Incentives and Loan Terms: Making Vehicles Affordable During COVID-19

by Melinda Zabritski 3 min read September 23, 2020

SUV driving on road with foliage alongside road

Affordability has been the topic of conversation across the automotive industry over the past several years, and with COVID-19, the spotlight is even brighter, particularly as average loan amounts continue to grow.

To find ways to stay within budget, many consumers were swayed by manufacturer incentives, while others have stretched their loan terms to make their monthly payments manageable. In fact, the average new vehicle loan term reached 71.54 months in Q2 2020, up from 67.97 months during the same quarter just five years ago. On the surface, some are concerned about the extension of loan terms, as it can make vehicles more expensive in the long run or cause financial hardship for consumers, but that may not necessarily be the case.

Prime consumers seek longer term new loans

While the average loan term for a new vehicle is almost six years, not every consumer is choosing long term financing. The consumers with the highest increase in loan terms fell into low-risk categories. For instance, super prime consumers showed the largest increase of 3.71 months compared to last year, while prime consumers increased their loan terms by 2.57 months in the same time frame.

In addition, the longest loans—those with 85-96-month terms—belonged to consumers with an average credit score of 720 in Q2 2020, up from 703 one year ago. Some industry pundits believe longer term loans open consumers up to potential default, but the fact that low-risk consumers account for the most significant increases in terms, should quell some of the concern.

Longer Terms Keep Monthly Payments Down

The extension of loan terms coincides with significant increases in the average loan amount for a new vehicle—which increased nearly $4,000 in Q2 2020. Much of that increase has been driven by consumer preferences as full-sized pickups became the most financed new vehicle.

Even with an increase in loan amounts, when combined with extended terms, monthly payments for new loans have only increased slightly and have remained relatively on par with last year. The average monthly payment increased $18 year-over-year, with the average monthly payment coming in at $568.

To understand the impact that extended loan terms can have on the monthly payment, let’s take the average loan amount for a new vehicle ($36,072) and the average interest rate (5.15%). With 60-month terms, the monthly payment would be approximately $683, while with 72-month terms, the monthly payment would cost about $583.

So, while there is an increase in new loan amounts, consumers are finding ways to manage their payments, and longer loan terms have played a significant role in that.

Making Financing a Vehicle More Affordable

Another contributing factor that minimizes the likelihood of default with longer loans is lower interest rates. The average interest rate for a new vehicle is 5.15% as of Q2 2020, down from 6.25% in Q2 2019. That means, choosing a longer-term loan won’t have the same impact as previous years. As consumers’ financial situations will likely remain dynamic in the coming months, lenders should work with consumers to ensure that their loan options fit their needs, to make vehicle purchases more enticing and help them stay within budget.

Consumers are taking advantage of new car incentives, low interest rates and longer-term loans in order to ensure that their vehicle purchase is manageable. But, with the long-term effects of COVID-19 still unknown, it’s important for lenders to ensure they’re helping consumers make the best possible decisions. Understanding trends in the auto finance market can better position lenders and dealers to provide the best, most affordable options for each consumer.

To view the full Q2 2020 State of the Automotive Finance Market report, click here.

Related Posts

Rethinking Charged-Off Portfolio Prioritization

Experian’s new Recovery Scores model turns portfolio intelligence into more focused recovery strategies, helping organizations improve returns, direct effort and accelerate speed to cash. The challenge isn’t simply working more accounts. Whether a debt buyer is evaluating an acquisition, an agency is deciding where to assign collector time or a lender is managing its own post-charge-off accounts, the question is similar: How can limited capacity be directed toward accounts with the greatest potential for recovery? Prioritizing accounts mainly by age, balance or when they were last worked may not show which ones are most likely to generate a recovery. With the new Recovery Scores model, organizations can rank charged-off accounts by expected collectability, providing a consistent signal to inform placement strategy and treatment decisions across the recovery lifecycle. Make collector capacity a strategic resource Working every account with the same level of attention isn’t always practical. The more useful question is: Where should teams focus first to protect speed to cash? Our model performance analysis found: 80% of recovered dollars come from the top 40% of accounts worked. The value isn’t simply a better ranking. It’s how organizations can use it for collections optimization. Score bands can inform different strategies for placement, outsourcing, auction and legal channel treatment rather than applying the same approach across an entire portfolio. For debt buyers: The scores can inform acquisition pricing and how a newly purchased portfolio is divided across internal collections, legal channels and resale. Expected collectability can shape debt portfolio analysis, including how a portfolio is valued and segmented before collection work begins. For agencies: Score bands can help teams focus collector resources on accounts with stronger recovery potential. For first-party lenders: Managing recovery internally, the scores provide another signal to help structure decisions about which accounts to work and in what order. Look beyond collectability alone Prioritization rarely comes down to a single variable. Consider two accounts that both rank highly for expected collectability, but one has a substantially larger balance. Their recovery likelihood may be similar, but the potential dollars recovered are not. The Recovery Scores model uses debt collections analytics by combining Experian’s bureau-based score with current balance information. This helps organizations consider both the likelihood of recovery and the potential dollars at stake, while sensitive balance information remains within the organization’s working environment. Monitor accounts as they change The first decision about an account is rarely the last. Teams continually make choices about treatment, placement and resource allocation as accounts move through the recovery process. Recovery Scores is also available as a trigger. When underlying information changes, teams can receive an update and reconsider an account’s placement without waiting for the next portfolio-wide re-score. An account that shows lower recovery potential today may have a different recovery outlook later. Turn recovery potential into a portfolio strategy When portfolios contain more accounts than teams can work at once, the question isn’t simply, “How many accounts can we work?” It is, “Where can our resources have the greatest impact?” The latest Recovery Scores model helps organizations sharpen placement and treatment decisions. It gives debt buyers a way to price and segment portfolios with greater confidence and gives lenders another tool to direct limited collector time across their own post-charge-off portfolios. Learn more about Experian Recovery Scores

November 10, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
What Is a Third-Party Breach? How to Prepare for and Respond to Vendor Incidents

Learn what a third-party breach is and steps to prepare, contain risk, and support affected customers. Read more!

November 9, 2026 by Laura Burrows
Mortgage Underwriting Moves from Modernization Talk to Action 

Mortgage underwriting is entering a new phase. In a recent conversation with HousingWire’s Allison LaForgia, Michele Bodda, Group President of Experian Housing, Verification Solutions, and Employer Services, discussed how modern credit scores, alternative data and verification tools are changing how lenders evaluate borrowers.  Lenders can now judge modernization by its results, Bodda said. “Now we’re actually letting more modern scores get into underwriting to help price loans and go all the way through to securitization,” she told HousingWire. “We’re letting the scores and the data actually speak for itself instead of just talking about it.”  The Right Data at the Right Time  Modernizing underwriting means providing useful information at the right stage, rather than giving lenders everything at once. “You don’t need everything all at once. You don’t need everything on initial pull,” Bodda said.  Alternative data, such as rental payments and buy now, pay later activity, can help show how consumers manage obligations, especially those with thinner credit files. A thin credit file does not necessarily mean someone has a thin financial life.  “It’s our responsibility as one of the primary data providers to make sure we can make all of that available, so that we’re best representing the consumer,” Bodda said. A fuller view of data may help lenders identify creditworthy applicants who might otherwise be difficult to assess.  Simplifying Verification and Reducing Friction  Bodda also shared how Experian is making credit information more easily accessible and reducing unnecessary costs during the originations process, explaining that new enhancements to Experian’s Power Profile Plus allow lenders to pull credit data at the start of underwriting and request another score later without repurchasing the data.  “You can pull it later and not pay for the credit data again,” Bodda said.   Experian is also investing in income and employment verification, including through a new partnership with Workday. Bodda explained that Experian will continue to focus on process improvement, competition and innovation across the mortgage ecosystem.  A Broader Path to Homeownership  As consumer expectations and underwriting capabilities evolve, borrowers want a process that reflects their financial lives, while lenders seek greater efficiency. Modern scores, relevant data, and streamlined verification can help lenders assess applications with more context—and may help more people pursue homeownership.  “If we as an industry can open this up and bring more people into the process, then we’re going to thrive,” Bodda said in the interview.   Watch the interview and hear all of Michele’s insights, and more here.  

November 6, 2026 by Caroline Basile

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe