Four Tech Resolutions for Financial Institutions

by Jesse Hoggard 8 min read January 30, 2019

Tech Innovations 2019Perhaps more than ever before, technology is changing how companies operate, produce and deliver products and services to their customers. Similarly, technology is also driving a shift in customer expectation in how, when and where they consume products and services. But these changes aren’t just relegated to the arenas where tech giants with household names, like Amazon and Google, play. Likewise, financial institutions of every size are also fielding the changes brought on by innovations to the industry in recent years.

According to this report by PWC, 77% of firms plan on dedicating time and budgets to increase innovation. But what areas make the most sense for your business? With a seemingly constant shift in consumer and corporate focus, it can be difficult to know which technological advancements are imperative to your company’s success and which are just the latest fizzling buzzword. As you evaluate innovation investments for your organization in 2019 and beyond, here’s a list of four technology innovations that are already changing the financial sector or will change the banking landscape in the near future.

The APIs of Open Banking

Ok, it’s not a singular innovation, so I’m cheating a bit here, but it’s a great place to begin the conversation because it comprises and sets the stage for many of the innovations and technologies that are in use today or will be implemented in the future. Created in 2015, the Open Banking Standard defined how a bank’s system data or consumer-permissioned financial data should be created, accessed and shared through the use of application programming interfaces or APIs.

When financial institutions open their systems up to third-party developer partners, they can respond to the global trends driving change within the industry while greatly improving the customer experience. With the ability to securely share their financial data with other lenders, greater transparency into the banking process, and more opportunities to compare product offerings, consumers get the frictionless experience they’ve come to expect in just about every aspect of life – just not necessarily one that lenders are known for.

But the benefits of open banking are not solely consumer-centric. Financial institutions are able to digitize their product offerings and thus expand their market and more easily share data with partners, all while meeting clients’ individualized needs in the most cost-effective way.

Biometrically speaking…and smiling

Verifying the identity of a customer is perhaps one of the most fundamental elements to a financial transaction. This ‘Know Your Customer’ (KYC) process is integral to preventing fraud, identity theft, money laundering, etc., but it’s also time-consuming and inconvenient to customers. Technology is changing that. From thumbprint and, now, facial recognition through Apple Pay, consumers have been using biometrics to engage with and authorize financial transactions for some time now. As such, the use of biometrics to authenticate identity and remove friction from the financial process is becoming more mainstream, moving from smartphones to more direct interaction.

Chase has now implemented voice biometrics to verify a consumer’s identity in customer service situations, allowing the company to more quickly meet a customer’s needs. Meanwhile, in the US and Europe, Visa is testing biometric credit cards that have a fingerprint reader embedded in the card that stores his or her fingerprint in order to authenticate their identity during a financial transaction. In China, companies like Alipay are taking this to the next level by allowing customers to bypass the phone entirely with its ‘pay with a smile’ service. First launched in KFC restaurants in China, the service  is now being offered at hospitals as well.

How, when and where a consumer accesses their financial institution data actually creates a digital fingerprint that can be verified. While facial and vocal matching are key components to identity verification and protecting the consumer, behavioral biometrics have also become an important part of the fraud prevention arsenal for many financial institutions. These are key components of Experian’s CrossCore solution, the first open fraud and identity platform partners with a variety of companies, through open APIs discussed above.

Not so New Kid on the Block(chain)

The first Bitcoin transaction took place on January 12, 2009. And for a number of years, all was quiet. Then in 2017, Bitcoin started to blow up, creating a scene reminiscent of the 1850s California gold rush. Growing at a seemingly exponential rate, the cryptocurrency topped out at a per unit price of more than $20,000. By design cryptocurrencies are decentralized, meaning they are not controlled or regulated by a single entity, reducing the need for central third-party institutions, i.e. banks and other financial institutions to function as central authorities of trust. Volatility and regulation aside, it’s understandable why financial institutions were uneasy, if not skeptical of the innovation.

But perhaps the most unique characteristic of cryptocurrencies is the technology on which they are built: blockchain. Essentially, a blockchain is just a special kind of database. The database stores, validates, transfers and keeps a ledger of transfers of encrypted data—records of financial transfers in the case of Bitcoin. But these records aren’t stored on one computer as is the case with traditional databases. Blockchain leverages a distributed ledger or distributed trust approach where a full copy of the database is stored across many distributed processing nodes and the system is constantly checking and validating the contents of the database.

But a blockchain can store any type of data, making it useful in a wide variety of applications including tracking the ownership digital or physical assets or the provenance of documents, etc. From clearing and settlements, payments, trade finance, identity and fraud prevention, we’re already seeing financial institutions explore and/or utilize the technology. Santander was the first UK bank to utilize blockchain for their international payments app One Pay FX. Similarly, other banks and industry groups are forming consortiums to test the technology for other various uses. With all this activity, it’s clear that blockchain will become an integral part of financial institutions technology and operations on some level in the coming years.

Robot Uprising Rise in Robots

While Artificial Intelligence seems to have only recently crept into pop-culture and business vernacular, it was actually coined in 1956 by John McCarthy, a researcher at Dartmouth who thought that any aspect of learning or intelligence could essentially be taught to a machine. AI allows machines to learn from experience, adjust to new inputs and carry out human-like tasks. It’s the result of becoming ‘human-like’ or the potential to become superior to humans that creeps out people like my father, and also worries others like Elon Musk. Doomsday scenarios a la Terminator aside, it’s easy to see how the tech can and is useful to society. In fact, much of the AI development done today uses human-style reasoning as a model, but not necessarily the ultimate aim, to deliver better products and services.

It’s this subset of AI, machine learning, that allows companies like Amazon to provide everything from services like automatic encryption in AWS to products like Amazon Echo. While it’s much more complex, a simple way to think about AI is that it functions like billions of conditional if-then-else statements working in a random, varied environment typically towards a set goal. Whereas in the past, programmers would have to code these statements and input reference data themselves, machine learning systems learn, modify and map between inputs and outputs to create new actions based on their learning. It works by combining the large amounts of data created on a daily basis with fast, iterative processing and intelligent algorithms, allowing the program to learn from patterns in the data and make decisions. It’s this type of machine learning that banks are already using to automate routine, rule-based tasks like fraud monitoring and also drive the analytical environments used in their risk modeling and other predictive analytics.

Whether or not you’ve implemented AI, machine learning or bot technology into your operations, it’s highly likely your customers are already leveraging AI in their home lives, with smart home devices like Amazon Echo and Google Home. Conversational AI is the next juncture in how people interface with each other, companies and life in general. We’re already seeing previews of what’s possible with technologies like Google Duplex. This has huge implication for the financial services industry, from removing friction at a transaction level to creating a stickier, more engaging customer experience. To that end, according to this report from Accenture, AI may begin to provide in-the-moment, holistic financial advice that is in a customer’s best interest.

It goes without saying that the market will continue to evolve, competition will only grow more fierce, consumer expectation will continue to shift, and regulation will likely become more complex. It’s clear technology can be a mitigating factor, even a competitive differentiator, with these changing industry variables. Financial institutions must evolve corporate mindsets in their approach to prioritize innovations that will have the greatest enterprise-wide impact. By putting together an intelligent mix of people, process, and the right technology, financial institutions can better predict consumer need and expectation while modernizing their business models.

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: A Closer Look at Modern Lending with Jeff Hops and Erin Haselkorn

In this first episode of Ask the Expert, Experian's Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product, and Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director of Analyst Relations, explore how broader data and new signals can help lenders better understand today’s consumers, while maintaining responsible decisioning. Lending is changing  Interest rates, regulation, embedded finance and AI are reshaping the lending landscape. Consumer behavior is evolving just as quickly. But the core job hasn’t changed. Lenders are still making decisions about people they don’t fully know, and that makes data more important than ever. "There are periods where nothing changes, and periods where it seems like everything changes. We’re in the latter … but the core premise hasn’t changed. You’re still trying to lend to somebody you don’t know."Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product To make those decisions with confidence, lenders need a strong foundation of identity, history and reliable signals. In a period of rapid change, the quality and completeness of that data become even more critical. A more complex view of today’s consumer What has changed is the consumer. Traditional credit data is foundational but can be further enhanced with visibility on how people earn, manage and move money. Income may come from multiple sources, and financial activity often spans bank accounts, applications (apps) and digital channels. Cash flow data, for example, can provide a clearer view of what’s actually coming into a consumer’s account, beyond what traditional records may show.These additional signals can help lenders better understand: Income variability across multiple earning sources Current financial behavior through cash flow activity Digital and identity-linked activity across channels These signals don’t replace traditional data; they expand it. The result is a more complete and current view of the consumer. From exploration to real-world application The conversation around broader data signals has moved beyond theory. Lenders are no longer just asking whether these signals are useful. They’re asking where, how and under what governance they can be applied across the lending lifecycle. Lenders are actively researching, testing and implementing new data sources across the lending lifecycle. What was once experimental is now operational. Institutions are progressing through a clear path: Research Understanding available signals and use cases Testing Evaluating performance in controlled environments Implementation Applying insights in production Today, alternative data is being used in areas like analytics, channel scoring and decisioning, often within governed environments that allow for safe testing and validation. AI may accelerate this shift by helping institutions identify patterns at scale, but its value depends on the strength of the underlying data: quality, governance, context and clear business use cases. More signal, more responsibility As data availability expands, lenders have access to more granular insights than ever before. That creates opportunity, but also responsibility. The institutions that lead won’t be the ones that use the most data. They’ll be the ones that know which signals to use, how to validate them and how to apply them in ways that are fair, explainable and aligned to consumer outcomes. “Institutions can unlock more granular and powerful decisions, but they have to do it responsibly.”Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director, Analyst Relations The future of lending will be shaped not just by how much data is available, but by how thoughtfully it’s applied. Keeping the consumer at the center of decisioning is essential to building trust and long-term success. Explore alternative data with us A more complete understanding of today’s consumers starts with better data. We help lenders responsibly incorporate broader data signals and advanced analytics into decisioning strategies, enhancing visibility into today’s consumers while strengthening risk assessment and expanding access to credit. Let’s work together to build more confident, more responsible lending decisions. Learn more Contact us About our experts Jeff Hops Senior Director, Data Platform and Product, Experian Jeff Hops is a Senior Director in Experian’s Financial Services and Data business with over eight years of experience driving innovation in credit and data solutions. He has led product development for Experian’s Credit Report and played a key role in launching Ascend Identity Platform™, a leading identity resolution platform. Erin Haselkorn Senior Director, Analyst Relations, Experian Erin Haselkorn is responsible for analyst relations for Experian. She has developed an understanding of key marketing trends across a broad range of verticals. Her market research around data strategy, AI, fraud, identity and data management, paired with her broad Experian product knowledge, gives her a unique understanding of business automation and data trends. Erin is a frequent spokesperson and guest blogger.

Published: June 22, 2026 by Julie Lee
How Consumer Vehicle Choices Are Shaping Automotive Loan Trends

Conversations about rising auto loan balances and higher monthly payments has often centered around increasing vehicle prices and elevated interest rates; and while those factors have undoubtedly played a role, another important piece of the puzzle is the type of vehicles consumers are choosing to purchase. According to Experian’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026, consumers are continuing to opt for SUVs over other vehicle types, a trend that may be contributing to higher average loan amounts and monthly payments. SUVs accounted for 63.5% of all new retail vehicle registrations over the last 12 months, up from 62.8% a year ago. Additionally, more than 117 million SUVs were in operation across the United States in the first quarter of 2026, making up 42.2% of the market share. At the same time, traditional passenger cars continue to fall in share, coming in at 16.5%, a decrease from 18.4% last year. As consumers increasingly gravitate towards the larger vehicle segment, it reflects the ongoing desire for versatility, cargo capacity, and family-friendly functionality. Electrification’s growing role in consumer purchasing behavior Interestingly, electrified SUVs continue to gain traction, representing 27.7% of all new SUV registrations, these vehicles include battery-electric, hybrids, plug-in hybrids, and other alternative fuel types. Diving a bit deeper, the Tesla Model Y was the market share leader for new, retail electrified SUV registrations in the last 12 months, coming in at 15.8%. Rounding out the top five were Honda CR-V (9.6%), Toyota RAV4 (7.2%), Chevrolet Trax (7.2%), and Toyota Grand Highlander (3.4%). As model availability and familiarity with the electrification segment grows, the broader adoption of these vehicles are playing an increasingly important role in vehicle pricing and overall consumer demand. While average loan amounts and monthly payments are being driven by a combination of factors such as financing costs and consumer purchasing behavior, data in Q1 2026 demonstrates the continued interest in SUVs. This suggests that the industry’s shift toward larger vehicles is likely playing a meaningful role in today’s financing environment. To learn more about SUV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q1 2026 presentation.

Published: June 17, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch
When New Data Impacts MBS Pricing: Student Loan Debt

In our previous post, we described the Current Second Lien Balance field, which is one of over 2,000 fields in the new Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset. We showed that the Current Second Lien Balance field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery: New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data). Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe. Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions. In this article, we discuss another field that satisfies the above criteria: Student Loan Balance.  We evaluate this field in the context of these criteria. First, however, we provide a summary of the MLP dataset and how it compares to standard GSE loan-level data available today. Standard GSE Data vs. Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) Data The MLP dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance, filed junior liens, and AVM values).  MLP differs from loan-level data provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae, which the vast majority of market participants solely rely on, in a number of ways: Standard data provided by the GSEs and GNMA does not contain all the information necessary for accurate forecasting of mortgage prepayment and credit performance. Basic, critical fields like borrower’s current credit score and current junior liens on the property are missing. The new Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset from Experian contains borrower, loan, and property data fields covering the entire mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), both securitized and non-securitized. MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle. New, Material and Significant Field:  Student Loan Debt MLP contains a number of fields describing each mortgage borrower’s student debt load, including amounts in repayment, forbearance and collections; estimated interest rate, time remaining until forbearance expiration, and more. In the interest of simplicity, for this article we’ll focus on a single student loan-related field within MLP: Student Loans Balance, which is defined as the total balance on open non-deferred student trades reported in the last 3 months. Is Information Regarding Student Loans New to Markets? Standard loan-level data disclosed by the GSEs and GNMA contain no student-loan-specific fields. Theoretically, fields related to DTI at origination might capture some aspect of student loan debt. So, in the best-case scenario for an investor relying solely on standard disclosure, a DTI value as of origination is provided -- yet is never updated as the loan seasons and the borrower’s debt and income change (see more here).  But in the case of federal student loan debt attached to mortgages originated from early 2020 to late 2023, the level of detail provided by disclosure may be even more unknown due to COVID-era repayment and reporting moratoriums. The student loan repayment moratorium was a temporary federal policy that paused required payments, set interest rates to 0%, and suspended collections on most federally-held student loans. The moratorium began in March 2020, with payments resuming in October 2023, making it approximately 3.5 years in duration—the longest consumer credit payment pause in U.S. history. (Source: NCUA ) During the moratorium, student loan-related debt loads may have been understated as federal loans were in a temporary state of $0 repayment.  As an alternative to leaving student loan debt completely out of DTI calculations, an imputed payment equal to only 0.50% of the outstanding balance was often used as a placeholder for a borrower’s DTI calculation. As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, a new report from the Federal Reserve of New York shows a rise in student loan default rates by age group.  Student loan delinquencies have been broadly trending higher across all age groups.  Also, the average age of a borrower in default has risen to 40, and borrowers age 50 and older are now at a higher risk of default than younger groups. This 40 to 50-year-old age group represents prime home ownership years. Defaulted borrowers are also struggling to make other debt payments, too. The same report stated that almost 40% of past due student loan borrowers with auto loans are past due, 56% have at least one credit card past due, and 20% have a past due mortgage.  In addition to increased delinquency risk on their mortgage, borrowers with student loan debt also have fewer mortgage refinance options, as their elevated DTI may prevent qualification for a refinance, or increase the offered rate of a refinance and thereby reduce their incentive.  These dampening effects of student loan debt on mortgage CPR are clearly evident in the data, as described further below. Standard data only reports information related to the primary mortgage and does not include any details on the borrower’s other debts, with the exception of DTI at origination, which is never updated throughout the life of the loan. In contrast, MLP provides a comprehensive view of the borrower’s full credit profile, including other obligations such as credit cards, mortgages on other properties, student loan balances, and much more. Is Student Loan debt material to the residential mortgage market? Approximately $11 trillion of residential mortgage loans were originated during the student loan payment moratorium (Source: Experian MLP Dataset), a period marked by historically low mortgage rates during the COVID era.  As discussed above, DTI data contained in standard market disclosure may be particularly inaccurate for these loans.   As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, a new report from the Federal Reserve of New York shows a rise in student loan default rates by age group.  Student loan delinquencies have been broadly trending higher across all age groups.  Also, the average age of a borrower in default has risen to 40, and borrowers aged 50 and older are now at a higher risk of default than younger groups. This 40 to 50-year-old age group represents prime home ownership years.  Defaulted borrowers are also struggling to make other debt payments, too.   The same report stated that almost 40% of past due student loan borrowers with auto loans are past due, 56% have at least one credit card past due, and 20% have a past due mortgage.  In addition to increased delinquency risk on their mortgage, borrowers with student loan debt also have fewer mortgage refinance options, as their elevated DTI may prevent qualification for a refinance, or increase the offered rate of a refinance and thereby reduce their incentive.  These dampening effects of student loan debt on mortgage CPR are clearly evident in the data, as described further below.  Of today’s $13 trillion in outstanding mortgage debt, more than 10% of that debt ($1.5 trillion) is associated with borrowers who carry student loan debt.  For these borrowers, the average amount of student loan debt outstanding is approximately $50,000, versus a mortgage balance of approximately ~$289,000. In other words, the average student loan debt balance is almost 20% of the mortgage balance for the average borrower who carries both. For this set of borrowers, the average monthly payment is approximately $400 for student loan vs. approximately $2,200 for 1st lien mortgage—so that monthly student loan payments are a significant debt load, approximately 20% of the monthly mortgage payment.  (Source:  Experian MLP Dataset)  Is the effect of student loan debt a significant driver of performance? Figure 1 illustrates prepayments by student loan balance for a sample of loans drawn from MLP. The chart illustrates that borrowers with larger student loan balances prepay much more slowly, likely because some are effectively locked out of refinancing once student loan payments resume due to elevated DTI. The debt-to-income (DTI) ratio calculated using actual student loan payments may be significantly higher than the DTI calculated during the moratorium, in some cases exceeding GSE eligibility thresholds. As illustrated in Figure 1, for in-the-money (ITM) collateral, the differential between loans with material student loan balances (greater than $200,000) and loans with no student debt can reach up to 5 CPR. Notably, even for out-of-the-money (OTM) collateral, loans with student debt prepay 1 to 3 CPR slower, likely reflecting reduced mobility due to tighter financing constraints when purchasing a new home. Pools with otherwise similar prepayment characteristics may exhibit different prepayment behavior depending on the distribution of student loan exposure within their collateral. In addition, because loans with student debt tend to prepay more slowly, this effect increases over time due to burnout: loans without student debt prepay and exit the pools more quickly, leaving a higher concentration of slower-paying loans behind.  Given that 10% of the $13 trillion outstanding mortgage market is associated with borrowers who have student loans (Source:  Experian MLP dataset)—and that student loans have a meaningful impact on prepayments—many pools issued between March 2020 and October 2023 may be subject to this student loan debt CPR throttle, and therefore mispriced by investors relying exclusively on standard market data. Fig 1. Prepayment S-Curve: Student Loans Balance Source:  Experian MLP dataset hosted on IVolatility Data-Driven Platform _____________________________________________________ Michael Pyatski advises MBS traders, portfolio managers, quants, risk managers, loan originators, and technology professionals on making informed, data-driven business decisions that drive revenue growth, enhance risk management, and reduce trading costs. With more than 15 years of experience as an Agency RMBS trader—including serving as Head of the Proprietary Trading Desk at BNP Paribas—Michael developed and successfully implemented relative-value, data-driven profitable trading strategies to capture market opportunities embedded in data but not fully priced by the market. His trading experience, combined with a Ph.D. in econometrics, led him to found the Data-Driven Portal (https://datadrivenportal.com/), a platform that provides advanced technology for MBS trading and risk management. The platform’s No-Model Data-Driven technology leverages big data, econometric analysis, and AI to help traders identify relative-value opportunities in RMBS markets and generate above-market, risk-adjusted returns. _____________________________________________________

Published: June 17, 2026 by Perry DeFelice, Michael Pyatski