Guide to Debt Collection Text Messages

by Laura Burrows 6 min read April 12, 2023

It’s easy to ignore a phone call—especially from an unknown number—or delete an email without looking past the subject line. Even physical letters get thrown out without being opened. But nearly everyone will quickly open and read a text.

Surveys have repeatedly found text message open rates can range from around 90 to 98 percent. And now, debt collectors that are serious about streamlining operations and connecting with consumers via their preferred channel can integrate text messaging into their process.

Learn more

Using text messages in debt collection

It’s been a couple of years since the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) revised Regulation F, which implements the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The ruling was effective starting November 2021 and confirmed that debt collectors could use emails, text messages and other digital communication channels.

Businesses in many other industries have been communicating with customers by text for years. At a high level, the changes to Regulation F allow debt collectors to add new outreach methods to their debt collection tools. However, even with the go-ahead to communicate via text, strategy and compliance must be top of mind.

WATCH: Webinar: Keeping pace with collections compliance changes

The move to digital debt collections

Incorporating text messaging could be part of a larger shift toward digitizing operations. Some debt collection agencies are also using artificial intelligence, big data and automation to help verify consumers’ contact information, assist call center agents and follow up with consumers.

As the Experian 2022 Global Insights Report reports, 81 percent of consumers think more highly of brands if they have a positive online experience with that brand that involves multiple digital touchpoints. And over half of consumers trust organizations that use AI.1

Your website or mobile app is an important starting point. And digital tools, such as chatbots that can answer common questions and virtual negotiators offering payment plans, could be part of that experience. Your automated and manual text message outreach could also be increasingly important in the coming years.

The benefits of debt collection text messages

A text message strategy can be part of an omnichannel approach, and it offers debt collectors a few distinct benefits:

  • Get direct access to consumers who will likely see and read your messages.
  • Allow consumers to respond and ask questions via a channel that may be easier or more comfortable for them than a phone call.
  • Start a two-way dialogue and build rapport.
  • Save time by texting multiple consumers simultaneously and automating responses to common questions.

However, collection agencies also need to beware of the potential drawbacks. Consumers might see your texts as a nuisance if you frequently send messages or if you’re messaging people who truly can’t afford a payment right now.

Many consumers are also rightly wary of scammers texting them and asking them to click on a link. You’ll want to carefully think through your messaging strategy. Starting by getting consent to send a text message while you’re on the phone or when the consumer fills out a form online—and then immediately sending a text with an opt-in—can help overcome this potential barrier.

How to leverage debt collection text messages

Sending payment requests via text to consumers who have a high propensity to repay, and including a link to self-service payment portals, could offer a quick and easy win. However, it may be best to think through how you’ll use text messaging to optimize your outreach rather than replace other communication channels.

WATCH: Webinar: Adapting to the new collections landscape

Perhaps you’ve spoken directly with someone and helped them set up a payment plan. You could now use automated texts to remind them of upcoming payment due dates and thank them for their payments. It’s a simple way to test the water without sending debt collection-related messages that may fall under stricter regulatory requirements.

Staying compliant while texting

As part of a highly regulated industry, debt collection agencies must consider compliance. And it’s especially important to consider when trying new technology that directly interacts with consumers.

Laws and rulings may change, and it’s important to consult your counsel before making any decisions or implementing a text message strategy. However, at a high level, the Regulation F requires debt collectors to:

  • Prioritize capturing consent.You must obtain direct consent from a consumer or indirect consent from an original creditor that got the consumer’s consent. The initial communication before sending a text or email must be written. Debt collectors that use specific procedures for obtaining consent may receive safe harbor protections against inadvertent disclosures to third parties.
  • Make opting out easy. You must send consumers a clear and conspicuous opt-out notice and offer them a reasonable and simple method to opt out of text messaging or other electronic communications. Debt collectors must identify when they receive an opt-out request, even if the request doesn’t follow their specific instructions. For example, if a consumer sends “end,” you may need to recognize that as an opt-out even if your opt-out instructions tell them to send “stop.”
  • Continue complying with FDCPA harassment guidelines. There’s no specific federal limit on how often you can text consumers. However, you’ll still need to comply with the FDCPA’s general rules regarding harassment and contacting consumers at convenient times. In general, you may want to send texts between 8 a.m. and 9 p.m. local time (for the consumer), unless they request a different time. Limiting how many texts you send can also improve consumers’ experiences and may lead to better long-term results.
  • Reconfirm consent every 60 days. Even if consumers don’t opt out, the implied or expressed consent you received could only be valid for 60 days. To continue texting a consumer, you may need to have them reconfirm their consent or use a complete and accurate database to confirm that their phone number was not reassigned.2

You may also be subject to more stringent state or local laws. For instance, Washington State laws might prohibit debt collectors from sending more than two texts in a day.3 And Washington, D.C. forbids debt collectors from initiating communications with consumers via written or electronic communications (including text messages) during and for at least 60 days following a public health emergency.

READ: A Digital Debt Collection Future: Maximizing Collections and Staying Compliant

Partnering with Experian

Experian offers access to vast data sources, skip tracing tools for collections and advanced analytical capabilities that help debt collectors move into the digital age.

From optimizing outreach with the AI-driven Experian Decisioning to verifying real-time phone ownership using Phone Number ID™ with Contact Monitor™, you can integrate the latest technology while remaining compliant. You can then decide the best ways to use text messages, or other electronic communication methods, to make profitable decisions and maximize recovery rates.

Learn more about Experian’s debt collection solutions.

¹Experian. (April 2022). Experian 2022 Global Insights Report
²Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2023). 1006.6 Communications in connection with debt collection.
³Washington State Legislator. (2023). RCW 19.16.250 Prohibited practices

Related Posts

Who’s Driving What? How Fuel Loyalty and Generational Preferences are Shaping the Vehicle Market

Take a look around at any road, parking lot, or highway, and you’ll see just how diverse today’s vehicle landscape has become. Within that evolving mix, electric vehicles (EVs) have seen years of rapid growth, and while the market is seemingly entering a new phase, interest remains. So, with several vehicles and fuel types to choose from, what keeps drivers coming back to electrified vehicles? Experian Automotive’s Automotive Market Trends Report: Q2 2026 found that among EV owners who returned to the market in the last 12 months, majority (72.2%) replaced their EV with another EV, while 18.5% switched to a gasoline vehicle. Hybrid buyers also showed considerable loyalty to electrification, with 55.7% of gas-hybrid owners staying with the same fuel type when replacing their vehicle, and 32.7% swapping for a gasoline vehicle. Consumers are seemingly remaining loyal to EVs and hybrids because they are attracted to the benefits that fit their everyday lifestyle, such as lower fuel or charging costs amid the elevated gas prices. For some, it could also be tied to convenience, as drivers who have found a reliable charging routine or appreciate the efficiency of a hybrid may have little reason to switch back to a traditional gasoline vehicle. Generations are taking different paths to electrification Generational differences also influence hybrid and EV loyalty, with younger consumers generally showing greater openness to alternative fuel types. While older generations tend to have greater familiarity with traditional gasoline vehicles, hybrid and EV adoption is increasing across all age groups as these options become more accessible and mainstream. Millennials, in particular, showed the strongest inclination toward electrified vehicles. Through Q2 2026, they accounted for the highest EV share at 8.2%, compared with Gen X at 5.5%, Gen Z (4.7%), and Baby Boomers (4.7%). The difference becomes even more pronounced when hybrids are in the mix, as 23.1% of Millennial registrations were gas-electric hybrids or plug-in hybrids, versus 16.7% for Gen X, 16.8% for Gen Z, and 18.0% for Baby Boomers. For automotive professionals, these differences make understanding who is driving what, and what they may choose next, increasingly important. The future of the automotive market may be less about consumers choosing one vehicle type over the other and more about understanding the distinct patterns and preferences of each generation. As the market continues to evolve, those insights can help automotive professionals better meet consumers where they are. To learn more about vehicle market trends, view the full Automotive Market Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation on demand.

September 24, 2026 by John Howard
New Data Available for MBS Investors: Current Credit Score 

In a previous post, we described how every mortgage borrower’s financial situation and credit profile evolve over time.  After a borrower opens a loan, their financial status evolves—jobs are gained and lost; incomes can rise or fall, and financially stressful situations or windfalls can occur. These effects are often reflected in the consumer’s evolving credit score, which changes with the consumer’s payment behavior on open loans, credit inquiry activity, credit card utilization, and other revolving lines, among other things.    Even though MBS, whole loan, and MSR investors ultimately bear borrower credit risk, they may have access to less current borrower credit information than other participants in the mortgage ecosystem.   In securitized markets (both agency MBS and private-label MBS), updated scores are not provided in disclosure to bondholders, even as loans age year over year.  In whole loan and MSR markets, a single origination credit score is often provided at the time of bid, and after a successful bid, the investor may have a permissible purpose to pull individual scores on an owned portfolio. But until recently, there was no single loan-level dataset that included continuously refreshed credit scores across the U.S. mortgage market—the type of foundational dataset needed to build and tune credit and prepayment models.  A monthly-refreshed Current Credit Score field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery to MBS markets:  New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data). Neither private-label MBS nor agency MBS standard market data includes a monthly-refreshed borrower credit score.  Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe. For the vast majority of loans in MBS, borrowers credit scores are available.  Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions.  A current credit score wraps all of a borrower’s credit-related behaviors into a single numerical value and has historically been associated with a borrower’s likelihood of becoming 60+ days past due on any obligation within the subsequent 24 months.    In fact, a current credit score is among the most informative indicators of near-term mortgage default risk, as shown in the image below, which depicts 30+ DPD rates by current credit score bands for the entire U.S. mortgage market, controlling for origination score <=650.    Without access to current credit scores, investors are limited to the score at origination—causing the four distinct performance trends shown here to appear as a single averaged line. In reality, score migration since origination reveals significant divergence in credit risk, with the lowest current-score bucket exhibiting a nearly 10 times higher 30+ DPD rate than the highest-score bucket in the latest period shown.  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset hosted on IVolatility DataDriven Platform  In this article, we’ll take a quick look at how score migration acts as an early predictor of a performing loan’s first roll into 30-day delinquent status.    MBS Investors’ Current Credit Score Blindspot: Solved   An MBS investor relying on standard market data and securitization remittance reports sees no sign of borrower stress until the subject mortgage loan in the securitization misses a payment and is reported at 30 days delinquent. Of course, in the vast majority of cases, a borrower begins struggling financially well before missing a mortgage payment:  The borrower may miss payments on other types of loans (credit card, auto loan, personal unsecured, or payday loans) as they prioritize their home and mortgage.  Outstanding balances on credit cards may grow as the borrower begins to make only minimum payments on revolvers.  The borrower may apply for additional credit cards, personal or payday loans   The borrower may apply to increase limits on existing credit cards as outstanding balance nears spending limit  All these stress-indicative behaviors result in a decreasing credit score, many months before the borrower misses their first mortgage payment. An MBS investor with access to each borrower’s current credit score, refreshed each month, can predict increased likelihood of default many months before the first missed mortgage payment—and is therefore at a major information advantage relative to the market generally.  Experian’s Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance on all types of debt, filed junior liens, and AVM values).   MLP is much more comprehensive than loan-level data provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, and PLS data vendors in several ways:   Standard market datasets may not contain certain data elements that some market participants consider useful when evaluating mortgage prepayment or credit performance. Basic, critical fields such as the borrower’s current credit score and the current junior lien balance on the property are missing.    MLP contains borrower, loan, and property data fields spanning a broad portion of the mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), including both securitized and non-securitized loans.   MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle.  Is Downward-Trending Credit Score a Signal for Impending Delinquency?  MLP contains thousands of fields describing each loan, borrower, and property across all U.S. mortgages.  It allows for virtually unlimited segmentation and granular analysis.   For purposes of this illustrative article, we’ll take a high-level look at the entire U.S. mortgage market and perform a quick analysis to confirm intuition that a declining credit score provides a signal for higher likelihood of near-term mortgage delinquency.  Figure 1 illustrates the current pay status (as of 6/30) for the entire U.S. mortgage market, as contained in the MLP dataset, along with count, UPB and UPB-weighted Vantage 4.0 credit score for each bucket.  Figure 1  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance dataset  As illustrated in Figure 1, approximately 772,000 individual mortgage loans were reported to Experian as 30 days delinquent as of 6/30/2026.  Of the 772,000 30d delinquent loans in the June snapshot, approximately 426,000 were current in the prior (May) snapshot.  Some of these 426,000 loans were reperformers which had been bouncing from 30 DPD to current over the prior few snapshots. To remove reperformance score noise, we further parsed out the population which: 1) had rolled from current to 30 DPD from May to June; and 2) was consistently current for a full year prior to the 6/30 missed payment.  The population meeting both conditions totaled approximately 123,000 loans.  Figure 2 below shows, for this population of 123,000 “clean current” loans, the UPB-weighted average Vantage4 credit score for each of the 12 months leading up to the June missed payment, as well as the impact of the missed payment on the 6/30 score.  Figure 2  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset  Figure 2 reveals a rather slow and steady ~20-point deterioration of score in the 12 months prior to first missed payment – as well as the 80-point drop once the missed payment hits.  When we compare this cohort’s Vantage 4.0 score trend to the broader Current population across the entire dataset in Figure 3, we see a marked difference in both absolute value and trend:  Figure 3  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset  Not only is the cohort’s starting Vantage 4.0 score lower than the broader current population, but it also displays a dropping trend (with a notable 2 to 3x acceleration in monthly score drop the month before the first missed mortgage payment) while the broader Current population’s score (of which the isolated cohort is a subset) remains rock steady.  Lastly, we present Figure 4, a histogram comparing the distribution of at-origination and as-of 5/30 (i.e., the period just before the missed June mortgage payment) credit scores for the clean current population. The distribution appears to shift toward lower credit scores. To the extent credit scores are correlated with credit risk, this shift may indicate elevated credit risk relative to origination. Since this degradation occurs during a period of perfect mortgage pay performance, it is invisible to MBS investors who lack access to current borrower credit scores. Experian MLP provides monthly refreshed credit scores for mortgage borrowers contained within the MLP database.  Figure 4  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset 

September 22, 2026 by Michael Pyatski, Perry DeFelice
Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe