Scam Detection 101: How to Spot Scam Schemes Before Customers Fall Victim

by Laura Burrows 5 min read August 25, 2026

At A Glance

Explore five common scam schemes, the signals to watch for and how fraud teams can identify scams earlier in the customer journey.

Scams have become one of the fastest-growing fraud threats facing financial institutions. In 2025 alone, U.S. consumers filed more than 3 million fraud reports, continuing a decade-long trend of increasing losses. As digital banking, real-time payments, and artificial intelligence reshape the financial landscape, scammers are evolving just as quickly, using sophisticated social engineering techniques to convince legitimate customers to willingly send money or share sensitive information.

For fraud teams, this represents a fundamental shift. Traditional fraud prevention strategies are designed to stop unauthorized access, but today’s scams often involve authorized customers making seemingly legitimate transactions. By the time an institution realizes a customer has been manipulated, the funds have often already left the account. The challenge is no longer simply identifying fraudulent transactions; it’s recognizing the subtle behavioral signals that indicate a customer is being deceived before a payment is made.

Fortunately, while scam tactics continue to evolve, they tend to follow a predictable pattern.

Every scam follows a familiar path

Whether it’s a phishing email, an imposter pretending to be a family member or a fake investment opportunity, most scams progress through the same lifecycle. Fraudsters first identify a target and establish contact before gradually building trust. Once credibility has been established, they create urgency and encourage the victim to act quickly, whether that’s sharing credentials, approving a payment or moving funds. Only after the transaction has been completed does the customer discover they’ve been scammed.

For financial institutions, the greatest opportunity lies in recognizing the signs of manipulation before the final transfer occurs. Although organizations can’t see the text messages, social media conversations or phone calls taking place outside their systems, they can identify the behavioral changes those interactions leave behind.

AI is making scams more convincing than ever

Artificial intelligence (AI) has dramatically lowered the barrier to entry for fraudsters. What were once poorly written phishing emails or obviously fake websites can now be personalized, grammatically correct and nearly indistinguishable from legitimate communications. Voice cloning and deepfake technology have also transformed imposter scams, allowing criminals to convincingly imitate family members, coworkers or financial institutions.

These tactics are becoming mainstream. Deepfake fraud attempts increased by over 2,000% in the last three years and now account for 6.5% of fraud attempts. Nearly one-third of scams originate on social media, and crypto-related scams generated more than $8.6 billion in losses during 2025. Rather than replacing traditional social engineering, AI has simply made it more scalable, more personalized and more difficult for consumers to recognize.

Five scams targeting financial institutions

While new scam variants appear regularly, five schemes continue to account for much of the fraud impacting financial institutions today.

Phishing scams

remain one of the most common entry points. Customers receive convincing emails, text messages or phone calls that appear to come from trusted organizations and are directed to cloned websites where credentials or one-time passcodes are collected. Institutions may never see the phishing message itself, but they can often detect unusual login activity, unfamiliar devices or sudden behavioral changes immediately afterward.

Imposter scams

have become significantly more sophisticated as fraudsters leverage AI-generated voices and deepfake technology. Rather than stealing credentials, these criminals manipulate customers into sending money directly by impersonating someone they know and trust. Because customers authenticate themselves and willingly initiate payments, behavioral analytics becomes increasingly important for identifying signs of coercion or unusual transaction patterns.

Investment scams

follow a slower timeline, often unfolding over weeks or months. Fraudsters establish credibility through fake trading platforms, fabricated investment returns and professional-looking websites before encouraging victims to make progressively larger investments. To a financial institution, these transactions may initially resemble legitimate investment activity until patterns begin to emerge, such as repeated transfers to unfamiliar recipients or significant movement of funds from savings into outbound payments.

Tech support scams

exploit customer concern by convincing victims that their device or account has been compromised. After persuading them to install remote-access software, fraudsters take control of authenticated sessions and initiate high-risk account activity themselves. In these situations, the institution may observe familiar credentials paired with entirely unfamiliar session behavior; a strong indication that a remote-access tool is being used.

Romance scams

often prove especially devastating because they rely on emotional manipulation rather than urgency. Fraudsters spend weeks or months building relationships before introducing financial requests, leading to repeated payments that gradually increase over time. Because victims genuinely believe they are helping someone they care about, these scams can be particularly difficult to interrupt without thoughtful customer interventions.

Building a smarter scam defense

As scam tactics continue to evolve, preventing fraud and identity verification requires a broader view of customer behavior. Rather than focusing solely on whether a transaction is authorized, financial institutions must understandwhya customer is behaving differently and whether those changes indicate external manipulation.

No single signal catches a scam, which is why organizations that combine multiple fraud signals across account opening, authentication, payment activity, and ongoing account monitoring will be better positioned to detect scams earlier, before customers become victims.

Ready to strengthen your scam prevention strategy?

image of scams white paper

Explore our fullwhite paperto learn how to recognize emerging scam tactics and the signals that can help stop them sooner.

Related Posts

Rethinking Charged-Off Portfolio Prioritization

Experian’s new Recovery Scores model turns portfolio intelligence into more focused recovery strategies, helping organizations improve returns, direct effort and accelerate speed to cash. The challenge isn’t simply working more accounts. Whether a debt buyer is evaluating an acquisition, an agency is deciding where to assign collector time or a lender is managing its own post-charge-off accounts, the question is similar: How can limited capacity be directed toward accounts with the greatest potential for recovery? Prioritizing accounts mainly by age, balance or when they were last worked may not show which ones are most likely to generate a recovery. With the new Recovery Scores model, organizations can rank charged-off accounts by expected collectability, providing a consistent signal to inform placement strategy and treatment decisions across the recovery lifecycle. Make collector capacity a strategic resource Working every account with the same level of attention isn’t always practical. The more useful question is: Where should teams focus first to protect speed to cash? Our model performance analysis found: 80% of recovered dollars come from the top 40% of accounts worked. The value isn’t simply a better ranking. It’s how organizations can use it for collections optimization. Score bands can inform different strategies for placement, outsourcing, auction and legal channel treatment rather than applying the same approach across an entire portfolio. For debt buyers: The scores can inform acquisition pricing and how a newly purchased portfolio is divided across internal collections, legal channels and resale. Expected collectability can shape debt portfolio analysis, including how a portfolio is valued and segmented before collection work begins. For agencies: Score bands can help teams focus collector resources on accounts with stronger recovery potential. For first-party lenders: Managing recovery internally, the scores provide another signal to help structure decisions about which accounts to work and in what order. Look beyond collectability alone Prioritization rarely comes down to a single variable. Consider two accounts that both rank highly for expected collectability, but one has a substantially larger balance. Their recovery likelihood may be similar, but the potential dollars recovered are not. The Recovery Scores model uses debt collections analytics by combining Experian’s bureau-based score with current balance information. This helps organizations consider both the likelihood of recovery and the potential dollars at stake, while sensitive balance information remains within the organization’s working environment. Monitor accounts as they change The first decision about an account is rarely the last. Teams continually make choices about treatment, placement and resource allocation as accounts move through the recovery process. Recovery Scores is also available as a trigger. When underlying information changes, teams can receive an update and reconsider an account’s placement without waiting for the next portfolio-wide re-score. An account that shows lower recovery potential today may have a different recovery outlook later. Turn recovery potential into a portfolio strategy When portfolios contain more accounts than teams can work at once, the question isn’t simply, “How many accounts can we work?” It is, “Where can our resources have the greatest impact?” The latest Recovery Scores model helps organizations sharpen placement and treatment decisions. It gives debt buyers a way to price and segment portfolios with greater confidence and gives lenders another tool to direct limited collector time across their own post-charge-off portfolios. Learn more about Experian Recovery Scores

November 10, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
What Is a Third-Party Breach? How to Prepare for and Respond to Vendor Incidents

Learn what a third-party breach is and steps to prepare, contain risk, and support affected customers. Read more!

November 9, 2026 by Laura Burrows
Mortgage Underwriting Moves from Modernization Talk to Action 

Mortgage underwriting is entering a new phase. In a recent conversation with HousingWire’s Allison LaForgia, Michele Bodda, Group President of Experian Housing, Verification Solutions, and Employer Services, discussed how modern credit scores, alternative data and verification tools are changing how lenders evaluate borrowers.  Lenders can now judge modernization by its results, Bodda said. “Now we’re actually letting more modern scores get into underwriting to help price loans and go all the way through to securitization,” she told HousingWire. “We’re letting the scores and the data actually speak for itself instead of just talking about it.”  The Right Data at the Right Time  Modernizing underwriting means providing useful information at the right stage, rather than giving lenders everything at once. “You don’t need everything all at once. You don’t need everything on initial pull,” Bodda said.  Alternative data, such as rental payments and buy now, pay later activity, can help show how consumers manage obligations, especially those with thinner credit files. A thin credit file does not necessarily mean someone has a thin financial life.  “It’s our responsibility as one of the primary data providers to make sure we can make all of that available, so that we’re best representing the consumer,” Bodda said. A fuller view of data may help lenders identify creditworthy applicants who might otherwise be difficult to assess.  Simplifying Verification and Reducing Friction  Bodda also shared how Experian is making credit information more easily accessible and reducing unnecessary costs during the originations process, explaining that new enhancements to Experian’s Power Profile Plus allow lenders to pull credit data at the start of underwriting and request another score later without repurchasing the data.  “You can pull it later and not pay for the credit data again,” Bodda said.   Experian is also investing in income and employment verification, including through a new partnership with Workday. Bodda explained that Experian will continue to focus on process improvement, competition and innovation across the mortgage ecosystem.  A Broader Path to Homeownership  As consumer expectations and underwriting capabilities evolve, borrowers want a process that reflects their financial lives, while lenders seek greater efficiency. Modern scores, relevant data, and streamlined verification can help lenders assess applications with more context—and may help more people pursue homeownership.  “If we as an industry can open this up and bring more people into the process, then we’re going to thrive,” Bodda said in the interview.   Watch the interview and hear all of Michele’s insights, and more here.  

November 6, 2026 by Caroline Basile

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe