loyalty accounts, subscription renewals, account recovery, financial notifications and familiar digital routines introduces a different kind of confidence. Legitimate digital identities leave behind patterns of persistence and engagement that develop gradually over time. Fraudsters can assemble convincing identity attributes, but creating years of ordinary digital life is much harder. Building confidence in an identity requires more than verifying information submitted during a single onboarding session. It requires understanding whether the identity reflects a broader history that supports what the application suggests. A multilayered approach builds stronger identity confidence No single signal can provide a complete view of identity risk. Organizations need multiple sources of confidence that reinforce one another. That's the thinking behind our approach: combining behavioral intelligence, identity verification and digital identity continuity into a more complete view of risk. We bring these complementary layers together through: • NeuroID adds behavioral context during onboarding and account creation, helping identify interaction patterns that may indicate automation, manipulation or coordinated fraud. • Precise ID® strengthens identity verification and resolution by comparing applicant information with trusted identity data. • AtData, recently added to our portfolio, contributes email-centered intelligence based on persistence, engagement and long-term digital history. Together, these capabilities help organizations move beyond evaluating a single moment in time to understanding whether an identity is supported by consistent behavior, trusted identity data and an established digital history. The future of fraud prevention isn't about rewarding the smoothest application. It's about recognizing the most trustworthy identity. Fraudsters can rehearse an application. They can optimize an onboarding journey. They can even assemble convincing identity attributes. What they can't easily manufacture is years of ordinary digital life. That's why digital identity continuity has become an important layer of modern fraud prevention. Combined with identity verification and behavioral intelligence, it helps organizations distinguish between identities that simply look convincing and those supported by a history that is much harder to fake. Learn more Contact us

September 2, 2026 by Julie Lee
From Hybrids to Refinancing: Consumers are Finding New Roads to Vehicle Affordability

For today’s automotive consumers, considering a vehicle purchase isn’t just about the price they see on the window, it’s about finding the right combination of their vehicle preference and monthly payment. In fact, data from Experian Automotive’s State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q2 2026 highlighted how affordability continues to shape the automotive finance market. For instance, hybrids offered the lowest average new vehicle loan payment across all fuel types, coming in at $646 in Q2 2026, compared to electric vehicles (EVs) at $692, and gasoline-powered vehicles at $721. This led to considerable growth in new vehicle market share for hybrids this quarter, accounting for 16.80%, from 12.99% last year. While the automotive market continues to offer consumers an expanding mix of fuel types, the combination of growing hybrid share and comparatively lower monthly payments is something worth watching. Affordability isn’t just about what consumers drive, it’s how they finance it While hybrid vehicles are continuing to pave their way in the vehicle market, consumers who already have an auto loan are finding greater savings through refinancing. In the second quarter of 2026, automotive refinancing reached approximately 140,000 loans. More notably, the financial benefit associated with refinancing has grown. Consumers who refinanced this quarter reduced their average interest rate by more than 2.4%, with the average rate moving from 10.40% on the original loan to 7.97% on the refinanced loan. Those rate reductions translated into meaningful monthly savings, especially when refinancing through particular lenders. In Q2 2026, refinancing saved consumers an average of $83 per month, compared to an average monthly savings of $64 this time last year. However, credit unions delivered the largest average payment difference among lender types at $102 this quarter, followed by banks ($65), and finance companies ($38). It’s important for automotive professionals to acknowledge that affordability is not a single moment in the vehicle journey. It can influence the vehicle a consumer chooses, the financing they opt for during that transaction, and the decisions they make years after driving off the lot. Understanding and leveraging those different moments can help professionals identify opportunities to better serve consumers throughout the vehicle ownership lifecycle. To learn more about automotive finance trends, view the full State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q2 2026 presentation on demand.

August 27, 2026 by Melinda Zabritski
AI Agent Identity Verification: How to Verify AI Agents in Digital Transactions

AI agents are changing the way consumers interact with businesses online. Learn how you can establish greater confidence in AI transactions.

August 26, 2026 by Laura Burrows

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe