Freddie Mac Loan-Level Directed Collateral (LLDC) and Experian MLP: Refining Loan-Level Analytics for the MBS Market

by Perry DeFelice, Angad Paintal, Michael Pyatski 6 min read January 12, 2026

By: Perry DeFelice & Angad Paintal, Experian, and Michael Pyatski, IVolatility

Freddie Mac’s November 2025 launch of Loan-Level Directed Collateral (LLDC) capabilities (details here) marks a significant advancement in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) capital markets. Historically, investors have been constrained by security-level pooling constructs that limit the expression of differentiated loan-level analytics. By allowing loan-level customization of Freddie pools & REMIC classes, LLDC empowers institutional investors to construct pools which reflect differentiated analytics—creating a competitive edge while simultaneously enhancing market-wide efficiency. 

A historical lens: Evolution of MBS disclosure 

The agency MBS market began its transformation in the 1980s with the release of pool-level data, enabling the rise of specified (“spec”) pools that traded on unique characteristics like origination loan size, credit score at origination, or geography.  Specifications made the MBS market incrementally more efficient by allowing finer gradation of pricing for prepayment and credit risk.   

The next leap came in 2013 with the public release of agency MBS loan-level data, which kicked off a new era of advanced analytics and precision modeling.  The introduction of loan-level data further improved pricing efficiency by allowing the evaluation of layered risk (ie, credit score + LTV) at the loan level. 

Unlike agency MBS markets, non-agency MBS disclosure remains fragmented. Hundreds of issuers lack a standardized data format. Third-party aggregators attempt to normalize disparate trustee and servicer data, but uniformity and quality still lags behind agency disclosures. The rise of 144a private placements over the past decade has reversed transparency progress—despite broader data availability and technological breakthroughs.  The opacity of the growing 144a MBS market is particularly concerning and carries public policy implications, since market discipline for performance degradation is most efficiently meted out with greater transparency. 

Despite AI-driven advances in data processing, disclosure remains stuck in an analog past. Borrower and property data remain static snapshots at origination, rarely updated. As a result, market participants operate with stale inputs, undermining the accuracy of risk assessments and pricing. 

 The Data Gap: What’s Missing in Current MBS Datasets 

Across the MBS landscape, investors lack visibility into: 

  • Borrowers’ current credit health (beyond loan pay status) 
  • Borrowers’ current income and DTI 
  • Updated property valuations and lien statuses 
  • Behavioral trends like refinance propensity, ie, how many mortgages has this borrower refinanced in the past? 

Even state-of-the-art prepayment and pricing models frequently diverge from empirical performance. As shown in the table below, models often misalign with actual data from agency pools and inverse IO CMOs (IIOs): 

 *Source:  IVolatility MBS Data-Driven portal, and a prevalent Agency MBS valuation model

A Data Renaissance: Experian’s Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset (MLP) 

To address these shortcomings, Experian created the Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset (MLP), a joined dataset capturing real-time borrower credit behavior, loan performance, and subject property data. MLP covers nearly 100% of U.S. mortgage loans dating back to 2005. 

MLP Highlights: 

  • Current Credit Profile: Updated credit scores, credit inquiry activity (ie, is borrower shopping for a new mortgage?), non-mortgage debt balances and pay performance (student loan, auto loan, credit card, etc.) 
  • Current modeled income and DTI 
  • Behavioral History: Number of past refinances, payment habits (does this borrower pay off credit card balance in full each month?), utilization patterns 
  • Property Insights: Current AVM, current junior liens (including those opened after the loan was securitized), total CLTV 

With this richer dataset, investors can: 

  • Improve credit and prepayment modeling accuracy 
  • Create new spec pool stories (e.g., serial refinancer, credit revolver utilization, current CLTV inclusive of subsequent second liens, credit inquiry activity) 
  • Overlay cohort-level data to bid more confidently on highly customized pools and REMICs structured under LLDC 

Market Impacts: Efficiency and Equity 

LLDC’s value lies in enabling more refined segmentation—particularly when enhanced with datasets like MLP. This facilitates better execution for originators and more precise pricing for investors. In turn, borrowers benefit from lower mortgage rates. 

Importantly, MLP-driven segmentation could especially aid lower-income or weaker-credit borrowers. Currently, the less negatively-convex loans of these borrowers subsidize (from a pricing and rate perspective) the more negatively-convex loans of stronger credit, higher-income borrowers due to the averaging effect within generic pools. By identifying loans with better convexity (lower prepay likelihood), investors can price them more favorably, improving affordability in the form of lower mortgage rates for lower-income, weaker-credit borrowers. 

Case Study: Predicting Prepayment with Credit Inquiry Data 

In the coming weeks, we’ll provide illustrative analyses that highlight new fields and scores available in the MLP dataset.  To start, we’ll focus on perhaps the most intuitive datapoint for prepayment prediction:  mortgage credit inquiry activity by the borrower.  Specifically, credit inquiry activity is captured in a newly introduced field: Days Since Latest Mortgage Credit Inquiry. 

Why It Matters: 

  • Traditional prepayment models rely on widely available market-level data (e.g., PMMS, HPI, MBA Index) and loan characteristics (loan size, fixed vs. ARM, margin, etc.) 
  • MLP offers new and scarce loan and borrower-level inputs, which provide additional forecasting power 

Key Insight: 

Borrowers with low current DTI (≤36%) are significantly more likely to refinance compared to those with high current DTI (>36%), and to do it faster after mortgage credit inquiry activity.  Note that the current DTI is available in MLP, but not in most MBS disclosures. 

*Source: Experian Mortgage Loan Performance Dataset, hosted on the IVolatility MBS Data-Driven Portal

This field is especially useful and practical for traders targeting specific mortgage cohorts (coupons, loan sizes, credit score range) for TBA roll trades, as an example. 

Looking Ahead: A Richer Lens for MBS Analysis 

This article is the first in a series exploring new data fields in the MLP dataset. Future installments will examine: 

  • Prior refinance behavior  
  • Total number of owned properties, credit card utilization, and payment behavior  

Want to explore how MLP insights could improve your portfolio strategy? 

Contact Experian to access the full MLP dataset and see your lift potential. 

_____________________________________________________

Michael Pyatski advises MBS traders, portfolio managers, quants, risk managers, loan originators, and technology professionals on making informed, data-driven business decisions that drive revenue growth, enhance risk management, and reduce trading costs.

With more than 15 years of experience as an Agency RMBS trader—including serving as Head of the Proprietary Trading Desk at BNP Paribas—Michael developed and successfully implemented relative-value, data-driven profitable trading strategies to capture market opportunities embedded in data but not fully priced by the market. His trading experience, combined with a Ph.D. in econometrics, led him to found the Data-Driven Portal (https://datadrivenportal.com/), a platform that provides advanced technology for MBS trading and risk management.

The platform’s No-Model Data-Driven technology leverages big data, econometric analysis, and AI to help traders identify relative-value opportunities in RMBS markets and generate above-market, risk-adjusted returns.

_____________________________________________________

Related Posts

Rewriting the Road Ahead with Longer Loan Terms and Increased Refinancing Options

The automotive market is entering a new phase defined not just by what consumers are buying, but by how they’re choosing to finance it. According to Experian Automotive’s State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026, nearly one-third (35.55%) of all new vehicle loans now stretch more than six years, up from 30.83% in Q1 2025. Similarly on the used side, 31.54% of loans extended more than six years, an increase from 28.60% last year. The shift highlights why affordability is reshaping how consumers are financing their vehicles, particularly in larger and higher-priced vehicles. Refinancing gains traction as interest rates stabilize In addition to longer-term loans, consumers are becoming increasingly deliberate with their financing decisions and managing monthly payments as refinancing activity has gained momentum. For instance, consumers who refinanced this quarter lowered their interest rate by 2.2% and saved an average of $81 on their monthly payment. Credit unions, in particular, continued to play a major role in helping consumers secure more affordable payment options. In Q1 2025, credit unions accounted for the lion’s share of automotive refinancing at 63.43%, from 62.31% a year ago. By comparison, banks went from 23.51% to 22.59% year-over-year. Furthermore, those who refinanced with a credit union saved an average of $101 this quarter, whereas those who refinanced with banks saved $60. Expanding credit access through flexible financing Another notable trend this quarter was the incessant growth in subprime financing as credit accessibility across the market continues to increase. In the first quarter of this year, subprime borrowers made up 15.75% of total vehicle financing, from 14.40% last year. For new vehicles in particular, the subprime market went from 5.61% to 6.88% year-over-year, while subprime in used vehicle financing grew to 20.60% this quarter, from 19.36% a year ago. Increased activity in the subprime segment highlights continued confidence in the automotive market and underscores the importance of expanded financing options. As consumers seek greater flexibility with financing decisions that fit their lifestyle, lenders and dealers have the opportunity to approach them with more personalized solutions. These trends are helping keep both new and used vehicle markets moving forward, while creating new opportunities for consumers to manage payments and purchase confidently. To learn more about automotive finance trends, view the full State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026 presentation on demand.

Published: June 2, 2026 by Melinda Zabritski
Staying Competitive After Trigger Leads Evolve: A Roadmap For Lenders

Trigger leads have long been the preferred solution for identifying high-intent mortgage borrowers. But with the implementation of the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (HPPA), which introduces new limitations and consumer protections around trigger leads, that playbook will need to shift. Now, lenders are quickly facing a pivotal shift in how they discover, engage, and convert prospective borrowers into customers. The industry now stands at a crossroads. Lenders who adapt early—leaning into predictive tools, consent-based engagement, and smarter prescreening—will redefine borrower acquisition in a more privacy-centric era.  HPPA: A structural change to mortgage marketing  The HPPA amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act by significantly restricting the use of mortgage inquiries for prescreen purposes. As of March 5, 2026, credit bureaus may only provide or utilize mortgage inquiries to:  End users with explicit borrower consent  The originator of the consumer’s current mortgage  The servicer of the consumer’s current mortgage  An insured depository institution or credit union where the consumer has an existing account  While these exemptions may provide continuity for banks and credit unions, many mortgage brokers and nonbank lenders will need to overhaul their prescreen practices—or risk being cut off entirely from a previously high-performing acquisition channel.  Why this isn’t just a compliance shift—It’s a strategic recalibration  Mortgage triggers in prescreen allow lenders to react instantly to consumer intent. Lenders rely on a prompt and convincing narrative to entice applicants to switch lenders. Mortgage inquiry triggers are effective and were, therefore, a prospecting strategy for many lenders. Recent legislative changes significantly restrict the availability of these inquiry triggers, and impacted lenders are focusing on a more intentional prospecting strategy to compete.   Without these mortgage triggers in prescreen, lenders need to ask:  Who are we trying to reach?  What early signals can we act on?  How do we earn permission and attention before a mortgage inquiry ever happens?  Transforming the funnel: From reaction to anticipation  The shift in mortgage inquiry-based prescreen isn’t the end of high-intent lead targeting. It’s the beginning of a more strategic and intentional approach—one that leverages earlier indicators of mortgage readiness and focuses on building relationships, not just closing transactions.  Here’s where the momentum is evolving, creating a new and smarter funnel:  Prescreen marketing: Using credit and behavioral attributes to help identify consumers who meet specific lending criteria before they signal active intent.  Predictive modeling: Leveraging propensity scores or custom models to prioritize outreach based on conversion likelihood.  Consent-based engagement: Implementing compliant mechanisms to capture and manage borrower opt-ins at scale.  The power of predictive modeling  According to recent industry interviews, propensity modeling is emerging as one of the most effective replacements for trigger-based prescreen. These models analyze hundreds of credit attributes—such as utilization, account mix, account age, and depth—to help identify consumers statistically more likely to seek a mortgage.  For lenders just beginning to use predictive modeling, off-the-shelf models can be a quick way to identify potential borrowers. For example, when layering propensity scores on top of credit eligibility, which can improve borrower targeting, many lenders see an increase in open mortgage loan rates.  Meanwhile, custom-built models, which analyze a lender’s own campaign performance over time, offer the highest level of precise targeting. These models isolate the attributes most predictive of conversions within a specific product mix—optimizing not just volume, but fit.  Speed without traditional triggers? It’s possible  One of the biggest concerns among lenders is maintaining the speed historically enabled by trigger leads. But that concern may be overblown.  Self-service prescreen platforms now allow marketers to generate qualified lead lists in as little as 24 hours, enabling rapid response during rate drops, competitive shifts, or seasonal demand spikes.   For those new to prescreening, batch campaigns still offer value, especially with analyst support.   Don’t overlook retention  In an era of intense acquisition competition, retention becomes a key differentiator.  Lenders who monitor property status, cash flow, and consumer credit behavior can proactively identify when an existing borrower is likely to list, refinance, or exit. Armed with that intelligence, lenders can re-engage with the borrower at the right moment—sometimes before a competitor is considered or contacted.  This level of behavioral intelligence may soon separate proactive lenders from reactive ones.  Actions instead of reactions  The evolution of trigger-based prescreen doesn’t just require new tools; it demands new thinking. Lenders should begin by auditing their current pipelines and determining:  What percentage of our acquisition is dependent on triggers?  What share of our book falls under the HPPA exemptions?  How will we scale compliant opt-in collection?  Are our current prescreen or modeling capabilities future-ready?  Those who answer these questions today—and act on them—won’t just be in compliance with the new laws, they’ll lead in a transformed market. Lenders should also be asking:   Do we have the infrastructure to collect and act on borrower consent?  Are our acquisition teams equipped to run prescreen campaigns — both batch and self-service?  What predictive models are we using (or could we use) to prioritize leads?  Are we proactively monitoring our portfolio to catch retention risks early?  How are we preparing our sales teams for longer, more consultative buying journeys?  Conclusion  The HPPA signals a shift away from relying on passive, inquiry-based prescreen acquisition and the beginning of smarter, more strategic engagement with potential borrowers. Lenders who embrace this transition early will find themselves not just compliant, but competitive—with deeper borrower insights, better conversion rates, and stronger long-term customer relationships.  The market is moving. The only question is: will you lead the change or chase it?  Citation  Experian. (2025, November). Interview: How the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act is reshaping mortgage marketing—and what lenders should do now [transcript]. Experian Mortgage Insights. Insights based on lender feedback, campaign performance data, and analysis of prescreen marketing strategies and predictive modeling outcomes were gathered from Experian client engagements and internal mortgage analytics between May and October 2025. Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act timeline and legal context referenced from legislation signed September 5, 2025, with implementation beginning March 5, 2026.   

Published: April 22, 2026 by Ivan Ahmed

Request More Information

Subscribe to our Housing Blog

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to the Housing Blog

Receive updates from Experian Housing
Subscribe