At A Glance
Healthcare marketing now runs across mixed-identity conditions, where authenticated data, contextual signals, and aggregated measurement all show up in the same campaign. Pharma brands need infrastructure that keeps DTC and HCP identity separate and still connects fragmented signals across activation, privacy, and measurement. Experian acts as an independent, privacy-first identity, data, and workflow layer for pharma marketers, designed specifically for this operating environment.Originally published in Digiday
Key takeaways
- Pharma campaigns now span environments with very different identity conditions, from strong addressability to contextual only signals, which makes coordination a core infrastructure challenge.
- Privacy and compliance rules require DTC (patient) and HCP (healthcare professional) data to stay in separate, non-overlapping workflows at every stage.
- Experian’s identity and workflow layer governs DTC tokenized matching and HCP deterministic National Provider Identifier (NPI) resolution as two distinct processes, never one merged identity path.
- Partner-enabled measurement connects exposure data to outcomes like script lift and qualified HCP engagement through trusted partners including IQVIA Digital, PurpleLab, and OptimizeRx.
A pharmaceutical brand launching a campaign today might rely on authenticated data in one environment, contextual signals in another, and aggregated measurement somewhere else entirely. That’s the reality of healthcare marketing right now, and most brands are still building the operational model to match it.
In a mixed-identity ecosystem, performance comes from the ability to coordinate multiple signal types across activation, privacy, and measurement workflows. Accuracy and scale depend on knowing which approach fits which environment and having the infrastructure to execute across all of them.
From onboarding to outcomes
Pharma marketing teams need identity workflows that can support accurate audience creation, governed activation, and partner-enabled measurement without combining DTC and HCP identity paths.
Download our pharma marketing playbook to help your team:
- Plan DTC and HCP identity strategies with clearer separation
- Prepare audiences for activation across approved channels and partners
- Evaluate audience quality, usable reach, and governance
Healthcare campaigns run across different signal conditions
Healthcare campaigns now run across environments with very different identity conditions, from fully addressable channels to contextual only placements. Digital advertising has long assumed that better identity leads to better targeting, frequency management, orchestration, and measurement, but healthcare has always operated with more constraints than most categories. Those constraints are becoming impossible to ignore as budgets move into connected TV (CTV), point-of-care, publisher-direct, programmatic and retail media-adjacent environments.
That shift changes the operating model. Marketers now have to manage audience strategy, supply quality and performance across channels that don’t support the same level of addressability, interoperability, or measurement visibility. In some environments, identity is strong and can support targeting and measurement. In others, identity is limited or unavailable, and marketers have to rely on contextual or aggregated signals. Managing across both environments is now a core infrastructure challenge for healthcare marketers, and it’s one that requires a deliberate strategy rather than a channel-by-channel patch.
Privacy risk is a media infrastructure issue
Privacy risk in healthcare marketing now shapes how campaigns get built and run from the ground up, extending well beyond compliance into media infrastructure itself. Tighter privacy and compliance expectations mean audience construction, exposure management, and outcomes analysis all get more complex once tracking is restricted.
Data can’t move freely across partners or workflows, and DTC and HCP data environments need to stay isolated from one another. This is especially true in pharma, where the stakes of a compliance misstep extend well beyond a campaign. This creates a more demanding operating model. Healthcare marketers have to balance identity-based and privacy-forward approaches while maintaining reach, relevance, and accountability. That balance requires governance that’s built into the infrastructure, not layered on top of it after the fact.
Experian acts as an independent, privacy-first identity, data, and workflow layer for pharma marketers, designed specifically for this operating environment:
These workflows are governed separately by design, with governed onboarding connecting fragmented DTC and HCP signals to activation-ready audiences without collapsing the two identity paths.
The mixed-identity playbook starts with matching the approach to the environment
The right mixed-identity approach depends on what each environment can support and what the campaign is needs to achieve. A pharmaceutical team may want more addressability, a publisher may only offer contextual or cohort signals, and a measurement partner may need exposure data, while platforms limit how identifiers can be shared.
Healthcare marketers need an operating model built for multiple identity conditions, with clear rules for how signals can be connected, activated, and measured without increasing privacy or compliance risk. That may include:
Experian’s infrastructure supports all three modes:
The missing layer in pharma marketing. Watch our Q&A
Supply quality is a prerequisite for measurement
Supply quality determines whether measurement in a mixed-identity environment can be trusted. When tracking and addressability vary across channels, advertisers need confidence that impressions ran in the right environments and under the right conditions before they can trust any downstream outcomes.
This is especially true in CTV and programmatic, where campaigns span fragmented supply paths, publishers, devices, and partners. Outcomes like script lift or provider engagement are only meaningful if the underlying exposure is reliable and well understood. In healthcare, this also ties directly to brand suitability and disclosure control. Curated supply, publisher-direct deals and placement-level transparency help campaigns run in appropriate environments and give measurement a more defensible foundation.
Clean rooms and tokenization support this, but their effectiveness depends on governance, interoperability, and whether insights can move cleanly across partners and workflows. Partner-enabled measurement, connecting exposure data to outcomes through trusted partners including IQVIA Digital, PurpleLab, and OptimizeRx, is structured in two steps:
- Link activation and measurement IDs without collapsing them into an open identity environment
- Produce aggregated, defensible outcomes including script lift, qualified HCP engagement, and verified delivery
Mixed-identity is the operating reality, and infrastructure is how you manage it
Mixed-identity is now the operating reality for healthcare marketing, not a temporary phase to work around. Performance depends on working across environments where identity is sometimes strong and sometimes limited by design. Healthcare marketers don’t need to pick a single identity approach and apply it everywhere. Building infrastructure that connects deterministic identity, tokenized matching, and contextual signals, keeping compliance, operational flexibility, and trust intact at every step, is what separates the brands managing this well from the ones still patching it channel by channel.
Talk to our team about your healthcare identity strategy
Whether you’re running DTC, HCP, or both, our team can help you build an infrastructure that works across identity environments. Let’s connect.
About the author
Kevin Dunn
Chief Revenue Officer, Experian
Kevin Dunn joins Experian Marketing Services with more than 20 years of leadership experience across marketing and advertising technology, most recently serving as Senior Vice President of Brands and Agencies at LiveRamp. In that role, he led growth across retail, CPG, travel, hospitality, financial services, and healthcare, overseeing new business, account expansion, and channel partnerships.
Kevin is known for building cohesive, accountable teams and leading with optimism, clarity, and a strong sense of shared purpose. His leadership philosophy centers on empowering people, driving positive outcomes for clients and fostering a culture where teams can grow, take smart risks, and succeed together.
FAQs
Mixed-identity means a healthcare campaign relies on more than one type of signal at once, such as authenticated data in one channel, contextual data in another, and aggregated measurement in a third. Pharma brands increasingly need infrastructure that coordinates all of these signal types together instead of treating each channel as a separate problem.
Experian keeps DTC and HCP identity in distinct, non-overlapping workflows so patient data and healthcare professional data never combine. DTC activation runs on high-fidelity tokenized matching, and HCP activation relies on deterministic National Provider Identifier (NPI) resolution using verified attributes like specialty and practice location.
Supply quality matters because outcomes like script lift or provider engagement only mean something if the underlying ad exposure is reliable. Curated supply, publisher-direct deals, and placement-level transparency give healthcare marketers a more defensible foundation before they trust any downstream measurement result.
Partner-enabled measurement connects exposure data to outcomes through trusted third parties such as IQVIA Digital, PurpleLab, and OptimizeRx, without merging activation and measurement identifiers into one open identity environment. The result is aggregated, defensible outcomes like script lift, qualified HCP engagement, and verified delivery.
Healthcare marketers don’t have to choose one approach over the other, since most campaigns already run across both conditions at the same time. Building infrastructure that connects deterministic identity, tokenized matching, and contextual signals is what allows a campaign to stay compliant while still reaching the right audience.
Latest posts
As today’s digital landscape gets more and more complicated there are more ways for brands to connect with users and drive purchases and more ways for ad tech to target and measure those touch points. As in-person shopping picks up steam due to the re-normalization of society post-COVID 19; the connection between digital ads and in-person purchases needs to be made once again. With the rise of Connected TV throughout the pandemic there are even more digital opportunities to target a user. But how do you make sure that those brand engagements are captured and correctly attributed to offline purchases and conversions? The answer lies in a holistic identity resolution strategy. Cross-device identity resolution with The Tapad Graph connects the identifiers and devices of individuals within a household to each other; enabling targeting, frequency capping, extension, segmentation and measurement or attribution between devices; including Connected TV and hashed (privacy-protected) email addresses along with Cookies, Mobile Ad Ids and IP Address. Brands can join their first-party data to The Tapad Graph to execute strategies that connect online and offline data for pre, mid and post-campaign efficiencies. Let’s imagine a scenario in which an outdoor retail brand is targeting users watching specific content on a Connected TV device. Powered by identity resolution, they start with a general ad on CTV and continue targeting down individual paths with each user. When one of them converts in store and makes a purchase; the outdoor retailer can connect that action through location and in-store traffic data with the cross-device identity resolution used to execute the digital campaign. Now the actions of the user online and offline are resolved for more accurate measurement and attribution after the campaign ends. But it doesn’t stop there– the brand’s CRM data can be reactivated for the next digital campaign and leveraged to capitalize on the most effective media mix for the user who made the purchase previously. These combined insights can be invaluable in shaping up future campaign strategies with geo-contextual ads, recommended additional products and personalization to help drive more conversions and purchases in-store or online. As in-person shopping picks back up and marketers are tasked once again with balancing online and in-store KPIs, the right identity resolution strategy can unlock necessary efficiencies for retailers, ad tech vendors and agencies tasked with supporting these initiatives. Get in touch
Experian Marketing Services and Data Quality President Genevieve Juillard recently sat down with Zach Rodgers, host of the AdExchanger Talks podcast to discuss the future of identity, the importance of data transparency and privacy, and our recent acquisition of Tapad. Genevieve focused on the opportunity for our industry to reimagine an advertising ecosystem that is resilient and adaptable; one that takes advantage of emerging data and prioritizes data transparency and consumer privacy. She also discussed the importance of advertising strategies that put consumers at the heart of every decision and give them more control over their data. Genevieve shared with AdExchanger that Experian’s acquisition of Tapad, a global leader in digital identity resolution, was a natural fit for our company. Tapad’s approach and role in the ecosystem is very much aligned with Experian’s, which is to develop solutions that are resilient to industry and consumer changes. The combination of our capabilities supports interoperability across all types of identifiers, both online and offline, and will position us to help our clients navigate the post-third-party cookie world. To learn more about Experian’s plans to support an effective advertising ecosystem that will evolve with our dynamic industry, listen to the full podcast Embracing ‘Healthy Fragmentation’ In Ad Tech, With Genevieve Juillard. Get in touch
It’s been over a year since Google announced they’d be deprecating the third-party cookie and in that time there’s been a major focus on two types of cookieless identity solutions. Identity vendors and marketers are strategizing which of these two future solutions best fits their needs so they can achieve privacy-safe scale once third-party cookies are no longer available for use on Chrome. Let’s break down these solutions and the considerations marketers need to take into account when deciding what partners to move forward with in the future of identity resolution. Authenticated Traffic Solutions Authenticated traffic solutions (ATS) are a type of digital identification that asks the end-user to identify themselves via personal information, most commonly email address. Often, you’ll see self-authentication at the point of entry to a website that asks you to create an account or login immediately to access the content you are seeking. E-commerce sites use authentication to keep track of consumer purchases and inform advertising decisions for that customer; and publishers use it to tailor featured content, or, more importantly for this discussion, leverage it within the ad ecosystem for targeting. While authentication can provide very valuable user data for audience segmenting and targeting, it can be limited in scale for a single publisher to leverage and monetize on their own. That’s why some identity vendors have worked to integrate themselves within as many publisher authentication modules as possible, so that they can create an aggregate of scale for the ad ecosystem to tap into. But, even this isn’t going to deliver the reach marketers truly thirst for. Alternatively, Facebook has the scale for authenticated traffic, but they keep their data inside a walled garden, so the utility of those authenticated users is only valuable within the Facebook ecosystem. So how can authenticated traffic solutions increase scale to broaden the scope of identifiers they can collect and leverage? Hint: a few of the biggest players have already figured it out. It’s the single sign-on. Google is probably the largest purveyor of a single-sign on solution that can directly impact advertising capabilities. Can you think of a site you visit that doesn’t offer a sign-in with your existing Google account? It’s a short list. Google has integrated themselves into so many applications and publishers that “Login with Gmail” is just second nature (you pictured the Gmail logo when you read that, didn’t you?). Now, if you’re about to purchase something you found off an Instagram ad, or perhaps a retailer you buy from regularly, you’ve probably noticed options to proceed with your checkout via “Amazon pay” or “Apple pay”. These are also single-sign ons. You’re authenticating yourself through Amazon or Apple to that retailer in exchange for A- the safety and security that Amazon or Apple provide for your financial information and B- skipping the annoying process of manually entering personal information over and over again at point of sale. It’s starting to sound like there’s a lot of authenticated data out there isn’t it? Well, that’s true, but again, Amazon and Apple are walled gardens. Amazon is working diligently to build out their own ecosystem to leverage their content and retail channel data for a holistic offering. And Apple keeps user data very close to the chest, constantly limiting its utility for themselves and advertisers. So what is identity resolution doing about it? The Trade Desk announced their solution; Unified ID 2.0, which promises to leverage email authenticated identity for a truly scaled solution for publishers via Javascript through Prebid. By handing over UID2.0 to an independent unbiased organization like Prebid, The Trade Desk is creating instant scale and trust in their solution. Unauthenticated Traffic Solutions Unlike ATS, unauthenticated traffic solutions do not rely on a log-in to identify a user, but they also don’t rely on third-party cookies. Instead, unauthenticated solutions (UATS) leverage their existing streams of real-time data through Javascript on publisher sites or an SDK (software development kit used by apps). The type of information UATS solutions can collect via Javascript or SDK vary, but it can include IP address, user agent and device level info. But being able to read this information at the point of entry to a website does not make a quality identifier. The best unauthenticated solutions will have the ability to set or ingest this information into a unique ID through an infrastructure with incredibly fast speed that can process trillions of anonymous data signals across multiple channels and devices. And even more so, be able to interpret those signals into a profile using machine learning– all at the moment a user enters a domain. It sounds complicated because it is, but it also has a lot of potential. The identity space cannot rest solely on authenticated traffic solutions, because, as you can see, it could limit ownership and operability to just a few power players/walled gardens. This doesn’t help the larger ecosystem monetize and personalize ad inventory. The right unauthenticated solution, however, can unify cross-device individuals and households at scale, because they’re integrated on the broadest number of publishers/SDKs across platforms, have the best algorithms to build confident connections between identifiers, and are universally transactable across the most common sell and demand side platforms. Think of it as the perfect partner- speaking a common language that everyone in the ecosystem understands and acts on. Today more than twenty cookieless identifiers are available in market for the ad ecosystem, and Google hasn’t even announced a date of deprecation. It’s important to be on the lookout for differentiators like scale and precision. Most importantly, choosing a truly cross-device partner will be key, especially as more digital devices and IDs grow in adoption, like CTV has this past year. Taking advantage of both What we will come to find, once the third-party cookie is obsolete, is that choosing just one of these solution types, or partners, will be a disadvantage. The more the industry comes together to collaborate on solutions, the more apparent it is that both of them have value, and thus employing both solutions will give marketers the best opportunities. Tapad, now part of Experian, recently announced the launch of Switchboard; a module within our identity solution; The Tapad Graph, to create this agnostic interoperability for identifiers of all types, and choice and control for the ad tech vendors and marketers who want them. By instantly creating the ability to partner with multiple solutions, Tapad + Experian is ensuring that all use cases for the third-party cookie live on in our cookieless future. Get in touch