7 Key Lessons From Companies That Prevented Data Breaches in 2018

by Michael Bruemmer 4 min read March 12, 2019

Any responsible business manager knows that protection business and client data is a vital part of running a success organization. Now a new report identifies key factors that can improve a company’s ability to avoid hacks and prevent data breaches.

And here’s the good news: These tactics really work.

During 2018, the number of personal records exposed in data breaches soared — a total of 446.5 million pieces of data – an increase that was more than double the number of records breached during 2017, according to the Identity Theft Resource Center. The business, healthcare and financial sectors were the top three sectors hit, with hacking being the most common form of attack.

But among the companies surveyed in the latestannual study sponsored by Experian Data Breach Resolution, there are important signs of hope. Despite the startling increase in the number of records stolen by data thieves – a gain of 126 percent – the number of survey participants reporting a breach increased by just 5 percent.

This trend demonstrates that while hackers might be grabbing more data when they do manage to crack a database, the smaller increase in total breaches reported in the survey indicate that a growing number of institutions are improving their abilities to fend off cybercriminals.

What’s their secret? To encourage more effective strategies to handle and prevent breaches, “Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach?” uncovers several important lessons learned from companies that are successfully insulating themselves – and their customers – from data theft.

  1. Prevention is the best response: The overarching lesson that researches found is that an effective data breach response plan starts with preventing breaches in the first place, rather than reacting after customer and business data has been stolen. Of the 643 U.S. business people surveyed who work on privacy, compliance and IT security, 29 percent reported that their organizations had prevented any breach involving more than 1,000 records for the past two years.
  2. Rate your plan: The Ponemon researchers found that the percentage of companies that find their data breach response plans to be very effective increased from 42 percent in 2016 to 52 percent in 2018. Not surprisingly, more people at organizations that didn’t report a breach rated their response plans as effective – 62 percent – while 45 percent of those at companies that suffered data theft nonetheless felt their plans were effective.
  3. Money matters: Ponemon researchers found that more investment in cybersecurity technology seemed to pay off. One of the most common factors among companies that prevented breaches was increased spending on technology to detect and prevent attacks. Of companies that prevented breaches, 73 percent increased their tech spending, versus 61 percent of those companies that were breached.
  4. No train, no gain: An even bigger improvement came from training employees and making them aware of privacy and data protection issues and practices. The likelihood of a data breach was significantly reduced when awareness training specifically targeted employees and other stakeholders in business processes who work with or access sensitive or confidential personal data. At organizations that implemented training, 79 percent avoided a breach versus 69 percent of those that were hacked.
  5. Cybersafety starts at the top: Executive engagement also matters. Making data security a priority among C-suite executives and corporate board members translates into keeping records safer. The study found that 54 percent of executives and 39 percent of directors were knowledgeable and engaged in planning data breach responses. At companies that were breached, 49 percent of executives and 32 percent of board members were involved with cybersecurity response.
  6. Sharing is caring: Another key finding in preventing breaches is that organizations that sharing their insights and experiences in handling and preventing breaches improved their cybersafety. Operations that participated in learning about data protection and hacks from industry peers and government agencies were more likely to avoid a breach – 59 percent of those who joined sharing programs didn’t suffer an attack, while 46 percent of those participating experienced a breach.
  7. Cybersafety is a process: Finally, organizations that want to stay cyber-safe might want to adopt the Boy Scout motto, “Be Prepared.” Companies that successfully prevented a data breach took several preventive measures to guard against attacks. That includes conducting regular reviews of physical security and access to confidential information, instituting third-party cybersecurity assessments, making data breach response part of their business continuity plans and creating backup websites that can be activated to provide content and information should a breach occur.

For the study, Ponemon researchers surveyed 643 professionals working in information technology and security, compliance and privacy who deal with data breach response plans in their organizations. The entire comprehensive survey of cybersecurity practices – “Sixth Annual Study: Is Your Company Ready for a Big Data Breach?” – is available to download now.

The Ponemon Institute, headquartered in Traverse City, Michigan, conducts independent research on data protection and emerging information technologies. Experian Data Breach Resolution helps businesses of all sizes manage the risk of fines, customer loss, negative press and litigation due to a breach of data, and is a subsidiary of Experian, the global leader in consumer and business credit reporting and marketing service operating in 80 countries.

Related Posts

Rewriting the Road Ahead with Longer Loan Terms and Increased Refinancing Options

The automotive market is entering a new phase defined not just by what consumers are buying, but by how they’re choosing to finance it. According to Experian Automotive’s State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026, nearly one-third (35.55%) of all new vehicle loans now stretch more than six years, up from 30.83% in Q1 2025. Similarly on the used side, 31.54% of loans extended more than six years, an increase from 28.60% last year. The shift highlights why affordability is reshaping how consumers are financing their vehicles, particularly in larger and higher-priced vehicles. Refinancing gains traction as interest rates stabilize In addition to longer-term loans, consumers are becoming increasingly deliberate with their financing decisions and managing monthly payments as refinancing activity has gained momentum. For instance, consumers who refinanced this quarter lowered their interest rate by 2.2% and saved an average of $81 on their monthly payment. Credit unions, in particular, continued to play a major role in helping consumers secure more affordable payment options. In Q1 2025, credit unions accounted for the lion’s share of automotive refinancing at 63.43%, from 62.31% a year ago. By comparison, banks went from 23.51% to 22.59% year-over-year. Furthermore, those who refinanced with a credit union saved an average of $101 this quarter, whereas those who refinanced with banks saved $60. Expanding credit access through flexible financing Another notable trend this quarter was the incessant growth in subprime financing as credit accessibility across the market continues to increase. In the first quarter of this year, subprime borrowers made up 15.75% of total vehicle financing, from 14.40% last year. For new vehicles in particular, the subprime market went from 5.61% to 6.88% year-over-year, while subprime in used vehicle financing grew to 20.60% this quarter, from 19.36% a year ago. Increased activity in the subprime segment highlights continued confidence in the automotive market and underscores the importance of expanded financing options. As consumers seek greater flexibility with financing decisions that fit their lifestyle, lenders and dealers have the opportunity to approach them with more personalized solutions. These trends are helping keep both new and used vehicle markets moving forward, while creating new opportunities for consumers to manage payments and purchase confidently. To learn more about automotive finance trends, view the full State of the Automotive Finance Market Report: Q1 2026 presentation on demand.

Published: June 2, 2026 by Melinda Zabritski
Staying Competitive After Trigger Leads Evolve: A Roadmap For Lenders

Trigger leads have long been the preferred solution for identifying high-intent mortgage borrowers. But with the implementation of the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act (HPPA), which introduces new limitations and consumer protections around trigger leads, that playbook will need to shift. Now, lenders are quickly facing a pivotal shift in how they discover, engage, and convert prospective borrowers into customers. The industry now stands at a crossroads. Lenders who adapt early—leaning into predictive tools, consent-based engagement, and smarter prescreening—will redefine borrower acquisition in a more privacy-centric era.  HPPA: A structural change to mortgage marketing  The HPPA amends the Fair Credit Reporting Act by significantly restricting the use of mortgage inquiries for prescreen purposes. As of March 5, 2026, credit bureaus may only provide or utilize mortgage inquiries to:  End users with explicit borrower consent  The originator of the consumer’s current mortgage  The servicer of the consumer’s current mortgage  An insured depository institution or credit union where the consumer has an existing account  While these exemptions may provide continuity for banks and credit unions, many mortgage brokers and nonbank lenders will need to overhaul their prescreen practices—or risk being cut off entirely from a previously high-performing acquisition channel.  Why this isn’t just a compliance shift—It’s a strategic recalibration  Mortgage triggers in prescreen allow lenders to react instantly to consumer intent. Lenders rely on a prompt and convincing narrative to entice applicants to switch lenders. Mortgage inquiry triggers are effective and were, therefore, a prospecting strategy for many lenders. Recent legislative changes significantly restrict the availability of these inquiry triggers, and impacted lenders are focusing on a more intentional prospecting strategy to compete.   Without these mortgage triggers in prescreen, lenders need to ask:  Who are we trying to reach?  What early signals can we act on?  How do we earn permission and attention before a mortgage inquiry ever happens?  Transforming the funnel: From reaction to anticipation  The shift in mortgage inquiry-based prescreen isn’t the end of high-intent lead targeting. It’s the beginning of a more strategic and intentional approach—one that leverages earlier indicators of mortgage readiness and focuses on building relationships, not just closing transactions.  Here’s where the momentum is evolving, creating a new and smarter funnel:  Prescreen marketing: Using credit and behavioral attributes to help identify consumers who meet specific lending criteria before they signal active intent.  Predictive modeling: Leveraging propensity scores or custom models to prioritize outreach based on conversion likelihood.  Consent-based engagement: Implementing compliant mechanisms to capture and manage borrower opt-ins at scale.  The power of predictive modeling  According to recent industry interviews, propensity modeling is emerging as one of the most effective replacements for trigger-based prescreen. These models analyze hundreds of credit attributes—such as utilization, account mix, account age, and depth—to help identify consumers statistically more likely to seek a mortgage.  For lenders just beginning to use predictive modeling, off-the-shelf models can be a quick way to identify potential borrowers. For example, when layering propensity scores on top of credit eligibility, which can improve borrower targeting, many lenders see an increase in open mortgage loan rates.  Meanwhile, custom-built models, which analyze a lender’s own campaign performance over time, offer the highest level of precise targeting. These models isolate the attributes most predictive of conversions within a specific product mix—optimizing not just volume, but fit.  Speed without traditional triggers? It’s possible  One of the biggest concerns among lenders is maintaining the speed historically enabled by trigger leads. But that concern may be overblown.  Self-service prescreen platforms now allow marketers to generate qualified lead lists in as little as 24 hours, enabling rapid response during rate drops, competitive shifts, or seasonal demand spikes.   For those new to prescreening, batch campaigns still offer value, especially with analyst support.   Don’t overlook retention  In an era of intense acquisition competition, retention becomes a key differentiator.  Lenders who monitor property status, cash flow, and consumer credit behavior can proactively identify when an existing borrower is likely to list, refinance, or exit. Armed with that intelligence, lenders can re-engage with the borrower at the right moment—sometimes before a competitor is considered or contacted.  This level of behavioral intelligence may soon separate proactive lenders from reactive ones.  Actions instead of reactions  The evolution of trigger-based prescreen doesn’t just require new tools; it demands new thinking. Lenders should begin by auditing their current pipelines and determining:  What percentage of our acquisition is dependent on triggers?  What share of our book falls under the HPPA exemptions?  How will we scale compliant opt-in collection?  Are our current prescreen or modeling capabilities future-ready?  Those who answer these questions today—and act on them—won’t just be in compliance with the new laws, they’ll lead in a transformed market. Lenders should also be asking:   Do we have the infrastructure to collect and act on borrower consent?  Are our acquisition teams equipped to run prescreen campaigns — both batch and self-service?  What predictive models are we using (or could we use) to prioritize leads?  Are we proactively monitoring our portfolio to catch retention risks early?  How are we preparing our sales teams for longer, more consultative buying journeys?  Conclusion  The HPPA signals a shift away from relying on passive, inquiry-based prescreen acquisition and the beginning of smarter, more strategic engagement with potential borrowers. Lenders who embrace this transition early will find themselves not just compliant, but competitive—with deeper borrower insights, better conversion rates, and stronger long-term customer relationships.  The market is moving. The only question is: will you lead the change or chase it?  Citation  Experian. (2025, November). Interview: How the Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act is reshaping mortgage marketing—and what lenders should do now [transcript]. Experian Mortgage Insights. Insights based on lender feedback, campaign performance data, and analysis of prescreen marketing strategies and predictive modeling outcomes were gathered from Experian client engagements and internal mortgage analytics between May and October 2025. Homebuyers Privacy Protection Act timeline and legal context referenced from legislation signed September 5, 2025, with implementation beginning March 5, 2026.   

Published: April 22, 2026 by Ivan Ahmed