Loading...

Streamline coordination of benefits (COB) for fewer claim denials

Published: March 27, 2024 by Experian Health

Streamline-coordination-of-benefits-COB-for-fewer-claim-denials-new-blog

Healthcare leaders often zero in on how uninsured rates affect their bottom line. But another patient group presents a quieter financial dilemma for providers: those with multiple active health plans. In these cases, it’s important to ensure each plan pays the right amount – in the right order. Should any confusion arise, providers may end up with their claims being denied, resulting in underpayments. This is where the coordination of benefits (COB) process comes in.

What is coordination of benefits (COB) and why is it important?

When a patient is covered by more than one plan, the “coordination of benefits” process kicks in to help health plans figure out their respective payment responsibilities. With patients often having multiple insurance policies, ensuring that each policy pays its share is vital. The purpose of coordination of benefits is to prevent overpayment or duplication of benefits, ensuring that the total benefits paid do not exceed the actual cost of the service received. Integrating a digital COB solution within registration and scheduling workflows can help providers ensure they bill primary and secondary payers correctly, preventing unnecessary claim denials.

Challenges of coordination of benefits

Coordination of Benefits is a pivotal aspect of RCM, but it’s not without its hurdles. Here’s a look at the complexities that often arise:

  • Overlapping Policies: Determining which policy pays first can be confusing. Patients with dual coverage might not always be aware of the hierarchy, leading to billing complications. And many legacy systems only select the primary, without consideration for secondary or tertiary. And regional plans add another layer of complexity.
  • Claim Denials: Incorrect coordination of benefits can lead to claim denials or overpayments. This not only affects revenue but also strains the patient-provider relationship when patients are billed incorrectly.
  • Administrative Burden: Manual COB verification is time-consuming and prone to errors. Staff often spend hours cross-referencing policies, which could be better spent on patient care.

Coordination of benefits: the dream vs. reality

In an ideal world, patients would register for care weeks ahead of their scheduled treatment. During the registration process, they would inform the provider of all their active insurance coverage, with correct and complete details close to hand. No plan would go unmentioned, and no policy number misplaced. Registration staff would quickly enter the information into their EMR without error, so coverage could be verified in real-time.

The reality is far different. Recent findings show that 65% of consumers struggle to understand what their health insurance covers. They do not carry copies of their insurance cards. They may not be aware that they are covered under a relative’s health plan. Patient access teams are under-staffed and over-stretched, with little time to ask guiding questions that would uncover additional insurance.

Coordination of benefits efforts should start as soon as it becomes apparent that a patient has active coverage under multiple plans. Unfortunately, the messy reality of coverage discovery and patient registration means patients and providers are left in the dark until a claim is denied. The payer rejects the claim for a COB-related reason, leaving billers with no clue how to resolve it. The problem gets worse from there.

Automating coordination of benefits for faster, cleaner claims

As with all aspects of healthcare billing, there are many complex rules and regulations governing COB transactions. Under HIPAA, health plans and payers (including Medicare and Medicaid) must coordinate benefits for each patient and determine the primary and secondary payers.

Tracking this manually is extremely challenging for providers: using the information provided by the patient (which may or may not be accurate), staff would contact each payer by phone or email to verify coverage. They would then review the COB rules and guidelines for each health plan to determine the primary payer and follow specific rules for billing secondary payers. It’s no wonder that COB transactions are now among the most automated administrative tasks.

Automating coordination of benefits not only saves staff time, but also increases the chances of finding all active coverage, collating complete insurance profiles for the patient, and making an accurate primacy determination. Digital systems also make it easier for providers and payers to communicate with one another, facilitating smoother dispute resolution and regulatory compliance.

Patient Access Curator brings real-time COB to EH clients

In late 2023, Experian Health acquired Wave HDC, bringing clients a new and unrivalled package of real-time coverage and benefits solutions based on AI-powered data curation.

This new solution, Patient Access Curator, helps healthcare billing teams prevent claim denials in seconds through real-time data analysis. This includes COB curation, which automatically analyzes payer responses to identify hidden cues that staff cannot see. If other insurance is identified, the tool alerts the user and triggers additional queries to verify active coverage and build a complete insurance profile for the patient. Each policy is then analyzed further to determine the patient’s primary, secondary and tertiary coverage, reliably sifting out any non-billable coverage.

Since 2020, the technology powering Patient Access Curator has prevented denials amounting to more than $1 billion.

Integrating coordination of benefits automation yields savings throughout the revenue cycle

Integrating COB automation with other RCM tools, such as coverage discovery and eligibility verification, means providers can prevent and manage denials in a single workflow. Doing this during patient registration allows teams to resolve issues in the early stages of the revenue cycle, rather than wait to deal with them once claims are denied.

While catching errors on the front-end results in faster patient registration and clean claims first time, the tool adds value later in the revenue cycle, too. Streamlining the correction process prevents revenue loss and reduces the need for manual intervention.

Here’s how these use cases look in practice:

  • In one multistate practice, the technology automated COB curation with insurance verification during patient registration. This enabled primary coverage corrections for 12% of patient registrations and identified undocumented Medicare and Medicaid coverages for 6% of registrations. Left unchecked, these omissions would have resulted in denials, delays, and missed revenue opportunities.
  • The technology was deployed in the denials workflow at a large health system, where it identified COB corrections for 92% of all COB denials. Of these, 60% were immediately refiled to the correct primary payer, minimizing delays in revenue recovery. In the remaining claims, the tool found evidence of inaccurate or outdated third-party liability records within payer claim adjudication systems.

Providers urgently need revenue cycle processes to be as efficient and reliable as possible – especially when dealing with patients with multiple, complex health plans. A powerful denial prevention solution that slots neatly into the registration workflow means they can maximize revenue with minimal human intervention. And with accurate results delivered in seconds, Patient Access Curator could be just what the doctor ordered.

Get in touch today to find out more about coordination of benefits automation and discuss other ways to increase efficiency on the front-end of the revenue cycle, using Patient Access Curator.

Related Posts

Learn the fundamentals of claims management in healthcare, including key steps, common challenges, and best practices to improve reimbursement rates and reduce denials.

Published: August 7, 2025 by Experian Health

Learn how key provisions in the 2025 budget bill may impact Medicaid, uncompensated care, and hospital finances - and how to prepare with the right revenue cycle tools.

Published: August 4, 2025 by Experian Health

Manual prior authorization workflows represent one of the most tedious and expensive aspects of the healthcare revenue cycle. However, despite access to automated prior authorization software, only 31% of providers use electronic prior authorizations, according to the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH). The CAQH predicts that providers who switch to automated prior authorization software could not only gain back valuable staff time, but also see significant cost savings. What is prior authorization and why is it important? In healthcare, prior authorizations are when providers and payers decide in advance if a patient's insurance plan will pay for a specific treatment. Prior authorizations are crucial to reimbursements and keeping revenue cycles on track. Providers that offer services without prior authorization are unlikely to receive reimbursement from the patient's insurer. This can result in unpaid medical bills, leaving billing teams chasing patient collections or writing off bad debt. During the prior authorization process, providers submit a rationale for a proposed treatment to the payer. The request is approved or denied based on certain criteria, including payer policies and medical necessity. The payer may reject a prior authorization request if the treatment or service isn't covered under the patient's insurance plan, if it's not considered medically necessary or if a more affordable alternative is available. Simple paperwork errors, like missed deadlines or incomplete documentation when submitting a prior authorization, may also result in a denial. Challenges of manual prior authorization processes Despite the importance of prior authorizations in the revenue cycle, tedious manual prior authorization processes present challenges for many healthcare providers. Some of the key obstacles providers face using manual prior authorization include: Heavy administrative burden Healthcare providers spend a significant amount of time starting, completing and revising prior authorization paperwork. An AMA survey found that 86% of physicians say prior authorization has increased healthcare resource usage. At the same time, additional AMA data reports that providers spend around 13 hours working on 39 prior authorizations each week, and nearly one-third of providers report that these prior authorization requests usually end up being denied. Changing payer policies Keeping up with multiple payers and ever-evolving payer policies adds strain on staff and ultimately results in prior authorization denials. Changes are often unannounced, making it hard for providers to stay on top of updates. As a result, prior authorization submissions aren’t always accurate and may be based on outdated rules. This can lead to instant rejection and wasted time correcting and resubmitting requests. Inefficient workflows Prior authorization requirements can be complicated, especially when providers are juggling different payers, standards and service lines. Coping with these complexities often puts strain on manual systems, especially when multiple staff and notetaking methods are involved. Staff members may each get different pieces of information from payer websites (or over the phone) and not have the ability to benefit from their shared knowledge efficiently. Navigating communication hurdles and rapid payer information changes can result in workflow inefficiencies that snowball quickly. How prior authorization software can improve efficiency Replacing manual prior authorizations processes with automated prior authorization software can help providers improve efficiency. Here are some key ways providers benefit from automated prior authorization solutions, like Experian Health's Authorizations. Reduces manual interventions: This solution limits guesswork, human errors, and misinterpretations by automating data originating from the EMRs. Automation saves staff time and energy and prevents frustration. Stays current with latest payer policies: The prior authorization system stays up-to-date with the latest regulations and payer requirements. Automatic updates provide staff with the most current information, eliminating the need for staff to visit multiple payer websites or cross-check data by hand. Provides real-time updates: Providers can promptly clear authorizations for service by proactively identifying authorization status as pending, denied or authorized. This allows physicians to make timely treatment plans and for patients to avoid disruptions in care. Reduces risk of denials: Through automation, electronic prior authorization software ensures the accuracy and completeness of submissions by automatically checking with payers and vendors to validate that the authorization is on file. Payers and providers also get a shared view of account information, reducing the need for prolonged discussions about the status of authorization and rework requests. Key features to look for in prior authorization software When implementing prior authorization software, look for a solution that offers a wide range of features to automate and streamline the prior authorization process. Experian Health's prior authorization solution, Authorizations, for instance, offers healthcare providers the following key features: Real-time knowledgebase: Access to up-to-date prior authorization requirements and criteria in the National Payer Rulesets Submissions support: Removes guesswork and directs users to the correct payer portal based on procedure Automated inquiries: Automates the prior authorization payer inquiry process Enhanced workflow: Dynamic work queues display status and guides users through next steps Postback: Allows users to easily send authorization status, number and validity dates to health information systems (HIS) and practice management systems (PMS) Image storage: Receives and securely stores payer responses in an integrated document imaging system Reconciliation: Provides insights into authorization variations and helps resolve them, so staff can take proactive steps to prevent denials and appeals Integration with electronic health records and billing systems: Why it matters Providers often choose a prior authorizations platform that seamlessly integrates with existing Electronic Health Records (EHR) and billing systems for maximum efficiency. Solutions like Experian Health's automated prior authorization management tool, Authorizations, easily adapt to existing processes. This eliminates the need for a complete workflow overhaul and minimizes the learning curve for staff. Embracing prior authorization software for a more efficient revenue cycle Revenue cycle leaders who implement prior authorization automation strategies could see significant savings – $494 million annually as an industry, according to CAQH data.  Claims and revenue management processes are often complex and outdated, costing healthcare organizations time and money. High denial rates and slow reimbursements can hurt cash flow and get in the way of financial stability. Automating prior authorization can reduce claim denials, speed up reimbursements and improve the bottom line. Learn more about how Experian Health's electronic prior authorization software, Authorizations, uses automation to achieve greater consistency and efficiency for healthcare organizations. Learn more Contact us

Published: July 30, 2025 by Experian Health

Subscribe to our blog

Enter your name and email for the latest updates.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Subscribe to the Experian Health blog

Get the latest industry news and updates!
Subscribe