Fighting Fraud in a Fintech World

by Brittany Peterson 3 min read February 8, 2019

Professionals are working in office, gathered around a tablet.

Innovation and technology have opened new doors of possibility for banks, credit unions and other financial industry organizations. It’s ushered in a new era of financial services products and capabilities within the digital ecosystem – creating more convenience and a better experience for consumers. And we have the plethora of fintech companies to thank for that.

But with new pathways to access financial accounts and information via digital platforms, opportunity has also been created for criminals to implement sophisticated fraud strategies, harming the financial services industry, and more importantly, consumers. In fact, according to recent findings from our Global Identity and Fraud Report, 55 percent of businesses globally reported an increase in fraud-related losses over the past 12 months – particularly account opening and account takeover attacks.  

So, with all of the advancements that fintech companies provide, how can they ensure they’re one step ahead of the fraudsters? We sat down with Kathleen Peters, Experian’s senior vice president and Head of Fraud & Identity, to discuss how fintech companies can effectively position themselves for success in this ever-changing fraud landscape.

How are businesses responding to the dynamic fraud threat?  

Based on the findings from our report, it’s clear businesses recognize the urgency of the matter and are taking steps to actively fight fraud. In the last 12 months, over half of businesses globally made significant investments in fraud management budgets.

However, despite the increases in budgets, we are seeing that fraud losses continue to grow year over year. This means that organizations, including fintech companies, need to ensure they have a complete understanding of how fraud impacts their business by looking at the problem holistically.

What are some of the advantages fintech companies have over traditional financial institutions when it comes to fraud?

With an increase in the volume of data breaches, we have to assume all personally identifiable information, such as name, addresses, date of birth and Social Security number, has been compromised. And with so much of our lives cemented in the digital ecosystem, we are left vulnerable to fraudsters. Many criminals are relentless in their search for weaknesses in the system, never giving up.

The advantage that many fintech companies have is their agility and customer-oriented approach. Organizations across the board need to be nimble and adopt new fraud prevention strategies to stay ahead of the criminals. But more importantly, these new strategies cannot negatively impact the customer experience. According to our report, the two most important elements for the consumer online experience are security and convenience.

What steps can fintech companies take to increase consumer trust?

Trust is built on a company’s ability to protect people’s identities and create an enjoyable experience. We believe a multi-layered approach is key to achieving success. A silver bullet for fraud prevention and identity management doesn’t exist, but the use of multiple strategies can provide a safe and convenient online environment.

Advanced data and technology, such as biometrics, device intelligence and identity tokenization, can now seamlessly be integrated to confidently authenticate customers. We know that consumers appreciate security they can see – especially physical biometric measures like a fingerprint or voice recognition. But when these methods are layered with additional, passive authentication capabilities, organizations can deliver the secure and convenient experience that consumers are truly looking for.

To read the full Global Identity and Fraud Report, click here.

Related Posts

Rethinking Charged-Off Portfolio Prioritization

Experian’s new Recovery Scores model turns portfolio intelligence into more focused recovery strategies, helping organizations improve returns, direct effort and accelerate speed to cash. The challenge isn’t simply working more accounts. Whether a debt buyer is evaluating an acquisition, an agency is deciding where to assign collector time or a lender is managing its own post-charge-off accounts, the question is similar: How can limited capacity be directed toward accounts with the greatest potential for recovery? Prioritizing accounts mainly by age, balance or when they were last worked may not show which ones are most likely to generate a recovery. With the new Recovery Scores model, organizations can rank charged-off accounts by expected collectability, providing a consistent signal to inform placement strategy and treatment decisions across the recovery lifecycle. Make collector capacity a strategic resource Working every account with the same level of attention isn’t always practical. The more useful question is: Where should teams focus first to protect speed to cash? Our model performance analysis found: 80% of recovered dollars come from the top 40% of accounts worked. The value isn’t simply a better ranking. It’s how organizations can use it for collections optimization. Score bands can inform different strategies for placement, outsourcing, auction and legal channel treatment rather than applying the same approach across an entire portfolio. For debt buyers: The scores can inform acquisition pricing and how a newly purchased portfolio is divided across internal collections, legal channels and resale. Expected collectability can shape debt portfolio analysis, including how a portfolio is valued and segmented before collection work begins. For agencies: Score bands can help teams focus collector resources on accounts with stronger recovery potential. For first-party lenders: Managing recovery internally, the scores provide another signal to help structure decisions about which accounts to work and in what order. Look beyond collectability alone Prioritization rarely comes down to a single variable. Consider two accounts that both rank highly for expected collectability, but one has a substantially larger balance. Their recovery likelihood may be similar, but the potential dollars recovered are not. The Recovery Scores model uses debt collections analytics by combining Experian’s bureau-based score with current balance information. This helps organizations consider both the likelihood of recovery and the potential dollars at stake, while sensitive balance information remains within the organization’s working environment. Monitor accounts as they change The first decision about an account is rarely the last. Teams continually make choices about treatment, placement and resource allocation as accounts move through the recovery process. Recovery Scores is also available as a trigger. When underlying information changes, teams can receive an update and reconsider an account’s placement without waiting for the next portfolio-wide re-score. An account that shows lower recovery potential today may have a different recovery outlook later. Turn recovery potential into a portfolio strategy When portfolios contain more accounts than teams can work at once, the question isn’t simply, “How many accounts can we work?” It is, “Where can our resources have the greatest impact?” The latest Recovery Scores model helps organizations sharpen placement and treatment decisions. It gives debt buyers a way to price and segment portfolios with greater confidence and gives lenders another tool to direct limited collector time across their own post-charge-off portfolios. Learn more about Experian Recovery Scores

November 10, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
What Is a Third-Party Breach? How to Prepare for and Respond to Vendor Incidents

Learn what a third-party breach is and steps to prepare, contain risk, and support affected customers. Read more!

November 9, 2026 by Laura Burrows
Mortgage Underwriting Moves from Modernization Talk to Action 

Mortgage underwriting is entering a new phase. In a recent conversation with HousingWire’s Allison LaForgia, Michele Bodda, Group President of Experian Housing, Verification Solutions, and Employer Services, discussed how modern credit scores, alternative data and verification tools are changing how lenders evaluate borrowers.  Lenders can now judge modernization by its results, Bodda said. “Now we’re actually letting more modern scores get into underwriting to help price loans and go all the way through to securitization,” she told HousingWire. “We’re letting the scores and the data actually speak for itself instead of just talking about it.”  The Right Data at the Right Time  Modernizing underwriting means providing useful information at the right stage, rather than giving lenders everything at once. “You don’t need everything all at once. You don’t need everything on initial pull,” Bodda said.  Alternative data, such as rental payments and buy now, pay later activity, can help show how consumers manage obligations, especially those with thinner credit files. A thin credit file does not necessarily mean someone has a thin financial life.  “It’s our responsibility as one of the primary data providers to make sure we can make all of that available, so that we’re best representing the consumer,” Bodda said. A fuller view of data may help lenders identify creditworthy applicants who might otherwise be difficult to assess.  Simplifying Verification and Reducing Friction  Bodda also shared how Experian is making credit information more easily accessible and reducing unnecessary costs during the originations process, explaining that new enhancements to Experian’s Power Profile Plus allow lenders to pull credit data at the start of underwriting and request another score later without repurchasing the data.  “You can pull it later and not pay for the credit data again,” Bodda said.   Experian is also investing in income and employment verification, including through a new partnership with Workday. Bodda explained that Experian will continue to focus on process improvement, competition and innovation across the mortgage ecosystem.  A Broader Path to Homeownership  As consumer expectations and underwriting capabilities evolve, borrowers want a process that reflects their financial lives, while lenders seek greater efficiency. Modern scores, relevant data, and streamlined verification can help lenders assess applications with more context—and may help more people pursue homeownership.  “If we as an industry can open this up and bring more people into the process, then we’re going to thrive,” Bodda said in the interview.   Watch the interview and hear all of Michele’s insights, and more here.  

November 6, 2026 by Caroline Basile

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe