At A Glance
Agentic AI is entering media planning before many teams have defined what it should control or where human judgment belongs. Learn how trusted identity, current data, governance, and independent measurement help prevent systems that execute decisions from scaling the wrong ones.Key takeaways:
- Treat agentic AI as a coordinated decision framework and define what it can control before it begins acting.
- Feed it accurate, current, and governed inputs to reduce the risk of automating decisions based on incomplete identity or stale signals.
- Keep measurement structurally separate from buying logic so performance can be assessed objectively.
- Experian’s Offline Graph, Digital Graph, Marketing Data, and independent outcomes measurement provide foundations for more defensible automated decisions.
Originally published in The Current
Agentic media planning has gone from emerging idea to assumed industry direction in a single cycle. The instinct to move fast on new technology makes sense. When a whole industry agrees on something quickly, though, the definitions, limits, and trade-offs that matter most tend to get skipped, and “agentic AI” still means very different things to different teams. Organizations building toward it without a shared definition, risk creating incompatible systems under the same label. There’s foundational work to do before automation takes the wheel.
What does agentic AI mean in media?
Much of the current enthusiasm around agentic AI conflates the technology with a specific tool. In many conversations, “agentic” has become shorthand for highly autonomous generative AI, as though large language models (LLMs) were the entire system rather than one component within it.
That framing understates what agentic systems are. Agentic systems are decision frameworks, not models. They coordinate predictive models, generative tools, and non-AI logic to move from signal to recommendation to action.

This pattern already exists outside media. Starbucks’ “Deep Brew” connects real-time purchase signals with personalized offers while informing what products stores stock and promote. The system coordinates customer demand with operational decisions across the business. Layering prompt engineering onto an LLM is a different thing entirely.
Without a shared definition of what “agentic” means for your organization, teams risk optimizing different visions of the same idea:
All may qualify as agentic, but without a shared definition, you can’t build toward the same goal. That’s why defining the problem statement comes first, not last.
Why do acting systems raise the stakes?
Here’s what sets agentic systems apart from earlier waves of automation: they don’t just inform decisions; they execute them. Programmatic has always operated within guardrails, executing and optimizing based on defined parameters. Agentic systems work more like navigation. They determine direction and weigh trade-offs against a wider set of context. When an agent reallocates budget mid-flight, suppresses an audience segment, or swaps creative, the quality of the identity and business logic behind that decision determines the outcome.
Here’s what sets agentic systems apart from earlier waves of automation: they don’t just inform decisions; they execute them.
Apply that framework to media. An agentic system operating on incomplete identity data or stale signals won’t slow down to account for the gap. It optimizes faster in the wrong direction. The coordination layer needs to weigh reach, incrementality, audience fatigue, and margin before it shifts spend, and that requires inputs that are accurate, current, and governed. Accountability and oversight aren’t optional anymore; they need to be built into the design from the start.
Watch our Curated Couch session on agentic media planning
Why should measurement stay separate from buying logic?
As autonomy grows in media systems, a structural problem emerges: the system shouldn’t measure its own performance.
When buying logic and measurement logic live in the same loop, performance numbers can look strong simply because they’re optimized to the system’s own signals. Success stops being defined externally and starts being defined internally. Agentic models trained on this pattern learn from the signals they favor, optimizing toward the outcomes they’re best equipped to observe. Performance looks good inside the system, and reflects a narrower view of what’s actually happening.

Independent measurement gets framed as friction on automation more often than not. In reality, it’s what lets automation to scale responsibly. Incorporating independent measurement signals into agentic decision-making, while maintaining meaningful separation from buying logic, produces an objective view of performance, one that can be compared consistently across systems rather than optimized within a single one. That distinction matters when you need to explain results to a client, stakeholder, or regulator.
AI as coordination layer, not an infrastructure replacement
Nothing here slows down automation. Independent measurement doesn’t add friction to execution but builds confidence in the outcomes those decisions generate. The organizations that will benefit most from agentic media won’t necessarily be the ones that adopt it fastest, but those that take the time to define where trusted autonomy creates measurable value and where human judgment needs to stay in the loop.
Before automation reallocates dollars or reshapes customer journeys, the data model has to hold up under scrutiny.
Trust in data, systems, and decision-making processes becomes the real constraint as agentic systems move from insight to action. That trust doesn’t come from autonomy alone, but it comes from governed data and decisions that can be explained, audited, and defended. Every brand that has operationalized automation at scale has learned the same lesson: before automation reallocates dollars or reshapes customer journeys, the data model has to hold up under scrutiny.
How does Experian help you build a defensible foundation?
Experian’s approach to AI in marketing starts from the same principle: intelligence is only as reliable as the foundation it’s built on.
We have spent decades building and governing data in regulated industries. That experience is what makes our foundation AI-ready: not just technically capable but built to withstand the scrutiny that responsible automation requires.
2026 State of advertising report
Our 2026 State of advertising report brings together perspectives from 14 leaders operating across key parts of the advertising ecosystem to show how shifts in AI, commerce media, healthcare, and more, are taking shape in practice.
Download our 2026 State of advertising report and hear from Scott Bender, Head of Publisher & Platform Partnerships, Newton Research, on how AI in advertising is reshaping planning, activation, and measurement.
The data foundation comes first
Agentic AI will reshape how media is planned and bought. That shift is happening now, and the opportunity is significant. But the advantage belongs to organizations that build on a foundation their systems, partners, and stakeholders can trust. Before automation runs, the inputs must be defensible, identity must be accurate, measurement must be independent, and the problem statement must be clear. Get those things right, and automation becomes more powerful. Skip them, and you’re simply moving faster in the wrong direction.
About the author
Budi Tanzi
SVP, Product, Experian
Budi Tanzi is the Senior Vice President of Product at Experian Marketing Services, overseeing all identity products. Prior to joining Experian, Budi worked at various stakeholders of the ad-tech ecosystem, such as Tapad, Sizmek, and StrikeAd. During his career, he held leadership roles in both Product Management and Solution Engineering. Budi has been living in New York for almost 11 years and enjoys being outdoors as well as sailing around NYC whenever possible.
FAQs
Agentic AI refers to systems that move from signal to recommendation to action with a high degree of autonomy. In media, this means an agent can reallocate budget, adjust audience targeting, or swap creative mid-flight based on real-time signals. Unlike standard programmatic systems that execute within predefined guardrails, agentic systems function more like a navigation layer, coordinating across data inputs, predictive models, and business rules to make directional decisions.
Data quality matters more as media automation becomes more autonomous because autonomous systems don’t slow down to account for bad inputs. If an agentic media system operates on incomplete identity data or stale audience signals, it optimizes faster toward the wrong outcomes. The quality of the identity foundation, the accuracy of audience attributes, and the reliability of measurement inputs all become more consequential, not less, as human oversight is reduced.
Programmatic executes and optimizes within defined parameters whereas agentic systems function at a higher level of abstraction, weighing reach, incrementality, fatigue, and margin before determining where and how to shift spend. Programmatic is the engine. Agentic AI, when built correctly, is the navigation layer that determines direction based on wider context and business objectives.
Measurement should be kept separate from buying logic in agentic systems because when a system measures its own performance, it optimizes toward outcomes it’s best equipped to observe. The definition of success becomes internal rather than external, and performance numbers may look strong while reflecting a narrower view of what’s working. Independent measurement, kept meaningfully separate from buying logic, produces results that can be compared across systems and explained to stakeholders without ambiguity.
Experian’s Offline Graph and Digital Graph provide a privacy-first identity foundation covering more than 250 million U.S. consumers and 4.2 billion digital IDs. Experian’s Marketing Data adds more than 5,000 attributes per audience, and Experian’s outcomes measurement keeps performance signals independent from buying logic.
Latest posts
OpenAudience™ will provide marketers the ability to easily plan and buy advertising for every digitally addressable consumer across the open web LOS ANGELES, May 2, 2019 /PRNewswire/ — For the past decade, the most effective way to advertise in digital media has been on Facebook and Google. Marketers in the U.S. now spend two-thirds of all digital ad spend on the “walled gardens”, despite the fact that they receive less than 36 percent of total consumer time spent online. According to eMarketer, addressing this massive asymmetry in advertising – where tens of billions of dollars are over allocated to the walled gardens – is the top concern of marketers in 2019. While programmatic technology has become the primary monetization system for the open web, it has lacked the simplicity and efficacy of walled gardens. Today, OpenX is changing that paradigm by bringing true people-based marketing to the open web for the first time with the introduction of OpenAudience. OpenAudience will provide marketers and publishers with an unprecedented, unified level of knowledge about consumer audiences – through a platform built on privacy by design principles that brings the efficiency and efficacy of walled garden advertising to the open web. OpenAudience is powered by a comprehensive proprietary data asset and supplemented by integrated partnerships with recognized leaders in data and identity like LiveRamp, Tapad, a part of Experian, and more. For marketers, OpenAudience will provide the ability to plan and buy people-based marketing campaigns that combine the impact and ease of use of Facebook advertising with the scale of the open web. OpenAudience is currently in active partner testing with multiple marketers in the U.S., including Fortune 500 financial service and consumer personal care companies, along with one of America’s largest online entertainment outlets, and will be generally available to the broader market in Q3 of 2019. For publishers, OpenAudience will deliver user-based knowledge that empowers them to value and sell advertising with unparalleled precision. With the ability to automatically place consumers into high-value audience segments drawn from the more than 240M U.S. Monthly Active Users OpenX reaches across the open web, OpenAudience allows publishers to maximize revenue like never before. “OpenAudience is a natural evolution of programmatic advertising, combining the unified knowledge of people-based audiences with the transactional power of programmatic to create a planning, buying and advertising experience that is unlike anything else in the market today,” said Todd Parsons, chief product officer at OpenX. “No exchange in the market today has enabled a unified view of publisher audiences,” said Travis Clinger, vice president of strategic initiatives, LiveRamp. “Now, OpenX is democratizing identity across all publishers on the open web, helping marketers to plan and buy audiences the way they do inside walled gardens. We are thrilled to be a key component of OpenAudience.” For more information, or to request a place in the private testing phase of OpenAudience, visit: http://www.openx.com, or contact your OpenX account representative today. About OpenX Nobody understands the open web better than OpenX. As the world’s largest independent advertising exchange, OpenX makes the efficient people-based marketing buying experience of the walled gardens available to all marketers across the open web. OpenX works with more than 30,000 advertisers across every screen and device, reaching nearly one billion consumers – including a quarter billion unique consumers in the US – and processing more than one trillion transactions globally each day. To date, OpenX has helped deliver more than $3 billion in total monetization to publishers. That’s the Power of Open™. Contact us today
Tom Rolph, VP EMEA at Tapad, part of Experian, says that ad-sponsored streaming services can be successful if they can deliver a higher quality viewer experience than other streaming services. Last week, Hulu, the streaming service acquired by Fox and now owned 60 per cent by Disney, announced it will be regularising its ad loads. The streaming service will be bringing ad breaks down to 90 seconds in an effort to deliver a better viewer experience. This is a positive move from Hulu and one which other ad-supported streaming services should follow in order to be successful in a competitive market. Previously ad breaks on Hulu could vary wildly, from 180 seconds to 240 seconds, due to existing deals with its three owners: Disney, Comcast and AT&T. Over in the UK, we haven’t suffered from quite as inconsistent an approach as in the US, but there is still viewer frustration with the ad experience on ITV Hub and All4, where the problem tends to be over exposure of the same ad. Therefore, this move to standardise ad break lengths for streaming platforms is one that should be embraced on both sides of the pond. An important shift in this space will be to limit the number of ads during each show, but have better ad targeting to minimise repetitive advertising and increase the ROI of ad spend. All of which can be accomplished by investing in identity resolution products that can support CTV devices. Last year Ofcom found that in the UK subscriptions to Netflix, Amazon and NOW TV have risen above those to traditional pay TV services. With Netflix and Amazon both ad-free and NOW TV only a limited ad funded model, it’s clear that there is a growing appetite for ad-free viewing models. A fact that is only further supported when you consider the role of the BBC and BBC iPlayer. But the picture isn’t entirely negative for ad-funded models. There is demand for great content on ad-funded services in the UK, with ITV Hub boasting over 1bn requests and 540m hours of TV watched. The ITV Hub mobile app has also been downloaded on over 27m devices across the country – with over 22m people now registered to ITV Hub database, including more than half of Britain’s 16-24 year olds. However, to continue to attract and retain younger viewers, the experience will have to improve. There are several areas where ad-supported streaming providers need to improve in order to remain top players in this space: Ad experienceAs explored above, both volume and repetition of ads can be a turn off for viewers, but with Brits already spending a total of £303.16m every month on TV streaming services, according to Finder.com, there is potential for free, ad-funded models to flourish as people hit a limit on what they are willing to spend. There are already signs of improvement with the ad experience, with ITV just signing a deal with Amobee to allow for addressable ads on ITV Hub, while Sky’s AdSmart technology remains best in class and has now crossed over the pond to be used by Comcast stablemate NBC. Server reliabilityA cursory search finds little evidence of ongoing reliability problems with Netflix, but much evidence of problems with ITV Hub and All4, which are both prone to crashing. To compete with bigger players with massive server farms, server capacity needs to be tackled. This is especially true when it comes to live events, where many people will recall ITV Hub’s famous fails during the World Cup. While even some of the larger players have had similar streaming issues (for example, Amazon’s move into live sports streaming when they had to pull UK streaming of the US Open Tennis due to user complaints), viewing experience should be prioritised as the space gets increasingly competitive. Getting the content rightAmazon and Netflix have huge content budgets, but UK broadcasters remain strong in this regard, Channel 4 has enjoyed viewing figures of 7.5m for the Great British Bake Off, while ITV pulled in 13.7m for I’m A Celebrity. By building on UK-specific content that speaks to UK audiences, ad-supported streaming services can continue to pull in more viewers. Mobile accessMore and more Brits are choosing to watch TV content on their smartphone or tablet, according to UKOM-approved comScore data. In fact, 6.5m adults visited the BBC iPlayer app to watch video on either a smartphone or tablet, edging out Netflix which attracted 5.8m Getting the experience right on mobile, with the option to download content so it can be viewed in areas of low or no signal, is key.If UK ad-supported TV stations can crack these key areas for their Connected TV offering then they will be set up to succeed and offer a true home-grown alternative to the US streaming giants. Full article here. Contact us today
Tapad’s, part of Experian, SVP of Identity shows us how marketers might communicate seamlessly through emerging channels like voice, the smart home, and, yes, podcasts.In his relatively new role as senior vice president of identity at Tapad, a part of Experian, Ajit Thupil keeps a close eye on the evolution of marketing as it becomes more intent on using data and identity technology to track ROI. Here he sits with Chris Wood at Tapad’s New York offices to discuss the future of identity. (To capture the inventive atmosphere at this location, the room they chatted in was named after Leonardo da Vinci.) For Thupil, it all comes back to the customer, whether it’s a brand client or a consumer. Brands want measurability and customers demand a seamless experience across the many devices they use in a day. While consumers are understandably reticent about giving up personally identifiable information (PII), current identity solutions use anonymous data profiles to connect the dots at the individual or household level. Given the frequency that users switch devices, along with their tendency to share bigger screens like TVs, there’s no dearth of challenges for this “head of problem solving” to solve. Contact us today