Small Business Market Segmentation Strategies

by Guest Contributor 7 min read November 28, 2011

By: Joel Pruis

Basic segmentation strategy for business banking asks the following questions:

– Is there a uniform definition of small business across the industry?
– How should small business be defined?  Sales size of the applicant?  Exposure to the financial institution?
– Is small business/business banking a retail or commercial line of business?

No One Size Fits All

The notion of a single definition for small business for any financial institution is inappropriate as the intent for segmentation is to focus marketing efforts, establish appropriate products to support the segment, develop appropriate delivery methods and use appropriate risk management practices.  For the purpose of this discussion we will restrict our content to developing the definition of the segment and high level credit product terms and conditions to support the segment.

The confusion on how to define the segment is typically due to the multiple sources of such definitions.  The Small Business Administration, developers of generic credit risk scorecards (such as Experian), marketing firms and the like all have multiple ways to define small business.  While they all have a different method of defining small business, the important factor to consider is that each definition serves the purpose of the creator.  As such, the definition of small business should serve the purpose of the specific financial institution.

A general rule of thumb is the tried and true 80/20 rule.  Assess your financial institution’s business purpose portfolio by rank ordering individual relationships by total dollar exposure.  Using the 80/20 rule, determine the smallest 80% of the number of relationships by exposure.  Typically the result is that the largest 20% of relationships will cover approximately 80% of the total dollars outstanding in your business purpose portfolio.  Conversely the smallest 80% of relationships will cover only about 20% of the total dollars outstanding.

Just from this basic analysis we can see the primary need for segmentation between the business banking and the commercial (middle market, commercial real estate, etc.) portfolios.  Assuming we do not segment we have a significant imbalance of effort vs. actual risk.  Meaning if we treat all credit relationships the same we are spending up to 80% of our time/resources on only 20% of our dollar risk.  Looking at this from the other direction we are only spending 20% of our credit resources assessing 80% of our total dollar risk.  Obviously this is a very basic analysis but any way that you look at it, the risk assessment (underwriting and portfolio management) must be “right-sized” in order to provide the appropriate risk management while working to maximize the return on such portfolio segments.

The realities of the credit risk assessment practices without segmentation is that the small business segment will be managed by exception, at best.  Given the large number of relationships and the small impact that the small business segment has on traditional credit quality metrics such as past dues and charge offs, the performance of the small business portfolio can, in fact, be hidden.  Such metrics focus on percentage of dollars that are past due or charged off against the entire portfolio.  Since the largest dollars are in the 20% of relationships, it will take a significant number of individual small business relationships being delinquent or charged off before the overall metric would become alarming.

Working with our clients in defining small business, one of the first exercises that we recommend is assessing the actual delinquency and charge off rates in the newly defined small business/business banking portfolio.  Simply put, determine the total dollars that fit the new definition and apply the charge-offs by borrowers that meet the definition that have occurred over the past 12 months divided by total outstanding in the new portfolio segment.  Similarly determine the current dollars past due of relationships meeting the definition of small business divided by the total outstanding of said segment.  Such results typically are quite revealing and will at least provide a baseline for which the financial institution can measure improvement and/or success.  Without such initial analysis, we have witnessed financial institutions laying blame on the new underwriting and portfolio management processes for such performance when it existed all along but was never measured.

So basically our first attempt to define the segment has created a total credit exposure limit.  Such limits should be used to determine the appropriate underwriting and portfolio management methods (both of which we will discuss further subsequent blogs), but this type of a definition does little to support a business development effort as the typical small business does not always borrow nor can we accurately assess the potential dollar exposure of any given business until we actually gather additional data.  Thus for business development purposes we establish the definition of small business primarily by sales size.  Looking at the data from your existing relationships, your financial institution can get an accurate indication of the maximum sales size that should be considered in the business development efforts.

As a result we have our business development definition by sales size of a given company and our underwriting and portfolio management defined by total exposure.  You may be thinking that such definitions are not always in sync with each other and you would be correct.  You will have some companies with total sales under your definition that borrower more than your total exposure limits while companies with total exposure that falls under small business but the total sales of such companies may exceed the business development limit.  It is impossible to catch every possibility and to do so is an exercise in futility.  Better that you start with the basics of the segmentation and then measure the new applications that exceed the total exposure or the relationships meeting the total exposure cap but exceed the sales limitation.  During the initial phase, judgment on a case by case basis will need to be used.

Questions such as:

  • Is the borrower that exceeds our sales limitations likely to need to borrow more in the near future?
  • Is the exposure of the borrower that meets our sales size requirement likely to quickly reduce its exposure to meet our definition?
  • Will our underwriting techniques be adequate to assess the risk of this relationship?
  • Will our portfolio monitoring methods be sufficient to assess the changes in the risk profile after it has been booked?
  • Will the relationship management structure be sufficient to support such a borrower?

As you encounter these situations it will become obvious to the financial institution the frequency and consistency of such exceptions to the existing definition and prompt adjustments and/or exclusions.  But to try and create the exclusions before collecting the data or examining the actual application volumes is where the futility lies. Best to avoid the futility and act only on actual data.

Further refinement of the segment definition will also be based on the above assessment.  Additional criteria will be added such as:

  • Industry segments (Commercial Real Estate, for example)
  • Product types (construction lending)

Just know that the definition will not stay static.  Based upon the average credit request changes from 2006 to 2010, changes can and will be significant.  The following graph represents the average request amounts from 2010 data compared to the dollar amounts from 2006 (noted below the chart).

Small business market segementation strategies blog post charts

So remember that where you start is not where you have to stay.  Keep measuring, keep adjusting and your segmentation strategy will serve you very well.

Look for my next post on generating small business applications.  Specifically I’ll cover who should be involved in the outbound marketing efforts of your small business segment.

I look forward to your continued comments, challenges and debate as we continue our discussion around small business/business banking.  And if you’re interested, I’m hosting a 3-part Webinar series, Navigating Through The Challenges Affecting Portfolio Performance, that will evaluate how statistics and modeling, combined with strategies from traditional credit management, can create a stronger methodology and protect your bottom line.

Related Posts

What Is AI Decisioning?

Every business makes decisions about people and transactions all day long. Should we approve this loan? Is this purchase fraud? Which customer should get this offer, and what should it be? For a long time, those decisions were made in one of two ways: a person reviewed each case by hand, or the company wrote fixed rules, like "approve anyone with a credit score above 700." Both work. Both also leave value on the table. The manual review is slow and hard to scale. The fixed rule can turn away good applicants and is slow to adapt when the market shifts. AI decisioning is a third way. What makes AI decisioning work Instead of relying on a single reviewer or a rigid rule, automated decisioning uses models that learn from data — studying how thousands of past cases turned out, finding the patterns that predict an outcome, and applying them to each new decision, often in real time. The result is faster, more consistent decisions. But a model on its own isn't the whole story. Getting real value from AI decisioning takes good data to learn from, AI analytics to generate insights, the tools to act on it and the governance to keep it compliant. What we've found is that the pieces only pay off when they work together, and that is where we're built differently. A model is only as good as what it learns from, and we pair your data with one of the deepest views of consumer and commercial credit: decades of full-file history and vetted attributes. Then we give you the tools to act on it. Use cases across your business Whether you're trying to grow your customer base, reduce fraud, manage lending risk, or improve collections, automated decisioning brings all the pieces together to make more accurate, consistent and explainable decisions at scale. Fraud and Identity A fraudulent transaction that slips through costs money and erodes trust. Rules are static, and fraudsters move fast. They'll probe boundaries, find the blind spots and move to the next scheme. By the time the rules are updated, they're already three steps ahead. How AI decisioning changes this: AI fraud detection with real-time risk scoring and decisioning across transactions and customer interactions Intelligence that continuously learns from results to help adapt fraud strategies as threats evolve Reduced false positives and less friction for customers at account opening and checkout Identity verification tools that confirm someone is who they say they are without slowing down the experience Credit and Lending Loan approval is where the relationship begins. Credit risk decisioning helps lenders find that delicate balance between approving enough people to grow, but carefully enough to manage risk. Missing that balance means turning away good customers or taking on losses that are difficult to absorb. How AI decisioning changes this: Increased approval opportunities for creditworthy applicants without increasing overall risk Models you can update and deploy quickly as market conditions change, rather than waiting months Ability to run "what-if" scenarios to test how a new strategy would have performed on your historical data before putting it live Collections Which customer should your team reach out to today? Through which channel? What kind of message? If you reach out too aggressively, you push someone who might have recovered into default. If you wait too long, you lose them. If you call someone at work, they resent you; if you text, they might ignore it. If you offer a payment plan, they might accept it, but only if the terms make sense to their financial situation. How AI decisioning changes this: Optimized next-best-action and contact-channel strategies for each individual customer Improved recovery potential through better targeting Less time spent on accounts with a lower propensity to pay, freeing your team for higher-impact cases Ability to segment and test new strategies before rollout Customer Acqusition Finding the right customers is about reaching the right people with the right offer at the right time. To stay competitive, it’s now a requirement to balance growth with risk while creating a seamless experience converting prospects into customers. How AI decisioning changes this: More precise prospect targeting using credit, behavioral, and alternative data, where permitted, to identify consumers most likely to respond Personalized offers delivered in real time Dynamic decision strategies that can be updated quickly as market conditions and customer behavior change Ongoing testing and optimization of acquisition strategies to improve campaign performance and support customer lifetime value Driving results with AI decisioning Every customer interaction is a decision. Businesses that can adapt quickly will be better positioned to grow, manage risk, and deliver the experiences customers expect. The technology will continue to evolve, but the goal remains the same: making informed decisions that balance business objectives, risk, and customer experience. Learn more about our decisioning software

July 27, 2026 by Zohreen Ismail
Why Innovation Matters for Members First Credit Union

Learn how Members First Credit Union uses innovation and data-driven insights to better serve members and expand financial opportunity.

July 24, 2026 by Scarlet Nickel
Ask the Expert: Unlocking the ROI of alternative data with Natasha Madan and Julius Heim

A visibility gap lenders can't afford to ignore Alternative data is often associated with thin-file or credit invisible consumers. But its value extends far beyond those segments. Experian's Clarity Services database includes approximately one in five credit-active consumers, including one in four consumers with prime-and-above credit profiles. That means lenders may be missing important signals, not only for emerging borrowers, but also for applicants who appear well qualified using traditional bureau data alone. Consider two consumers with the same credit score. Based on traditional credit data, they may appear equally creditworthy. But when Clarity data is added, one consumer may demonstrate stable repayment behavior while another shows recent defaults on alternative finance products. The credit score hasn't changed, but the decisioning context has. That's where alternative data creates value: helping lenders distinguish between consumers who look similar on paper but represent very different levels of risk and opportunity. In this Ask the Expert session, Experian’s Julius Heim, Vice President of Analytics Product Build, Innovation and Scores, and Natasha Madan, Senior Director, Analytics Consulting, explain how different alternative data assets solve different business challenges and why the greatest return comes from using them together throughout the credit lifecycle. What that visibility gap is really costing lenders Better visibility matters because every lending decision carries consequences. Without alternative data, lenders may approve applicants whose repayment behavior suggests elevated risk but isn't reflected in a traditional credit file. Without cash flow insights, they may decline consumers who appear thin file on bureau data despite demonstrating strong income and responsible financial management. The result is a two-sided cost: avoidable bad debt on one side and missed growth opportunities on the other. But ROI extends beyond approvals alone. It also appears through stronger marketing strategies, improved conversion, reduced friction and more precise risk segmentation throughout the lending lifecycle. "ROI can mean many things ... marketing to the right people, achieving better approval rates, reducing risk, getting less friction and overall profitability."Julius Heim, Vice President of Analytics Product Build, Innovation and Scores Where alternative data creates ROI Improve approval strategies Use additional consumer signals to recover creditworthy applicants while avoiding unnecessary declines. Reduce portfolio risk Identify elevated repayment risk earlier through enhanced visibility beyond traditional bureau data. Improve portfolio performance Increase conversion, reduce friction and strengthen profitability across the credit lifecycle. Different data. Different jobs. Not all alternative data solves the same problem. Clarity Services can help lenders strengthen decisions early in the customer journey. It provides additional visibility during prospecting and acquisition, helping identify potential risk before an application moves through the underwriting process. Cash flow insights can provide value in a different way. When traditional credit information offers part of the picture, consumer-permissioned cash flow data can provide greater insight into income, spending patterns and financial capacity. That makes it especially valuable as a second look during underwriting. Together, these complementary data assets help lenders improve decisioning throughout the credit lifecycle. They can support acquisition, underwriting, account management and collections while building on the trusted foundation of traditional bureau data. Research also continues to demonstrate measurable lift when cash flow insights are combined with traditional credit information. "I recently did a study with a client where we actually saw a 20% lift in KS [Kolmogorov-Smirnov] above and beyond credit bureau data. Again, the bureau data itself was very predictive. But even from the cash flow data, we still got a 20% lift, which is an amazing stat." Julius Heim, Vice President of Analytics Product Build, Innovation and Scores The greatest value comes from using these data sources together for a more holistic consumer view. Start with proof, then build Adopting alternative data doesn't have to begin with a large transformation. A practical first step is a data study. By comparing current decision strategies with enhanced data, lenders can identify where additional visibility creates measurable lift within their own portfolios. This approach allows institutions to validate results before making broader operational changes. Every lender has different workflows, technology environments and business priorities. A flexible implementation strategy helps organizations incorporate new data in ways that support existing processes rather than disrupting them. Three ways to get started Run a data study Benchmark current decision strategies and quantify potential lift. Start simple Begin with targeted data attributes or proven scores before expanding to more advanced use cases. Build with confidence Scale implementation based on measured business outcomes and organizational priorities. This approach allows lenders to validate results, build confidence and expand their strategy over time. Explore alternative data with a trusted partner Every lending decision benefits from better consumer insight. Experian helps lenders combine trusted credit data with alternative data, cash flow insights and advanced analytics to strengthen decisioning, improve portfolio performance and uncover new opportunities for growth. Whether you're evaluating alternative data for the first time or expanding an existing strategy, Experian can help you identify where additional consumer insight can create measurable business value. Learn more Contact us About our experts Julius Heim Vice President of Analytics Product Build, Innovation and Scores, Experian Julius Heim works at the intersection of financial services, analytics and innovation. He focuses on leveraging data to drive smarter decision-making and support more inclusive financial ecosystems. Julius brings a practical perspective on how organizations can translate insights into real-world impact, with particular interest in emerging trends across fintech, credit, and the use of alternative data, such as cash-flow data, across the credit lifecycle. Previously, he served as Head of Analytics on the lender side and held roles in insurance analytics earlier in his career. Natasha Madan Senior Director, Analytics Consulting, Experian Natasha Madan partners with lenders to drive smarter, data-driven credit and risk decisions. She specializes in leveraging alternative data and advanced analytics to help organizations improve portfolio performance, optimize customer acquisition, and expand responsible access to credit. During her 15 years at Experian, Natasha has held leadership roles spanning data analytics, product analytics and consulting, giving her a broad perspective of how data can be leverage to solve complex business challenges. She has worked with a diverse range of lenders – including banks, credit unions, fintechs and specialty finance companies to develop analytics strategies that optimize customer acquisition, underwriting and portfolio management. Natasha is passionate about helping organizations unlock the full potential of data to improve both business outcomes and consumer financial inclusion.

July 24, 2026 by Julie Lee

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe