Freddie Mac Loan-Level Directed Collateral (LLDC) and Experian MLP: Refining Loan-Level Analytics for the MBS Market

by Perry DeFelice, Angad Paintal, Michael Pyatski 6 min read January 12, 2026

By: Perry DeFelice & Angad Paintal, Experian, and Michael Pyatski, IVolatility

Freddie Mac’s November 2025 launch of Loan-Level Directed Collateral (LLDC) capabilities (details here) marks a significant advancement in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) capital markets. Historically, investors have been constrained by security-level pooling constructs that limit the expression of differentiated loan-level analytics. By allowing loan-level customization of Freddie pools & REMIC classes, LLDC empowers institutional investors to construct pools which reflect differentiated analytics—creating a competitive edge while simultaneously enhancing market-wide efficiency. 

A historical lens: Evolution of MBS disclosure 

The agency MBS market began its transformation in the 1980s with the release of pool-level data, enabling the rise of specified (“spec”) pools that traded on unique characteristics like origination loan size, credit score at origination, or geography.  Specifications made the MBS market incrementally more efficient by allowing finer gradation of pricing for prepayment and credit risk.   

The next leap came in 2013 with the public release of agency MBS loan-level data, which kicked off a new era of advanced analytics and precision modeling.  The introduction of loan-level data further improved pricing efficiency by allowing the evaluation of layered risk (ie, credit score + LTV) at the loan level. 

Unlike agency MBS markets, non-agency MBS disclosure remains fragmented. Hundreds of issuers lack a standardized data format. Third-party aggregators attempt to normalize disparate trustee and servicer data, but uniformity and quality still lags behind agency disclosures. The rise of 144a private placements over the past decade has reversed transparency progress—despite broader data availability and technological breakthroughs.  The opacity of the growing 144a MBS market is particularly concerning and carries public policy implications, since market discipline for performance degradation is most efficiently meted out with greater transparency. 

Despite AI-driven advances in data processing, disclosure remains stuck in an analog past. Borrower and property data remain static snapshots at origination, rarely updated. As a result, market participants operate with stale inputs, undermining the accuracy of risk assessments and pricing. 

 The Data Gap: What’s Missing in Current MBS Datasets 

Across the MBS landscape, investors lack visibility into: 

  • Borrowers’ current credit health (beyond loan pay status) 
  • Borrowers’ current income and DTI 
  • Updated property valuations and lien statuses 
  • Behavioral trends like refinance propensity, ie, how many mortgages has this borrower refinanced in the past? 

Even state-of-the-art prepayment and pricing models frequently diverge from empirical performance. As shown in the table below, models often misalign with actual data from agency pools and inverse IO CMOs (IIOs): 

 *Source:  IVolatility MBS Data-Driven portal, and a prevalent Agency MBS valuation model

A Data Renaissance: Experian’s Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset (MLP) 

To address these shortcomings, Experian created the Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset (MLP), a joined dataset capturing real-time borrower credit behavior, loan performance, and subject property data. MLP covers nearly 100% of U.S. mortgage loans dating back to 2005. 

MLP Highlights: 

  • Current Credit Profile: Updated credit scores, credit inquiry activity (ie, is borrower shopping for a new mortgage?), non-mortgage debt balances and pay performance (student loan, auto loan, credit card, etc.) 
  • Current modeled income and DTI 
  • Behavioral History: Number of past refinances, payment habits (does this borrower pay off credit card balance in full each month?), utilization patterns 
  • Property Insights: Current AVM, current junior liens (including those opened after the loan was securitized), total CLTV 

With this richer dataset, investors can: 

  • Improve credit and prepayment modeling accuracy 
  • Create new spec pool stories (e.g., serial refinancer, credit revolver utilization, current CLTV inclusive of subsequent second liens, credit inquiry activity) 
  • Overlay cohort-level data to bid more confidently on highly customized pools and REMICs structured under LLDC 

Market Impacts: Efficiency and Equity 

LLDC’s value lies in enabling more refined segmentation—particularly when enhanced with datasets like MLP. This facilitates better execution for originators and more precise pricing for investors. In turn, borrowers benefit from lower mortgage rates. 

Importantly, MLP-driven segmentation could especially aid lower-income or weaker-credit borrowers. Currently, the less negatively-convex loans of these borrowers subsidize (from a pricing and rate perspective) the more negatively-convex loans of stronger credit, higher-income borrowers due to the averaging effect within generic pools. By identifying loans with better convexity (lower prepay likelihood), investors can price them more favorably, improving affordability in the form of lower mortgage rates for lower-income, weaker-credit borrowers. 

Case Study: Predicting Prepayment with Credit Inquiry Data 

In the coming weeks, we’ll provide illustrative analyses that highlight new fields and scores available in the MLP dataset.  To start, we’ll focus on perhaps the most intuitive datapoint for prepayment prediction:  mortgage credit inquiry activity by the borrower.  Specifically, credit inquiry activity is captured in a newly introduced field: Days Since Latest Mortgage Credit Inquiry. 

Why It Matters: 

  • Traditional prepayment models rely on widely available market-level data (e.g., PMMS, HPI, MBA Index) and loan characteristics (loan size, fixed vs. ARM, margin, etc.) 
  • MLP offers new and scarce loan and borrower-level inputs, which provide additional forecasting power 

Key Insight: 

Borrowers with low current DTI (≤36%) are significantly more likely to refinance compared to those with high current DTI (>36%), and to do it faster after mortgage credit inquiry activity.  Note that the current DTI is available in MLP, but not in most MBS disclosures. 

*Source: Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset, hosted on the IVolatility MBS Data-Driven Portal

This field is especially useful and practical for traders targeting specific mortgage cohorts (coupons, loan sizes, credit score range) for TBA roll trades, as an example. 

Looking Ahead: A Richer Lens for MBS Analysis 

This article is the first in a series exploring new data fields in the MLP dataset. Future installments will examine: 

  • Prior refinance behavior  
  • Total number of owned properties, credit card utilization, and payment behavior  

Want to explore how MLP insights could improve your portfolio strategy? 

Contact Experian to access the full MLP dataset and see your lift potential. 

_____________________________________________________

Michael Pyatski advises MBS traders, portfolio managers, quants, risk managers, loan originators, and technology professionals on making informed, data-driven business decisions that drive revenue growth, enhance risk management, and reduce trading costs.

With more than 15 years of experience as an Agency RMBS trader—including serving as Head of the Proprietary Trading Desk at BNP Paribas—Michael developed and successfully implemented relative-value, data-driven profitable trading strategies to capture market opportunities embedded in data but not fully priced by the market. His trading experience, combined with a Ph.D. in econometrics, led him to found the Data-Driven Portal (https://datadrivenportal.com/), a platform that provides advanced technology for MBS trading and risk management.

The platform’s No-Model Data-Driven technology leverages big data, econometric analysis, and AI to help traders identify relative-value opportunities in RMBS markets and generate above-market, risk-adjusted returns.

_____________________________________________________

Related Posts

Who’s Driving What? How Fuel Loyalty and Generational Preferences are Shaping the Vehicle Market

Take a look around at any road, parking lot, or highway, and you’ll see just how diverse today’s vehicle landscape has become. Within that evolving mix, electric vehicles (EVs) have seen years of rapid growth, and while the market is seemingly entering a new phase, interest remains. So, with several vehicles and fuel types to choose from, what keeps drivers coming back to electrified vehicles? Experian Automotive’s Automotive Market Trends Report: Q2 2026 found that among EV owners who returned to the market in the last 12 months, majority (72.2%) replaced their EV with another EV, while 18.5% switched to a gasoline vehicle. Hybrid buyers also showed considerable loyalty to electrification, with 55.7% of gas-hybrid owners staying with the same fuel type when replacing their vehicle, and 32.7% swapping for a gasoline vehicle. Consumers are seemingly remaining loyal to EVs and hybrids because they are attracted to the benefits that fit their everyday lifestyle, such as lower fuel or charging costs amid the elevated gas prices. For some, it could also be tied to convenience, as drivers who have found a reliable charging routine or appreciate the efficiency of a hybrid may have little reason to switch back to a traditional gasoline vehicle. Generations are taking different paths to electrification Generational differences also influence hybrid and EV loyalty, with younger consumers generally showing greater openness to alternative fuel types. While older generations tend to have greater familiarity with traditional gasoline vehicles, hybrid and EV adoption is increasing across all age groups as these options become more accessible and mainstream. Millennials, in particular, showed the strongest inclination toward electrified vehicles. Through Q2 2026, they accounted for the highest EV share at 8.2%, compared with Gen X at 5.5%, Gen Z (4.7%), and Baby Boomers (4.7%). The difference becomes even more pronounced when hybrids are in the mix, as 23.1% of Millennial registrations were gas-electric hybrids or plug-in hybrids, versus 16.7% for Gen X, 16.8% for Gen Z, and 18.0% for Baby Boomers. For automotive professionals, these differences make understanding who is driving what, and what they may choose next, increasingly important. The future of the automotive market may be less about consumers choosing one vehicle type over the other and more about understanding the distinct patterns and preferences of each generation. As the market continues to evolve, those insights can help automotive professionals better meet consumers where they are. To learn more about vehicle market trends, view the full Automotive Market Trends Report: Q2 2026 presentation on demand.

September 24, 2026 by John Howard
New Data Available for MBS Investors: Current Credit Score 

In a previous post, we described how every mortgage borrower’s financial situation and credit profile evolve over time.  After a borrower opens a loan, their financial status evolves—jobs are gained and lost; incomes can rise or fall, and financially stressful situations or windfalls can occur. These effects are often reflected in the consumer’s evolving credit score, which changes with the consumer’s payment behavior on open loans, credit inquiry activity, credit card utilization, and other revolving lines, among other things.    Even though MBS, whole loan, and MSR investors ultimately bear borrower credit risk, they may have access to less current borrower credit information than other participants in the mortgage ecosystem.   In securitized markets (both agency MBS and private-label MBS), updated scores are not provided in disclosure to bondholders, even as loans age year over year.  In whole loan and MSR markets, a single origination credit score is often provided at the time of bid, and after a successful bid, the investor may have a permissible purpose to pull individual scores on an owned portfolio. But until recently, there was no single loan-level dataset that included continuously refreshed credit scores across the U.S. mortgage market—the type of foundational dataset needed to build and tune credit and prepayment models.  A monthly-refreshed Current Credit Score field meets our three-pronged materiality standard for new data delivery to MBS markets:  New: Provides information not available in existing datasets (i.e., orthogonal to currently available data). Neither private-label MBS nor agency MBS standard market data includes a monthly-refreshed borrower credit score.  Material: Impacts a sizeable portion of the MBS universe. For the vast majority of loans in MBS, borrowers credit scores are available.  Significant: Differentiates collateral performance by a large enough margin to influence trading and risk management decisions.  A current credit score wraps all of a borrower’s credit-related behaviors into a single numerical value and has historically been associated with a borrower’s likelihood of becoming 60+ days past due on any obligation within the subsequent 24 months.    In fact, a current credit score is among the most informative indicators of near-term mortgage default risk, as shown in the image below, which depicts 30+ DPD rates by current credit score bands for the entire U.S. mortgage market, controlling for origination score <=650.    Without access to current credit scores, investors are limited to the score at origination—causing the four distinct performance trends shown here to appear as a single averaged line. In reality, score migration since origination reveals significant divergence in credit risk, with the lowest current-score bucket exhibiting a nearly 10 times higher 30+ DPD rate than the highest-score bucket in the latest period shown.  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset hosted on IVolatility DataDriven Platform  In this article, we’ll take a quick look at how score migration acts as an early predictor of a performing loan’s first roll into 30-day delinquent status.    MBS Investors’ Current Credit Score Blindspot: Solved   An MBS investor relying on standard market data and securitization remittance reports sees no sign of borrower stress until the subject mortgage loan in the securitization misses a payment and is reported at 30 days delinquent. Of course, in the vast majority of cases, a borrower begins struggling financially well before missing a mortgage payment:  The borrower may miss payments on other types of loans (credit card, auto loan, personal unsecured, or payday loans) as they prioritize their home and mortgage.  Outstanding balances on credit cards may grow as the borrower begins to make only minimum payments on revolvers.  The borrower may apply for additional credit cards, personal or payday loans   The borrower may apply to increase limits on existing credit cards as outstanding balance nears spending limit  All these stress-indicative behaviors result in a decreasing credit score, many months before the borrower misses their first mortgage payment. An MBS investor with access to each borrower’s current credit score, refreshed each month, can predict increased likelihood of default many months before the first missed mortgage payment—and is therefore at a major information advantage relative to the market generally.  Experian’s Mortgage Loan Performance (MLP) dataset contains thousands of fields describing mortgage performance from each borrower, loan, and property perspective, all refreshed monthly (including, amongst other things, new credit scores and refinance inquiry activity, loan performance on all types of debt, filed junior liens, and AVM values).   MLP is much more comprehensive than loan-level data provided by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Ginnie Mae, and PLS data vendors in several ways:   Standard market datasets may not contain certain data elements that some market participants consider useful when evaluating mortgage prepayment or credit performance. Basic, critical fields such as the borrower’s current credit score and the current junior lien balance on the property are missing.    MLP contains borrower, loan, and property data fields spanning a broad portion of the mortgage universe, including Agency, Non-Agency, and Esoteric mortgage products (CES, HELOC, Reverse), including both securitized and non-securitized loans.   MLP enables full three-dimensional (borrower + loan + property) tracking with persistent keys for borrower (before and after refinancing), loan (in securities/deals even after exit due to payoffs or buyouts, including before and after MSR sales), and property.  This enables end-to-end analysis of each borrower’s (and property’s) mortgage experience throughout their credit lifecycle.  Is Downward-Trending Credit Score a Signal for Impending Delinquency?  MLP contains thousands of fields describing each loan, borrower, and property across all U.S. mortgages.  It allows for virtually unlimited segmentation and granular analysis.   For purposes of this illustrative article, we’ll take a high-level look at the entire U.S. mortgage market and perform a quick analysis to confirm intuition that a declining credit score provides a signal for higher likelihood of near-term mortgage delinquency.  Figure 1 illustrates the current pay status (as of 6/30) for the entire U.S. mortgage market, as contained in the MLP dataset, along with count, UPB and UPB-weighted Vantage 4.0 credit score for each bucket.  Figure 1  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance dataset  As illustrated in Figure 1, approximately 772,000 individual mortgage loans were reported to Experian as 30 days delinquent as of 6/30/2026.  Of the 772,000 30d delinquent loans in the June snapshot, approximately 426,000 were current in the prior (May) snapshot.  Some of these 426,000 loans were reperformers which had been bouncing from 30 DPD to current over the prior few snapshots. To remove reperformance score noise, we further parsed out the population which: 1) had rolled from current to 30 DPD from May to June; and 2) was consistently current for a full year prior to the 6/30 missed payment.  The population meeting both conditions totaled approximately 123,000 loans.  Figure 2 below shows, for this population of 123,000 “clean current” loans, the UPB-weighted average Vantage4 credit score for each of the 12 months leading up to the June missed payment, as well as the impact of the missed payment on the 6/30 score.  Figure 2  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset  Figure 2 reveals a rather slow and steady ~20-point deterioration of score in the 12 months prior to first missed payment – as well as the 80-point drop once the missed payment hits.  When we compare this cohort’s Vantage 4.0 score trend to the broader Current population across the entire dataset in Figure 3, we see a marked difference in both absolute value and trend:  Figure 3  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset  Not only is the cohort’s starting Vantage 4.0 score lower than the broader current population, but it also displays a dropping trend (with a notable 2 to 3x acceleration in monthly score drop the month before the first missed mortgage payment) while the broader Current population’s score (of which the isolated cohort is a subset) remains rock steady.  Lastly, we present Figure 4, a histogram comparing the distribution of at-origination and as-of 5/30 (i.e., the period just before the missed June mortgage payment) credit scores for the clean current population. The distribution appears to shift toward lower credit scores. To the extent credit scores are correlated with credit risk, this shift may indicate elevated credit risk relative to origination. Since this degradation occurs during a period of perfect mortgage pay performance, it is invisible to MBS investors who lack access to current borrower credit scores. Experian MLP provides monthly refreshed credit scores for mortgage borrowers contained within the MLP database.  Figure 4  Source:  Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset 

September 22, 2026 by Michael Pyatski, Perry DeFelice
Ask the Expert: The Future of Lending Starts With Identity With Shawn Rife and Brian Cardona

Identity intelligence and alternative data can help lenders validate consumers and support more informed decisions across the customer lifecycle.

September 16, 2026 by Julie Lee

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Don't miss out on the latest industry trends and insights!
Subscribe