Technology-Sharing Is Critical in Preventing Fraud

by Adam Fingersh 6 min read December 7, 2016

Technology-Sharing cybersecurity fraud prevention

Fraud and cybersecurity are two of the biggest risks challenging organizations and the economy today. Fraud has become its own industry, to the tune of $500 billion in estimated losses annually to the global economy.

Increasingly, the public seems resigned to the idea that such compromises are the new normal. An estimated 1.9 million records are compromised every day, and news of breaches seems to break constantly. All of this produces a kind of fraud fatigue that may be lowering consumers’ expectations for identity and online security. Still, businesses must continue their efforts to prevent fraud attacks to protect all parties’ interests. The rapid growth of fraud-related activity only reinforces the need for aggressive fraud prevention strategies and the adoption of new technology to prepare for the latest emerging cybersecurity threats.

These challenges highlight the need to improve the effectiveness of current processes and future technology roadmaps.  The good news is that we know the elements needed to strengthen fraud risk strategies already exist. The question most often asked is how to utilize them, so I’ve put together those I think are most important:

  • First, a multi-layered authentication and risk-based approach is the best method to prevent fraud.
  • Take a comprehensive approach to identity with true customer intelligence.
  • Avoid silos and recognize the value of combining your solutions into one platform

Want to learn more?  You can read the full article below or here.
_______________________________________________________

Technology-Sharing Is Critical in Preventing Fraud

fraud prevention technology

Fraud and cybersecurity are two of the biggest risks challenging organizations and the economy today. Fraud has become its own industry, to the tune of $500 billion in estimated losses annually to the global economy.

Increasingly, the public seems resigned to the idea that such compromises are the new normal. An estimated 1.9 million records are compromised every day, and news of breaches seems to break constantly. All of this produces a kind of fraud fatigue that may be lowering consumers’ expectations for identity and online security. Still, businesses must continue their efforts to prevent fraud attacks to protect all parties’ interests. The rapid growth of fraud-related activity only reinforces the need for aggressive fraud prevention strategies and the adoption of new technology to prepare for the latest emerging cybersecurity threats.

Many businesses understand that combining data and technology to strengthen their fraud risk strategies can help reduce losses. Ever-evolving fraud schemes, changes in regulatory requirements and the advent of new digital initiatives make it difficult for businesses to manage all of the tools needed to keep up with the relentless pace of change. The systems used internally by businesses have become increasingly complex, expensive, and difficult to integrate and manage. This complexity tests an organization’s ability to scale in response to new risks quickly and causes too much friction for customers, often resulting in a bad customer experience.

These challenges highlight the need to improve the effectiveness of current processes and future technology roadmaps. The good news is that we know the elements needed to strengthen fraud risk strategies already exist. The question most often asked is how to utilize them, so I’ve put together strategies that I think are most important.

First, a multi-layered authentication and risk-based approach is the best method to prevent fraud. This aligns with the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s efforts to establish standards and guidelines for identity-proofing and credential management for consumers.

The most successful companies in this mission are those that take a comprehensive approach with true customer intelligence. Rather than rely on a single data point, these companies ensure they use multiple sources and types of data, for examples, combining personally identifiable information (PII) with digital identity or device intelligence. The combination of these seemingly disparate types of data not only offers a better picture of the customer but also makes it easier to identify when a fraudster has compromised the identity.

Those same companies are now able to frustrate criminals by broadening from a focus solely on the accuracy of an identity to looking at the use patterns associated with that identity as well. This strategy does two important things:

  • Determine which identities—or pieces of identities—are potentially in use by someone other than their true owner
  • Isolate those identity attributes that a criminal must re-use because changing them every time is too costly and complicated

Fraud-detection algorithms that analyze use patterns have long focused on the re-use of data elements through link analysis to identify common phone numbers and addresses. This represents a fairly basic approach to detecting fraud, but the sophistication of this type of analysis is evolving. Newer solutions on the market can link a wide variety of data elements in a user-driven manner within the customer’s enterprise so it is both dynamic and focused on fraud trends that impact a specific business.

Companies have also learned to avoid silos or have at least figured out how to build a bridge between silos so information can not only be shared but also leveraged in order to protect both the business and the customer while providing a better overall experience.

Lastly, organizations are recognizing when they are not getting full value out of the many fraud systems and products they use, and are making the strategic decision to rectify it through shared technology platforms that improve efforts to detect and respond to emerging threats. Combining all new and existing fraud solutions into one platform lets companies quickly respond to new threats, which means less fraud and more confidence in transactions.

By creating true customer intelligence, sharing it across the organization and then leveraging all of their available systems and tools, the most successful companies take a more open approach, which allows them to create greater operational efficiency by getting more out of existing fraud and identity systems. They also are able to deploy new fraud detection capabilities effectively and decrease the time it takes to go to market with new tools and strategies. Keeping more control in the hands of the fraud team to adapt and deploy strategies that match the pace of fraud also reduces the burdens on IT and data science teams.

The cycle of fraud loss and deterioration of the customer experience characterizes life in today’s globally connected digital world. With crime rings stepping up the scale, sophistication, and velocity of their attacks, it’s likely that such threats will persist and even increase in the foreseeable future.

The evolution of fraud prevention has shifted, allowing for users to create intelligence across an enterprise connected to internal applications and third-party solutions. This evolution strengthens fraud risk strategies and improves compliance. The link between data and technology ultimately determines the impact on overall fraud losses.

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee
Financial Institutions Are Rethinking Customer Acqusition

Customer acquisition strategies are constantly evolving toward more precise targeting. From a marketing lens, you can track every step, optimize communication channels and still miss the person most likely to convert. Attribution can tell us which channels work and automation can make marketing spend more efficient. But both assume we know who is actually on the other end. Financial institutions are learning that finding audiences and targeting them is no longer the biggest challenge. As acquisition optimization marketing becomes more sophisticated, teams can measure and act on more signals than before. What they can't always know is whether the person on the receiving end is real. Customer acquisition has evolved into an identity problem. The challenge is not that every questionable signal represents malicious activity. It's that acquisition systems must make increasingly intelligent decisions with an imperfect understanding of who they're actually engaging. When identities are fragmented, duplicated, temporary or synthetic, optimization becomes a question of trust as much as targeting. When your signals don't reliably identify customers The customer journey often includes searching, filling out a form, creating an account, requesting a quote and subscribing. All of these signals work well when identity is relatively stable.  However, financial institutions are finding that these signals are becoming less reliable. A single person can operate across multiple personas, devices, browsers, aliases, accounts and intermediaries while several apparent “people” may actually represent one underlying actor. Financial instituions are finding: Fragmented customer signals Difficulty distinguishing an old account from a new one Different digital pathways associated with the same individual Signals that are generated by automation Real customers getting flagged because signals are too thin to evaluate confidently Legacy signals continue to be challenged Marketing has historically treated intent as a valuable signal because intent was relatively difficult to produce. A search required human intent. A form required someone to fill it out. An inquiry implied a meaningful amount of human effort. Financial institutions are already combating AI-enabled fraud, and now marketing teams are starting to face it on a massive scale. AI can mimic human behavior by researching products, comparing prices, filling out forms, creating accounts and signing up for services. A valid email address is no longer enough. Marketers need to know: How long has it existed? How recently has it been active? Does its activity appear consistent or suddenly anomalous? Has it gone dormant and returned? Is it associated with patterns that suggest stability or unusual behavior? How to build on your strongest signal Email remains one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce, following people across devices, platforms, transactions, subscriptions, accounts and years of activity. For over two decades, this has shaped how AtData thinks about identity. Now, as part of Experian, it’s shaping how an entire platform and team approach identity. A marketer doesn’t need every prospect to have existed online for twenty years. But understanding whether a newly acquired prospect has meaningful identity context can dramatically improve the quality of the decision being made around it. Better identity intelligence can help organizations reduce unnecessary friction by improving their ability to recognize legitimate customers. With a strong identity foundation, marketing teams can better address: Which audiences are more likely to convert? Which leads are high quality? Which channels are driving incremental growth? What do the best prospects look like? The value isn't simply having an email address. It's understanding the history and behavioral context associated with it. That context can provide a stronger digital identity signal, helping marketers understand how long they have been active, whether its behavior is consistent with that of a real person and whether current activity aligns with past patterns. It continues to be one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce. An infrastructure built for what's coming The acquisition of AtData by Experian reflects a fundamental shift in how identity infrastructure needs to work. Experian's scale and decisioning capabilities, combined with AtData's real-time email intelligence, create a strong platform. Read more about the why behind the acquisition and see how email works as an identity anchor for fraud prevention. Contact us to learn about our customer acquisition solutions

September 15, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
As Electric Vehicle Adoption Eases, Dealers Can Find New Opportunities To Reach Consumers

After years of rapid growth, new electric vehicle (EV) registrations have moderated, and the EV market has entered a new chapter. But slower growth shouldn’t be mistaken for disappearing demand, with data suggesting the reality is much more nuanced. According to Experian Automotive’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026, battery EVs accounted for 8.21% of new retail registrations in the last 12 months, down from 9.23% a year earlier. However, consumers aren’t simply walking away from electrification. In fact, more than one million new EVs were registered during the past 12 months and the used EV market recorded more than 540,000 registrations over the same period. The opportunity may be less about waiting for the EV market to grow and more about understanding where EV demand is present, who is driving them, and how to reach those consumers more effectively. Who is likely to purchase an EV and what vehicle types are they interested in? Understanding who’s in the market for an EV can allow dealers to position themselves around consumers’ needs as they choose a vehicle that fits their everyday lifestyle. In the second quarter of 2026, Millennials and Gen X accounted for 67.83% of new EV registrations, nearly 10 percentage points above their combined share of all new, retail registrations. Millennials were also the largest generational audience across both new and used EV market share, coming in at 35.76% and 38.42%, respectively. It’s important to consider that the EV shopper isn’t necessarily looking for an unfamiliar or new type of vehicle. In many cases, they’re seemingly looking for an electric version of the practical vehicle they already know. For instance, SUVs accounted for 77.47% of new EV registrations in Q2 2026, which was similar to SUVs’ 63.49% share of all new retail registrations. For these shoppers, creating messaging around value, practicality, and available choices may resonate differently than premium technology messaging aimed at some new-EV prospects. The more precisely dealers can identify those audiences, the less they need to depend on broad EV market momentum to generate demand. To learn more about EV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation.

September 15, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe