Tag: fraud attacks

While bots have many helpful purposes, they have unfortunately become a tool for malicious actors to gain fraudulent access to financial accounts, personal information and even company-wide systems. Almost every business that has an online presence will have to face and counter bot attacks. In fact, a recent study found that across the internet on a global scale, malicious bots account for 30 percent of automated internet activity.1 And these bots are becoming more sophisticated and harder to detect. What is a bot attack and bot fraud? Bots are automated software applications that carry out repetitive instructions mimicking human behavior.2 They can be either malicious or helpful, depending on their code.  For example, they might be used by companies to collect data analytics, scan websites to help you find the best discounts or chat with website visitors. These "good" bots help companies run more efficiently, freeing up employee resources. But on the flip side, if used maliciously, bots can commit attacks and fraudulent acts on an automated basis. These might even go undetected until significant damage is done. Common types of bot attacks and frauds that you might encounter include: Spam bots and malware bots: Spam bots come in all shapes and sizes. Some might scrape email addresses to entice recipients into clicking on a phishing email. Others operate on social media sites. They might create fake Facebook celebrity profiles to entice people to click on phishing links. Sometimes entire bot "farms" will even interact with each other to make a topic or page appear more legitimate. Often, these spam bots work in conjunction with malware bots that trick people into downloading malicious files so they can gain access to their systems. They may distribute viruses, ransomware, spyware or other malicious files.  Content scraping bots: These bots automatically scrape content from websites. They might do so to steal contact information or product details or scrape entire articles so they can post duplicate stories on spam websites.  DDoS bots and click fraud bots: Distributed denial of service (DDoS) bots interact with a target website or application in such large numbers that the target can't handle all the traffic and is overwhelmed. A similar approach involves using bots to click on ads or sponsored links thousands of times, draining advertisers' budgets.  Credential stealing bots: These bots use stolen usernames and passwords to try to log into accounts and steal personal and financial information. Other bots may try brute force password cracking to find one combination that works so they can gain unauthorized access to the account. Once the bot learns consumer’s legitimate username and password combination on one website, they can oftentimes use it to perform account takeovers on other websites. In fact, 15 percent of all login attempts across industries in 2022 were account takeover attacks.1 AI-generated bots: While AI, like ChatGPT, is vastly improving the technological landscape, it's also providing a new avenue for bots.3 AI can create audio and videos that appear so real that people might think they're a celebrity seeking funds.  What are the impacts of bot attacks? Bot attacks and bot fraud can have a significant negative impact, both at an individual user level and a company level. Individuals might lose money if they're tricked into sending money to a fake account, or they might click on a phishing link and unwittingly give a malicious actor access to their accounts. On a company level, the impact of a bot attack can be even more widespread. Sensitive customer data might get exposed if the company falls victim to a malware attack. This can open the door for the creation of fake accounts that drain a company's money. For example, a phishing email might lead to demand deposit account (DDA) fraud, where a scammer opens a fraudulent account in a customer's name and then links it to new accounts, like new lines of credit. Malware attacks can also cause clients to lose trust in the company and take their business elsewhere.A DDoS attack can take down an entire website or application, leading to a loss of clients and money. A bot that attacks APIs can exploit design flaws to steal sensitive data. In some cases, ransomware attacks can take over entire systems and render them unusable.  How can you stop bot attacks? With so much at risk, stopping bot attacks is vital. But some of the most typical defenses have core flaws. Common methods for stopping bot attacks include:  CAPTCHAs: While CAPTCHAs can protect online systems from bot incursions, they can also create friction with the user process. Firewalls: To stop DDoS attacks, companies might reduce attack points by utilizing firewalls or restricting direct traffic to sensitive infrastructures like databases.4 Blocklists: These can prevent IPs associated with attacks from accessing your system entirely. Multifactor authentication (MFA): MFA requires two forms of identification or more before granting access to an account. Password protection: Password managers can ensure employees use strong passwords that are different for each access point.  While the above methods can help, many simply aren't enough, especially for larger companies with many points of potential attacks. A piecemeal approach can also lead to friction on the user's side that may turn potential clients away. Our 2024 Identity and Fraud Report revealed that up to 38 percent of U.S. adults stopped creating a new account because of the friction they encountered during the onboarding process. And often, this friction is in place to try to stop fraudulent access. Incorporating behavioral analytics to combat attacks Another effective way to enhance bot detection is through the use of behavioral analytics. This technology helps track user activity and identify patterns that may suggest malicious bot behavior. By analyzing aspects such as typing speed, mouse movement and the way users interact with websites, businesses can gain real-time insights into whether a visitor is human or a bot. Behavioral analytics in fraud uses machine learning and advanced algorithms to continuously monitor and refine user behavior patterns. This allows businesses to identify bot attacks more accurately and prevent them before they cause harm. By analyzing real-time behaviors, such as how fast someone enters information or their browsing habits, businesses can flag suspicious activity that traditional methods might miss. Why partner with Experian? What companies need is fraud and bot protection with a positive customer experience. We provide account takeover fraud prevention solutions that can help protect your company from bot attacks, fraudulent accounts and other malicious attempts to access your sensitive data. Experian's approach embodies a paradigm shift where fraud detection increases efficiency and accuracy without sacrificing customer experience. We can help protect your company from bot attacks, fraudulent accounts and other malicious attempts to access your sensitive data.  Learn more This article includes content created by an AI language model and is intended to provide general information. 1"Bad bot traffic accounts for nearly 30% of APAC internet traffic," SMEhorizon, June 13, 2023. https://www.smehorizon.com/bad-bot-traffic-accounts-for-nearly-30-of-apac-internet-traffic/2"What is a bot?" AWS. https://aws.amazon.com/what-is/bot/3Nield, David. "How ChatGPT — and bots like it — can spread malware," Wired, April 19, 2023. https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-ai-bots-spread-malware/4"What is a DDoS attack?" AWS. https://aws.amazon.com/shield/ddos-attack-protection/

Experian’s own Chris Ryan and Bobbie Paul recently joined David Mattei from Aite to discuss the latest research and insights into emerging fraud schemes and how businesses can combat them in light of COVID-19 and the resulting economic changes. Between them, Chris, Bobbie, and David have more than 60 years of experience in the world of fraud prevention. Listen in as they discuss how businesses can shape their fraud prevention plan in the short term, including: The impacts of the health crisis and physical distancing The rise of e-commerce and consumer digital engagement Changes in criminal activity Fraud attack vectors 2020 fraud loss projections Critical next steps for the 30-60 day time frame Experian · Make Your Fraud Plan Recession-Ready: 2020 Fraud Trends

Last month, Kenneth Blanco, Director of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, warned that cybercriminals are stealing data from fintech platforms to create synthetic identities and commit fraud. These actions, in turn, are alleged to be responsible for exploiting fintech platforms’ integration with other financial institutions, putting banks and consumers at risk. According to Blanco, “by using stolen data to create fraudulent accounts on fintech platforms, cybercriminals can exploit the platforms’ integration with various financial services to initiate seemingly legitimate financial activity while creating a degree of separation from traditional fraud detection efforts.” Fintech executives were quick to respond, and while agreeing that synthetic IDs are a problem, they pushed back on the notion that cybercriminals specifically target fintech platforms. Innovation and technology have indeed opened new doors of possibility for financial institutions, however, the question remains as to whether it has also created an opportunity for criminals to implement more sophisticated fraud strategies. Currently, there appears to be little evidence pointing to an acute vulnerability of fintech firms, but one thing can be said for certain: synthetic ID fraud is the fastest-growing financial crime in the United States. Perhaps, in part, because it can be difficult to detect. Synthetic ID is a type of fraud carried out by criminals that have created fictitious identities. Truly savvy fraudsters can make these identities nearly indistinguishable from real ones. According to Kathleen Peters, Experian’s SVP, Head of Fraud and Identity, it typically takes fraudsters 12 to 18 months to create and nurture a synthetic identity before it’s ready to “bust out” – the act of building a credit history with the intent of maxing out all available credit and eventually disappearing. These types of fraud attacks are concerning to any company’s bottom line. Experian’s 2019 Global Fraud and Identity Report further details the financial impact of fraud, noting that 55% of businesses globally reported an increase in fraud-related losses over the past 12 months. Given the significant risk factor, organizations across the board need to make meaningful investments in fraud prevention strategies. In many circumstances, the pace of fraud is so fast that by the time organizations implement solutions, the shelf life may already be old. To stay ahead of fraudsters, companies must be proactive about future-proofing their fraud strategies and toolkits. And the advantage that many fintech companies have is their aptitude for being nimble and propensity for early adoption. Experian can help too. Our Synthetic Fraud Risk Level Indicator helps both fintechs and traditional financial institutions in identifying applicants likely to be associated with a synthetic identity based on a complex set of relationships and account conditions over time. This indicator is now available in our credit report, allowing organizations to reduce exposure to identity fraud through early detection. To learn more about Experian’s Synthetic Fraud Risk Level Indicator click here, or visit experian.com/fintech.

With 16.7 million reported victims of identity fraud in 2017 (that’s 6.64 percent of the U.S. population), it was another record year for the number of fraud victims. And as online and mobile transaction growth continued to significantly outpace brick-and-mortar growth, criminal attacks also grew rapidly. This past year, we saw an increase of more than 30 percent in e-commerce fraud attacks compared with 2016. As we’ve done over the past three years, Experian® analyzed millions of online transactions to identify fraud attack rates for both shipping and billing locations across the United States. We looked at several data points, including geography and IP address, to help businesses better understand how and where fraud is being perpetrated so they can better protect against it. The 2017 e-commerce fraud attack rate analysis shows: Delaware and Oregon continue to be the riskiest states for both billing and shipping fraud. Delaware; Oregon; Washington, D.C.; Florida; and Georgia are the top five riskiest states for billing fraud. Delaware, Oregon, Florida, New York and California are the top five riskiest states for shipping fraud, accounting for 50 percent of total fraud attacks. South El Monte, Calif., is the riskiest city overall, with an increase in shipping fraud of approximately 230 percent. Shipping fraud most often occurs near major airports and seaports due to reshippers and freight forwarders that receive domestic goods and often send them overseas. When a transaction originates from an international IP address, shipping fraud is 6.7 times likelier than the average, while billing fraud becomes 7.1 times likelier. Where is e-commerce fraud happening? Typically, the highest-risk areas for fraud are in ZIP™ codes and cities near large ports of entry or airports. These are ideal locations to reship fraudulent merchandise, enabling criminals to move stolen goods more effectively. Top 10 riskiest billing ZIP™ codes   Top 10 riskiest shipping ZIP™ codes 97252 Portland, OR 97079 Beaverton, OR 33198 Miami, FL 33122 Miami, FL 33166 Miami, FL 91733 South El Monte, CA 33122 Miami, FL 97251 Portland, OR 77060 Houston, TX 97250 Portland, OR 33195 Miami, FL 33166 Miami, FL 97250 Portland, OR 97252 Portland, OR 97251 Portland, OR 33198 Miami, FL 33191 Miami, FL 33195 Miami, FL 97253 Portland, OR 33192 Miami, FL Source: Experian.com Source: Experian.com     What’s more, many of the riskiest ZIP™ codes and cities experience a high volume of transactions originating from international IP addresses. In fact, the top 10 riskiest ZIP codes overall tend to experience fraudulent activity from numerous countries overseas, including China, Venezuela, Taiwan and Hong Kong, and Argentina. These fraudsters tend to implement complex fraud schemes that can cost businesses millions of dollars in fraud losses. Additionally, the analysis shows that traffic coming from a proxy server — which could originate from domestic and international IP addresses — is 74 times riskier than the average transaction. The problem The increase in e-commerce fraud attacks shouldn’t come as a huge surprise. The uptick in data breaches, merchants’ continued adoption of EMV-enabled terminals to protect against counterfeit card fraud and the abundance of consumer data on the dark web means that information is even more accessible to criminals. This enables them to open fraudulent accounts, take over legitimate accounts and submit fraudulent transactions. Another reason for the increase is automation. In the past, criminals needed a strong understanding of fraud methods and technology, but they can now bring down an entire organization by simply downloading a file and automating the submission of thousands of applications or transactions simultaneously. Since fraudsters need to make these transactions appear as normal as possible, they often leverage the cardholder’s actual billing details with slight differences, such as e-mail address or shipping location. Unfortunately, the mass availability of compromised data and the abundance of fraudsters makes it increasingly challenging to identify and separate legitimate customers from attackers across the country. Because of the widespread prevalence of fraud and data compromises, we don’t see billing fraud concentrated in just one region of the country. In fact, the top five states for billing fraud make up only about 18 percent of overall fraud attacks.   Top 5 riskiest billing fraud states   Top 5 riskiest shipping fraud states State Fraud attack rate State Fraud attack rate Delaware 93.4 Delaware 195.9 Oregon 86.1 Oregon 170.1 Washington, D.C. 46.5 Florida 45.1 Florida 39.2 New York 37.3 Georgia 31.5 California 32.6 Source: Experian.com Source: Experian.com   Prevention and protection need to be the priority As businesses get a better understanding of how and where fraud is perpetrated, they can implement proactive strategies to detect and prevent attacks, as well as protect payment information. While no one single strategy can address the entire scope of fraud, there are advanced data sets and technology — such as device intelligence, behavioral and physical biometrics, document verification and entity resolution — that can help businesses make better fraud decisions.   Fortunately, consumers can also play a major role in safeguarding their information. In addition to regularly checking their credit reports and bank/credit card statements for fraudulent activity, consumers can limit the data they share on social networking sites, where attackers often begin when perpetrating identity fraud.   While we continue to help both organizations and consumers limit their exposure to e-commerce fraud, we anticipate that criminals will attempt more sophisticated fraud schemes. But businesses can stay ahead of the curve. This comes down to having a keen understanding of how fraud is being perpetrated, as well as leveraging data, technology and multiple layered strategies to better recognize legitimate customers and make more precise fraud decisions. View our e-commerce fraud heat map and download the top 100 riskiest ZIP codes in the United States. Experian is a nonexclusive full-service provider licensee of the United States Postal Service®. The following trademark is owned by the United States Postal Service®: ZIP. The price for Experian’s services is not established, controlled or approved by the United States Postal Service.

Since the advent of the internet, our lives have changed drastically for the better. We can perform many of life’s daily activities from the comfort of our own home. According to Aite, in 2016 alone 36 million Americans made some form of mobile payment — paying a bill, purchasing something online, paying for fast food or making a mobile wallet purchase at a retailer. Simply put, the internet has made our lives easier. But with the good also comes the bad. While most consumers have moved to the digital world, so have fraudsters. With minimal risk and high reward at stake, e-commerce fraud attacks have increased dramatically over the last few years, with no signs of slowing down. We recently analyzed millions of transactions from the first half of 2017 to identify fraud attack rates based on billing and shipping addresses and broke down the findings into various geographic trends. Fraud attack rates represent the attempted fraudulent e-commerce transactions against the population of overall e-commerce orders. Consumers living out West and in the South have experienced more than their fair share of fraud. During the first half of 2017, the West and the South were the top two regions for both billing and shipping attacks. While both regions were at the top during the same time last year, the attacks themselves have increased substantially. Given the proximity to seaports and major international airports, this is somewhat unsurprising — particularly for shipping fraud — as many fraudsters will leverage reshippers to transport goods soon after delivery. .dataTb{margin:20px auto;width:100%}.dataTb:after{clear:both}.dataTb table{}.dataTb td,.dataTb th{border:1px solid #ddd;padding:.8em}.dataTb th{background:#F4F4F4}.tbL{float:left;width:49%}.tbR{float:right;width:49%;margin:0 0 0 2%} Shipping: Riskiest Regions Region Attack rate West 38.1 South 32.1 Northeast 27.0 North Central 20.7 Billing: Riskiest Regions Region Attack rate West 37.2 South 32.9 Northeast 27.3 North Central 24.0   At the state level, the top three shipping fraud states remained the same as 2016 — Delaware, Oregon and Florida — but the order changed. Oregon was the most targeted, with a fraud rate of 135.2 basis points, more than triple its rate at in the end of 2016. Though no longer in the top spot, Delaware saw alarming spikes as well, with shipping attack rates nearly triple last year’s rate at 128.6 basis points and billing attacks at 79.6 basis points. .dataTb{margin:20px auto;width:100%}.dataTb:after{clear:both}.dataTb table{}.dataTb td,.dataTb th{border:1px solid #ddd;padding:.8em}.dataTb th{background:#F4F4F4}.tbL{float:left;width:49%}.tbR{float:right;width:49%;margin:0 0 0 2%} Shipping: Riskiest States State Attack rate Oregon 135.2 Delaware 128.2 Florida 57.4 New York 45.0 Nevada 36.9 California 36.9 Georgia 33.5 Washington, D.C 30.8 Texas 29.6 Illinois 29.4 Billing: Riskiest States Region Attack rate Oregon 87.5 Delaware 79.6 Washington, D.C. 63.0 Florida 47.4 Nevada 38.8 California 36.9 Arkansas 36.6 New York 35.5 Vermont 34.2 Georgia 33.4     Diving a bit deeper, ZIPTM codes in Miami, Fla., make up a significant portion of the top 10 ZIP CodeTM lists for shipping and billing attacks — in fact, many of the same ZIP codes appear on both lists. The other ZIP Code that appears on both lists is South El Monte, Calif., which has a high percentage of industrial properties — common targets for fraudsters to ship packages, then reship overseas. You can download the top 100 riskiest Zip Codes in the U.S. for H1 2017. .dataTb{margin:20px auto;width:100%}.dataTb:after{clear:both}.dataTb table{}.dataTb td,.dataTb th{border:1px solid #ddd;padding:.8em}.dataTb th{background:#F4F4F4}.tbL{float:left;width:49%}.tbR{float:right;width:49%;margin:0 0 0 2%} Shipping: Top 10 riskiest ZIP™ Codes ZIP Code Attack rate 33122 [Miami, Fla.] 2409.4 91733 [South El Monte, Calif.] 1655.5 33198 [Miami, Fla.] 1295.2 33166 [Miami, Fla.] 1266.0 33195 [Miami, Fla.] 1037.3 33192 [Miami, Fla.] 893.9 97251 [Portland, Ore.] 890.6 07064 [Port Reading, NJ] 808.9 89423 [Minden, Nev.] 685.5 77072 [Houston, Tex.] 629.3 Billing: Top 10 riskiest ZIP™ Codes ZIP Code Attack rate 77060 [Houston, Tex.] 1337.6 33198 [Miami, Fla.] 1215.6 33122 [Miami, Fla.] 1106.2 33166 [Miami, Fla.] 1037.4 91733 [South El Monte, Calif.] 780.1 33195 [Miami, Fla.] 713.7 97252 [Portland, Ore.] 670.8 33191 [Miami, Fla.] 598.8 33708 [St. Petersburg, Fla.] 563.6 33792 [Miami, Fla.] 493.0   As e-commerce fraud continues to grow, businesses need to be proactive to keep themselves and their customers safe. That means incorporating multiple, layered fraud prevention strategies that work together seamlessly — for example, understanding details about users and their devices, knowing how users interact with the business and evaluating previous transaction history. This level of insight can help businesses distinguish real customers from nefarious ones without impacting the customer experience. While businesses are ultimately responsible for the safety of customers and their data, the onus doesn’t rest solely with them. Consumers should also be vigilant when it comes to protecting their digital identities and payment information. That means creating strong, unique passwords; actively monitoring online accounts; and using two-factor authentication to secure account access. At the end of the day, e-commerce fraud is a challenge that businesses and consumers will experience for the foreseeable future. But rising attack rates don’t have to spell doom and gloom for the industry. E-commerce growth is still extremely strong, as consumers interact through multiple channels (in-store, mobile and web) and expect a personalized experience. Establishing trust and verifying digital identities are key to meeting these latest expectations, which provide new opportunities for businesses and consumers to interact seamlessly and transact securely. With multiple safeguards in place, businesses have a variety of options to protect their customers and their brand reputation.   Experian is a nonexclusive full-service provider licensee of the United States Postal Service®. The following trademarks are owned by the United States Postal Service®: ZIP and ZIP Code. The price for Experian’s services is not established, controlled or approved by the United States Postal Service.

Knowing where e-commerce fraud takes place matters We recently hosted a Webinar with Mike Gross, Risk Strategy Director at Experian and  Julie Conroy, Research Director  at Aite Research Group, looking at the current state of card-not-present fraud, and what to prepare for in the coming year. Our biannual analysis of fraud attacks, served as a backdrop for the trends we’ve been seeing. I wanted to share some observations from the Webinar. Of course, if you prefer to hear it firsthand, you can download the archive recording here. I’ll start with the current landscape of card-not-present fraud. Julie shared 5 key trends her firm has identified regarding e-commerce fraud: Rising account take-over fraud Loyalty points targeted Increasingly global transactions Frustrating false declines Increasingly mobile consumers One particularly interesting note that Julie made was regarding consumer frustration levels towards forgotten passwords. While consumers are more frustrated when they’re locked out of access to their banking accounts (makes sense, it’s their money), forgotten passwords are more detrimental to e-commerce retailers since consumers are likely to go to another site. This equates to a frustrated consumer, and lost revenue for the business. Next, Mike went through the findings from our 2016 e-commerce fraud attack analysis. Fraud attack rates show the attempted fraudulent e-commerce transactions against the population of overall e-commerce orders. Overall, e-commerce attack rates spiked 33% in 2016. The biggest trends we saw included: Increased EMV adoption is driving a shift from counterfeit to card-not-present fraud 2B breached records disclosed in 2016, more than 3x any previous year Consumers reporting credit card fraud jumped from 15% in 2015 to over 32% in 2016 Attackers shifting locations slightly and international orders rely on freight forwarders 10 states saw an increase of over 100% in fraudulent orders Over 70 of the top 100 riskiest postal codes were not in last year’s list So, what will 2017 bring? Be prepared for more attacks, more global rings, more losses for businesses, and the emergence of IoT fraud. Businesses need to anticipate an increase of fraud over time and to be prepared. The value of employing a multi-layered approach to fraud prevention especially when it comes to authenticating consumers to validate transactions cannot be understated. By looking at all the points of the customer journey, businesses can better protect themselves from fraud, while maintaining a good consumer experience. Most importantly, having the right fraud solution in place can help businesses prevent losses both in dollars and reputation.

Experian analyzed millions of e-commerce transactions from the first six months of 2016 to identify the latest fraud attack rates across the United States for both shipping and billing locations. As we approach the one-year anniversary of the EMV liability shift, the 2016 e-commerce fraud attack rates look to be at least 15 percent higher than last year’s total. Experian analyzed millions of e-commerce transactions from the first six months of 2016 to identify the latest fraud attack rates across the United States for both shipping and billing locations. Billing fraud rates are associated with the address of the purchaser. Shipping fraud rates are associated with the address where purchased goods are sent. As we approach the one-year anniversary of the EMV liability shift, the 2016 e-commerce fraud attack rates look to be at least 15 percent higher than last year’s total. E-commerce fraud is often an indicator that other fraud activities have already happened, whether a credit card has been stolen, identity fraud has occurred, or personal credentials have been compromised.

Industry’s first smart plug-and-play fraud platform allows companies to connect their own solutions, Experian products and third-party vendors in one place to better protect their customers from fraud threats Experian unveiled the fraud and identity industry’s first open platform designed to catch fraud faster, improve compliance and enhance the customer experience. Experian’s CrossCore™ gives companies an easier way to connect any new or existing tools and systems in one place, whether they are Experian, internal or third-party partner solutions. This “plug-and-play” capability allows companies to rapidly adapt to changing conditions and risks. “Our clients have expressed frustration over the lack of a truly holistic industry solution that delivers the level of confidence and control they need without requiring a massive multiyear project to replace everything they have,” said Steve Platt, global executive vice president, Fraud and Identity, Experian. “New fraud threats, updates to regulatory requirements and customer expectations for a hassle-free experience are making it challenging for fraud and compliance teams to keep up. CrossCore will give them the flexibility they need to balance customer protection with customer experience.” The CrossCore open platform enables organizations to manage services through a common access point that supports a layered approach to managing risks across providers. CrossCore includes powerful workflow and strategy design capabilities that allow fraud and compliance teams to create and adapt strategies based on evolving threats and business needs. This helps them to respond more quickly and reduces the burden on IT. Fraud and compliance teams must constantly respond to new fraud threats and changing regulatory requirements by implementing new tools on top of existing solutions. “A layered approach is imperative, because fraudsters can break through each layer individually, but they will face greater barriers with each additional layer imposed,” said Avivah Litan, vice president and distinguished analyst, Security and Privacy, of Gartner.[1] Over time, as layers have been added and fortified, systems have become increasingly complex, expensive to integrate and difficult to manage, often increasing customer friction. A key feature of the CrossCore fraud platform is the ease of integration with third-party partner solutions. At launch, CrossCore will support fraud and identity services provided by third-party partners, including Acxiom® (Identity Solutions), TeleSign and many others already integrated with Experian solutions, with more being added to the platform. Previously, integrating third-party solutions required tremendous time and effort, which often challenged in-house teams to execute in a timely, efficient manner. Through CrossCore, the responsibility of integrating additional tools and systems moves away from those teams to the platform itself, enabling clients to select best-in-class solutions from multiple providers without creating a strain on resources. Al Pascual, senior vice president, research director and head of fraud & security for Javelin, said, “There are so many great niche solutions to work with, and new ones come out almost every day. To really have a world-class approach, the client has to put all those little things together, because there never will be one vendor who does it all. The market challenge is about how to make it faster and easier to bring things together to enable a more dynamic and fluid approach to managing risk.” CrossCore features Common access through a flexible API connects disparate systems to improve risk controls while reducing integration cost and complexity An open approach enables clients to connect and optimize a portfolio of best-in-class solutions across Experian, third-party services and existing systems Powerful strategy design and workflow decisioning functions enable fraud and compliance teams to apply services in any combination to get the level of confidence required A modern Software as a Service (SaaS) architecture provides scalability and the ability to make strategy changes dynamically with no down time Experian, which offers fraud and identity services in more than 44 countries, developed CrossCore to address the widespread market need consistently expressed by its clients for a faster, easier way to get more out of their existing systems and add new tools to improve their customers’ experience while minimizing risk. Companies can begin accessing CrossCore immediately, with the ability to turn on Experian services through a single integration, connect their own fraud and identity capabilities with a common API and turn on new services as they are added. The initial release includes key Experian products: FraudNet for Account Opening; Hunter®, for application fraud detection; Prove-ID, for international identity verification; and Precise ID®, for U.S. identity verification, including knowledge-based authentication. (KBA). Third-party fraud and identity service providers can engage with CrossCore to connect their services. “Now, companies can implement a new approach to managing fraud and identity services — one that will give them greater control over their risk exposure and enable them to provide a safer and more enjoyable experience for their customers,” added Platt. Learn more about CrossCore at https://www.experian.com/crosscore [1]Gartner, Identity Proofing Revisited as Data Confidentiality Dies, Avivah Litan, Dec. 12, 2013; last reviewed on April 28, 2015  

2015 data shows where billing and shipping e-commerce fraud attacks occur in the United States Experian e-commerce fraud attacks and rankings now available Does knowing where fraud takes place matter? With more than 13 million fraud victims in 2015,[1] assessing where fraud occurs is an important layer of verification when performing real-time risk assessments for e-commerce. Experian® analyzed millions of e-commerce transactions from 2015 data to identify fraud-attack rates across the United States for both shipping and billing locations. View the Experian map to see 2015 e-commerce attack rates for all states and download the top 100 ZIP CodeTMrankings. “Fraud follows the path of least resistance. With more shipping and billing options available to create a better customer experience, criminals attempt to exploit any added convenience,” said Adam Fingersh, Experian general manager and senior vice president of Fraud & Identity Solutions. “E-commerce fraud is not confined to larger cities since fraudsters can ship items anywhere. With the switch to chip enabled credit card transactions, and possible growth of card-not-present fraud, our fraud solutions help online businesses monitor their riskiest locations to prevent losses both in dollars and reputation in the near term.” For ease of interpretation, billing states are associated with fraud victims (the address of the purchaser) and shipping states are associated with fraudsters (the address where purchased goods are sent). According to the 2015 e-commerce attack rate data: Florida is the overall riskiest state for billing fraud, followed by Delaware; Washington, D.C.; Oregon and California. Delaware is the overall riskiest state for shipping fraud, followed by Oregon, Florida, California and Nevada. Eudora, Kan., has the overall riskiest billing ZIP Code (66025). The next two riskiest ZIPTM codes are located in Miami, Fla. (33178) and Boston, Mass. (02210). South El Monte, Calif., has the overall riskiest shipping ZIP Code (91733). The next four riskiest shipping ZIP codes are all located in Miami. Overall, five of the top 10 riskiest shipping ZIP codes are located in Miami. Defiance, Ohio, has the least risky shipping ZIP Code (43512). The majority of U.S. states are at or below the average attack rate threshold for both shipping and billing fraud, with only seven states — Florida, Oregon, Delaware, California, New York, Georgia and Nevada — and Puerto Rico ranking higher than average. This indicates that attackers are targeting consumers equally in the higher-risk states while leveraging addresses from both higher- and lower-risk states to ship and receive fraudulent merchandise. Many of the higher-risk states are located near a large port-of-entry city, including Miami; Portland, Ore.; and Washington, D.C., perhaps allowing criminals to move stolen goods more effectively. All three cities are ranked among the riskiest cities for both measures of fraud attacks. Neighboring proximity to higher-risk states does not appear to correlate to any additional risk — Pennsylvania and Rhode Island are ranked as two of the lower-risk states for both shipping and billing fraud. Other lower-risk states include Wyoming, South Dakota and West Virginia. Experian analyzed millions of e-commerce transactions to calculate the e-commerce attack rates using “bad transactions” in relation to the total number of transactions for the 2015 calendar year.   View the Experian map to see 2015 e-commerce attack rates for all states and download the top 100 ZIP Code rankings.       [1]According to the February 2016 Javelin study 2016 Identity Fraud: Fraud Hits an Inflection Point.