Loading...

Red Flags Rule – just weeks until the FTC enforcement date of December 31. Well beyond that for clarity.

Published: November 24, 2010 by Keir Breitenfeld

As the December 31st deadline approaches for FTC enforcement of the Red Flags Rule, we still seem quite a ways off from getting out from under the cloud of confusion and debate related to the definition of ‘creditor’ under the statutory provisions. For example, the Thune-Begich amendment to “amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act with respect to the applicability of identity theft guidelines to creditors” looks to greatly narrow the definition of creditor under the Rule, and therefore narrow the universe of businesses and institutions covered by the Red Flags Rule. The question remains, and will remain far past the December 31 enforcement deadline, as to how narrow the ‘creditor’ universe gets. Will this amendment be effective in excluding those types of entities generally not in the business of extending credit (such as physicians, lawyers, and other service providers) even if they do provide service in advance of payment collection or billing? Will this amendment exclude more broadly, for example ‘buy-here, pay-here’ auto dealers who don’t extend credit or furnish data to a credit reporting agency? Finally, is this the tip of an iceberg in which more entities opt out of the requirement for robust and effective identity theft prevention programs? So one has to ask if the original Red Flags Rule intent to “require many businesses and organizations to implement a written Identity Theft Prevention Program designed to detect the warning signs – or “red flags” – of identity theft in their day-to-day operations, take steps to prevent the crime, and mitigate the damage it inflicts” still holds true? Or is the idea of protecting consumer identities only a good one when it is convenient? It doesn’t appear to be linked with fraud risk as healthcare fraud, for example, is of major concern to most practitioners and service providers in that particular industry. Lastly, from an efficiency perspective, this debate would likely have been better timed at the drafting of the Red Flags Rule, and prior to the implementation of Red Flags programs across industries that may be ultimately excluded.

Related Posts

Experian is proud to be a Thought Leadership Sponsor at this year’s Federal Identity Forum & Expo. Meet us on site at FedID!

Published: August 1, 2025 by Kim Le

Now in its tenth year, Experian’s U.S. Identity and Fraud Report continues to uncover the shifting tides of fraud threats and how consumers and businesses are adapting. Our latest edition sheds light on a decade of change and unveils what remains consistent: trust is still the cornerstone of digital interactions. This year’s report draws on insights from over 2,000 U.S. consumers and 200 businesses to explore how identity, fraud and trust are evolving in a world increasingly shaped by generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and other emerging technologies. Highlights: Over a third of companies are using AI, including generative AI, to combat fraud. 72% of business leaders anticipate AI-generated fraud and deepfakes as major challenges by 2026. Nearly 60% of companies report rising fraud losses, with identity theft and payment fraud as top concerns. Digital anxiety persists with 57% of consumers worried about doing things online. Ready to go deeper? Explore the full findings and discover how your organization can lead with confidence in an evolving fraud landscape. Download report Watch on-demand webinar Read press release  

Published: August 1, 2025 by Julie Lee

User and entity behavior analytics monitors how users and systems typically behave and raises a red flag when something unusual happens.

Published: July 15, 2025 by Allison Lemaster