Are Behavioral Analytics the Answer to Next-Generation Fraud Bots? 

by James Craddick 4 min read December 17, 2024

Bots have been a consistent thorn in fraud teams’ side for years. But since the advent of generative AI (genAI), what used to be just one more fraud type has become a fraud tsunami. This surge in fraud bot attacks has brought with it:

  • A 108% year-over-year increase in credential stuffing to take over accounts1
  • A 134% year-over-year increase in carding attacks, where stolen cards are tested1

While fraud professionals rush to fight back the onslaught, they’re also reckoning with the ever-evolving threat of genAI. A large factor in fraud bots’ new scalability and strength, genAI was the #1 stress point identified by fraud teams in 2024, and 70% expect it to be a challenge moving forward, according to Experian’s U.S. Identity and Fraud Report.

This fear is well-founded. Fraudsters are wasting no time incorporating genAI into their attack arsenal. GenAI has created a new generation of fraud bot tools that make bot development more accessible and sophisticated. These bots reverse-engineer fraud stacks, testing the limits of their targets’ defenses to find triggers for step-ups and checks, then adapt to avoid setting them off.

How do bot detection solutions fare against this next generation of bots?

The evolution of fraud bots

The earliest fraud bots, which first appeared in the 1990s2, were simple scripts with limited capabilities. Fraudsters soon began using these scripts to execute basic tasks on their behalf — mainly form spam and light data scraping. Fraud teams responded, implementing bot detection solutions that continued to evolve as the threats became more sophisticated.

The evolution of fraud bots was steady — and mostly balanced against fraud-fighting tools — until genAI supercharged it. Today, fraudsters are leveraging genAI’s core ability (analyzing datasets and identifying patterns, then using those patterns to generate solutions) to create bots capable of large-scale attacks with unprecedented sophistication. These genAI-powered fraud bots can analyze onboarding flows to identify step-up triggers, automate attacks at high-volume times, and even conduct “behavior hijacking,” where bots record and replicate the behaviors of real users.

How next-generation fraud bots beat fraud stacks

For years, a tried-and-true tool for fraud bot detection was to look for the non-human giveaways: lightning-fast transition speeds, eerily consistent keystrokes, nonexistent mouse movements, and/or repeated device and network data were all tell-tale signs of a bot. Fraud teams could base their bot detection strategies off of these behavioral red flags.

Stopping today’s next-generation fraud bots isn’t quite as straightforward. Because they were specifically built to mimic human behavior and cycle through device IDs and IP addresses, today’s bots often appear to be normal, human applicants and circumvent many of the barriers that blocked their predecessors. The data the bots are providing is better, too3, fraudsters are using genAI to streamline and scale the creation of synthetic identities.4 By equipping their human-like bots with a bank of high-quality synthetic identities, fraudsters have their most potent, advanced attack avenue to date.

Skirting traditional bot detection with their human-like capabilities, next-generation fraud bots can bombard their targets with massive, often undetected, attacks. In one attack analyzed by NeuroID, a part of Experian, fraud bots made up 31% of a business’s onboarding volume on a single day. That’s nearly one-third of the business’s volume comprised of bots attempting to commit fraud. If the business hadn’t had the right tools in place to separate these bots from genuine users, they wouldn’t have been able to stop the attack until it was too late.

Beating fraud bots with behavioral analytics: The next-generation approach

Next-generation fraud bots pose a unique threat to digital businesses: their data appears legitimate, and they look like a human when they’re interacting with a form. So how do fraud teams differentiate fraud bots from an actual human user?

NeuroID’s product development teams discovered key nuances that separate next-generation bots from humans, and we’ve updated our industry-leading bot detection capabilities to account for them. A big one is mousing patterns: random, erratic cursor movements are part of what makes next-generation bots so eerily human-like, but their movements are still noticeably smoother than a real human’s. Other bot detection solutions (including our V1 signal) wouldn’t flag these advanced cursor movements as bot behavior, but our new signal is designed to identify even the most granular giveaways of a next-generation fraud bot.

Fraud bots will continue to evolve. But so will we. For example, behavioral analytics can identify repeated actions — down to the pixel a cursor lands on — during a bot attack and block out users exhibiting those behaviors. Our behavior was built specifically to combat next-gen challenges with scalable, real-time solutions. This proactive protection against advanced bot behaviors is crucial to preventing larger attacks.

For more on fraud bots’ evolution, download our Emerging Trends in Fraud: Understanding and Combating Next-Gen Bots report.

Sources

1HUMAN Enterprise Bot Fraud Benchmark Report

2Abusix

3 NeuroID

4 Biometric Update

Related Posts

Rewriting the Road Ahead with Longer Loan Terms and Increased Refinancing Options

The automotive market is entering a new phase defined not just by what consumers are buying, but by how they’re choosing to finance it. According to Experian Automotive’s State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026, nearly one-third (35.55%) of all new vehicle loans now stretch more than six years, up from 30.83% in Q1 2025. Similarly on the used side, 31.54% of loans extended more than six years, an increase from 28.60% last year. The shift highlights why affordability is reshaping how consumers are financing their vehicles, particularly in larger and higher-priced vehicles. Refinancing gains traction as interest rates stabilize In addition to longer-term loans, consumers are becoming increasingly deliberate with their financing decisions and managing monthly payments as refinancing activity has gained momentum. For instance, consumers who refinanced this quarter lowered their interest rate by 2.2% and saved an average of $81 on their monthly payment. Credit unions, in particular, continued to play a major role in helping consumers secure more affordable payment options. In Q1 2025, credit unions accounted for the lion’s share of automotive refinancing at 63.43%, from 62.31% a year ago. By comparison, banks went from 23.51% to 22.59% year-over-year. Furthermore, those who refinanced with a credit union saved an average of $101 this quarter, whereas those who refinanced with banks saved $60. Expanding credit access through flexible financing Another notable trend this quarter was the incessant growth in subprime financing as credit accessibility across the market continues to increase. In the first quarter of this year, subprime borrowers made up 15.75% of total vehicle financing, from 14.40% last year. For new vehicles in particular, the subprime market went from 5.61% to 6.88% year-over-year, while subprime in used vehicle financing grew to 20.60% this quarter, from 19.36% a year ago. Increased activity in the subprime segment highlights continued confidence in the automotive market and underscores the importance of expanded financing options. As consumers seek greater flexibility with financing decisions that fit their lifestyle, lenders and dealers have the opportunity to approach them with more personalized solutions. These trends are helping keep both new and used vehicle markets moving forward, while creating new opportunities for consumers to manage payments and purchase confidently. To learn more about automotive finance trends, view the full State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026 presentation on demand.

Published: June 2, 2026 by Melinda Zabritski
Staying Competitive After Trigger Leads Evolve: A Roadmap For Lenders

Trigger leads have long been the preferred solution for identifying high-intent mortgage borrowers. But with the implementation of the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (HPPA), which introduces new limitations and consumer protections around trigger leads, that playbook will need to shift. Now, lenders are quickly facing a pivotal shift in how they discover, engage, and convert prospective borrowers into customers. The industry now stands at a crossroads. Lenders who adapt early—leaning into predictive tools, consent-based engagement, and smarter prescreening—will redefine borrower acquisition in a more privacy-centric era.  HPPA: A structural change to mortgage marketing  The HPPA amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act by significantly restricting the use of mortgage inquiries for prescreen purposes. As of March 5, 2026, credit bureaus may only provide or utilize mortgage inquiries to:  End users with explicit borrower consent  The originator of the consumer’s current mortgage  The servicer of the consumer’s current mortgage  An insured depository institution or credit union where the consumer has an existing account  While these exemptions may provide continuity for banks and credit unions, many mortgage brokers and nonbank lenders will need to overhaul their prescreen practices—or risk being cut off entirely from a previously high-performing acquisition channel.  Why this isn’t just a compliance shift—It’s a strategic recalibration  Mortgage triggers in prescreen allow lenders to react instantly to consumer intent. Lenders rely on a prompt and convincing narrative to entice applicants to switch lenders. Mortgage inquiry triggers are effective and were, therefore, a prospecting strategy for many lenders. Recent legislative changes significantly restrict the availability of these inquiry triggers, and impacted lenders are focusing on a more intentional prospecting strategy to compete.   Without these mortgage triggers in prescreen, lenders need to ask:  Who are we trying to reach?  What early signals can we act on?  How do we earn permission and attention before a mortgage inquiry ever happens?  Transforming the funnel: From reaction to anticipation  The shift in mortgage inquiry-based prescreen isn’t the end of high-intent lead targeting. It’s the beginning of a more strategic and intentional approach—one that leverages earlier indicators of mortgage readiness and focuses on building relationships, not just closing transactions.  Here’s where the momentum is evolving, creating a new and smarter funnel:  Prescreen marketing: Using credit and behavioral attributes to help identify consumers who meet specific lending criteria before they signal active intent.  Predictive modeling: Leveraging propensity scores or custom models to prioritize outreach based on conversion likelihood.  Consent-based engagement: Implementing compliant mechanisms to capture and manage borrower opt-ins at scale.  The power of predictive modeling  According to recent industry interviews, propensity modeling is emerging as one of the most effective replacements for trigger-based prescreen. These models analyze hundreds of credit attributes—such as utilization, account mix, account age, and depth—to help identify consumers statistically more likely to seek a mortgage.  For lenders just beginning to use predictive modeling, off-the-shelf models can be a quick way to identify potential borrowers. For example, when layering propensity scores on top of credit eligibility, which can improve borrower targeting, many lenders see an increase in open mortgage loan rates.  Meanwhile, custom-built models, which analyze a lender’s own campaign performance over time, offer the highest level of precise targeting. These models isolate the attributes most predictive of conversions within a specific product mix—optimizing not just volume, but fit.  Speed without traditional triggers? It’s possible  One of the biggest concerns among lenders is maintaining the speed historically enabled by trigger leads. But that concern may be overblown.  Self-service prescreen platforms now allow marketers to generate qualified lead lists in as little as 24 hours, enabling rapid response during rate drops, competitive shifts, or seasonal demand spikes.   For those new to prescreening, batch campaigns still offer value, especially with analyst support.   Don’t overlook retention  In an era of intense acquisition competition, retention becomes a key differentiator.  Lenders who monitor property status, cash flow, and consumer credit behavior can proactively identify when an existing borrower is likely to list, refinance, or exit. Armed with that intelligence, lenders can re-engage with the borrower at the right moment—sometimes before a competitor is considered or contacted.  This level of behavioral intelligence may soon separate proactive lenders from reactive ones.  Actions instead of reactions  The evolution of trigger-based prescreen doesn’t just require new tools; it demands new thinking. Lenders should begin by auditing their current pipelines and determining:  What percentage of our acquisition is dependent on triggers?  What share of our book falls under the HPPA exemptions?  How will we scale compliant opt-in collection?  Are our current prescreen or modeling capabilities future-ready?  Those who answer these questions today—and act on them—won’t just be in compliance with the new laws, they’ll lead in a transformed market. Lenders should also be asking:   Do we have the infrastructure to collect and act on borrower consent?  Are our acquisition teams equipped to run prescreen campaigns — both batch and self-service?  What predictive models are we using (or could we use) to prioritize leads?  Are we proactively monitoring our portfolio to catch retention risks early?  How are we preparing our sales teams for longer, more consultative buying journeys?  Conclusion  The HPPA signals a shift away from relying on passive, inquiry-based prescreen acquisition and the beginning of smarter, more strategic engagement with potential borrowers. Lenders who embrace this transition early will find themselves not just compliant, but competitive—with deeper borrower insights, better conversion rates, and stronger long-term customer relationships.  The market is moving. The only question is: will you lead the change or chase it?  Citation  Experian. (2025, November). Interview: How the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act is reshaping mortgage marketing—and what lenders should do now [transcript]. Experian Mortgage Insights. Insights based on lender feedback, campaign performance data, and analysis of prescreen marketing strategies and predictive modeling outcomes were gathered from Experian client engagements and internal mortgage analytics between May and October 2025. Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act timeline and legal context referenced from legislation signed September 5, 2025, with implementation beginning March 5, 2026.   

Published: April 22, 2026 by Ivan Ahmed

Subscribe to our thought leadership

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our thought leadership

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe