Are Behavioral Analytics the Answer to Next-Generation Fraud Bots? 

by James Craddick 4 min read December 17, 2024

Bots have been a consistent thorn in fraud teams’ side for years. But since the advent of generative AI (genAI), what used to be just one more fraud type has become a fraud tsunami. This surge in fraud bot attacks has brought with it:

  • A 108% year-over-year increase in credential stuffing to take over accounts1
  • A 134% year-over-year increase in carding attacks, where stolen cards are tested1

While fraud professionals rush to fight back the onslaught, they’re also reckoning with the ever-evolving threat of genAI. A large factor in fraud bots’ new scalability and strength, genAI was the #1 stress point identified by fraud teams in 2024, and 70% expect it to be a challenge moving forward, according to Experian’s U.S. Identity and Fraud Report.

This fear is well-founded. Fraudsters are wasting no time incorporating genAI into their attack arsenal. GenAI has created a new generation of fraud bot tools that make bot development more accessible and sophisticated. These bots reverse-engineer fraud stacks, testing the limits of their targets’ defenses to find triggers for step-ups and checks, then adapt to avoid setting them off.

How do bot detection solutions fare against this next generation of bots?

The evolution of fraud bots

The earliest fraud bots, which first appeared in the 1990s2, were simple scripts with limited capabilities. Fraudsters soon began using these scripts to execute basic tasks on their behalf — mainly form spam and light data scraping. Fraud teams responded, implementing bot detection solutions that continued to evolve as the threats became more sophisticated.

The evolution of fraud bots was steady — and mostly balanced against fraud-fighting tools — until genAI supercharged it. Today, fraudsters are leveraging genAI’s core ability (analyzing datasets and identifying patterns, then using those patterns to generate solutions) to create bots capable of large-scale attacks with unprecedented sophistication. These genAI-powered fraud bots can analyze onboarding flows to identify step-up triggers, automate attacks at high-volume times, and even conduct “behavior hijacking,” where bots record and replicate the behaviors of real users.

How next-generation fraud bots beat fraud stacks

For years, a tried-and-true tool for fraud bot detection was to look for the non-human giveaways: lightning-fast transition speeds, eerily consistent keystrokes, nonexistent mouse movements, and/or repeated device and network data were all tell-tale signs of a bot. Fraud teams could base their bot detection strategies off of these behavioral red flags.

Stopping today’s next-generation fraud bots isn’t quite as straightforward. Because they were specifically built to mimic human behavior and cycle through device IDs and IP addresses, today’s bots often appear to be normal, human applicants and circumvent many of the barriers that blocked their predecessors. The data the bots are providing is better, too3, fraudsters are using genAI to streamline and scale the creation of synthetic identities.4 By equipping their human-like bots with a bank of high-quality synthetic identities, fraudsters have their most potent, advanced attack avenue to date.

Skirting traditional bot detection with their human-like capabilities, next-generation fraud bots can bombard their targets with massive, often undetected, attacks. In one attack analyzed by NeuroID, a part of Experian, fraud bots made up 31% of a business’s onboarding volume on a single day. That’s nearly one-third of the business’s volume comprised of bots attempting to commit fraud. If the business hadn’t had the right tools in place to separate these bots from genuine users, they wouldn’t have been able to stop the attack until it was too late.

Beating fraud bots with behavioral analytics: The next-generation approach

Next-generation fraud bots pose a unique threat to digital businesses: their data appears legitimate, and they look like a human when they’re interacting with a form. So how do fraud teams differentiate fraud bots from an actual human user?

NeuroID’s product development teams discovered key nuances that separate next-generation bots from humans, and we’ve updated our industry-leading bot detection capabilities to account for them. A big one is mousing patterns: random, erratic cursor movements are part of what makes next-generation bots so eerily human-like, but their movements are still noticeably smoother than a real human’s. Other bot detection solutions (including our V1 signal) wouldn’t flag these advanced cursor movements as bot behavior, but our new signal is designed to identify even the most granular giveaways of a next-generation fraud bot.

Fraud bots will continue to evolve. But so will we. For example, behavioral analytics can identify repeated actions — down to the pixel a cursor lands on — during a bot attack and block out users exhibiting those behaviors. Our behavior was built specifically to combat next-gen challenges with scalable, real-time solutions. This proactive protection against advanced bot behaviors is crucial to preventing larger attacks.

For more on fraud bots’ evolution, download our Emerging Trends in Fraud: Understanding and Combating Next-Gen Bots report.

Sources

1HUMAN Enterprise Bot Fraud Benchmark Report

2Abusix

3 NeuroID

4 Biometric Update

Related Posts

Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee
Financial Institutions Are Rethinking Customer Acqusition

Customer acquisition strategies are constantly evolving toward more precise targeting. From a marketing lens, you can track every step, optimize communication channels and still miss the person most likely to convert. Attribution can tell us which channels work and automation can make marketing spend more efficient. But both assume we know who is actually on the other end. Financial institutions are learning that finding audiences and targeting them is no longer the biggest challenge. As acquisition optimization marketing becomes more sophisticated, teams can measure and act on more signals than before. What they can't always know is whether the person on the receiving end is real. Customer acquisition has evolved into an identity problem. The challenge is not that every questionable signal represents malicious activity. It's that acquisition systems must make increasingly intelligent decisions with an imperfect understanding of who they're actually engaging. When identities are fragmented, duplicated, temporary or synthetic, optimization becomes a question of trust as much as targeting. When your signals don't reliably identify customers The customer journey often includes searching, filling out a form, creating an account, requesting a quote and subscribing. All of these signals work well when identity is relatively stable.  However, financial institutions are finding that these signals are becoming less reliable. A single person can operate across multiple personas, devices, browsers, aliases, accounts and intermediaries while several apparent “people” may actually represent one underlying actor. Financial instituions are finding: Fragmented customer signals Difficulty distinguishing an old account from a new one Different digital pathways associated with the same individual Signals that are generated by automation Real customers getting flagged because signals are too thin to evaluate confidently Legacy signals continue to be challenged Marketing has historically treated intent as a valuable signal because intent was relatively difficult to produce. A search required human intent. A form required someone to fill it out. An inquiry implied a meaningful amount of human effort. Financial institutions are already combating AI-enabled fraud, and now marketing teams are starting to face it on a massive scale. AI can mimic human behavior by researching products, comparing prices, filling out forms, creating accounts and signing up for services. A valid email address is no longer enough. Marketers need to know: How long has it existed? How recently has it been active? Does its activity appear consistent or suddenly anomalous? Has it gone dormant and returned? Is it associated with patterns that suggest stability or unusual behavior? How to build on your strongest signal Email remains one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce, following people across devices, platforms, transactions, subscriptions, accounts and years of activity. For over two decades, this has shaped how AtData thinks about identity. Now, as part of Experian, it’s shaping how an entire platform and team approach identity. A marketer doesn’t need every prospect to have existed online for twenty years. But understanding whether a newly acquired prospect has meaningful identity context can dramatically improve the quality of the decision being made around it. Better identity intelligence can help organizations reduce unnecessary friction by improving their ability to recognize legitimate customers. With a strong identity foundation, marketing teams can better address: Which audiences are more likely to convert? Which leads are high quality? Which channels are driving incremental growth? What do the best prospects look like? The value isn't simply having an email address. It's understanding the history and behavioral context associated with it. That context can provide a stronger digital identity signal, helping marketers understand how long they have been active, whether its behavior is consistent with that of a real person and whether current activity aligns with past patterns. It continues to be one of the most persistent identifiers in digital commerce. An infrastructure built for what's coming The acquisition of AtData by Experian reflects a fundamental shift in how identity infrastructure needs to work. Experian's scale and decisioning capabilities, combined with AtData's real-time email intelligence, create a strong platform. Read more about the why behind the acquisition and see how email works as an identity anchor for fraud prevention. Contact us to learn about our customer acquisition solutions

September 15, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
As Electric Vehicle Adoption Eases, Dealers Can Find New Opportunities To Reach Consumers

After years of rapid growth, new electric vehicle (EV) registrations have moderated, and the EV market has entered a new chapter. But slower growth shouldn’t be mistaken for disappearing demand, with data suggesting the reality is much more nuanced. According to Experian Automotive’s Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026, battery EVs accounted for 8.21% of new retail registrations in the last 12 months, down from 9.23% a year earlier. However, consumers aren’t simply walking away from electrification. In fact, more than one million new EVs were registered during the past 12 months and the used EV market recorded more than 540,000 registrations over the same period. The opportunity may be less about waiting for the EV market to grow and more about understanding where EV demand is present, who is driving them, and how to reach those consumers more effectively. Who is likely to purchase an EV and what vehicle types are they interested in? Understanding who’s in the market for an EV can allow dealers to position themselves around consumers’ needs as they choose a vehicle that fits their everyday lifestyle. In the second quarter of 2026, Millennials and Gen X accounted for 67.83% of new EV registrations, nearly 10 percentage points above their combined share of all new, retail registrations. Millennials were also the largest generational audience across both new and used EV market share, coming in at 35.76% and 38.42%, respectively. It’s important to consider that the EV shopper isn’t necessarily looking for an unfamiliar or new type of vehicle. In many cases, they’re seemingly looking for an electric version of the practical vehicle they already know. For instance, SUVs accounted for 77.47% of new EV registrations in Q2 2026, which was similar to SUVs’ 63.49% share of all new retail registrations. For these shoppers, creating messaging around value, practicality, and available choices may resonate differently than premium technology messaging aimed at some new-EV prospects. The more precisely dealers can identify those audiences, the less they need to depend on broad EV market momentum to generate demand. To learn more about EV insights, view the full Automotive Consumer Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation.

September 15, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe