How to Detect and Prevent Authorized Push Payment Fraud Scams

by Alex Lvoff 4 min read October 25, 2023

Authorized Push Payment fraud, also known as APP fraud or APP scams, involves a fraudster persuading a victim to willingly deposit funds to their account or to the account of a complicit third party, also known as a money mule. This type of fraud often includes social engineering of the victim using fake investment schemes, impersonation scams, purchase scams or other schemes. Social engineering clouds victims’ judgments and encourages them to make payments willingly to one or more money mules, with funds eventually reaching fraudsters’ accounts. This type of fraud has become more attractive to criminals since the advent of real-time payment systems, which are now a reality worldwide.

Fraud fueled by real-time payments

Authorized push payment fraud is becoming more prevalent, and it is imperative that you know how to detect and prevent it to safeguard your organization.Real-time payment systems, such as Faster Payments in the United Kingdom (UK), PIX in Brazil, the New Payments Platform in Australia, and FedNow in the USA, make real-time payment fraud a reality.

APP fraud is notoriously difficult for banks to prevent because the victim is sending the money themselves, and steps that banks take to authenticate customers are ineffective, as the customer will pass identity checks. The victims cannot reverse a payment once they realize they have been conned, as payments made using real-time payment schemes are irrevocable.APP fraud is particularly prevalent in countries where banks have an infrastructure that facilitates fast or immediate transfers, like the UK.

Reimbursment is vital to victims

Some common types of authorized push payment fraud include attacks on individuals like romance scams, family emergency swindles, targeting property transactions, and intercepting supplier payments. To protect against APP fraud, it is important to employ layered fraud protection across all products and channels used to manage real-time payments. But that alone is not enough.Reimbursement is vital in reversing the financial distress caused by APP scams, but it cannot reverse the emotional distress these scams cause. Prevention, detection, and awareness measures must be moved up on the agenda for banks, non-traditional lenders, PSPs (Payment Service Providers), and customers alike to ensure that the customer is protected at every stage of the payment journey.

Effective alerts are a key focus area for preventing customers from falling victim to APP scams. An effective warning is one that is dynamic and tailored to the customer’s payment journey. Recent research indicates that minor changes to notifications across banking apps can have the potential to drastically reduce the number of individuals that fall victim to APP fraud. The biggest effects were achieved when a combination of risk-based and Call to Action (CTA) warnings were implemented over a period of time.

A collective effort across the banking industry and beyond is crucial to protect customers and tackle the fight against APP fraud. Banks, non-traditional lenders, and PSPs can raise awareness to educate their customers on the signs and risks of APP scams, and work with industry oversight bodies to commit to voluntary standards and codes to ensure good customer outcomes. Online forums, social media platforms, and influential voices also have a role to play in raising awareness of and preventing scams. Customers can also help by being vigilant and reading and acting upon warnings and information presented to them.

Authorized push payment fraud prevention

To effectively combat authorized push payment fraud, financial institutions must implement a range of measures, including:

  • Direct communication with consumers.
  • Enhanced transaction monitoring.
  • Effective risk mitigation and management.
  • Improved employee education.
  • Public awareness campaigns.

In response to this growing threat, banks have introduced various checks and balances, such as the Confirmation of Payee (CoP) service in the UK, which cross-references bank details with the account holder’s name when processing online payments.Banks are also leveraging sophisticated fraud prevention software stacks, incorporating machine learning and contextual data to identify and flag suspicious transactions. By utilizing AI technologies, financial institutions can process data points faster and enhance their fraud detection capabilities, mitigating identity risk and safeguarding customer accounts.

Clear communication with customers is essential in the fight against APP fraud. Higher-risk companies now include warnings in their communications, advising customers not to act on messages that request payment into new bank accounts.Financial institutions can also offer cool-off periods before payments are sent, increase due diligence around payment destinations, and monitor accounts that regularly receive high-value payments. Additionally, financial institutions can play a crucial role in educating their customers and promoting awareness around this increasingly common type of fraud. By combining these approaches with robust fraud prevention software, the public can fight against this type of fraudulent attack.

Taking the next steps with the right partner

At Experian, we offer rich data sources, advanced analytics capabilities, and the consultancy services needed to rapidly adopt data analytics solutions that mitigate fraud risks.Our solutions are used by PSPs of all types and sizes – including some of the largest banks – to identify potentially fraudulent customers and transactions, and to ensure that action is taken in real time to prevent fraudulent payments being made.

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee
Financial Institutions Are Rethinking Customer Acqusition

Customer acquisition strategies are constantly evolving toward more precise targeting. From a marketing lens, you can track every step, optimize communication channels and still miss the person most likely to convert. Attribution can tell us which channels work and automation can make marketing spend more efficient. But both assume we know who is actually on the other end. Financial institutions are learning that finding audiences and targeting them is no longer the biggest challenge. As acquisition optimization marketing becomes more sophisticated, teams can measure and act on more signals than before. What they can't always know is whether the person on the receiving end is real. Customer acquisition has evolved into an identity problem. The challenge is not that every questionable signal represents malicious activity. It's that acquisition systems must make increasingly intelligent decisions with an imperfect understanding of who they're actually engaging. When identities are fragmented, duplicated, temporary or synthetic, optimization becomes a question of trust as much as targeting. When your signals don't reliably identify customers The customer journey often includes searching, filling out a form, creating an account, requesting a quote and subscribing. All of these signals work well when identity is relatively stable.  However, financial institutions are finding that these signals are becoming less reliable. A single person can operate across multiple personas, devices, browsers, aliases, accounts and intermediaries while several apparent “people” may actually represent one underlying actor. Financial instituions are finding: Fragmented customer signals Difficulty distinguishing an old account from a new one Different digital pathways associated with the same individual Signals that are generated by automation Real customers getting flagged because signals are too thin to evaluate confidently Legacy signals continue to be challenged Marketing has historically treated intent as a valuable signal because intent was relatively difficult to produce. A search required human intent. A form required someone to fill it out. An inquiry implied a meaningful amount of human effort. Financial institutions are already combating AI-enabled fraud, and now marketing teams are starting to face it on a massive scale. AI can mimic human behavior by researching products, comparing prices, filling out forms, creating accounts and signing up for services. A valid email address is no longer enough. Marketers need to know: How long has it existed? How recently has it been active? Does its activity appear consistent or suddenly anomalous? Has it gone dormant and returned? Is it associated with patterns that suggest stability or unusual behavior? How to build on your strongest signal Email remains one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce, following people across devices, platforms, transactions, subscriptions, accounts and years of activity. For over two decades, this has shaped how AtData thinks about identity. Now, as part of Experian, it’s shaping how an entire platform and team approach identity. A marketer doesn’t need every prospect to have existed online for twenty years. But understanding whether a newly acquired prospect has meaningful identity context can dramatically improve the quality of the decision being made around it. Better identity intelligence can help organizations reduce unnecessary friction by improving their ability to recognize legitimate customers. With a strong identity foundation, marketing teams can better address: Which audiences are more likely to convert? Which leads are high quality? Which channels are driving incremental growth? What do the best prospects look like? The value isn't simply having an email address. It's understanding the history and behavioral context associated with it. That context can provide a stronger digital identity signal, helping marketers understand how long they have been active, whether its behavior is consistent with that of a real person and whether current activity aligns with past patterns. It continues to be one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce. An infrastructure built for what's coming The acquisition of AtData by Experian reflects a fundamental shift in how identity infrastructure needs to work. Experian's scale and decisioning capabilities, combined with AtData's real-time email intelligence, create a strong platform. Read more about the why behind the acquisition and see how email works as an identity anchor for fraud prevention. Contact us to learn about our customer acquisition solutions

September 15, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
As Electric Vehicle Adoption Eases, Dealers Can Find New Opportunities To Reach Consumers

After years of rapid growth, new electric vehicle (EV) registrations have moderated, and the EV market has entered a new chapter. But slower growth shouldn’t be mistaken for disappearing demand, with data suggesting the reality is much more nuanced. According to Experian Automotive’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026, battery EVs accounted for 8.21% of new retail registrations in the last 12 months, down from 9.23% a year earlier. However, consumers aren’t simply walking away from electrification. In fact, more than one million new EVs were registered during the past 12 months and the used EV market recorded more than 540,000 registrations over the same period. The opportunity may be less about waiting for the EV market to grow and more about understanding where EV demand is present, who is driving them, and how to reach those consumers more effectively. Who is likely to purchase an EV and what vehicle types are they interested in? Understanding who’s in the market for an EV can allow dealers to position themselves around consumers’ needs as they choose a vehicle that fits their everyday lifestyle. In the second quarter of 2026, Millennials and Gen X accounted for 67.83% of new EV registrations, nearly 10 percentage points above their combined share of all new, retail registrations. Millennials were also the largest generational audience across both new and used EV market share, coming in at 35.76% and 38.42%, respectively. It’s important to consider that the EV shopper isn’t necessarily looking for an unfamiliar or new type of vehicle. In many cases, they’re seemingly looking for an electric version of the practical vehicle they already know. For instance, SUVs accounted for 77.47% of new EV registrations in Q2 2026, which was similar to SUVs’ 63.49% share of all new retail registrations. For these shoppers, creating messaging around value, practicality, and available choices may resonate differently than premium technology messaging aimed at some new-EV prospects. The more precisely dealers can identify those audiences, the less they need to depend on broad EV market momentum to generate demand. To learn more about EV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation.

September 15, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe