Synthetic ID fraud is a growing problem driven by an online and mobile-driven market, along with an increase in data breaches and dark web sharing.

When discussing automotive lending, it seems like one term is on everyone’s lips: “subprime auto loan bubble.” But what is the data telling us?

New CFPB study demonstrates the importance of moving forward with inclusion of new sources of high-quality financial data — like on-time payment data from rent, utility and telecommunications providers — into a consumer’s credit file.

Study noted that travelers relied heavily on credit for vacation purchases last yr—with many planning to charge much of their vacation expenses this summer

Experian took a deep dive into the data and performance surrounding the credit union universe in their first-ever “State of Credit Unions” report, featuring insights utilizing data from both 2015 and 2017.

According to State of the Automotive Finance Market report, 30-day delinquencies dropped and subprime auto lending reached a 10-year record low for Q1.

The healthcare sector continues to be at high risk of cyberattacks and data breaches, jeopardizing healthcare organizations of every size.

According to a study by VantageScore, consumers with credit scores between 601-650 carry the largest credit card bills, at more than $10,000.

Risk managers and brokers say phishing and social engineering are the biggest security threats facing their companies and clients.

Later this year, FICO will retire its Score V1, making it mandatory for those lenders still using the old software to find another solution.

Identity theft is frustrating. According to our recent survey, many Americans are unknowingly engaging in risky behaviors online.

Experian helps automotive dealers make smarter advertising decisions by transforming market intelligence into targeted actions

Weekend getaways, beach vacations and summer camp are all part of the beauty of summer. But they can come with a hefty price tag, and many consumers delay payment by placing summer fun costs on a credit card. In a recent study by Experian and Edelman Berland, travelers rely heavily on credit for vacation purchases and unexpected costs, and many charge more than half of their vacation this summer. A whopping 86 percent spent money on a summer vacation in 2016—an average of $2,275 per person with $1,308 of that amount on credit card spending. And 35 percent of those surveyed had not saved in advance. Even consumers who budgeted for vacation typically accrue unexpected costs. Sixty-one percent of those who set a budget ended up spending more than they planned. Accumulated debt doesn’t bode well for consumers. In the first quarter of 2016, consumers had an average of $3,910 in credit card debt, according to Experian data. That's $44 less than in the fourth quarter of 2015, but up $142 year over year. Overspending on vacation puts consumers in a more hazardous position to rack up debt during the holiday season and carry even higher balances into 2017 and beyond. Many consumers who are overspending consolidate summer debt, and proactive lenders can take advantage of that activity by making timely offers to consumers in need. At the same time, reactive lenders may feel the pain as balances transfer out of their portfolio. By identifying consumers who are likely to engage in card-to-card balance transfers, lenders can prepare for these consumer bankcard trends. Insights can then be used to acquire new customers and balances through prescreen campaigns, while protecting existing balances before they can transfer out of an existing loan portfolio. Lenders can also use tools to estimate a consumer’s spend on all general purpose credit and charge cards over the past year, and then target high-spending consumers with customized offers. With Memorial Day and the end-of-the-school-year fast approaching, card balances are likely already on the rise. Now is the time for lenders to prepare.  

Experian’s quarterly analysis of fraud rates, found: UK families who are struggling financially are becoming prime targets of financial fraud.

There are about as many definitions for people-based marketing as there are companies using the term. Each company seems to skew the definition to fit their particular service offering. The distinctions are vast, and especially for financial services companies running regulated campaigns, they can be incredibly important. At Experian, we define people-based marketing in its purest form: targeting at the individual level across channels. This is a practice we’re very familiar with in offline marketing, having honed arguably one of the most accurate views of U.S. consumers over the past three decades. And now we’re taking those tried and true principals and applying them to digital channels. It’s not as easy as it sounds. The challenge with people-based marketing  With direct mail, people-based marketing was easy. Jane Doe lives at 123 Main St. If I want to reach her, I can simply send her a direct mail piece at that address. To help, I can utilize any number of services, including the National Change of Address database, to know where to reach her if she ever moves. People-based marketing through digital channels is exponentially more difficult. While direct mail has one signal with which you use to identify a consumer (the address), digital channels offer countless signals. And not all of those signals can be used, either individually or in conjunction with other signals, to reliably tie a consumer to a persistent offline ID. A prime example of this is cookies. The problem with cookies A cookie, in and of itself, isn’t the problem. The problem is the linkage. How was a cookie associated with the person to whom the ad is being served? As marketers, we need to make sure that we are reaching the right people with the right ad … and more importantly not reaching those people who have opted out. This is especially true in the world of regulated data, where you need to know who you are targeting. And cookie-based linkage is controlled by a handful of companies, many of which are walled gardens who don’t share how they link offline people to online cookies and don’t collect this information directly. They rely on other third-party websites to gather PII, and connect it to their cookies. In some cases, the data is very accurate (especially with transaction data). In some cases, it is not (think websites that collect PII when giving surveys, offering coupons, etc.). In short, in order for you to use cookie-based targeting accurately, you need to have insight into the source of the base linkage data that was used to connect the offline consumer record to the online cookie. This same concept applies to all forms of digital linkage that drive people-based marketing. Why does people-based marketing matter in digital credit marketing?  With campaigns that utilize non-regulated data, such as “Invitation to Apply” campaigns that are driven from demographic and psychographic data, the consequences of not reaching the consumer you meant to target are negligible. But with campaigns that utilize regulated data, you must ensure you’re targeting the exact consumer you meant to reach. More importantly, you must make sure you’re not targeting an ad to a consumer who had previously opted out of receiving offers driven with regulated data (prescreen offers, for example). Even if you’ve already delivered a direct mail piece with the same offer, this doesn’t negate your responsibility to reach only approved consumers who have not opted out. --- Bottom line, the world of 1:1 marketing is growing more sophisticated, and that’s a good thing. Marketers just need to understand that while regulated data can be powerful, they must also take great responsibility when handling it. The data exists to deliver firm offers of credit to your very specific target in all-new mediums. People-based marketing has its place, and it can now be done in a compliant, digitally-savvy way – in the financial services space, nonetheless.   Register for our webinar on Credit Marketing Strategies to Drive Today's Digital Consumer.