From Definition to Prevention: Understanding Synthetic ID Fraud

by Guest Contributor 6 min read March 4, 2024

This article was updated on March 4, 2024.

If you steal an identity to commit fraud, your success is determined by how long it takes the victim to find out. That window gets shorter as businesses get better at knowing when and how to reach an identity owner when fraud is suspected. In response, frustrated fraudsters have been developing techniques to commit fraud that does not involve a real identity, giving them a longer run-time and a bigger payday. 

That’s the idea behind  synthetic identity (SID) fraud — one of the fastest-growing types of fraud.

Defining synthetic identity fraud

Organizations tend to have different  definitions of synthetic identity fraud, as a synthetic identity will look different to the businesses it attacks. Some may see a new account that goes bad immediately, while others might see a longer tenured account fall delinquent and default. The qualifications of the synthetic identity also change over time, as the fraudster works to increase the identity’s appearance of legitimacy. In the end, there is no person to confirm that fraud has occurred, in the very best case, identifying a synthetic identity is inferred and verified. As a result, inconsistent reporting and categorization can make tracking and fighting SID fraud more difficult.

To help create a more unified understanding and response to the issue, the Federal Reserve and 12 fraud experts worked together to develop a definition. In 2021, the  Boston Federal Reserve  published the result, “Synthetic identity fraud is the use of a combination of personally identifiable information to fabricate a person or entity to commit a dishonest act for personal or financial gain.”1 To break down the definition, personally identifiable information (PII) can include:

  • Primary PII:  Such as a name, date of birth (DOB), Social Security number (SSN) or another government-issued identifier. When combined, these are generally unique to a person or entity.
  • Secondary PII:  Such as an address, email, phone number or device ID. These elements can help verify a person or entity’s identity.

Synthetic identities are created when fraudsters establish an identity from scratch using fake PII. Or they may combine real and fake PII (I.e., a stolen SSN with a fake name and DOB) to create a new identity. Additionally, fraudsters might steal and use someone’s SSN to create an identity – children, the  elderly  and incarcerated people are popular targets because they don’t commonly use credit.4 But any losses would still be tied to the SID rather than the victim.

Exploring the Impact of SID fraud

The most immediate and obvious impact of SID fraud is the fraud losses. Criminals may create a synthetic identity and spend months  building up its credit profile, opening accounts and increasing credit limits. The identities and behaviors are constructed to look like legitimate borrowers, with some having a record of on-time payments. But once the fraudster decides to monetize the identity, they can apply for loans and max out credit cards before ‘busting out’ and disappearing with the money. 

Aite-Novaric Group estimates that SID fraud losses totaled $1.8 billion in 2020 and will increase to $2.94 billion in 2024.2 However, organizations that do not identify SIDs may classify a default as a credit loss rather than a fraud loss.

By some estimates, synthetic identity fraud could account for up to 20 percent of loan and credit card charge-offs, meaning the annual charge-off losses in the U.S. could be closer to $11 billion.3 Additionally, organizations lose time and resources on collection efforts if they do not identify the SID fraud.

Those estimates are only for unsecured U.S. credit products. But fraudsters use synthetic identities to take out secured loans, including auto loans.

As part of schemes used to steal relief funds during the pandemic, criminals used synthetic identities to open demand deposit accounts to receive funds. These accounts can be used to launder money from other sources and commit peer-to-peer payment fraud. Deposit account holders are also a primary source of cross-marketing for some financial institutions. Criminals can take advantage of vulnerable onboarding processes for deposit accounts where there’s low risk to the institution and receive offers for lending products.

Building a successful SID prevention strategy

Having an effective SID prevention strategy is more crucial than ever for organizations. Aside from fraud losses, consumers listed identity theft as their top concern when conducting activities online. And while 92% of businesses have an identity verification strategy in place, 63% of consumers are “somewhat confident” or “not very confident” in businesses’ ability to accurately identify them online.

Read: Experian’s 2023 Identity and Fraud Report

Many traditional fraud models and identity verification methods are not designed to detect fake people. And even a step up to a phone call for verification isn’t enough when the fraudster will be the one answering the phone.

Criminals also quickly respond when organizations update their fraud detection methods by looking for less-protected targets. Fraudsters have even signed their SIDs up for social media accounts and apps with low verification hurdles to help their SIDs pass identity checks.5

Understand synthetic identity risks across the lifecycle

Synthetic Identities are dynamic. When lending criteria is tightened to synthetics from opening new accounts, they simply come back when they can qualify. If waiting brings a higher credit line, they’ll wait. It’s important to recognize that synthetic identity isn’t a new account or a portfolio management problem – it’s both.

Use analytics that are tailored to synthetic identity

Many of our customers in the financial services space have been trying to solve synthetic identity fraud with credit data. There’s a false sense of security when criteria is tightened and losses go down—but the losses that are being impacted tend to not be related to credit. A better approach to synthetic ID fraud leverages a larger pool of data to assess behaviors and data linkages that are not contained in traditional credit data.

You can then escalate suspicious accounts to require additional reviews, such as screening through the Social Security Administration’s Electronic Consent Based SSN Verification (eCBSV) system or more stringent document verification.

Find a trusted partner

Experian’s interconnected data and analytics platforms offer lenders turnkey identity and synthetic identity fraud solutions. In addition, lenders can take advantage of the risk management system and continuous monitoring to look for signs of SIDs and fraudulent activity, which is important for flagging accounts after opening. These tools can also help lenders identify and prevent other common forms of fraud, including account takeovers, e-commerce fraud, child identity theft fraud and elderly fraud.

Learn more about our synthetic identity fraud solutions.

1Federal Reserve Bank (2021). Defining Synthetic Identity Fraud
2Aite Novarica (2022). Synthetic Identity Fraud: Solution Providers Shining Light into the Darkness
3Experian (2022). Preventing synthetic identity fraud
4The Federal Reserve (2022). Synthetic Identity Fraud: What Is it and Why You Should Care?
5Experian (2022). Preventing synthetic identity fraud

Related Posts

How ChexSystems Strengthened Consumer Fraud Monitoring with Experian

Learn how ChexSystems and Experian help financial institutions strengthen consumer fraud monitoring and build customer trust.

August 4, 2026 by Scarlet Nickel
The New Competitive Advantage in Fintech Is a Unified View of the Consumer

Fintech growth is returning, but growth alone is no longer enough to separate market leaders from the rest. The next stage of fintech will be shaped by how well organizations understand the consumers they serve, how accurately they assess risk and how consistently they make decisions across the customer lifecycle. That requires more than speed, more data or a single new model. It requires a unified view of the consumer that brings together identity, credit and behavioral signals into one decisioning strategy. Experian’s 2026 State of Fintech Report identifies partnerships, data and fraud as three forces shaping the next phase of fintech growth. The report also makes a clear point: institutions that integrate these forces into cohesive strategies will be better positioned to grow with confidence. For many fintechs, the challenge is not a lack of innovation. It is the increasing complexity of turning innovation into scalable, explainable and profitable growth. Fintech organizations span a wide range of maturity, from early-stage startups to scaled lenders, and many are experimenting with new products, technologies and customer engagement models at the same time. That creates opportunity, but it also creates pressure to make more disciplined decisions. The market is rewarding institutions that connect product strategy, risk management and customer experience in a more coordinated way. This is why the unified consumer view is becoming so important. It helps fintechs turn fragmented signals into consistent decisions that support both growth and resilience. Why a unified consumer view matters now A unified consumer view means bringing together the signals that define a customer’s identity, credit behavior, financial capacity and risk profile. It moves fintechs away from isolated decision points and toward a more connected picture of the customer across origination, account management and servicing. This matters because consumer behavior is becoming more fluid, fraud is becoming more sophisticated and product strategies are becoming more specialized. A customer may appear strong through one lens and risky through another. An application may pass an onboarding check, but later show behavior that suggests emerging fraud or repayment stress. Without a connected view, those signals may stay trapped in different systems or teams. The 2026 State of Fintech Report highlights this shift across several areas. Fintechs are managing credit cards and unsecured personal loans with greater precision, recognizing that each product requires different strategies and risk controls. Credit cards require ongoing account management because exposure continues after origination. Unsecured personal loans follow a fixed repayment structure, which makes underwriting precision especially important at the point of origination. These differences show why a one-size-fits-all strategy cannot support modern fintech growth. A unified consumer view helps lenders apply the right data, risk framework and customer strategy to the right product at the right time. Siloed decisions create blind spots Many fintechs already use multiple sources of data. They may rely on traditional credit data, alternative data, fraud tools, cash flow information, identity verification and internal account performance data. If those signals are managed separately, the organization may still lack a clear view of the customer. Data can become fragmented. Risk teams can reach different conclusions than fraud teams. Product teams can pursue growth without a full understanding of emerging portfolio pressure. The State of Fintech Report points out that fintech competition is increasingly defined by the ability to align data strategies with decision frameworks. That means data is not just a support function. It is becoming central to growth, risk management and customer experience. Organizations are investing in richer datasets and more advanced analytics, but the differentiator is how effectively those inputs are operationalized. This is where many fintechs still have work to do. The value comes not from any single dataset, but from how signals are layered, interpreted and applied together. For example, a lender may understand a consumer’s credit score, but that does not always reveal broader financial behavior. Cash flow data may add insight into income and expenses, but it needs to be categorized and normalized to support reliable decisions. Identity signals may help detect fraud, but they become more powerful when combined with credit and behavioral data. A unified view brings these inputs together so fintechs can better determine whether a customer represents a growth opportunity, a fraud risk, an emerging credit risk or a borrower who needs a different product experience. Product complexity requires better decisioning The need for a unified consumer view becomes even clearer when looking at how fintechs manage different credit products. Fintech lenders continue to originate approximately 1.5 unsecured personal loans for every one credit card, which reinforces the importance of both products within portfolio strategy. Credit card originations continue to grow moderately while unsecured personal loan originations have slowed after tighter lending standards. These patterns suggest that fintechs are not simply shifting from one product to another. They are becoming more mature in how they manage each product based on its structure, risk profile and consumer use case. Credit cards and installment loans behave differently. Credit cards introduce ongoing exposure and require active account management, line management and monitoring of utilization behavior. Unsecured personal loans carry fixed terms and structured repayment schedules, which makes origination quality especially important. For fintechs, this means product strategy and risk strategy must be tightly connected. The same consumer may need to be evaluated differently depending on the product, loan amount, repayment expectations and observed behavior. A unified consumer view gives lenders the context needed to make those differences actionable. This is also where segmentation becomes more sophisticated. The State of Fintech Report’s loan segmentation framework connects strategy, risk and data advantage across small-dollar, mid-tier and large-ticket loans. Small-dollar lending can support thin-file acquisition, but may require alternative data and stronger identity visibility. Mid-tier lending may involve debt consolidation and cash flow pressure, where transaction insights and trended data can be particularly useful. Large-ticket lending can support higher-value growth, but it also creates greater exposure and may require a fuller combination of credit, fraud and identity signals. This kind of framework helps fintechs align product strategy with risk and data strategy in a more deliberate way. Fraud is making the unified view even more urgent Fraud is another reason fintechs need to move beyond siloed decisioning. Fraud is becoming more complex across the customer lifecycle. Synthetic identities, first-party misuse and AI-driven threats are reshaping the risk landscape. Traditional controls that focus primarily on onboarding are no longer enough. Effective strategies now require continuous monitoring across account access, transactions and servicing. That shift changes how fintechs should think about customer intelligence. Fraud is no longer something that only happens at the point of application. It can emerge later through account behavior, suspicious activity or patterns that look normal when viewed in isolation. Advanced identity signals, including email intelligence, are becoming more central to fraud prevention because they add context that traditional data may not capture. The report also highlights Experian’s acquisition of AtData as part of a broader recognition that email-based identity signals represent a critical layer in digital identity and fraud detection.   The takeaway for fintech leaders is clear. Identity, fraud and credit risk cannot be treated as separate problems. A customer who appears creditworthy may still present identity risk. A fraud signal may also influence credit exposure. A repayment pattern may reflect financial stress, misuse or both. A unified view helps lenders evaluate these signals together so they can make decisions with more confidence and less friction for legitimate customers. Trust is becoming a growth strategy Trust has always mattered in financial services, but fintechs now need to think about trust as a measurable part of decisioning. Customers expect fast applications, seamless experiences and fair outcomes. Regulators and internal governance teams expect transparency, explainability and consistency. Business leaders expect growth without unnecessary exposure. These expectations are difficult to meet when data and decisions are fragmented. The State of Fintech Report’s 2026 action playbook identifies trust as a function of decision accuracy, identity confidence and customer transparency. That framing is important because it moves the conversation beyond speed alone. A fast decision is not valuable if it approves the wrong customer, declines a good customer or creates unnecessary friction in the wrong place. Fintechs should evaluate where friction improves outcomes, such as preventing fraud or identifying risk, and where it creates unnecessary loss of good customers. For many lenders, the path forward is not removing friction everywhere. It is applying the right level of friction at the right moment based on a clearer view of the consumer. This is where unified decisioning becomes a competitive advantage. It allows fintechs to create experiences that feel faster and more relevant while still protecting the portfolio. It supports better segmentation, more informed offers and more consistent risk treatment. It also gives teams a shared understanding of why decisions are made, which is essential as AI and automation become more embedded in lending workflows. What should fintech leaders do next? A unified view of the consumer is not built by adding one more tool or one more dataset. It requires a decisioning strategy that connects data, analytics, fraud, identity and product objectives. Fintech leaders should start by evaluating where their current decisioning frameworks fall short. Are credit and fraud signals looked at together? Are cash flow insights being used consistently? Are identity signals monitored after account opening? Are decisions explainable across teams and channels? The 2026 State of Fintech Report recommends prioritizing experimentation tied to measurable decision lift and model performance. This means testing combinations of credit, alternative, cash flow and identity signals to determine where incremental data improves response rates, approval rates, early-loss reduction and fraud mitigation. It also means treating data and decisioning as connected priorities, with a focus on signal quality, integration and measurable impact. The goal is not to collect more inputs for the sake of volume. The goal is to understand which signals improve outcomes and how those signals should be applied at scale. For fintechs, this is the next competitive frontier. Growth will continue to depend on product innovation, customer acquisition and speed to market. But the lenders that separate themselves will be the ones that can connect those growth priorities to a stronger decisioning foundation. That requires a consumer view that is broader than a credit profile, deeper than a fraud check and more actionable than a data warehouse. It requires a unified framework that helps lenders understand who the customer is, how the customer behaves and how risk may change over time. Download the 2026 State of Fintech Report The next phase of fintech will not be defined by a single innovation. It will be defined by the ability to connect identity, credit and behavioral data into more confident decisions across the full customer lifecycle. Fintechs that build this unified view will be better positioned to grow, manage risk and strengthen customer trust in a more complex market. To explore the trends shaping fintech growth and decisioning in 2026, download Experian’s 2026 State of Fintech Report. Read now To learn more about how Experian partners with fintechs, visit www.experian.com/fintech. Learn more

August 4, 2026 by Laura Davis
The Conversion Problem: Why Only 1 in 3 Mortgage Shoppers Close (and How to Fix It) 

Discover why only 1 in 3 mortgage shoppers close and how lenders can improve conversion using borrower readiness signals, alternative data and AI-driven insights.

August 3, 2026 by Royce Chang

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe