When New Data Impacts MBS Pricing: Student Loan Debt

by Michael Pyatski, Perry DeFelice, Angad Paintal 8 min read June 17, 2026

Student loan data

In our previous post, we described the Current Second Lien Balance field, which is one of over 2,000 fields in the new Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset. We showed that the Current Second Lien Balance field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery:

  • New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data).
  • Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe.
  • Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions.

In this article, we discuss another field that satisfies the above criteria: Student Loan Balance.  We evaluate this field in the context of these criteria. First, however, we provide a summary of the MLP dataset and how it compares to standard GSE loan-level data available today.

Standard GSE Data vs. Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) Data

The MLP dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance, filed junior liens, and AVM values).  MLP differs from loan-level data provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, and Ginnie Mae, which the vast majority of market participants solely rely on, in a number of ways:

  • Standard data provided by the GSEs and GNMA does not contain all the information necessary for accurate forecasting of mortgage prepayment and credit performance. Basic, critical fields like borrower’s current credit score and current junior liens on the property are missing.
  • The new Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset from Experian contains borrower, loan, and property data fields covering the entire mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), both securitized and non-securitized.
  • MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle.

New, Material and Significant Field:  Student Loan Debt

MLP contains a number of fields describing each mortgage borrower’s student debt load, including amounts in repayment, forbearance and collections; estimated interest rate, time remaining until forbearance expiration, and more. In the interest of simplicity, for this article we’ll focus on a single student loan-related field within MLP: Student Loans Balance, which is defined as the total balance on open non-deferred student trades reported in the last 3 months.

Is Information Regarding Student Loans New to Markets?

Standard loan-level data disclosed by the GSEs and GNMA contain no student-loan-specific fields. Theoretically, fields related to DTI at origination might capture some aspect of student loan debt. So, in the best-case scenario for an investor relying solely on standard disclosure, a DTI value as of origination is provided — yet is never updated as the loan seasons and the borrower’s debt and income change (see more here).  But in the case of federal student loan debt attached to mortgages originated from early 2020 to late 2023, the level of detail provided by disclosure may be even more unknown due to COVID-era repayment and reporting moratoriums.

The student loan repayment moratorium was a temporary federal policy that paused required payments, set interest rates to 0%, and suspended collections on most federally-held student loans. The moratorium began in March 2020, with payments resuming in October 2023, making it approximately 3.5 years in duration—the longest consumer credit payment pause in U.S. history. (Source: NCUA )

During the moratorium, student loan-related debt loads may have been understated as federal loans were in a temporary state of $0 repayment.  As an alternative to leaving student loan debt completely out of DTI calculations, an imputed payment equal to only 0.50% of the outstanding balance was often used as a placeholder for a borrower’s DTI calculation.

Standard data only reports information related to the primary mortgage and does not include any details on the borrower’s other debts, with the exception of DTI at origination, which is never updated throughout the life of the loan. In contrast, MLP provides a comprehensive view of the borrower’s full credit profile, including other obligations such as credit cards, mortgages on other properties, student loan balances, and much more.

Is Student Loan debt material to the residential mortgage market?

Approximately $11 trillion of residential mortgage loans were originated during the student loan payment moratorium (Source: Experian MLP Dataset), a period marked by historically low mortgage rates during the COVID era.  As discussed above, DTI data contained in standard market disclosure may be particularly inaccurate for these loans.  

As the Wall Street Journal recently reported, a new report from the Federal Reserve of New York shows a rise in student loan default rates by age group.  Student loan delinquencies have been broadly trending higher across all age groups.  Also, the average age of a borrower in default has risen to 40, and borrowers aged 50 and older are now at a higher risk of default than younger groups. This 40 to 50-year-old age group represents prime home ownership years. 

Defaulted borrowers are also struggling to make other debt payments, too.  

The same report stated that almost 40% of past due student loan borrowers with auto loans are past due, 56% have at least one credit card past due, and 20% have a past due mortgage.  In addition to increased delinquency risk on their mortgage, borrowers with student loan debt also have fewer mortgage refinance options, as their elevated DTI may prevent qualification for a refinance, or increase the offered rate of a refinance and thereby reduce their incentive.  These dampening effects of student loan debt on mortgage CPR are clearly evident in the data, as described further below. 

Of today’s $13 trillion in outstanding mortgage debt, more than 10% of that debt ($1.5 trillion) is associated with borrowers who carry student loan debt.  For these borrowers, the average amount of student loan debt outstanding is approximately $50,000, versus a mortgage balance of approximately ~$289,000. In other words, the average student loan debt balance is almost 20% of the mortgage balance for the average borrower who carries both. For this set of borrowers, the average monthly payment is approximately $400 for student loan vs. approximately $2,200 for 1st lien mortgage—so that monthly student loan payments are a significant debt load, approximately 20% of the monthly mortgage payment.  (Source:  Experian MLP Dataset) 

Is the effect of student loan debt a significant driver of performance?

Figure 1 illustrates prepayments by student loan balance for a sample of loans drawn from MLP. The chart illustrates that borrowers with larger student loan balances prepay much more slowly, likely because some are effectively locked out of refinancing once student loan payments resume due to elevated DTI. The debt-to-income (DTI) ratio calculated using actual student loan payments may be significantly higher than the DTI calculated during the moratorium, in some cases exceeding GSE eligibility thresholds.

As illustrated in Figure 1, for in-the-money (ITM) collateral, the differential between loans with material student loan balances (greater than $200,000) and loans with no student debt can reach up to 5 CPR. Notably, even for out-of-the-money (OTM) collateral, loans with student debt prepay 1 to 3 CPR slower, likely reflecting reduced mobility due to tighter financing constraints when purchasing a new home.

Pools with otherwise similar prepayment characteristics may exhibit different prepayment behavior depending on the distribution of student loan exposure within their collateral. In addition, because loans with student debt tend to prepay more slowly, this effect increases over time due to burnout: loans without student debt prepay and exit the pools more quickly, leaving a higher concentration of slower-paying loans behind.  Given that 10% of the $13 trillion outstanding mortgage market is associated with borrowers who have student loans (Source:  Experian MLP dataset)—and that student loans have a meaningful impact on prepayments—many pools issued between March 2020 and October 2023 may be subject to this student loan debt CPR throttle, and therefore mispriced by investors relying exclusively on standard market data.

Fig 1. Prepayment S-Curve: Student Loans Balance

Source:  Experian MLP dataset hosted on IVolatility Data-Driven Platform

_____________________________________________________

Michael Pyatski advises MBS traders, portfolio managers, quants, risk managers, loan originators, and technology professionals on making informed, data-driven business decisions that drive revenue growth, enhance risk management, and reduce trading costs.

With more than 15 years of experience as an Agency RMBS trader—including serving as Head of the Proprietary Trading Desk at BNP Paribas—Michael developed and successfully implemented relative-value, data-driven profitable trading strategies to capture market opportunities embedded in data but not fully priced by the market. His trading experience, combined with a Ph.D. in econometrics, led him to found the Data-Driven Portal (https://datadrivenportal.com/), a platform that provides advanced technology for MBS trading and risk management.

The platform’s No-Model Data-Driven technology leverages big data, econometric analysis, and AI to help traders identify relative-value opportunities in RMBS markets and generate above-market, risk-adjusted returns.

_____________________________________________________

Related Posts

Workflow Automation for Financial Services

Manual processes are quietly expensive. Every handoff between teams, every file transfer waiting in a queue and every decision that sits on someone's desk adds cost, introduces risk and slows the customer experience. For financial institutions, those delays translate directly into lost revenue and eroded margins. That’s why workflow automation is becoming critical for financial institutions looking to stay competitive. Done well, it doesn't just make existing tasks faster. It reshapes how decisions get made across the entire customer lifecycle, from the first marketing touch to account servicing and beyond. What is workflow automation? Workflow automation is the use of technology to run a sequence of tasks, decisions and handoffs with minimal manual intervention. Instead of a person moving work from one step to the next — pulling data, applying a rule, routing an account and sending a communication — software executes those steps automatically based on defined logic and real-time data. For financial institutions, workflow automation usually combines four ingredients: Data Connecting to the internal and external data sources that inform a decision. Analytics Scores, models and attributes that turn raw data into insights. Decisioning A rules engine that determines the right action for each customer or account. Execution The operational layer that carries out the action, whether that's an offer, a credit line change or outreach. The benefits of workflow automation The value of automation goes well beyond "doing the same thing faster." The benefits financial institutions consistently see include:Greater efficiency and lower operating costsAutomation frees underwriters, analysts and agents to focus on exceptions and high-value work rather than repetitive processing. Faster, more consistent decisionsA credit application that once waited in a queue can be assessed in real time against consistent, auditable policies, improving both the applicant's experience and portfolio quality. Better customer experiencesAutomation enables financial institutions to personalize communications at the point of interaction and offer the self-service options that many people now prefer. Improved compliance and governanceReduce the risk of costly compliance failures with built-in controls, audit trails and guided workflows. ScalabilityRespond to changing volumes without sacrificing speed, consistency or the customer experience. Where workflow automation makes the biggest difference Workflow automation tends to deliver the most value where decisions are frequent, repeatable and informed by data. In financial services, those opportunities exist across the customer lifecycle. Onboarding Onboarding is a customer's first experience of your organization, and it's also where friction can cause customers to abandon the process and turn to another provider. Forty percent of U.S. consumers have considered walking away from opening a new account when the process felt burdensome.1 An automated onboarding workflow can bring together document verification, device intelligence, behavioral analytics, credit attributes and more, then orchestrate them into a single decision. The result is a lower-friction experience for the customer and a consistent, auditable process. Once customers are on the books, serving them well means making continuous, high-volume decisions: credit line changes, cross-sell and up-sell opportunities, risk monitoring and retention actions. Automation makes it practical to run these recurring decisions consistently across an entire portfolio, using a holistic view of each customer that draws on multiple scores and attributes. Lending The underwriting process is a great example of how workflow automation can help prevent applicants from waiting days for an answer. Loan origination and credit decisioning capabilities are designed to create a seamless review process across consumer and commercial lending. After automating originations with our solutions, Michigan State University Federal Credit Union cut application processing time to under 24 hours. Fraud Financial institutions are checking fraud at every touchpoint, and the standard for AI fraud detection continues to rise as fraudsters use AI to slip under the thresholds of any single detection tool. Rather than running fraud checks in isolation, an automated workflow can run multiple fraud and identity verification services in parallel and weigh signals together. A fraud decisioning platform connects signals across internal systems, Experian data and third-party services, allowing teams to stay on top of evolving threats. Build a strong foundation for workflow automation Workflow automation can connect these stages, creating a consistent decisioning framework. What ultimately separates good automation from great automation is the quality of the data and decisioning software underneath it. An automated workflow is only as good as the information feeding it. That's where our comprehensive credit, alternative and identity data with the tools financial institutions need to act on it. Learn more here What is workflow automation in financial services? It's the use of software to execute sequences of data gathering, analysis, decisioning and action. How does automated decisioning improve credit decisions? Automated decisioning applies consistent logic to every account in real time or in bulk, enabling faster and more informed decisions, quicker responses to market and regulatory changes at the point of interaction. Does workflow automation replace human judgment? No. The goal is to automate routine, high-volume decisions so skilled staff can focus on the exceptions and complex cases that genuinely require human judgment. For example, a sensitive collections conversation or a nuanced underwriting call. Are we still compliant with regulations if we use an automated workflow process? Well-designed platforms include built-in governance, audit trails and compliance controls that help institutions align with requirements like the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and other regulatory guidelines improving compliance compared with manual processes. How long does it take to implement? It varies by solution and scope, but modern cloud-based platforms are designed for fast onboarding and limited IT involvement. 1.Global Fraud Snapshot 2025: Opportunities and challenge in identity, fraud and financial crime

September 9, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
Expanding the Prescreen View with Alternative Credit Data

Start with a simple question Credit prescreen is an important tool in many lenders’ growth strategies. But the precision of any prescreen strategy depends on the data behind it. What financial behavior might traditional credit data alone not reveal? With Clarity data now available for Instant Prescreen decisioning, lenders can bring alternative credit insights into their targeting strategy, helping them identify prospects who may align with their established criteria, refine targeting strategies and explore additional acquisition opportunities while maintaining control over their risk thresholds. Additional insights alongside traditional credit data For many consumers, a traditional credit file tells a rich and reliable story. But it doesn't always tell the whole story. Consumers may also be using alternative financial products, such as small-dollar installment loans, single-payment loans, auto title loans or rent-to-own agreements and building payment histories that provide additional signals about their financial behavior. For lenders, those unseen signals can represent untapped opportunities. With more than 60 million unique subprime identities, Clarity's database helps lenders gain a more complete view of their applicant pool. Clarity data adds another dimension to that view, providing alternative credit insights that can help lenders better understand consumers whose financial behavior may not be fully represented by traditional credit data alone. How Clarity data sharpens instant prescreen decisioning Clarity provides specialty alternative credit data, with insights into subprime and near-prime consumer activity that may not appear in traditional credit files. And because Clarity is part of Experian, those insights can now be brought directly into Instant Prescreen decisioning. That means lenders can incorporate additional attributes and scores into their credit decisioning strategies without managing a separate data feed or stitching together disconnected sources. It has quickly become a visibility gap lenders can't ignore. Additional data may help support more granular segmentation and targeting strategies. Lenders remain in control of their criteria and risk thresholds while gaining additional information to inform their prescreen strategies. When considered alongside traditional credit data, alternative credit insights can support several aspects of prescreen decisioning: Identify more opportunities: Surface qualified prospects who may be harder to identify using traditional credit data alone. Refine targeting: Add alternative credit insights to help differentiate consumers with greater precision. Inform offer strategies: Use a broader view of financial behavior to help align consumers with appropriate offers. Expand intelligently: Explore incremental audience opportunities while maintaining control over your established risk criteria. Simplify execution: Access Experian and Clarity insights within a connected Instant Prescreen decisioning environment. See more opportunity in your prescreen strategy Growth doesn’t always require looking for an entirely new audience. Sometimes, it starts with seeing more in the audience already in front of you. By bringing Clarity data into Instant Prescreen, lenders can add another layer of insight to their decisioning, helping identify incremental opportunities, refine targeting and support acquisition decision processes across a broader range of consumers. Explore prescreen solutions

September 3, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
Are Fraudsters Building Better Identities Than Your Customers?

Fraudsters are getting surprisingly good at onboarding. Sometimes, better than your customers. Legitimate customers treat onboarding like an errand. They start an application between other tasks, get distracted, forget a password, switch devices, upload a document or come back later to finish. Their digital lives aren’t always linear, because real life isn’t either. Fraudsters approach onboarding differently. For them, opening an account is the objective. Every interaction is designed to increase the odds of success. The difference raises an uncomfortable question hanging over onboarding: What exactly are we rewarding? When smooth becomes suspicious Digital onboarding has traditionally rewarded experiences that feel smooth, consistent and complete. The challenge is that legitimate customers rarely behave that way. Most people approach onboarding somewhere between mildly distracted and mildly annoyed. They pause halfway through because dinner is burning. They reopen an old account only to realize everything is attached to an email they made in college and, somehow, still use for airline receipts. Digital life accumulates history unevenly, because ordinary life does too. Fraudsters have every reason to eliminate those inconsistencies. Applications may be rehearsed. Identity attributes are assembled deliberately. Contact points are prepared in advance. Every interaction is optimized to make the application appear credible. Ironically, the qualities organizations often associate with confidence — clean submissions, steady progression and few corrections — can also describe applications that have been carefully engineered to pass inspection. The challenge isn't that smooth onboarding is meaningless. It's that smooth onboarding, by itself, doesn't tell the whole story. Context changes interpretation A smooth onboarding experience should be the beginning of the evaluation, not the end. Behavior provides important context. How someone moves through an application can reveal whether the experience feels naturally human or unusually orchestrated. Do they interact naturally? Do they hesitate, correct mistakes or navigate in ways that resemble ordinary human behavior? Or does the session appear unusually scripted, automated or repetitive? Identity verification adds another layer. Matching information across trusted sources, validating identity details and strengthening confidence in account creation remain important, particularly when onboarding decisions carry financial, fraud or customer experience consequences. But verification largely answers a point-in-time question: Does this information match right now? A third layer comes from digital history. An inbox attached to years of airline receipts, loyalty accounts, subscription renewals, account recovery, financial notifications and familiar digital routines introduces a different kind of confidence. Legitimate digital identities leave behind patterns of persistence and engagement that develop gradually over time. Fraudsters can assemble convincing identity attributes, but creating years of ordinary digital life is much harder. Building confidence in an identity requires more than verifying information submitted during a single onboarding session. It requires understanding whether the identity reflects a broader history that supports what the application suggests. A multilayered approach builds stronger identity confidence No single signal can provide a complete view of identity risk. Organizations need multiple sources of confidence that reinforce one another. That's the thinking behind our approach: combining behavioral intelligence, identity verification and digital identity continuity into a more complete view of risk. We bring these complementary layers together through: • NeuroID adds behavioral context during onboarding and account creation, helping identify interaction patterns that may indicate automation, manipulation or coordinated fraud. • Precise ID® strengthens identity verification and resolution by comparing applicant information with trusted identity data. • AtData, recently added to our portfolio, contributes email-centered intelligence based on persistence, engagement and long-term digital history. Together, these capabilities help organizations move beyond evaluating a single moment in time to understanding whether an identity is supported by consistent behavior, trusted identity data and an established digital history. The future of fraud prevention isn't about rewarding the smoothest application. It's about recognizing the most trustworthy identity. Fraudsters can rehearse an application. They can optimize an onboarding journey. They can even assemble convincing identity attributes. What they can't easily manufacture is years of ordinary digital life. That's why digital identity continuity has become an important layer of modern fraud prevention. Combined with identity verification and behavioral intelligence, it helps organizations distinguish between identities that simply look convincing and those supported by a history that is much harder to fake. Learn more Contact us

September 2, 2026 by Julie Lee

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe