Key takeaways: Error-prone manual processes are a top reason for delayed reimbursements. Automation across the revenue cycle can help providers see quicker reimbursements. Many processes can be automated: patient estimates, eligibility verification checks, collections, claims management, and more. Prompt reimbursements are crucial for today's healthcare organizations. Delayed reimbursements can lead to a domino effect that impacts the entire revenue cycle. Provider productivity goes down along with quality of care, patients have poor experiences and the bottom line takes a hit. Reimbursement delays often stem from error-prone, outdated manual processes, overburdened staff and excessive administrative work. However, incorporating revenue cycle management automation can help providers overcome numerous reimbursement challenges and improve processes overall. With revenue cycle automation, providers can eliminate many persistent pain points in traditional revenue cycle management (RCM). Staff no longer lose time to tedious manual tasks, patients get their queries answered faster, and managers get the meaningful data they need to drive improvements. And the biggest win? It's easier for providers to get reimbursed for their services, faster and in full. What is revenue cycle automation and how does it work? Healthcare revenue cycle management knits together the financial and clinical components of care to ensure providers are properly reimbursed. As staff and patients know all too well, this can be a complex and time-consuming process, involving repetitive tasks and lengthy forms to ensure the right parties get the right information at the right time. This requires data pulled from multiple databases and systems for accurate claims and billing, and is a perfect use case for automation. In practice, revenue cycle automation involves using technology to complete tasks and processes that may have previously been manually completed. These tasks might include: Automatically generating and issuing invoices, bills and financial statements Streamlining patient data management and exchanging information quickly and reliably Processing digital payments Collating and analyzing performance data to draw out valuable insights. Understanding the challenges in traditional revenue cycle management When it comes to delayed reimbursements, providers lacking revenue cycle management automation typically face the following challenges: Inefficiencies in patient access According to The State of Patient Access 2025, front-end operations are still a source of friction for patients and providers. Four out of the five top patient access challenges reported by providers relate to front-end data collection. Top concerns include insurance searches, reducing errors, and speeding up authorization. Nearly 48% say data collected at registration is “somewhere” or “not” accurate, while 85% report an urgent need for faster, more comprehensive insurance verification. Rising claim denials due to manual errors The State of Patient Access also showed that manual, error-prone processes often lead to delays, claim denials and patient frustration. In fact, more than half (56%) of providers say patient information errors are a primary cause of denied claims. When claims are denied, reworks are often time-consuming, costly and place additional burdens on already overworked staff. Difficulty in managing patient collections Due to rising costs, confusion over estimates and a lack of patient payment options, providers are often left to deal with unpaid medical bills. According to Experian Health data, 29% of patients say paying for healthcare is getting worse. Affordability is a key factor, but patients are also struggling to understand how much their insurance covers and looking for convenient payment options, like payment plans. Download The State of Patient Access 2025 report for a full run-down of patient and provider views about access to care. Six ways revenue cycle automation accelerates reimbursements Revenue cycle improvement through automation can help speed up reimbursements for healthcare providers by: 1. Capturing accurate information quickly during patient access Gathering patient data manually is time-consuming. Errors in the process can lead to denied claims and roadblocks in patient care. Tools like Experian Health's Patient Access Curator use artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline patient access and billing, improve data quality and address claim denials from the outset. This solution also ensures that all data is correct on the front end by checking eligibility, coordination of benefits (COB), Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI), demographics and insurance discovery. 2. Simplifying collections and focusing on the right accounts Healthcare collections are a drag on resources. Automating the repetitive elements in the collections process helps reduce the burden on staff. Collections Optimization Manager leverages automation to analyze patients' payment histories and other financial information to route their accounts to the right collections pathway. Scoring and segmenting accounts means no time is wasted chasing the wrong accounts. Patients who can pay promptly can do so without unnecessary friction. As a result, providers get paid faster. 3. Reducing manual work and staff burnout Chronic staffing shortages continue to plague healthcare providers. In Experian Health's recent staffing survey, 96% of respondents said this affected payer reimbursements and patient collections. While automation cannot replace much-needed expert staff, it can ease pressure on busy teams by relieving them of repetitive tasks, reducing error rates and speeding up workflows. 4. Maintaining regulatory compliance with minimal effort While regulatory compliance may not directly influence how quickly providers get paid, it does play a crucial role in preventing the delays, denials and financial penalties that impede the overall revenue cycle. Constant changes in regulations and payer reimbursement policies can be difficult to track. Automation helps teams continuously monitor and adapt to these changes for a smoother revenue cycle, often with parallel benefits such as improving the patient experience. One example is Experian Health's price transparency solutions, which help providers demonstrate compliance with new legislation and provide extra clarity for patients. 5. Improving the end-to-end claims process Perhaps the most apparent way RCM automation leads to faster reimbursement is in ensuring faster and more accurate claims submissions. Automated claims management solutions, like Experian Health's award-winning ClaimSource®, reduce the need for error-prone manual processes, while improving accuracy and efficiencies in the claims editing and submission process. Additional claims management tools, like Claim Scrubber, also help providers submit more complete and accurate claims. Other tools, like Denial Workflow Manager, can be used if claims are denied. With automation and its extensive data analysis capabilities, work lists are generated based on the client's specifications, like denial category and dollar amount, to identify the root cause of denials and improve upstream processes to prevent them. And as artificial intelligence (AI) gains traction, providers are discovering new ways to use technology to improve claims management. AI Advantage™ uses AI and machine learning to find patterns in payer behavior and identify undocumented rules that could lead to a claim being denied, alerting staff so they can act quickly and avert issues. Then, it uses algorithmic logic to help staff segment and rework denials most efficiently. Providers get paid sooner while minimizing downstream revenue loss. 6. Providing better visibility into improvement opportunities Finally, automation helps providers analyze and act on revenue cycle data by identifying bottlenecks, trends and improvement opportunities. Automated analyses bring together relevant data from multiple sources in an instant to validate decisions. Machine learning draws on historical information to predict future outcomes, so providers can understand the root cause of delays and take steps to resolve issues. A healthcare revenue cycle dashboard is not just a presentation tool; it facilitates real-time monitoring of the organization's financial health, so staff can optimize workflows and speed up reimbursement. Embracing automation for a more efficient revenue cycle Like any business, healthcare organizations must maintain a positive cash flow to remain viable and continue serving their communities. Revenue cycle automation strategies can cut through many of the common obstacles that get in the way of financial stability and growth and speed up reimbursements. Learn more about Experian Health's revenue cycle management technology and see where automation could have the biggest impact on your organization's financial health. Learn more Contact us
Tracking down missing health coverage has always been challenging for providers, but proposed changes to the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid could make it even tougher. If the reforms take effect, as many as 13.7 million Americans could lose health insurance over the next decade. With more patients cycling in and out of coverage, many will turn up for care without knowing their coverage status, leaving them at risk for bills they can't afford and exposing providers to denials and revenue loss. Insurance verification has traditionally relied on Social Security Numbers (SSN). As the industry moves away from this approach, providers need faster, more reliable ways to confirm health insurance without SSNs. Health insurance without an SSN? The challenge of missing SSNs in patient records For decades, the SSN was a go-to data point for verifying insurance coverage. In the absence of a national patient identifier, it served as a consistent way to match individuals to their insurance records across health systems and payers. However, many patients do not have SSNs, and concerns about data privacy, duplication and identity theft led providers and payers to phase out SSNs. Although SSNs may still be collected during enrollment for administrative use, industry best practice now discourages using SSNs unless absolutely necessary. Recognizing the need for more secure and trustworthy identifiers, many payers have moved away from SSNs. For instance, in 2018, Medicare replaced SSN-based Health Insurance Claim Numbers with Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers (MBIs). These are now the primary means of checking a person's identity for Medicare transactions like billing, eligibility status and claim status. Commercial health plans have followed suit, relying more heavily on member IDs and internal identifiers for billing and eligibility and avoiding SSNs in patient records in line with privacy rules set out in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. As a result, SSNs are disappearing from patient records and payer databases. The question for providers is how to accurately verify insurance without SSN access. The impact of unidentified insurance on claims and reimbursement When active insurance coverage is overlooked, providers lose the opportunity to bill for care. Some patients will be incorrectly assigned self-pay status, triggering unnecessary billing cycles or charity write-offs. Others get care without providing their coverage information at the time of care, especially in fast-moving outpatient and emergency departments. Either way, the revenue is at risk in situations like these. Providers lose time and revenue. Teams are forced to reprocess claims, track down retroactive coverage, and appeal denials that could have been avoided. Missed coverage also takes a toll on patients, who now owe more than $220 billion in medical debt. And with cost concerns prompting four in ten patients to consider skipping care when they don't receive a price estimate, missing coverage is more than a paperwork problem – it's a clear threat to health and well-being. Case study: How UCHealth saved over $3.5 million by reducing accounts sent to collections with billable insurance. Strategies to identify health insurance without an SSN As the use of the SSN in medical billing declines, providers are looking for new and better tools to find insurance coverage. Digital technology and data integration make it possible to verify insurance without SSN use. Here are a few of the most effective strategies: 1. Using probabilistic matching and third-party data Advanced coverage discovery platforms now use probabilistic matching to connect patients to payers. These tools analyze data points like name, address, date of birth and phone number to identify likely matches. Instead of needing a patient's exact identifiers, they calculate match confidence based on data quality and historical payer data. 2. Leveraging health information exchanges (HIEs) Another option is to connect to regional or statewide HIEs to check insurance details shared across health systems, payers and public programs. This is especially valuable for transient or underserved populations who often move between providers and may not always carry updated insurance cards. 3. Patient self-service portals with identity validation At the front end, patient self-service tools offer opportunities to collect insurance information before a visit. Identity validation technology helps confirm the person's identity without requiring an SSN. Patients can scan an insurance card, update coverage details or answer verification questions within the portal. This reduces the workload for front desk staff and ensures better data before the patient arrives. Automated tools to streamline insurance discovery While patient access tools help patients confirm their coverage details, automated back-end solutions are essential for identifying insurance when information is incomplete or missing. Intelligent coverage discovery platforms can predict and verify active coverage without relying on SSNs, using demographic inputs like name, address and date of birth. These platforms run real-time or batch searches across multiple proprietary databases, combining search best practices, historical claims data and payer response patterns to flag likely matches. At the point of scheduling or registration, automated eligibility checks help identify billable coverage early, reducing errors, manual work and missed reimbursement opportunities. Experian Health's Coverage Discovery® exemplifies this approach, uncovering commercial, Medicare and Medicaid coverage that may have been unknown or forgotten. By identifying primary, secondary and tertiary coverage, it flags accounts that might otherwise be written off or sent to charity. Not only does this help maximize reimbursement revenue, but it also automates the self-pay scrubbing process and reduces the number of accounts sent to bad-debt collections. In 2023 alone, the platform identified billable coverage in more than 30% of self-pay accounts, resulting in over $25 million in found coverage. This level of automation is especially critical as policy changes continue to disrupt coverage stability. Proactive alerts can flag patients previously marked as self-pay but now linked to valid insurance, helping providers course-correct before claims go unpaid. Better patient matching, better outcomes As insurance coverage becomes more complex, providers need smarter and more efficient ways to verify it. Automated platforms like Coverage Discovery identify active insurance using minimal patient data, improving accuracy and reducing dependence on SSNs. When active coverage isn't found, Patient Financial Clearance helps fill the gap, screening for Medicaid eligibility or identifying patients who may qualify for charity care. Together, these tools give providers a more complete financial picture and ensure patients are connected to the coverage or support they need. The result is not just cleaner claims and faster payments, but better patient and provider outcomes. With more than a fifth of patients experiencing delays in healthcare because of issues verifying insurance information, improving coverage accuracy is a win for everyone. Find out more about how Coverage Discovery can help healthcare providers reduce bad debt by verifying patients' health insurance coverage without SSNs. Learn more Contact us
Revenue cycle management (RCM) plays a central role in healthcare, influencing both patient access and the financial well-being of providers. As healthcare organizations navigate growing costs, shifting patient expectations, and increasingly complex administrative tasks, they're finding themselves at a crossroads. Experian Health's State of Patient Access 2025 report offers a look at these challenges from the views of patients and providers, while showcasing how technology is changing the way we approach patient access and revenue cycle operations. In this interview, Clarissa Riggins, Chief Product Officer at Experian Health, shares key takeaways from the report, offers actionable solutions for providers, and outlines trends that are set to shape the future of RCM. Q1: "Let's start with the big picture. What's going on with patients' access to healthcare right now?" Riggins says, "It's stabilizing, which is a good sign. According to The State of Patient Access 2025, 68% of patients and 43% of providers say access has stayed the same. That's the highest it's been since 2022. Only 15% of patients said it's gotten worse, and that's the lowest number we've seen in a few years." Q2: "That's reassuring. But there are still challenges, right? What are patients struggling with most?" "The number one issue continues to be wait times," explains Riggins. "About 25% of patients said getting in to see a provider quickly is still a major hurdle. On top of that, 22% reported delays because of insurance verification, and 20% said they ran into problems with errors in their medical records or billing information. So, while some things have improved, there are still gaps to close.” Q3: "You mentioned insurance verification. How much of a barrier is that?" "It's a big one," she says. "When insurance verification isn't seamless, it creates a domino effect. That 22% figure I mentioned, those are people who had to wait for care because their insurance details weren't sorted out. Automating that part of the process can make a huge difference in getting people the care they need faster.” Q4: "Are digital tools making a difference in these areas?" "They have the potential to, but adoption is a challenge. 37% of providers said one of their biggest obstacles is getting patients to actually use the tools available. And 55% said patients don't know how to navigate self-scheduling. We're seeing some resistance, but it's not because the tech isn't there. It's more about awareness and ease of use. She continues, "For example, going back to insurance eligibility, Experian Health's Patient Access Curator uses artificial intelligence (AI) to automatically check coverage in real time. This helps providers confirm benefits instantly and spot issues early. That kind of automation takes the guesswork and delays out of the equation, so patients can get the care they need without unnecessary holdups. It's not just more efficient for staff; it literally speeds up access to treatment." Q5: "Let's talk about cost. How is that affecting access for patients today?" “Cost is a major pain point," she explains. "The report shows that 34% of patients say they often struggle to pay for healthcare. That number is up from 23% last year. And nearly all patients, 95%, say they at least sometimes have trouble paying. It's clear that affordability is still one of the top reasons people delay care." Q6: "What can providers do to improve the payment experience for patients?" “It starts with transparency. Patients want to know what they'll owe before they get care. When 81% of patients say they feel more prepared after receiving an accurate estimate, it shows just how critical that upfront information is," Riggins notes. "Experian Health's Patient Estimates solution was built around this need. It allows providers to give patients clear, personalized cost estimates before they receive care, helping them feel informed and in control." "And 43% said they would consider canceling or postponing care if they didn't get that information," she continues. "That's huge. It proves this isn't just about convenience; it's about access. These tools help patients avoid financial surprises, which can be the deciding factor in whether they follow through with treatment." “This solution isn't just making billing easier. It's directly supporting better health outcomes by making care more accessible and less intimidating financially." Q7: "So, it's not just about having the tools. It's about how they're used?" "Exactly. Providers need to make sure the tools are easy to use and that patients understand how to use them. That means clear instructions, mobile-friendly interfaces, and support when people get stuck. If the experience feels complicated, people just won't engage." Q8: "What are patients looking for when it comes to better access?" "Patients are very clear. They want convenience," Riggins says. "According to The State of Patient Access 2025 report: 82% don't want to complete forms multiple times if their information hasn't changed 80% want to be able to schedule appointments from their phone (via a browser or an app) 77% want a heads-up on insurance coverage before treatment 52% want more digital options, period So, if providers listen to these preferences and meet patients where they are, access improves naturally." Q9: "What about billing and patient record issues? How can providers avoid those mistakes?" "Strong data practices are key. That means better systems to catch errors before they become problems, regular staff training, and giving patients the chance to double-check their records. Adding tools like Patient Access Curator can really make a difference. It uses artificial intelligence to handle a bunch of tasks all at once – eligibility checks, COB, MBI, demographics, and insurance discovery. By automating tasks that are traditionally performed by human staff, healthcare organizations can save time associated with administrative intake and coverage verification. This also means solving for bad data in real-time, which can help prevent billing and claim errors in the long run. Clean data makes everything easier, from billing to insurance verification to patient trust," Riggins concludes. Patient access is evolving, but not without its challenges. As the State of Patient Access 2025 report highlights, stability is improving, but issues like price transparency, low adoption of digital access tools and insurance verification continue to create friction. The path forward lies in listening to what patients are asking for: easy-to-use digital tools, clear pricing, and fewer administrative headaches. By utilizing automation and AI, providers can streamline access and build stronger, more trusted relationships with their patients. Learn more about how Experian Health can help healthcare organizations improve patient access, and download the report for the full survey results. Download now Contact us
Healthcare providers have heard it before – high employee turnover and the constant need to train on new solutions can severely impact the efficiency of revenue cycle management (RCM) teams. As denials increase, the resources required to address them grow, putting additional strain on healthcare providers and their teams. For decades, manual claim management has been the cornerstone of revenue cycle operations. However, with shifting payer algorithms, higher patient volumes, and evolving insurance coverages, this approach is no longer sustainable. Getting the highest percentage of claims paid with the exact amount of human capital is unachievable. Many health systems can't keep up, and RCM teams are experiencing burnout. There is a glaring need for the rapid adaptation of automation to improve front-end data collection, where reducing errors can have the highest impact on claims, and the teams responsible for them. According to Experian Health's latest State of Patient Access survey, 56% of providers say patient information errors are a primary cause of denied claims, 48% report inaccuracies in data collected at registration, and 83% emphasize the urgent need for faster, more comprehensive insurance verification. Front-end operations are a major source of friction. Four out of the five top patient access challenges reported by providers relate to front-end data collection, including improving insurance eligibility searches, reducing errors and speeding up authorizations. Is it any wonder that these actions are typically performed by hard-working and taxed humans? These inefficiencies don't just slow down internal workflows. Manual, error-prone processes lead to delays, claim denials and patient frustration, not to mention low morale with revenue cycle teams trying to find the errant data. Providers note that staffing shortages are compounding the problem, which suggests that tackling front-end workflows would be a strategic operational win. How Patient Access Curator enhances revenue cycle efficiency What if providers could take that manually laden process, integrate automation, and allow their staff to apply their revenue cycle experience, equity and strategic thinking in the right place? Patient Access Curator (PAC) uses automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to streamline patient access and billing, address claim denials and improve data quality without the need for human intervention. This integrated solution performs rapid eligibility, coordination of benefits (COB), Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI), demographics and insurance discovery checks to ensure that all data is correct on the front end, freeing teams up to focus on more strategic tasks. It doesn't require the long training requirement of standalone products; it fits seamlessly into existing EHR systems, and works directly within the system, with no need for drawn-out onboarding programs. According to one of the early adopters of the Patient Access Curator, their revenue cycle team is already seeing – and feeling – the results of automation. A Senior Director of Revenue Cycle at a large Midwestern health system says, “One of the primary reasons we chose the Patient Access Curator was because it makes the normally manual work of revenue cycle much easier, which in turn improves productivity, empowerment and morale. Registrars are now able to make determinations right within the system. It's easy to use.” With so much data to capture, manual strategies are bound to stumble and apply downward pressure on those tasked with high-volume work. Patient Access Curator removes the need for manual checks on multiple payer websites and data repositories to verify insurance eligibility, and checks for any billable coverage that might have been missed. Experian Health's industry-leading claims management products are designed to simplify these processes. The newest denial prevention technology strengthens this suite with capabilities previously unavailable. Efficient claims management with artificial intelligence and automation Patient Access Curator captures and processes patient insurance data at registration using an “if-then” logic that returns multiple data points from a single inquiry, in seconds. Registration staff can leverage this technology to collect and verify much of the information they need to compile an accurate claim, with just a single click. In a matter of seconds, they'll have a comprehensive readout of: Eligibility verification: PAC automatically interrogates 271 responses, flagging up active secondary and tertiary coverage information to eliminate coverage gaps Coordination of Benefits: Integrating with eligibility verification workflow, PAC automatically analyzes payer responses to find hidden signs of additional insurances that may be missed by a human eye, and triggers additional inquiries to those third parties to determine primacy, for faster COB processing Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers: PAC uses AI and robotic process automation to find and fix patient identifiers so no one misses out on essential support Insurance discovery: For patient accounts marked as self-pay or unbillable, PAC automates additional coverage searches Demographics: The platform can quickly check and verify patient contact information Patient Access Curator achieves such speedy results “because the underlying code acts like a Rosetta Stone, automatically translating the language of the user and the health system into the terms required by the payer,” says Jordan Levitt, Senior Vice President of Experian Health. “This means data can be transferred easily between interfaces.” Hear how Columbus Regional Hospital has used the Patient Access Curator to simplify and streamline its revenue cycle operations. With Patient Access Curator, better data adds up to increased revenue cycle efficiency, along with the following: Reduced errors: Automation minimizes human intervention in repetitive tasks. Faster processing: Automated systems can handle large volumes of claims and payments much faster than manual processes, accelerating the reimbursement cycle, improving cash flow and reducing delays in revenue collection. Enhanced compliance: Automation tools like Patient Access Curator are continually learning from inputs, and adapt to stay up-to-date with evolving regulatory requirements and payer policies. This ensures that claims are compliant, reducing the risk of denials and costly rework. Improved denial prevention: Patient Access Curator identifies patterns in historical claim data, flagging or fixing potential errors before submission. This proactive approach helps in preventing denials and optimizing revenue recovery. Streamlined workflows: Automation frees up staff from mundane tasks, allowing them to focus on strategic initiatives such as patient engagement and financial planning. This leads to more efficient use of resources and improved overall productivity. At a time when revenue cycles are under increasing pressure from changing payer rules, labor dynamics and operational constraints, this new solution offers a long-awaited boost to both reimbursement rates and productivity. Patient Access Curator is available now – learn how it can help healthcare organizations boost revenue cycle efficiency and prevent claim denials in seconds. Learn more Contact us
Highlights: Healthcare claims processing is becoming more complex, putting financial stability at risk. Many organizations are turning to technology, particularly automation and artificial intelligence (AI), to improve the speed and accuracy of claims processing in healthcare Organizations that modernize their claims systems and track key performance indicators are better positioned to reduce denials and accelerate reimbursement. Healthcare claims processing is getting harder, according to Experian Health's 2024 State of Claims report. For 65% of healthcare leaders, claims management is more complex than before the pandemic. Slower reimbursements, rising denial rates and mounting administrative pressure are putting financial performance at risk. To improve speed and accuracy, many organizations are investing in technology: 45% of providers plan to invest in claims management technology in the next six months. As margins tighten, those that modernize their healthcare claims processing systems will be better equipped to stay financially strong. Understanding the current healthcare claims processing landscape Despite its central role in healthcare finance, claims processing continues to be one of the most resource-intensive and error-prone parts of the revenue cycle. Findings from the State of Claims report highlight three linked challenges that make it tough for providers to get paid promptly: rising denial rates, recurring errors that lead to even more denials, and the growing burden of rework. Denial rates are rising Claim denials are a persistent and growing issue. According to the report, 38% of healthcare leaders said that more than 10% of their claims are denied, and 11% reported denial rates over 15%. These numbers represent not just lost revenue, but significant time spent on rework and appeals. Common causes of denials The underlying reasons for denials are largely preventable. In the survey, 46% of respondents pointed to missing or inaccurate data and authorization problems as key contributors. These issues often stem from manual errors, inconsistent data entry, or gaps in communication between systems and teams. Incorrect insurance details, incomplete patient records and missing prior authorizations all lead to avoidable rejections. The cost of rework is growing As denial rates climb, so does the effort required to fix them. Almost half (48%) of respondents said they review denials manually, with three-quarters of denials handled by someone other than the person who processed the original claim. This puts extra strain on overextended revenue cycle teams on top of delayed payments. Leveraging technology for improved claims management Clearly, there's a need to reduce the manual burden. Comprehensive claims management platforms can help by automating workflows, tracking payer policies and improving claim accuracy at every stage. With claims processing tools designed to streamline decision points and flag potential issues early, revenue cycle teams can work more efficiently and sidestep disappointing financial results. For example, Denial Workflow Manager makes it easier to identify and prioritize denied claims by automating follow-up steps and assigning tasks to the right team members. Enhanced Claim Status submits automated status requests to payers, so staff can respond to pended, returned-to-provider, denied or zero-pay transactions before the Electronic Remittance Advice and Explanation of Benefits are processed. Along with ClaimSource®, organizations can centralize claim activity and apply customizable edits and consistent formatting to reduce errors before submission. Case study: How St. Luke's Health System cut denials by 76% with Enhanced Claim Status Enhancing data accuracy for cleaner claims While many denial management strategies focus on the submission process, achieving clean claims starts much earlier in the revenue cycle. Much of the inaccurate and incomplete patient data that causes so many denials originates at registration. Patient Access Curator addresses this issue by validating critical patient and insurance information at the front end. It pulls data from multiple sources to verify insurance eligibility, confirm coverage details and flag inconsistencies in real time. By resolving errors early on, it prevents incorrect data from flowing downstream into the claim process, resulting in millions of dollars saved. As Ken Kubisty, Vice President of Revenue Cycle at Exact Sciences notes, “You know when the Patient Access Curator went live because you can see it in our stock price. It helped us drive a $100 million bottom-line improvement within two quarters.” On the back end, a tool like Claim Scrubber bolsters clean claim strategies by reviewing pre-billed claims line by line, to catch any remaining errors. Together, this front-to-back accuracy boosts first-pass payment rates and reduces the risk of costly rework. Watch the webinar: Hear how Exact Sciences and Trinity Health used Patient Access Curator to tackle denials and make major savings. Implementing automation and AI to streamline claims processing Once claims are accurate and ready for submission, automation and artificial intelligence (AI) can help organizations work smarter and faster. Nearly half (47%) of providers already using AI consider it a competitive advantage, and it's easy to see why. Predictive tools allow teams to identify which claims are at risk of denial before they are sent, so they can intervene early and avoid costly delays. Tools like AI Advantage™ use AI and machine learning to analyze patterns in claims history and payer behavior. This solution flags claims that are likely to be denied and prioritizes them for review, helping staff focus their time where it has the greatest financial impact. By identifying potential issues in advance, organizations can reduce preventable denials and improve reimbursement rates. Analyzing key performance indicators to stay ahead Even with the right tools and processes in place, consistent results require teams to keep a close eye on performance. Regularly reviewing key performance indicators gives them the insight they need to adjust strategies and stay ahead of claim issues. Metrics like denial rates, clean claim rates and days in accounts receivable show where claims are most frequently getting stuck, where errors are recurring, and where improvements are actually working. While claims processing technology can do much of the heavy lifting, it isn't a set-it-and-forget-it solution. Long-term success depends on constant fine-tuning. Organizations that stay engaged and monitor key metrics closely are better positioned to reduce denials, accelerate payments and improve financial outcomes. Experian Health consultants are also available to help guide these efforts, offering expert support and strategic advice to help claims processing teams get the most out of their investment. Find out how Experian Health's claims management tools help organizations take control of claims processing in healthcare for cleaner claims, fewer denials and faster reimbursement. Learn more Contact us
Claim denials are skyrocketing, and so are revenue cycle leaders' stress levels. In our most recent State of Claims survey, 54% of respondents said their current claims technology is sufficient to address existing revenue cycle demands at their organizations. However, that number was 77% just two years ago. That's because denial management has long been a reactive strategy. Many organizations focus on addressing claim denials after services are rendered and information is sent to payers. However, this approach often leads to increased labor costs, delayed reimbursements, and a higher volume of denied claims. It's time for a paradigm shift towards claim denial prevention, a proactive strategy that addresses potential issues before they result in denials. To prevent claim denials, go on the defensive Jordan Levitt, Senior Vice President at Experian Health, sees it as playing defense. “We use a term called 'Perimeter Defense' - get the patient's information right on the front end, before it gets into the system,” says Levitt. “Denials are happening because incorrect or bad data gets in early, costing health systems time - and money – to fix on the back end. The mindset is moving from management to prevention.” The legacy denial management approach being used today involves significant manual intervention, including correcting errors, resubmitting claims, and appealing denials. The result is a costly and time-consuming process that diverts valuable resources from more strategic tasks. Denial prevention, on the other hand, focuses on addressing potential issues at the front end of the revenue cycle. By ensuring that claims are accurate and complete before they are submitted, organizations can significantly reduce the volume of denied claims. This proactive approach not only accelerates cash flow but also reduces the burden on billing staff and lowers contingency vendor fees. Bad patient data is like a virus “There's a revenue cycle adage often referred to as 'Know Thy Patient,'” says Levitt. “With the Denial Prevention philosophy, at registration and scheduling we need to know exactly who they are (e.g. John Smith or Jonathan Smith?), where they live, and how to reach them, in addition to all of their coverages, the order of billing - everything.” The inherent problem today, he continues, is that the first time incorrect or outdated patient data is ingested into a health system, it proliferates throughout the entire system. Electronic health records are great at keeping patient data together for a health system, but they don't distinguish between good data and bad data. It's all just data. “Whether a patient is coming by way of a physician's office, a business office or residence and the information is wrong, it populates throughout an integrated system - hospitals, urgent care, labs,” says Levitt. “Once you let bad data in the door, regardless of the origination point, it's like a virus. Each time that happens and you're building the work queues and you're building buckets of contingency funds if you can't solve it at the start of the process. Every action you take once bad data enters your system is wasting resources.” Fixing poor data on the front end is the key to preventing claim denials That seems like an obvious solution. However, throwing more people at the problem isn't the right answer when technology that is faster, more accurate and fully integrated into workflows is available. Solving for incorrect or missing eligibility, insurance coverage, Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI), demographics and continuation of benefits is readily available with just a simple click. Experian Health's Patient Access Curator is a robust revenue cycle solution designed to prevent claim denials at the front end. It addresses bad data quality with real-time data correction, performing eligibility checks, coordination of benefits (COB), Medicare Beneficiary Identifier (MBI), demographics, and discovery in a single solution. With a single click, Patient Access Curator ensures quick, accurate registration and scheduling, significantly reducing denial volumes and billing errors, including: Eligibility Verification: Automatically interrogates 271 responses to indicate any secondary or tertiary coverage data. Coverage Discovery: Works behind the scenes to minimize the cost of insurance discovery and streamline workflows, often generating additional insurance revenue missed by previous processes. MBI Correction: Continuously finds and corrects MBIs using artificial intelligence (AI), in-memory analytics, and robotic process automation. Demographic Updates: Automatically identifies obsolete or inaccurate data using proprietary algorithms. COB Analysis: Analyzes each payer response in real-time at the point of service and integrates directly into the eligibility verification process. Benefits of claim denial prevention By successfully transitioning to a denial prevention strategy, revenue cycle teams can: Reduce denial volumes: By addressing issues before claims are submitted, organizations can significantly reduce the volume of denied claims. Lower labor costs: Automation and real-time data correction reduce the need for manual intervention, allowing staff to focus on more value-added tasks. Accelerate cash flow: Faster, more accurate claims submission leads to quicker reimbursements and improved cash flow. Enhance patient satisfaction: Accurate and timely claims processing reduces the need for patient follow-up and improves overall patient satisfaction. Beyond denial management: The strategic shift to claim denial prevention The transition from claim denial management to denial prevention represents a significant shift in how healthcare organizations approach revenue cycle management. By focusing on proactive strategies and leveraging advanced technologies like Patient Access Curator, organizations can reduce the burden of denied claims, lower costs, and improve overall efficiency. Embracing denial prevention is not just a strategic advantage—it's a necessity in today's complex healthcare landscape. Watch the video to see how Patient Access Curator is evolving patient access at light speed, using the power of AI and machine learning. Learn more about Patient Access Curator and contact us to see if you qualify for a free denial analysis. Learn more Contact us
Revenue cycle management (RCM) leaders feel it every day: financial pressures continue to mount, with hospital and laboratory operating margin compression becoming a challenge for even the most financially sound healthcare organizations. To combat claim denial pressures and strained lab and hospital profit margins, healthcare providers should start with the beginning in mind. Strained lab and hospital profit margins are particularly evident in revenue cycle operations, where every dollar billed to a payer needs to find its way back to the system. Rising labor costs, increased expenses for purchased services, and declining patient demand - plus inflationary pressures and labor shortages - have exacerbated these issues. As a result, many hospitals and health system leaders are struggling to maintain financial sustainability. The best revenue cycle leaders must deftly navigate a complex mix of denial management strategies and AI-based technology, like Patient Access Curator, to maximize revenue and improve operational efficiency. Payers aren't helping lab or hospital profit margins Payers, facing their own financial pressures, are tightening hospital operating margins even further, leading to increased claim denials, hyper-focused audits, and reduced reimbursement rates. These strategies create a series of cascading challenges for RCM teams, including increased administrative burdens and revenue leakage. According to a report by Healthcare Finance, 84% of health systems cite lower reimbursement from payers as a top cause of low operating margins. Additionally, 82% of CFOs have seen a significant increase in payer denials since pre-pandemic levels. Higher labor costs are another major driver of margin pressure, with 96% of CFOs reporting this as a significant issue. Healthcare leaders agree – strained profit margins are an ongoing struggle In Experian Health's own research, healthcare executives identified strained profit margins as their biggest challenge. The underlying struggle is about money—keeping cash flowing and supporting a healthy organization. One of the country's top health system CFOs stated that it's the first time in his 30-year career where his beds are full, but he has zero margin. This highlights the severity of the issue. Jason Considine, President at Experian Health, says, "We talk to healthcare leaders frequently and our survey and polling have revealed their primary concerns leading to strained margins – and a highly-pressured financial environment. Some of these reasons might be front and center [for a particular organization], others secondary or tertiary. But all of them are driving down margins across health systems: inpatient revenue erosion, cost of labor, rising staffing and supply complexity, delayed payer reimbursements, regulations, and a very fluid, shifting payer mix. It's consistent from system to system, hospital to hospital." Quick fixes only deepen the problem How have most healthcare organizations been playing catch-up? They throw various fixes at the problem, like cobbling together denial management teams, and adding more software, contingency vendors, and labor. However, those solutions can be a knee-jerk reaction, and only compress margins further. Take a look at coordination of benefits (COB) denials. Revenue cycle leaders often don't have the complete data picture when they look at a 271 response to establish primacy and ignore the “noise” of secondary or tertiary payers. Many don't truly know their system's current process for COB denials – nor that of the vendors or staff who try to 'fix' the problems. Bud Zuberer, VP of Sales at Experian Health, says, "On a daily basis we hear that COB denials, contingency fees, and labor costs are crippling revenue cycle teams. They're paralyzed with too many decisions to make. This collection of problems has led to a rise in denial management teams and personnel. We're witnessing the invention of companies to 'solve' the problem. But that's not the answer. The answer lies in ensuring the data ingestion is correct from the start.” Adding more solutions or software to an already full slate of vendors can also be problematic, as it requires more human touchpoints and capital investments. Ultimately, this affects cash flow, cash acceleration, and days in accounts receivable (AR). Prevention is the best medicine to improve strained lab and hospital profit margins The fastest way to ease the pain of rising claim denials and falling cash flow is denial prevention – fixing downstream problems upstream, before they occur. As Zuberer points out, clean data from the start will reduce denials and chasing cash on the back end. Experian Health's all-in-one Patient Access Curator prevents claim denials in seconds by solving bad data quality and real-time data correction, drastically cutting contingency vendor fees and accelerating cash flow. Some of the key benefits of Patient Access Curator include: Reducing billing errors: Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine-learning guided technology improve claim and data accuracy. Quick, accurate patient registration and scheduling: Streamlines processes. Lower denial volumes: Prevents claim denials at the front end. Decrease human resources related to denial management: Eases staffing shortages and frees up team members for higher-value tasks. Client success story Exact Sciences, one of the largest laboratories in the U.S., recently began using the Patient Access Curator in its revenue cycle operations. Thanks to Patient Access Curator, Exact Sciences achieved the following results: 15% increase in revenue per test due to accurate eligibility and fewer denials 4x business volume without increasing headcount 50% reduction in denials and major improvement in timely filings $100 million added to the bottom line in 6 months “You know when Patient Access Curator went live because you can see it in our stock price. It helped us drive a $100 million bottom-line improvement within two quarters.” - Ken Kubisty, Vice President of Revenue Cycle at Exact Sciences Read the full case study or see what Kubisty had to say in a new testimonial: Prevent strained profit margins in the long run Strained profit margins are a significant challenge for healthcare organizations, impacting revenue cycle operations and overall financial health. By adopting strategic approaches and leveraging technology, healthcare leaders can navigate these complexities and confirm every dollar is accounted for. In this evolving landscape, proactive and adaptive leadership is crucial for sustaining financial stability and delivering high-quality care. Learn more about how Patient Access Curator helps prevent strained lab and hospital profit margins by solving for bad data, all at once. Patient Access Curator Contact us
“Enhanced Claim Status will provide you with more information extracted directly from the payer site that you will not get in a regular claim status.”—Jake Reid, Senior Director of Revenue Cycle Business Offices at St. Luke's Health System Challenge St. Luke's Health System is Idaho's largest healthcare provider, handling over three million outpatient visits per year and processing more than 450,000 claims per month. As the organization grew, rising patient volumes put pressure on staff to keep billing processes running smoothly. They needed a scalable solution to manage claims follow-ups without increasing headcount or compromising patient care. “We had a growing population and an increase in accounts receivable (AR),” says Jake Reid, Senior Director of Revenue Cycle Business Offices at St. Luke's. “We couldn't keep up. To continue to fulfill our mission to support our communities and stay financially sound, we needed a more efficient way to collect revenue.” They focused on four key questions: How can we maximize staff efficiency by improving post-claim follow-up? How can we leverage technology to handle growing account volumes without increasing headcount? How can we avoid wasted touches so staff can focus on accounts that require follow-up? How can we accelerate AR recovery to improve cash flow and reduce aging? Solution After exploring in-house and outsourced options, St. Luke's decided to implement Experian Health's Enhanced Claim Status to automate and streamline the claims follow-up process. The tool pulls adjudication data directly from payer sites and delivers detailed claim statuses within Epic, eliminating the need for staff to manually track claims through payer portals or wait for remittances. What started as a pilot with just one payer quickly expanded to include other high-impact payers. The team liked how Enhanced Claim Status provided real-time insights into denied, rejected and pending claims, so they were able to prioritize and resolve issues sooner. Claims are automatically routed into work queues based on customized rules, accelerating follow-up by one to two weeks. This allowed staff to focus on the right accounts and reduced unnecessary work. Reid says, “Enhanced Claim Status will provide you with more information extracted directly from the payer site that you will not get in a regular claim status.” The team values this richer data, which includes enhanced data like proprietary reason codes and actionable explanations for each claim. St. Luke's worked closely with Experian Health to ensure all necessary fields were captured from payer responses and set up for payers not already supported, so no claims were overlooked. They were able to set their own rules for status checks, retry intervals and cutoff points, and claim status codes were categorized to determine the most appropriate work queue, based on St. Luke's own requirements. All payer responses are automatically formatted in a consistent way, so staff can continue to work efficiently, no matter how many new payers are added. Read the blog: 6 steps to improving the claims adjudication process Outcome Shifting to automated claim status checks significantly reduced the administrative burden, achieving the following financial results: Denials dropped by 76%, falling from 27% to just 6.5% since 2017 “Discharged/not billed” accounts were reduced by $15 million per month Hospital billing aged over 90 days now consistently meets Epic's Silver or Gold benchmarks, with the watch list down from an average of $13 million to under $1 million since going live in 2019 Patient billing over 90 days now sits at just 4.5%, putting St. Luke's among the top performers of Epic users Automation also helped St. Luke's save the equivalent of three full-time staff each year. With fewer unbilled accounts and more efficient workflows, the overall cost to collect went down. Staff appreciated having better data and more time to focus on complex accounts, which increased their capacity to support patients directly. Reid says that with Enhanced Claim Status, the organization has successfully achieved its goal of accelerating AR resolution and denials management, without overburdening staff. He attributes this to continuous testing, improvement and close collaboration with Experian Health: “Much of our success came from customizing the build to our workflows and processes. You will lose momentum and staff buy-in if you don't ensure the build is solid. The importance of testing cannot be underestimated. Finally, ensure you are checking in with Experian often to address any issues that arise. Experian has always been very responsive to my teams and I'd expect that to be the same for you.” Find out more about how Enhanced Claim Status accelerates claim follow-up and improves cash flow. Learn more Contact us
What happens when payers and providers interpret contract terms differently? Or revenue cycle teams miss critical details buried in the fine print? Contracts between healthcare providers and payers are supposed to make each party's responsibilities crystal clear. In reality, that isn't always the case. Hospitals face costly consequences if they fail to comply with payer policies, yet often struggle to monitor payment accuracy when it comes to being paid on time and in full. That's why good contract management matters. Ensuring both parties are reading from the same page protects providers from unmet expectations and revenue loss. As Timothy Daye, Director of Managed Care Contracting at Duke Health Integrated Practice, puts it, “It's about getting paid correctly per your contracts, so you don't leave money on the table.” With increasing pressure to manage costs, hospitals are rethinking how they manage contracts. This article looks at why a more strategic approach – built on contract management software – is essential. Why hospitals need a contract management system Medical plans receive around three billion claims each year, according to the latest CAQH index report. At that scale, even small discrepancies in contract terms can have a major financial impact for providers seeking reimbursement. In Experian Health's 2024 State of Claims survey, 73% of providers said claim denials were increasing, while 77% were seeing more frequent amendments to payer policies. These changes can catch providers off guard, especially when contract terms aren't clearly documented or regularly updated. For hospitals, the challenges in managing payer contracts include: Complex negotiations: Providers handle thousands of contracts with multiple plans and provisions, all subject to changing regulations. Without proper oversight, managing these negotiations can be time-consuming and overwhelming. Limited data analysis and outdated processes: Effective contract management depends on accurate, up-to-date data. Yet many organizations still rely on poorly defined manual systems that lack the analytics and real-time insights needed to evaluate contract performance, forecast revenue or support strategic decision-making. Conflicts over claim denials: Underpayments and denials are among providers' biggest challenges, with payers reportedly initially denying 15% of all claims. Disputes over claims, payments, and contract interpretations strain relationships and disrupt revenue cycle performance. A robust contract management system, using purpose-built software, brings structure to the negotiations and helps build effective and transparent working relationships with payers. Some of the benefits include: 1. More accurate reimbursements and fewer underpayments Automated oversight of payer contracts makes it easier to find discrepancies between the amounts billed and the rates agreed in payer contracts. Contract management software helps providers avoid missing out on reimbursements because of buried contract clauses and supports contract-based appeals to recover underpayments. 2. Better terms and stronger relationships with payers Contract management software for hospitals allows revenue teams to evaluate contract results and use that information to assess proposed terms for new contracts. This puts providers on a stronger footing in negotiations and allows them to agree to more favorable terms. More effective communications and quicker dispute resolution also improve provider-payer relationships. 3. Faster, more efficient workflows at scale Finally, automated workflows combine more accurate data to process claims faster, leading to a more predictable revenue cycle. They also lower administrative costs and allow staff more time to prioritize other patient-facing and revenue-building activities. Key features of hospital contract management software Not all solutions offer the automation, data or expert support to make the above benefits a reality. Experian Health's Contract Manager delivers all three. Here's how it works: A team of contract analysts assesses the organization's contract terms, fee schedules and payment policies to clarify what's required and when. Accurate rates and authorization rules are populated automatically to minimize pricing errors and reduce manual effort. Contract mapping and claim valuation logic reduces the risk of audits and penalties, while automated alerts help providers ensure their contracts comply with current healthcare regulations. Configurable online dashboards give staff immediate access to reimbursement reports, so they can compare expected and allowed amounts and monitor performance. Unlike manual systems, contract management software can be easily scaled for organizations of any size. Because it integrates seamlessly with existing hospital information and practice management systems, Contract Manager can audit claims for a medical group or a large health system with one solution. When paired with Contract Analysis, healthcare providers get added negotiating power by getting the data needed to assure terms that optimize reimbursement. Discover how Experian Health's Best in KLAS Contract Manager solution helped Boston Children's Hospital resolve underpayments, work with payers to resolve issues and errors, and more. Choose the right hospital contract management software Managing payer agreements may not be the most visible part of the revenue cycle, but its impact is significant. Minor contract discrepancies can quietly erode margins. As providers work to control costs while maintaining care quality, hospital contract management software has become critical in securing fair reimbursement rates and auditing payer contract performance with confidence. Providers should choose a solution that allows them to verify payment accuracy, resolve disputes faster and prevent lost revenue through unnecessary claim denials. The solution should also deliver real-time visibility into contract compliance and reimbursement trends so revenue cycle teams can stay ahead of policy changes and protect margins. Experian Health's Contract Manager and Contract Analysis solution continuously audits payer contract performance and applies current reimbursement rules for Medicare and other payers, for the most precise pricing. It ensures staff have accurate data to hand to conduct contract-based appeals and communicate clearly with payers. For these reasons, Contract Manager was named Best in KLAS in 2025. It's a proven choice for hospitals seeking to reduce revenue leakage and strengthen payer relationships at scale. Find out more about how Experian Health's hospital contract management software helps providers take control of reimbursement and protect their long-term financial health. Learn more Contact us
