Lifecycle of a Ransomware Attack – Learnings from NetDiligence Cyber Risk Summit

by Michael Bruemmer 5 min read July 28, 2021

Ransomware needs to be on your radar. Here’s why.

Ransomware review

Ransomware is a cyberattack where cybercriminals take over an organization’s computer network with malware. Once they assume control, the criminals demand a ransom to restore the victim’s encrypted data access. With an estimated generation of $412 million in 2020 alone1, the frequency of these attacks is growing.

At Experian, we handle many data breach cases and know that7 of 10 breaches involve ransomware. This summer, NetDiligence dedicated a panel at its Cyber Risk Summit on the Lifecycle of a Ransomware Event and invited us to talk about our solutions to help business leaders prepare to minimize interruptions spurred by ransomware.

The lifecycle of a ransomware attack includes five stages:

Ransomware Attack

1. Attack

Bad actors attack to discover assets, take data, extort it for direct payment, or profit from reselling data on the dark web. They can also launch a‘double-take’ attack: first collecting ransom to access data and demanding secondary payment to keep it off the dark web. Hackers prey on company networks, searching for vulnerabilities and accessing encrypted files through phishing or planting malicious links to infect the network with malware. More than double the global rate of 14%2, U.S ransomware attacks have become more aggressive, accounting for 30% of all cyberattacks in 20202. At Experian, we’ve seen an even higher occurrence, with 59% of the events serviced 2021 to date involving ransomware.

2. Discovery

Once attackers infiltrate a system, they demand a ransom for the decryption key to unlock the encrypted files. Companies usually discover the attack through a ransom note emailed to an executive, a file left on a server, or even a flashing warning on all connected computers. If they leave a message including their contact information, ransom sum, payment delivery time, and consequences for unmet conditions, such as tipping off the media, releasing stolen data, or selling it on the dark web.

Next, companies will contact their cyber insurance carrier to log stolen information, get systems back online, navigate legal issues, and facilitate hacker negotiations. Since only about one-third of companies have cyber insurance, most will rush to hire cybersecurity counsel post-attack3, amounting to more stress and delays since it can take months for large companies or those without backups to determine the extent of the damage.

At Experian, almost allevents involving ransomware take about 20% more time to begin breach notification. Whether there is an incident plan in place or not, companies experience immense panic.

3. Negotiation

Typically, a company will hire a professional, either directly or through their cyber insurance, to negotiate with hackers. While hackers expect price haggling, the ransom price could still be hefty. According to the cybersecurity firm, Coveware, the average ransom was $154,000 in Q4 2020, down from $230,000 the year before4. But hackers can drive up the price. Prime example: JBS, the world’s largest meat processor, paid an $11 million ransom in June 2021 to prevent customer data from being compromised.

In a perfect world, the ransomware negotiation process goes this way:

  • Establish communication with the attackers
  • Obtain proof of decryption
  • Obtain data exfiltration proof
  • Negotiate a (huge) discount
  • Celebrate

Unfortunately, negotiations can be tricky, and the process rarely goes this way. Sometimes attackers go “dark” or request additional payments. Additionally, decryption tools may have bugs that skip mapped network drives or skip folders with long paths and unusual characters.

An investigation is key to determine how hackers got in, what was exposed, and if they still have access—knowing exactly how and what was compromised will help in the negotiation.

4. Settlement

After the ransom negotiations are over, companies must carefully consider the strategy behind the decision to pay or not to pay the ransom. The FBI generally discourages ransom payments because they may entice other criminals to engage in ransomware and paying does not guarantee data recovery. Additionally, the Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) has payment bans and restrictions that support national security that must be upheld or face fines. At this stage, companies need to ensure that the ransom settlement does not violate constantly evolving regulations.

If companies settle, the payment will typically be delivered via cryptocurrency like Bitcoin since it is harder to detect the payees. The hackers will mix the bitcoin for others diluting the currency flow and making it difficult to trace.

5. Post-Event

For many companies, the settlement is just the beginning of ransomware attack costs. Companies will also have to pay to restore back-ups, rebuild systems and implement stronger cybersecurity controls to avoid future attacks. As discussed at the Cyber Risk Summit, here are five recommendations for companies to enforce tighter cyber control:

  1. Advanced Endpoint Monitoring System
  2. Restrict Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP)
  3. Regularly Update Software and Operating Systems
  4. Implement Password Management Policies
  5. Establish and Update Incident Response Plan and Ransomware Playbook

Ransomware is just getting started. To minimize the impact of an attack, companies create a proactive preparedness plan. Determining to protect and scan for threats, establish negotiation and payment rules, and external breach communications, is critical.

Breaches are our business at Experian. We know ransomware breaches have more complex FAQs, letter versions, and increased call center escalations.

To learn howExperian’s Reserved Responsesolution can prepare your business for a data breach,click here.

Sources:

1Washington Post, “How Ransomware Attacks Work”, July 2021

2Verizon 2021 Data Breach Investigations Report

3Washington Post, “Ransomware Axa Insurance Attacks”, June 2021

4Covewave, “Ransomware Marketplace Report”, Q4 2020

Related Posts

Used EV Growth Signals a New Phase of Consumer Purchasing Behavior

The electric vehicle (EV) revolution isn’t slowing down, it’s changing lanes. While recent conversations have seemingly focused on softening demand for new EVs, the used segment has been gaining momentum. According to Experian Automotive’s 2025 EV Year in Review Report, new retail individual EV registrations fell 35.9% year-over-year. Meanwhile, the used retail individual EV registrations grew 25.4% from a year ago. As affordability and growing model availability reshapes consumer behavior, buyers are increasingly turning to pre-owned EVs, which has shown an interesting market divergence that is redefining how consumers are adopting this segment and what it can mean for automakers, dealers, and the overall industry. Key players behind rising used EV demand Notably, Tesla accounted for over half (60.5%) of used retail individual EV registrations in 2025, followed by Chevrolet at 6.4% and Nissan (5.5%). Diving a bit deeper, Tesla made up the top three models of the used individual registrations last year, with the Model 3 coming in at 27.2%, Model Y at 21.7%, and Model S (6.6%). The Chevrolet Bolt EV followed at 4.8% and the Nissan Leaf was at 4%. Tesla’s position as the leading make in the used EV market is a natural extension of its long-standing dominance in new EV sales. The brand’s leadership over the years created a large fleet of vehicles that are now entering the pre-owned market. What the used EV boom means for automotive professionals The growing demand for used EVs can present more opportunities for automotive professionals. Dealers that provide a healthy supply of pre-owned EVs can increase accessibility and play a role in adoption for consumers who are actively looking to purchase, while marketers can emphasize value and ownership benefits. As the market continues to evolve, automotive professionals who understand and respond to these changing dynamics will be best positioned to capitalize on the expanding pool of used EV shoppers. To learn more about EV insights, visit Experian Automotive’s EV Resource Center.

Published: June 30, 2026 by Kirsten Von Busch
How Terrace Finance Uses NeuroID to Respond to Fraud Faster and Smarter

Learn how Terrace Finance used NeuroID behavioral analytics to detect fraud faster, respond to attacks, and strengthen risk management.

Published: June 29, 2026 by Scarlet.Nickel@experian.com
Ask the Expert: A Closer Look at Modern Lending with Jeff Hops and Erin Haselkorn

In this first episode of Ask the Expert, Experian's Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product, and Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director of Analyst Relations, explore how broader data and new signals can help lenders better understand today’s consumers, while maintaining responsible decisioning. Lending is changing  Interest rates, regulation, embedded finance and AI are reshaping the lending landscape. Consumer behavior is evolving just as quickly. But the core job hasn’t changed. Lenders are still making decisions about people they don’t fully know, and that makes data more important than ever. "There are periods where nothing changes, and periods where it seems like everything changes. We’re in the latter … but the core premise hasn’t changed. You’re still trying to lend to somebody you don’t know."Jeff Hops, Senior Director of Data Platform and Product To make those decisions with confidence, lenders need a strong foundation of identity, history and reliable signals. In a period of rapid change, the quality and completeness of that data become even more critical. A more complex view of today’s consumer What has changed is the consumer. Traditional credit data is foundational but can be further enhanced with visibility on how people earn, manage and move money. Income may come from multiple sources, and financial activity often spans bank accounts, applications (apps) and digital channels. Cash flow data, for example, can provide a clearer view of what’s actually coming into a consumer’s account, beyond what traditional records may show.These additional signals can help lenders better understand: Income variability across multiple earning sources Current financial behavior through cash flow activity Digital and identity-linked activity across channels These signals don’t replace traditional data; they expand it. The result is a more complete and current view of the consumer. From exploration to real-world application The conversation around broader data signals has moved beyond theory. Lenders are no longer just asking whether these signals are useful. They’re asking where, how and under what governance they can be applied across the lending lifecycle. Lenders are actively researching, testing and implementing new data sources across the lending lifecycle. What was once experimental is now operational. Institutions are progressing through a clear path: Research Understanding available signals and use cases Testing Evaluating performance in controlled environments Implementation Applying insights in production Today, alternative data is being used in areas like analytics, channel scoring and decisioning, often within governed environments that allow for safe testing and validation. AI may accelerate this shift by helping institutions identify patterns at scale, but its value depends on the strength of the underlying data: quality, governance, context and clear business use cases. More signal, more responsibility As data availability expands, lenders have access to more granular insights than ever before. That creates opportunity, but also responsibility. The institutions that lead won’t be the ones that use the most data. They’ll be the ones that know which signals to use, how to validate them and how to apply them in ways that are fair, explainable and aligned to consumer outcomes. “Institutions can unlock more granular and powerful decisions, but they have to do it responsibly.”Erin Haselkorn, Senior Director, Analyst Relations The future of lending will be shaped not just by how much data is available, but by how thoughtfully it’s applied. Keeping the consumer at the center of decisioning is essential to building trust and long-term success. Explore alternative data with us A more complete understanding of today’s consumers starts with better data. We help lenders responsibly incorporate broader data signals and advanced analytics into decisioning strategies, enhancing visibility into today’s consumers while strengthening risk assessment and expanding access to credit. Let’s work together to build more confident, more responsible lending decisions. Learn more Contact us About our experts Jeff Hops Senior Director, Data Platform and Product, Experian Jeff Hops is a Senior Director in Experian’s Financial Services and Data business with over eight years of experience driving innovation in credit and data solutions. He has led product development for Experian’s Credit Report and played a key role in launching Ascend Identity Platform™, a leading identity resolution platform. Erin Haselkorn Senior Director, Analyst Relations, Experian Erin Haselkorn is responsible for analyst relations for Experian. She has developed an understanding of key marketing trends across a broad range of verticals. Her market research around data strategy, AI, fraud, identity and data management, paired with her broad Experian product knowledge, gives her a unique understanding of business automation and data trends. Erin is a frequent spokesperson and guest blogger.

Published: June 22, 2026 by Julie.JLee@experian.com