The Average Vehicle Age Myth

by Guest Contributor 3 min read June 29, 2021

Car driving on a rural road

There is a myth in the automotive industry that the average age of a vehicle can tell us whether or not vehicles are lasting longer than before. But the reality is, the average vehicle age is not as old as it seems and cannot necessarily tell us about the longevity or durability of vehicles on the road. In the Q1 2021 Market Trends Review, we took a deep dive into the data to explore the average age myth, identify the most realistic way to pinpoint average age, and explore other ways to inform aftermarket strategy.

Fact Versus Fiction

It is commonly believed that the average vehicle age can help determine the longevity and durability of a vehicle, as well as the potential growth or decline for aftermarket service dollars. The issue with that premise is that the average age can vary depending on which model years are considered and if the vehicles are “daily drivers.”

For example, the most current 25 model years (1997-2022) made up 94.5% of vehicles in operation through Q1 2021, while model years 1967 to 1996 accounted for less than 6%. If we calculate the average vehicle age including all model years between 1967 to 2022, it will result in an average age of about 11.88 years old. However, just looking at the most current 25 model years, the average age is actually about 10.72 years old.

A result of including all model years from 1967 to 2022, is an inflated average age. Including the non-daily operators, which are usually antique vehicles, isn’t a good indicator of typical, daily vehicle service needs.  And, adding an additional model year to the fixed base falsely increases the overall average age volume over previous years, further inflating the numbers. Instead, focusing on the most recent 25 model years paints a more accurate picture of the daily drivers on the road, which can help inform strategy—but there are additional data points that are more informative.

Growing Sweet Spot Key to Understanding Aftermarket Expectations

While the average age alone may not be able to signal aftermarket needs, there are other data points that do. One major consideration is the aftermarket “sweet spot.” The aftermarket sweet spot identifies vehicles that fall within the six-to-12-years old range and may need more advanced maintenance repairs sooner rather than later.

In Q1 2021, 94.2 million vehicles, or 33% of the vehicles in operation, fell within the sweet spot, a more than 7% increase compared to Q1 2020. This can mean big opportunity for the aftermarket.

But a strategy should never be built off a single data point. For aftermarket professionals to adequately prepare to service these vehicles, they first need to know which vehicles are currently on the road. Full-sized pickups (16.2%), entry-level CUVs (10.6%) and mid-range standard cars (9.6%) made up the top three vehicle segments on the road through the first quarter.  Meanwhile, the Ford F-150 (3.7%), Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (2.7%) and Toyota Camry (2.4%) accounted for the top three make and models on the road.

Besides those vehicles currently in the sweet spot, there is also opportunity when looking towards the future. The next few years are expected to bring even more vehicles into range. 2017-2019 model year vehicles each have over 16 million vehicles positioned to enter the sweet spot. That is over 40 million pre-sweet spot vehicles.

While average age alone may not be the best way to inform aftermarket business strategy, the sweet spot remains an important indicator for future service needs. As aftermarket professionals continue to strategize for their businesses, leveraging data will allow them to anticipate consumer needs and drive their business goals forward.

To learn more about average age, the aftermarket sweet spot, and other trends, watch the  full Q1 2021 Market Trends Review webinar.

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee
Financial Institutions Are Rethinking Customer Acqusition

Customer acquisition strategies are constantly evolving toward more precise targeting. From a marketing lens, you can track every step, optimize communication channels and still miss the person most likely to convert. Attribution can tell us which channels work and automation can make marketing spend more efficient. But both assume we know who is actually on the other end. Financial institutions are learning that finding audiences and targeting them is no longer the biggest challenge. As acquisition optimization marketing becomes more sophisticated, teams can measure and act on more signals than before. What they can't always know is whether the person on the receiving end is real. Customer acquisition has evolved into an identity problem. The challenge is not that every questionable signal represents malicious activity. It's that acquisition systems must make increasingly intelligent decisions with an imperfect understanding of who they're actually engaging. When identities are fragmented, duplicated, temporary or synthetic, optimization becomes a question of trust as much as targeting. When your signals don't reliably identify customers The customer journey often includes searching, filling out a form, creating an account, requesting a quote and subscribing. All of these signals work well when identity is relatively stable.  However, financial institutions are finding that these signals are becoming less reliable. A single person can operate across multiple personas, devices, browsers, aliases, accounts and intermediaries while several apparent “people” may actually represent one underlying actor. Financial instituions are finding: Fragmented customer signals Difficulty distinguishing an old account from a new one Different digital pathways associated with the same individual Signals that are generated by automation Real customers getting flagged because signals are too thin to evaluate confidently Legacy signals continue to be challenged Marketing has historically treated intent as a valuable signal because intent was relatively difficult to produce. A search required human intent. A form required someone to fill it out. An inquiry implied a meaningful amount of human effort. Financial institutions are already combating AI-enabled fraud, and now marketing teams are starting to face it on a massive scale. AI can mimic human behavior by researching products, comparing prices, filling out forms, creating accounts and signing up for services. A valid email address is no longer enough. Marketers need to know: How long has it existed? How recently has it been active? Does its activity appear consistent or suddenly anomalous? Has it gone dormant and returned? Is it associated with patterns that suggest stability or unusual behavior? How to build on your strongest signal Email remains one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce, following people across devices, platforms, transactions, subscriptions, accounts and years of activity. For over two decades, this has shaped how AtData thinks about identity. Now, as part of Experian, it’s shaping how an entire platform and team approach identity. A marketer doesn’t need every prospect to have existed online for twenty years. But understanding whether a newly acquired prospect has meaningful identity context can dramatically improve the quality of the decision being made around it. Better identity intelligence can help organizations reduce unnecessary friction by improving their ability to recognize legitimate customers. With a strong identity foundation, marketing teams can better address: Which audiences are more likely to convert? Which leads are high quality? Which channels are driving incremental growth? What do the best prospects look like? The value isn't simply having an email address. It's understanding the history and behavioral context associated with it. That context can provide a stronger digital identity signal, helping marketers understand how long they have been active, whether its behavior is consistent with that of a real person and whether current activity aligns with past patterns. It continues to be one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce. An infrastructure built for what's coming The acquisition of AtData by Experian reflects a fundamental shift in how identity infrastructure needs to work. Experian's scale and decisioning capabilities, combined with AtData's real-time email intelligence, create a strong platform. Read more about the why behind the acquisition and see how email works as an identity anchor for fraud prevention. Contact us to learn about our customer acquisition solutions

September 15, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
As Electric Vehicle Adoption Eases, Dealers Can Find New Opportunities To Reach Consumers

After years of rapid growth, new electric vehicle (EV) registrations have moderated, and the EV market has entered a new chapter. But slower growth shouldn’t be mistaken for disappearing demand, with data suggesting the reality is much more nuanced. According to Experian Automotive’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026, battery EVs accounted for 8.21% of new retail registrations in the last 12 months, down from 9.23% a year earlier. However, consumers aren’t simply walking away from electrification. In fact, more than one million new EVs were registered during the past 12 months and the used EV market recorded more than 540,000 registrations over the same period. The opportunity may be less about waiting for the EV market to grow and more about understanding where EV demand is present, who is driving them, and how to reach those consumers more effectively. Who is likely to purchase an EV and what vehicle types are they interested in? Understanding who’s in the market for an EV can allow dealers to position themselves around consumers’ needs as they choose a vehicle that fits their everyday lifestyle. In the second quarter of 2026, Millennials and Gen X accounted for 67.83% of new EV registrations, nearly 10 percentage points above their combined share of all new, retail registrations. Millennials were also the largest generational audience across both new and used EV market share, coming in at 35.76% and 38.42%, respectively. It’s important to consider that the EV shopper isn’t necessarily looking for an unfamiliar or new type of vehicle. In many cases, they’re seemingly looking for an electric version of the practical vehicle they already know. For instance, SUVs accounted for 77.47% of new EV registrations in Q2 2026, which was similar to SUVs’ 63.49% share of all new retail registrations. For these shoppers, creating messaging around value, practicality, and available choices may resonate differently than premium technology messaging aimed at some new-EV prospects. The more precisely dealers can identify those audiences, the less they need to depend on broad EV market momentum to generate demand. To learn more about EV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation.

September 15, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe