Taking the risk out of your tax refund process

Updated: June 12, 2026 by Guest Contributor 3 min read April 9, 2015

Tax return fraud: Using 3rd party data and analytics to stay one step ahead of fraudsters

By Neli Coleman

According to a May 2014 Governing Institute research study of 129 state and local government officials, 43 percent of respondents cited identity theft as the biggest challenge their agency is facing regarding tax return fraud. Nationwide, stealing identities and filing for tax refunds has become one of the fastest-growing nonviolent criminal activities in the country. These activities are not only burdening government agencies, but also robbing taxpayers by preventing returns from reaching the right people.

Anyone who has access to a computer can fill out an income-tax form online and hit submit. Most tax returns are processed and refunds released within a few days or weeks. This quick turnaround doesn’t allow the government time to fully authenticate all the elements submitted on returns, and fraudsters know how to exploit this vulnerability. Once released, these monies are virtually untraceable.

Unfortunately, simply relying on business rules based on past behaviors and conducting internal database checks is no longer sufficient to stem the tide of increasing tax fraud. The use of a risk-based identity-authentication process coupled with business-rules-based analysis and knowledge-based authentication tools is critical to identifying fraudulent tax returns. The ability to perform non-traditional checks that go beyond the authentication of the individual to consider the methods and devices used to perpetrate the tax-refund fraud further strengthens the tax-refund fraud-detection process. The inclusion of multiple non-traditional checks within a risk-based authentication process closes additional loopholes exploited by the tax fraudster, while simultaneously decreasing the number of false positives.

Experian’s Tax Return Analysis PlatformSM provides both the verification of identity and the risk-based authentication analytics that score the potential fraud risk of a tax return along with providing specific flags that identify the return as fraudulent. Our data and analytics are a product of years of expertise in consumer behavior and fraud detection along with unique services that detect fraud in the devices being used to submit the returns and identity credentials that have been used to perpetrate fraud in financial transactions outside of tax. Together, the combination of rules-based and risk-based income-tax-refund fraud-detection protocols can curb one of the fastest-growing nonviolent criminal activities in the country.

With identity theft reaching unprecedented levels, government agencies need new technologies and processes in place to stay one step ahead of fraudsters. In a world where most transactions are conducted in virtual anonymity, it is difficult, but not impossible, to keep pace with technological advances and the accompanying pitfalls. A combination of existing business rules based on authentication processes and risk-based authentication techniques provided through third-party data and analytics services create a multifaceted approach to income-tax-refund fraud detection, which enables revenue agencies to further increase the number of fraudulent returns detected. Every fraudulent return that is identified and unpaid, improves the government’s ability to continue to meet the demand for services by its constituents while at the same time strengthening the public’s trust in the tax system.

Related Posts

Building for Bots in the AI Age: Separating Legitimate Agents From Fraudsters

See how NeuroID helps businesses distinguish legitimate AI agents from fraud bots, while Agent Trust verifies agent-initiated transactions.

October 29, 2026 by Laura Burrows
2026 Retail Banking Identity and Fraud Report 

Learn how banks can convert rising fraud investment into protection customers recognize, value and feel in our recent report. Read more!

October 28, 2026 by Laura Burrows
One Platform, Fewer Handoffs, Faster Decisions

The average credit union manages between 100-300 vendor relationships, and nearly a third have no dedicated staff managing them. What was supposed to drive efficiency is stunting growth and compromising the member experience. Application volume is continuing to rise, and consumers expect a loan decision at digital speed. But for credit unions, meeting that expectation isn't the only goal. They must also continue to make the right lending decisions while also prioritizing risk management. The institutions pulling ahead aren't the ones with the most tools. They're the ones that have turned credit, fraud and decisioning into a single, coordinated system. A single loan decision touches: Credit data Identity verification Fraud signals Decisioning logic Reporting Rarely does all of that live in one place. More often, it’s stitched together across separate platforms, each with its own contract and its own support line. When a credit view and a fraud view are generated separately, they must be reconciled instead of read together in the same instant. Every handoff is a place where a decision slows down and a signal gets missed. It's why a fraud pattern that would be obvious next to the credit file often surfaces only after the funds are already gone. Fragmentation also makes it harder to optimize lending strategies over time. When data, analytics and decisioning are disconnected, credit unions have less visibility into what's working, what's changing and where strategies need to be adjusted. An integrated decisioning ecosystem closes those seams by design, with credit, fraud and lending strategy running on one platform and accessed through a single Application Programming Interface (API). Identity and compliance capabilities can be an integrated decisioning flow. The data doesn't need to be reconciled after the fact because it was never separated in the first place. Stop overengineering, start removing friction When decisioning underperforms, the instinct is to build something more custom: a proprietary model, tighter segmentation, more configuration.  Custom modeling has its place for institutions with the scale and data to justify it. But often, for small or mid-sized credit unions, the bigger opportunity is a flexible decisioning strategy that uses a strong, continuously refreshed model. This shouldn't be either/or. The right approach gives credit unions a strong decisioning strategy today, with the ability to introduce more customized analytics and modeling as their needs evolve.  The same principle applies to strategy management: credit unions can gain greater control through self-service capabilities as they build a more sophisticated data science team.   That kind of flexibility is important as credit unions modernize their decisioning infrastructure. Research surveying more than 2,000 senior credit risk and fraud decision-makers across 11 countries found that organizations investing in unified platforms and modern infrastructure are moving faster and realizing the greatest Return on Investment (ROI).   As their needs evolve, credit unions can adjust decisioning strategies without introducing another layer of technology or relying on third parties to make every change. Until self-service is the right fit, choose a partner that understands what makes your credit union’s membership and risk appetite different from others.  Same member, same afternoon, faster answer Consider a credit union growing its auto and personal loan originations.  A member applies for an auto loan on Saturday afternoon. Credit data, identity and fraud signals are read together in a single real-time pass instead of separate reviews:  Most applications resolve immediately, approved or declined based on a more comprehensive view of the applicant. A smaller number are flagged for quick step-up verification and cleared within minutes. Only genuinely ambiguous cases reach an underwriter, who is working from one complete picture instead of reconciling multiple signals. The member has an answer before the weekend is over. The credit union books the loan before competitors even open on Monday. Built to scale This kind of process holds up today. However, the better test is whether it holds up eighteen months from now when application volume has grown, new products are live and the data flowing through the system looks nothing like it does right now. Future-proofing isn't only about handling more volume. It's about having room to be nimbler and make adjustments as quickly as the market changes. A credit union that relies on standard models within a decisioning strategy may want more customized analytics and greater control over its strategies tomorrow. Connect with us With more than three decades of credit expertise and one of the industry's largest data footprints, Experian helps credit unions do more than solve this year's friction. We're helping to build a decisioning foundation that scales, so growth becomes something the system absorbs, rather than something it must be rebuilt around. Explore More

October 21, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe