E-commerce fraud continues to be an area of concern — just look to the West and the South

by Guest Contributor 5 min read September 6, 2017

e-commerce fraud

Since the advent of the internet, our lives have changed drastically for the better. We can perform many of life’s daily activities from the comfort of our own home. According to Aite, in 2016 alone 36 million Americans made some form of mobile payment — paying a bill, purchasing something online, paying for fast food or making a mobile wallet purchase at a retailer. Simply put, the internet has made our lives easier. But with the good also comes the bad. While most consumers have moved to the digital world, so have fraudsters. With minimal risk and high reward at stake, e-commerce fraud attacks have increased dramatically over the last few years, with no signs of slowing down.

We recently analyzed millions of transactions from the first half of 2017 to identify fraud attack rates based on billing and shipping addresses and broke down the findings into various geographic trends. Fraud attack rates represent the attempted fraudulent e-commerce transactions against the population of overall e-commerce orders.

Consumers living out West and in the South have experienced more than their fair share of fraud. During the first half of 2017, the West and the South were the top two regions for both billing and shipping attacks. While both regions were at the top during the same time last year, the attacks themselves have increased substantially. Given the proximity to seaports and major international airports, this is somewhat unsurprising — particularly for shipping fraud — as many fraudsters will leverage reshippers to transport goods soon after delivery.

.dataTb{margin:20px auto;width:100%}.dataTb:after{clear:both}.dataTb table{}.dataTb td,.dataTb th{border:1px solid #ddd;padding:.8em}.dataTb th{background:#F4F4F4}.tbL{float:left;width:49%}.tbR{float:right;width:49%;margin:0 0 0 2%}

Shipping: Riskiest Regions
Region Attack rate
West 38.1
South 32.1
Northeast 27.0
North Central 20.7
Billing: Riskiest Regions
Region Attack rate
West 37.2
South 32.9
Northeast 27.3
North Central 24.0

At the state level, the top three shipping fraud states remained the same as 2016 — Delaware, Oregon and Florida — but the order changed. Oregon was the most targeted, with a fraud rate of 135.2 basis points, more than triple its rate at in the end of 2016.

Though no longer in the top spot, Delaware saw alarming spikes as well, with shipping attack rates nearly triple last year’s rate at 128.6 basis points and billing attacks at 79.6 basis points.

.dataTb{margin:20px auto;width:100%}.dataTb:after{clear:both}.dataTb table{}.dataTb td,.dataTb th{border:1px solid #ddd;padding:.8em}.dataTb th{background:#F4F4F4}.tbL{float:left;width:49%}.tbR{float:right;width:49%;margin:0 0 0 2%}

Shipping: Riskiest States
State Attack rate
Oregon 135.2
Delaware 128.2
Florida 57.4
New York 45.0
Nevada 36.9
California 36.9
Georgia 33.5
Washington, D.C 30.8
Texas 29.6
Illinois 29.4
Billing: Riskiest States
Region Attack rate
Oregon 87.5
Delaware 79.6
Washington, D.C. 63.0
Florida 47.4
Nevada 38.8
California 36.9
Arkansas 36.6
New York 35.5
Vermont 34.2
Georgia 33.4

Diving a bit deeper, ZIPTM codes in Miami, Fla., make up a significant portion of the top 10 ZIP CodeTM lists for shipping and billing attacks — in fact, many of the same ZIP codes appear on both lists. The other ZIP Code that appears on both lists is South El Monte, Calif., which has a high percentage of industrial properties — common targets for fraudsters to ship packages, then reship overseas. You can download the top 100 riskiest Zip Codes in the U.S. for H1 2017.

.dataTb{margin:20px auto;width:100%}.dataTb:after{clear:both}.dataTb table{}.dataTb td,.dataTb th{border:1px solid #ddd;padding:.8em}.dataTb th{background:#F4F4F4}.tbL{float:left;width:49%}.tbR{float:right;width:49%;margin:0 0 0 2%}

Shipping: Top 10 riskiest ZIP™ Codes
ZIP Code Attack rate
33122 [Miami, Fla.] 2409.4
91733 [South El Monte, Calif.] 1655.5
33198 [Miami, Fla.] 1295.2
33166 [Miami, Fla.] 1266.0
33195 [Miami, Fla.] 1037.3
33192 [Miami, Fla.] 893.9
97251 [Portland, Ore.] 890.6
07064 [Port Reading, NJ] 808.9
89423 [Minden, Nev.] 685.5
77072 [Houston, Tex.] 629.3
Billing: Top 10 riskiest ZIP™ Codes
ZIP Code Attack rate
77060 [Houston, Tex.] 1337.6
33198 [Miami, Fla.] 1215.6
33122 [Miami, Fla.] 1106.2
33166 [Miami, Fla.] 1037.4
91733 [South El Monte, Calif.] 780.1
33195 [Miami, Fla.] 713.7
97252 [Portland, Ore.] 670.8
33191 [Miami, Fla.] 598.8
33708 [St. Petersburg, Fla.] 563.6
33792 [Miami, Fla.] 493.0

As e-commerce fraud continues to grow, businesses need to be proactive to keep themselves and their customers safe. That means incorporating multiple, layered fraud prevention strategies that work together seamlessly — for example, understanding details about users and their devices, knowing how users interact with the business and evaluating previous transaction history. This level of insight can help businesses distinguish real customers from nefarious ones without impacting the customer experience.

While businesses are ultimately responsible for the safety of customers and their data, the onus doesn’t rest solely with them. Consumers should also be vigilant when it comes to protecting their digital identities and payment information. That means creating strong, unique passwords; actively monitoring online accounts; and using two-factor authentication to secure account access.

At the end of the day, e-commerce fraud is a challenge that businesses and consumers will experience for the foreseeable future. But rising attack rates don’t have to spell doom and gloom for the industry. E-commerce growth is still extremely strong, as consumers interact through multiple channels (in-store, mobile and web) and expect a personalized experience. Establishing trust and verifying digital identities are key to meeting these latest expectations, which provide new opportunities for businesses and consumers to interact seamlessly and transact securely. With multiple safeguards in place, businesses have a variety of options to protect their customers and their brand reputation.

Experian is a nonexclusive full-service provider licensee of the United States Postal Service®. The following trademarks are owned by the United States Postal Service®: ZIP and ZIP Code. The price for Experian’s services is not established, controlled or approved by the United States Postal Service.

Related Posts

How Union Credit Expands Access to Credit Unions with Experian

Discover how Union Credit and Experian help credit unions reach younger consumers through personalized digital lending experiences.

Published: July 1, 2026 by Scarlet.Nickel@experian.com
Faster Decisions, Better Outcomes: Experian Verify™ Now Available Through Centro, Mezzo’s Orchestration Engine 

Explore how Experian Verify™ and Mezzo’s Centro orchestration engine are helping mortgage lenders modernize income and employment verification, reduce workflow complexity, and make faster, more confident lending decisions at scale.

Published: July 1, 2026 by Lizel Ferrer
Used EV Growth Signals a New Phase of Consumer Purchasing Behavior

The electric vehicle (EV) revolution isn’t slowing down, it’s changing lanes. While recent conversations have seemingly focused on softening demand for new EVs, the used segment has been gaining momentum. According to Experian Automotive’s 2025 EV Year in Review Report, new retail individual EV registrations fell 35.9% year-over-year. Meanwhile, the used retail individual EV registrations grew 25.4% from a year ago. As affordability and growing model availability reshapes consumer behavior, buyers are increasingly turning to pre-owned EVs, which has shown an interesting market divergence that is redefining how consumers are adopting this segment and what it can mean for automakers, dealers, and the overall industry. Key players behind rising used EV demand Notably, Tesla accounted for over half (60.5%) of used retail individual EV registrations in 2025, followed by Chevrolet at 6.4% and Nissan (5.5%). Diving a bit deeper, Tesla made up the top three models of the used individual registrations last year, with the Model 3 coming in at 27.2%, Model Y at 21.7%, and Model S (6.6%). The Chevrolet Bolt EV followed at 4.8% and the Nissan Leaf was at 4%. Tesla’s position as the leading make in the used EV market is a natural extension of its long-standing dominance in new EV sales. The brand’s leadership over the years created a large fleet of vehicles that are now entering the pre-owned market. What the used EV boom means for automotive professionals The growing demand for used EVs can present more opportunities for automotive professionals. Dealers that provide a healthy supply of pre-owned EVs can increase accessibility and play a role in adoption for consumers who are actively looking to purchase, while marketers can emphasize value and ownership benefits. As the market continues to evolve, automotive professionals who understand and respond to these changing dynamics will be best positioned to capitalize on the expanding pool of used EV shoppers. To learn more about EV insights, visit Experian Automotive’s EV Resource Center.

Published: June 30, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch