Ask any agency or brand leader what they want from a curation partner, and you’ll hear similar things: better data, cleaner deals, and measurable outcomes. At the same time, most teams are also managing a media strategy that spans dozens of platforms, partners, and environments. Your strategy shouldn’t be constrained by any one of them.
While those things matter, there’s a question underneath all of them that rarely gets asked directly.
Is your curation partner structured to serve you, or to serve their own position in the ecosystem?
That question matters more today than it did two years ago. The programmatic ecosystem has consolidated. Platforms have gotten larger, partnerships have become more entangled, and the line between trusted partner and another stakeholder with an agenda has gotten harder to see.
At Experian, we think about neutrality as the structural question curation has to answer first. Before data quality. Before deal performance. Before scale.
What neutral actually means
Neutral isn’t the same as passive. It means being structured to serve both sides of a transaction without benefiting from pushing either side in a particular direction. That’s the definition of a trusted intermediary: sitting in the middle of the ecosystem to create better outcomes, not to capture a larger share of it.
For curation, that means a few things we take seriously. We are demand-side platform (DSP) agnostic. We don’t route buyers toward certain platforms because we have a financial stake in their success. We honor existing supply-side platform (SSP) relationships and build integrations that work across the agencies, brands, publishers, and technology platforms our clients already use. Our goal is to work inside your ecosystem, not compete with it.
Why neutrality is harder to find than it should be
Most players in the programmatic supply chain have built their business models around a specific position. DSPs optimize for platform retention, SSPs want a larger share of available supply, and walled gardens are designed to keep signal inside their environment.
Those are understandable business decisions. But they create conflicting incentives for anyone inside those structures who is also being positioned as a neutral curation partner.
Experian’s position is different. Our value grows when the ecosystem stays open and connected. That alignment shapes how we build, price, and go to market. It’s what makes genuine neutrality possible at scale.
Neutrality is what makes everything else trustworthy
Data quality, interoperability, and performance all matter in a curation partner. But none of those capabilities deliver their full value when the partner providing them has a stake in steering outcomes toward their own infrastructure.
Neutrality is the condition that makes the rest of the evaluation trustworthy.
For teams assessing curation partners right now, I’d start there. Ask how the partner makes money. Ask who benefits when you stay inside their ecosystem. Those answers will tell you a great deal about whether the relationship is actually built in your interest.
About the author
Kevin Dunn
Chief Revenue Officer, Experian
Kevin Dunn joins Experian Marketing Services with more than 20 years of leadership experience across marketing and advertising technology, most recently serving as Senior Vice President of Brands and Agencies at LiveRamp. In that role, he led growth across retail, CPG, travel, hospitality, financial services, and healthcare, overseeing new business, account expansion, and channel partnerships.
Kevin is known for building cohesive, accountable teams and leading with optimism, clarity, and a strong sense of shared purpose. His leadership philosophy centers on empowering people, driving positive outcomes for clients and fostering a culture where teams can grow, take smart risks, and succeed together.
Latest posts
With the recent announcement of delaying third-party cookie deprecation to 2024, the industry has more time to rethink how to identify and communicate with consumers.
As today’s digital landscape gets more and more complicated there are more ways for brands to connect with users and drive purchases and more ways for ad tech to target and measure those touch points. As in-person shopping picks up steam due to the re-normalization of society post-COVID 19; the connection between digital ads and in-person purchases needs to be made once again. With the rise of Connected TV throughout the pandemic there are even more digital opportunities to target a user. But how do you make sure that those brand engagements are captured and correctly attributed to offline purchases and conversions? The answer lies in a holistic identity resolution strategy. Cross-device identity resolution with The Tapad Graph connects the identifiers and devices of individuals within a household to each other; enabling targeting, frequency capping, extension, segmentation and measurement or attribution between devices; including Connected TV and hashed (privacy-protected) email addresses along with Cookies, Mobile Ad Ids and IP Address. Brands can join their first-party data to The Tapad Graph to execute strategies that connect online and offline data for pre, mid and post-campaign efficiencies. Let’s imagine a scenario in which an outdoor retail brand is targeting users watching specific content on a Connected TV device. Powered by identity resolution, they start with a general ad on CTV and continue targeting down individual paths with each user. When one of them converts in store and makes a purchase; the outdoor retailer can connect that action through location and in-store traffic data with the cross-device identity resolution used to execute the digital campaign. Now the actions of the user online and offline are resolved for more accurate measurement and attribution after the campaign ends. But it doesn’t stop there– the brand’s CRM data can be reactivated for the next digital campaign and leveraged to capitalize on the most effective media mix for the user who made the purchase previously. These combined insights can be invaluable in shaping up future campaign strategies with geo-contextual ads, recommended additional products and personalization to help drive more conversions and purchases in-store or online. As in-person shopping picks back up and marketers are tasked once again with balancing online and in-store KPIs, the right identity resolution strategy can unlock necessary efficiencies for retailers, ad tech vendors and agencies tasked with supporting these initiatives. Get in touch
Experian Marketing Services and Data Quality President Genevieve Juillard recently sat down with Zach Rodgers, host of the AdExchanger Talks podcast to discuss the future of identity, the importance of data transparency and privacy, and our recent acquisition of Tapad. Genevieve focused on the opportunity for our industry to reimagine an advertising ecosystem that is resilient and adaptable; one that takes advantage of emerging data and prioritizes data transparency and consumer privacy. She also discussed the importance of advertising strategies that put consumers at the heart of every decision and give them more control over their data. Genevieve shared with AdExchanger that Experian’s acquisition of Tapad, a global leader in digital identity resolution, was a natural fit for our company. Tapad’s approach and role in the ecosystem is very much aligned with Experian’s, which is to develop solutions that are resilient to industry and consumer changes. The combination of our capabilities supports interoperability across all types of identifiers, both online and offline, and will position us to help our clients navigate the post-third-party cookie world. To learn more about Experian’s plans to support an effective advertising ecosystem that will evolve with our dynamic industry, listen to the full podcast Embracing ‘Healthy Fragmentation’ In Ad Tech, With Genevieve Juillard. Get in touch