Tag: claim denials

With millions of healthcare claims to process and millions of dollars at stake each month, getting claims right the first time is a top performance indicator for healthcare providers. The administrative burden is immense – there are more than a thousand health payers, each with their own requirements, edits and software. Each claim must be scrubbed to make sure every last detail is correct before it's submitted – or the result will be delayed payments and lost revenue. By taking this resource-intensive activity off providers' hands, medical billing clearinghouses are often the “most valuable player” of healthcare claims management. Choosing the right medical claims clearinghouse could make or break a provider's claims management success. What is a medical claims clearinghouse? Healthcare clearinghouses help providers increase reimbursement rates by checking each claim before it's submitted to the payer. They scrub for errors and omissions, then reformat the data to meet the specific requirements of each payer. Once a claim is cleared, the clearinghouse transmits the electronic claim (the “837 file”) to the appropriate commercial or government payer using a secure connection, in line with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The payer evaluates the claim and communicates acceptance or rejection to the clearinghouse. If payment is due, the payer will issue a reimbursement check with an Explanation of Benefits (EOB) statement. Rejected claims may be resubmitted once any corrections have been made. This sounds like a simple process, but it's extremely complex. Tracking and adapting to individual payer edits, state insurance regulations, and multiple software systems call for a level of expertise and industry insight that would be challenging for in-house teams to maintain efficiently. With a singular focus on claims routing and the quirks of individual payer adjudication workflows, healthcare clearinghouses are often better placed to streamline electronic claims submissions. What services do clearinghouses help with? A healthcare clearinghouse can typically offer: Claims processing: Managing the submission, processing, and tracking of medical claims electronically to insurance payers. Denial management: Handling denied claims by identifying the reasons for denial, correcting errors, and resubmitting claims for reimbursement. Real-time eligibility verification: Verifying patients' insurance coverage and eligibility in real time to ensure accurate billing and reduce claim denials. Electronic data interchange (EDI): Facilitating the electronic exchange of healthcare data between healthcare providers and insurance payers in standardized formats. Electronic remittance advice (ERA) processing: Receiving and processing electronic remittance advice from insurance payers to reconcile payments and denials with submitted claims. Claim scrubbing: Checking claims for errors, inaccuracies, and missing information before submission to reduce the likelihood of claim denials. Coordination of benefits (COB) verification: Identifying primary and secondary insurance coverage for patients with multiple insurance plans to ensure accurate billing and reimbursement. Claim status inquiry and reporting: Providing tools and services to track the status of submitted claims and generate reports on claim processing metrics. Compliance and regulatory support: Ensuring compliance with healthcare regulations, such as HIPAA, and staying updated on changes in billing requirements and coding standards. Provider enrollment: Helping healthcare providers enroll with insurance payers and update their provider information as needed. Appeals management: Assisting healthcare providers in appealing denied claims through proper documentation and communication with insurance payers. EDI connectivity and integration: Offering connectivity solutions and integration services to seamlessly exchange data between healthcare providers' practice management systems and the clearinghouse platform. Customer support and training: Providing ongoing support and training to healthcare providers and their staff on using the clearinghouse platform effectively and resolving issues related to claims processing and reimbursement Why work with a medical claims clearinghouse? The answer lies in the growing problem of denied claims. Denials dent provider profits through lost revenue and time wasted on reworking claims. A 2021 KFF study of in-network claims found that 18% were denied because they were for excluded services, 9% because of missing prior authorization or referrals, and 72% because of “other reasons.” This likely includes incorrect patient encounter codes, incomplete patient or physician information, or other data entry errors. Too many denials arise from avoidable human error. Providers can ill-afford an inefficient claims management workflow. Direct submissions require staff to repeat the same data entry tasks repeatedly, using multiple software accounts. Monitoring claims status without a centralized system is messy. And with ongoing staffing pressures, many providers don't have the resources or infrastructure to attempt this anyway. The savings of a direct-to-payer approach are soon outweighed by higher denial rates. Healthcare clearinghouses can ease the burden on in-house RCM teams, smooth friction between providers and payers, and provide industry intelligence to streamline claims submissions. By partnering with a medical claims clearinghouse, providers don't just save time and staff resources, but increase the likelihood of claims being submitted right the first time. The importance of choosing a clearinghouse that stays compliant Complying with industry regulations helps healthcare providers avoid costly fines and reputational damage. Compliance rules ensure adherence to stringent regulations like HIPAA, which safeguards patient data privacy and confidentiality, ensuring that all data handling practices comply with the highest standards. A compliant clearinghouse implements robust security measures like encryption and access controls to protect sensitive information during EDI. Staying compliant fosters trust among stakeholders, including patients, healthcare providers, and insurance payers. It demonstrates a commitment to ethical practices and upholds industry standards, promoting long-term relationships and sustainability in the always-evolving healthcare field. What to look for when choosing a medical billing clearinghouse? Here are five features to look out for when choosing the right medical billing clearinghouse partner: 1. Usability “Is this medical claims clearinghouse going to be easy to work with? Do they have a user-friendly interface?” Given that a significant motivation behind working with a medical claims clearinghouse is to make the claims process easier, the first question to ask is how easy they'll be to work with. The ideal clearinghouse partner will offer a streamlined user experience with an intuitive online claims dashboard or interface so that all claims can be managed in one place. Inevitably, issues that need to be checked by the provider's medical billing team will crop up. The clearinghouse should offer clear communication channels and protocols for verifying, correcting, and adding any missing information or documentation. Ideally, the clearinghouse's interface will provide at-a-glance error reports and updates on the status of each claim, to minimize delays and allow staff to report on progress. The clearinghouse should also offer staff training and real-time support for fast and effective implementation. Medical billing teams don't want to spend hours chasing up queries, so investigating call center support protocols and response times is a smart move. Some of the standard add-on services that make the medical claims clearinghouse more user-friendly include: Training materials: The clearinghouse should offer comprehensive training sessions, to empower healthcare providers and staff with the knowledge and skills to utilize the platform effectively. Customer service: The clearinghouse should pride itself on delivering exceptional customer service tailored to its users' unique needs and challenges. A dedicated support team is available via phone and email to promptly address inquiries, troubleshoot issues, and provide personalized assistance. Their responsive and knowledgeable approach ensures that users receive timely support and guidance whenever they require assistance. Also, look for a medical claims clearinghouse with security and privacy features to keep patient data safe. For example: Data encryption: All data transmitted through the clearinghouse platform should be encrypted using industry-standard protocols, safeguarding sensitive information from unauthorized access during transmission Access controls: Role-based access controls limit user access to specific features and functionalities based on their role and responsibilities within the healthcare organization, reducing the risk of unauthorized data access and misuse. Audit trails: Comprehensive audit trails track and record all user activities within the platform, enabling administrators to monitor and review user actions for compliance and security purposes. The medical claims clearinghouse should conduct periodic security audits and assessments to identify and address potential vulnerabilities and ensure ongoing compliance with industry regulations and best practices. Data redundancy and disaster recovery: Robust data redundancy measures and disaster recovery plans are in place to protect against data loss or corruption, ensuring continuity of service and minimizing downtime in the event of unforeseen incidents or emergencies. Confidentiality agreements: All staff members undergo training on data privacy and security practices and sign confidentiality agreements, reinforcing their commitment to protecting the confidentiality and privacy of patient information. 2. Reach and scope “Does this medical claims clearinghouse connect to all our regular payers? Will we need to engage additional clearinghouses for specific cases?” To leverage the advantages of outsourcing claims processing, providers must check that the clearinghouse can handle their specific claims mix and list their most-billed payers. Healthcare clearinghouses often specialize in different types of claims, such as in-patient, out-patient, dental, pharmacy, and so on, so this will likely be a quick way to narrow down the options. Similarly, some operate only in certain regions, and if the provider needs to submit claims to payers outside that area, they're going to need another clearinghouse. In most cases, choosing a clearinghouse with a broad reach and national scope will be beneficial so that all claims can be handled by a single vendor. If the provider plans to use the clearinghouse for Medicaid submissions, they'll also want to check that their partner is set up to do this in line with state requirements. Providers should also consider what services they need from their clearinghouse: submitting electronic claims? Verifying patient eligibility and coverage? Checking the status of claims and receiving ERAs? Some clearinghouses will perform all these functions, while others focus on one or two areas. 3. Error rates “What are the clearinghouse's average rejection rates? How can we accelerate corrections?” Minimizing billing errors is the key to reducing rejections and denials. When discussing program components with a potential clearinghouse partner, providers should look for features that minimize errors, such as checks for duplicate information, missing attachments and coding discrepancies. A dashboard that flags any potential issues means errors can be found and fixed immediately, rather than being discovered weeks later. To complement this process, providers should also consider what in-house actions could further reduce the risk of errors. Running internal checks with automated tools such as Claim Scrubber can ensure claims are in good shape before they're sent to the clearinghouse. Claim Scrubber reviews every line of pre-billed claims and verifies patient information coding entries before being sent on. General and payer-specific edits can be checked to increase first-time pass rates. Automated Prior Authorizations and Insurance Eligibility Verification tools offer another layer of extra checks, by verifying eligibility at each stage of the patient's healthcare journey. 4. Affordability “How are the clearinghouse's contracts structured? Are there extra fees to watch out for?” Providers will want to find a reasonably priced clearinghouse. Some charge a fixed monthly fee, while others charge a variable fee based on the volume of claims each month. Providers with relatively low claims should choose the first option. Eligibility checks, claim status updates and remittance receipts are likely to be charged separately, so these should also be factored into contract discussions. Because the rules around claims submissions often change, providers should avoid being locked into long-term contracts, and clarify the termination arrangements. Using a medical claims clearinghouse offers several financial benefits for healthcare providers: Faster reimbursement: Clearinghouses streamline the claims submission process, reducing the time it takes to submit and process claims. This results in quicker reimbursement from insurance payers, improving cash flow for healthcare organizations. Reduced claim denials: Healthcare clearinghouses employ claim scrubbing technology to identify and correct errors before submission, reducing the likelihood of claim denials. These solutions help minimize the need for costly appeals and resubmissions, saving time and resources. Improved efficiency: Automating manual tasks and providing electronic solutions for claims processing lets clearinghouses increase operational efficiency within healthcare organizations. Staff can focus on patient care instead of administrative tasks, optimizing productivity and reducing labor costs. Lowered administrative costs: Clearinghouses offer a centralized platform for managing claims and interacting with insurance payers, streamlining administrative processes and reducing administrative overhead costs associated with paper-based systems. Access to reporting analytics: Clearinghouses often provide analytics and reporting tools that offer insights into claim submission trends, denial rates, and reimbursement patterns. Healthcare providers can use this data to identify areas for improvement and optimize revenue cycle management strategies. Negotiation power with payers: Clearinghouses provide valuable data and analytics that healthcare providers can use during contract negotiations with insurance payers. Access to comprehensive claim data and performance metrics strengthens providers' negotiating position, potentially leading to more favorable reimbursement rates. It's also worth considering how partnering with a clearinghouse that integrates with other claims management solutions can deliver cost savings elsewhere in the revenue cycle, through optimized workflows and greater efficiency. 5. Integrated services “How does this service fit within our broader revenue cycle management (RCM) activities?” Claims management doesn't happen in isolation: everything from the patient billing experience to internal denials management should work together to improve the entire revenue cycle. It's important to look for a clearinghouse that can integrate with other RCM tools to improve first-pass rates and shorten payment cycles. Some clearinghouses can receive electronic remittance advice (ERA) and even automate payments, which could help providers get paid faster and further reduce the administrative load on staff. Clearinghouses can also integrate with a provider's electronic medical record and medical billing software to plug any gaps before claims are submitted. This integration ensures that accurate and up-to-date patient information is included in claims, reducing errors and denials. Additionally, clearinghouses may offer tools or APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) that allow EHR systems to transmit claims data directly to the clearinghouse platform, eliminating the need for manual data entry and improving efficiency. Clearinghouses should also integrate with practice management (PMS) systems to streamline claims submission. This interoperability enables a seamless transfer of patient and billing information from the PMS to the clearinghouse platform, automating claim generation and submission. Clearinghouses may even provide real-time claim status updates and remittance advice directly within the PMS. As noted, providers can accelerate claims and denial management by leveraging tools such as Claim Scrubber and ClaimSource. These tools draw on Experian Health's unrivaled dataset and analytics platforms, and integrate with Experian Health's other RCM solutions to verify and automate the information being added to each claim. Experian's patient identity solutions can also be used to keep patient data safe and secure, and cross-check demographic information to prevent hold-ups and streamline the entire process. Technological Trends and Innovations Technological advancements, particularly artificial intelligence (AI), are transforming claims denials management. AI-powered algorithms can analyze vast datasets to identify patterns, predict claim outcomes, and optimize workflows. These solutions enable healthcare providers to choose clearinghouses based on performance metrics, such as claim acceptance rates and denial management capabilities. By harnessing AI, clearinghouses offer unparalleled accuracy, speed, and intelligence, empowering healthcare organizations to maximize revenue and streamline healthcare operations. Glossary of Clearinghouse Terms Clearinghouse: A third-party entity that acts as an intermediary between healthcare providers and payers (insurance companies or government agencies) to facilitate the electronic processing of medical claims. EDI (Electronic Data Interchange): The electronic exchange of structured data between computer systems, used by clearinghouses to transmit medical claims data between providers and payers. HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act): Federal legislation that sets standards for protecting and securing patients' health information, including electronic transactions such as those handled by medical claims clearinghouses. Claim Submission: The process of sending a request for reimbursement for healthcare services rendered to a patient to the payer through the clearinghouse. Claim Validation: The process of verifying the completeness and accuracy of medical claims data before submission to the payer, helping to reduce errors and denials. EDI Enrollment: The process by which healthcare providers register with a clearinghouse to exchange electronic data, including setting up connectivity and establishing secure transmission protocols. Rejection: When a submitted medical claim does not meet the requirements or standards set by the payer, resulting in a refusal to process the claim for reimbursement. Error Code: A numeric or alphanumeric code provided by the clearinghouse or payer to indicate the reason for a claim rejection, facilitating troubleshooting and correction of the issue. Electronic Remittance Advice: A document sent by the payer to the healthcare provider detailing the status of processed claims, including payment information and explanations for any denials or adjustments. Claim Status Inquiry: The process of querying the clearinghouse or payer to obtain information on the current status of a submitted medical claim, such as whether it has been received, processed, or paid. Claim Resubmission: The process of correcting and re-submitting a rejected or denied medical claim for reconsideration and processing by the payer. Batch Processing: The method clearinghouses use to handle multiple medical claims simultaneously, typically in large batches, to increase efficiency and reduce processing time. Payer List: A directory maintained by the clearinghouse containing information about the insurance companies and government agencies with which it interfaces for medical claims processing, including contact details and electronic submission requirements. Learn more about how Experian Health's medical claims clearinghouse and claims management solutions can help providers simplify and accelerate claims processing for faster payments and fewer denials.

“As the IU Health Revenue Cycle team rallied to respond to the claims processing disruption, we were uniquely positioned with our long-time Experian partnership to quickly re-institute critical claims routines and restore a significant volume of claims transmissions.  This would not have been possible without Experian's nimble and comprehensive approach, immediately applying talented and committed resources that leveraged existing Experian platform infrastructure.” – Bryan Daniels, Vice President Revenue Cycle Solutions, IU Health Challenge Indiana University Health (IU Health) is the largest network of physicians in Indiana comprised of over 38,000 team members and 2,717 available beds. Based in Indianapolis, Indiana, the organization has dozens of facilities statewide and is on a mission to make the state one of the healthiest in the nation. In February 2024, IU Health found itself impacted by the cybersecurity incident so many providers across the country abruptly faced. They were unable to send claims to insurance companies and their revenue cycle operations came to screeching halt. Knowing they needed a trusted solution fast, the revenue cycle leadership team asked Experian Health if they could help. Solution Conversations advanced quickly and the Experian Health team was able to implement its Best in KLAS ClaimSource® platform within a week. ClaimSource is an innovative claims management solution designed for scalability and improves revenue streams by minimizing denials. By using automation, it boosts operational efficiency by prioritizing claims, payments, and denials, allowing users to tackle high-impact accounts promptly. Outcome Thanks to ClaimSource, IU Health achieved the following results: Accelerated $632 million in claims transmissions in the first five days of business. Processed $1.1B of claims backlog by March 27.  “We value our longstanding partnership with IU Health and it's very rewarding that we were able to help in a very critical situation,” said Jason Considine, Experian Health's Chief Commercial Officer. “We know IU Health places the utmost importance on patient care, and being an important part of our client's solution to deliver on their service commitment is reflective of our service commitment to simplify healthcare.” Learn more about how ClaimSource can help your healthcare organization accelerate cash flow, reduce denials and optimize efficiency.

Healthcare leaders often zero in on how uninsured rates affect their bottom line. But another patient group presents a quieter financial dilemma for providers: those with multiple active health plans. In these cases, it's important to ensure each plan pays the right amount – in the right order. Should any confusion arise, providers may end up with their claims being denied, resulting in underpayments. This is where the coordination of benefits (COB) process comes in. What is coordination of benefits (COB) and why is it important? When a patient is covered by more than one plan, the “coordination of benefits” process kicks in to help health plans figure out their respective payment responsibilities. With patients often having multiple insurance policies, ensuring that each policy pays its share is vital. The purpose of coordination of benefits is to prevent overpayment or duplication of benefits, ensuring that the total benefits paid do not exceed the actual cost of the service received. Integrating a digital COB solution within registration and scheduling workflows can help providers ensure they bill primary and secondary payers correctly, preventing unnecessary claim denials. Challenges of coordination of benefits  Coordination of Benefits is a pivotal aspect of RCM, but it's not without its hurdles. Here's a look at the complexities that often arise:  Overlapping Policies: Determining which policy pays first can be confusing. Patients with dual coverage might not always be aware of the hierarchy, leading to billing complications. And many legacy systems only select the primary, without consideration for secondary or tertiary. And regional plans add another layer of complexity.  Claim Denials: Incorrect coordination of benefits can lead to claim denials or overpayments. This not only affects revenue but also strains the patient-provider relationship when patients are billed incorrectly.  Administrative Burden: Manual COB verification is time-consuming and prone to errors. Staff often spend hours cross-referencing policies, which could be better spent on patient care.  Coordination of benefits: the dream vs. reality In an ideal world, patients would register for care weeks ahead of their scheduled treatment. During the registration process, they would inform the provider of all their active insurance coverage, with correct and complete details close to hand. No plan would go unmentioned, and no policy number misplaced. Registration staff would quickly enter the information into their EMR without error, so coverage could be verified in real-time. The reality is far different. Recent findings show that 65% of consumers struggle to understand what their health insurance covers. They do not carry copies of their insurance cards. They may not be aware that they are covered under a relative's health plan. Patient access teams are under-staffed and over-stretched, with little time to ask guiding questions that would uncover additional insurance. Coordination of benefits efforts should start as soon as it becomes apparent that a patient has active coverage under multiple plans. Unfortunately, the messy reality of coverage discovery and patient registration means patients and providers are left in the dark until a claim is denied. The payer rejects the claim for a COB-related reason, leaving billers with no clue how to resolve it. The problem gets worse from there. Automating coordination of benefits for faster, cleaner claims As with all aspects of healthcare billing, there are many complex rules and regulations governing COB transactions. Under HIPAA, health plans and payers (including Medicare and Medicaid) must coordinate benefits for each patient and determine the primary and secondary payers. Tracking this manually is extremely challenging for providers: using the information provided by the patient (which may or may not be accurate), staff would contact each payer by phone or email to verify coverage. They would then review the COB rules and guidelines for each health plan to determine the primary payer and follow specific rules for billing secondary payers. It's no wonder that COB transactions are now among the most automated administrative tasks. Automating coordination of benefits not only saves staff time, but also increases the chances of finding all active coverage, collating complete insurance profiles for the patient, and making an accurate primacy determination. Digital systems also make it easier for providers and payers to communicate with one another, facilitating smoother dispute resolution and regulatory compliance. Patient Access Curator brings real-time COB to EH clients In late 2023, Experian Health acquired Wave HDC, bringing clients a new and unrivalled package of real-time coverage and benefits solutions based on AI-powered data curation. This new solution, Patient Access Curator, helps healthcare billing teams prevent claim denials in seconds through real-time data analysis. This includes COB curation, which automatically analyzes payer responses to identify hidden cues that staff cannot see. If other insurance is identified, the tool alerts the user and triggers additional queries to verify active coverage and build a complete insurance profile for the patient. Each policy is then analyzed further to determine the patient's primary, secondary and tertiary coverage, reliably sifting out any non-billable coverage. Since 2020, the technology powering Patient Access Curator has prevented denials amounting to more than $1 billion. Integrating coordination of benefits automation yields savings throughout the revenue cycle Integrating COB automation with other RCM tools, such as coverage discovery and eligibility verification, means providers can prevent and manage denials in a single workflow. Doing this during patient registration allows teams to resolve issues in the early stages of the revenue cycle, rather than wait to deal with them once claims are denied. While catching errors on the front-end results in faster patient registration and clean claims first time, the tool adds value later in the revenue cycle, too. Streamlining the correction process prevents revenue loss and reduces the need for manual intervention. Here's how these use cases look in practice: In one multistate practice, the technology automated COB curation with insurance verification during patient registration. This enabled primary coverage corrections for 12% of patient registrations and identified undocumented Medicare and Medicaid coverages for 6% of registrations. Left unchecked, these omissions would have resulted in denials, delays, and missed revenue opportunities. The technology was deployed in the denials workflow at a large health system, where it identified COB corrections for 92% of all COB denials. Of these, 60% were immediately refiled to the correct primary payer, minimizing delays in revenue recovery. In the remaining claims, the tool found evidence of inaccurate or outdated third-party liability records within payer claim adjudication systems. Providers urgently need revenue cycle processes to be as efficient and reliable as possible – especially when dealing with patients with multiple, complex health plans. A powerful denial prevention solution that slots neatly into the registration workflow means they can maximize revenue with minimal human intervention. And with accurate results delivered in seconds, Patient Access Curator could be just what the doctor ordered. Get in touch today to find out more about coordination of benefits automation and discuss other ways to increase efficiency on the front-end of the revenue cycle, using Patient Access Curator.

Labor shortages and the uptick in claim denials are undoubtedly putting heavy financial strain on healthcare providers. Could automated claim denial prevention help ease the pressure? In a recent webinar, Jason Considine, Chief Commercial Officer at Experian Health, and Jordan Levitt, Co-founder at Wave HDC (recently acquired by Experian Health), discussed strategies to tackle denials head-on in the coming year. This article summarizes the key insights, including a new automated one-click denial prevention tool that shifts denials management to the front end of the revenue cycle. 5 revenue cycle challenges causing claim denials and strained margins To start, Considine opened the webinar with a discussion of the root causes of denials. These often originate during registration, and for many providers, “registration and data integrity continue to be a problem.” A fifth of denials are attributed to just five key issues: Coordination of benefits (COB) denials, which account for a major portion of denials as more patients have secondary and tertiary coverage; Contingency fees, which eat up margins in exchange for information that providers should be able to obtain themselves during registration; Labor costs, which can increase with labor-saving automations that push manual input downstream; Epic plan mapping, which becomes increasingly complex and error-prone as payer requirements evolve; Transactional pricing, where “pay-per-click” pricing models disincentivize providers from using registration tools to find patient information during registration. These interrelated issues should be solved with one up-front revenue cycle management (RCM) solution, rather than piecemeal fixes that are implemented later. According to Considine: “Vendors tend to offer ways to solve these problems after the patient leaves, but really we should have gotten the right information right up front. Pushing problem-solving downstream means you need more people to manage these solutions, you've got more vendors to manage, and you end up staffing denial management departments and throwing more people at the problem.” Shifting from denial management to denial prevention Part of the challenge is the sheer volume of patient information that must be collected from the start. Staff interact with multiple systems to collate, check and coordinate data on eligibility, COB, Medicare Beneficiary Identifiers, demographics and coverage. Many of these data points can be points of failure if the wrong information is captured and penetrates the rest of the system. This makes patient access the perfect place to solve the denials problem. Levitt says this is exactly what Wave HDC set out to do when they developed the technology that underpins Patient Access Curator. “The answer isn't multiple clicks, running one transaction at a time. With Patient Access Curator, you can know everything about the patient to run a clean revenue cycle process and propagate only clean data downstream, all within two to thirty seconds.” Patient Access Curator prevents denials by capturing all patient data at registration through a single click solution that returns multiple results in less than a minute. It's fast because the underlying code acts like a Rosetta Stone, automatically translating the language of the user and the health system into the terms required by the payer. This means data can be transferred easily between interfaces. Levitt explained how the tool builds a “perimeter defense against bad data,” by ensuring data accuracy from the start. Bad data is less likely to propagate through the system, which reduces the risk of denials. As a result, clients using the tool have been able to reduce contingency volume by over 60%. Introducing the next generation of smart RCM technology Many organizations are investing in staffing to address claim denials, but this approach is not effective in the long run. Levitt described how preventing denials calls for technology that's built for today's challenges. “Most tools out there are built to manage the problems of the last twenty years. But twenty years ago, we didn't really have COB issues. Patients were either insured or uninsured. Now, some are over-insured and some are under-insured. You see more patients come in with one insurance card in their hand, but with two, three, or four other coverages. It's much more complex. Patient Access Curator makes it simple by bundling all the transactions into one.” The technology uses artificial intelligence, in-memory analytics, and robotic process automation to verify eligibility and COB, find and fix patient identifiers, check contact information, and generate information about the patient's propensity to pay. And the result? Providers can simplify denials management even as the insurance and operational landscape becomes more complex. Watch the webinar to hear the full discussion and find out more about how Patient Access Curator helps healthcare organizations capture accurate patient information at registration with a single click.

Racing against the clock to troubleshoot billing issues, claims bottlenecks and staffing shortfalls are just part of an average day for healthcare revenue cycle managers. It's hard enough to maintain the status quo, never mind driving improvements in denial rates and net revenue. With integrated artificial intelligence (AI) and automation, many of these challenges in revenue cycle management (RCM) can be alleviated – and with just a single click. Real-time coverage discovery and coordination of benefits software reduces errors and accelerates accurate claim submissions. This eases pressure on busy RCM leaders, so they have the time to focus on improving the numbers that matter most. Top challenges in revenue cycle management Efficiency is the currency of revenue cycle management. Maximizing resources is not just about keeping dollars coming in the door but about making the best use of each team member's time and expertise. The ever-present call to “do more with less” is probably the biggest challenge. Breaking that down, some specific concerns that consume more time and resources than RCM managers would like, are: Complex billing procedures: With hundreds of health payers operating in the US, each offering different plans with different requirements, providers have their work cut out to ensure claims are coded and billed correctly. Any errors in verifying a patient's coverage, eligibility, benefits, and prior authorization requirements can lead to delays and lost revenue. More claim denials: Inaccurate patient information and billing codes guarantee a denial. Beyond the rework and revenue loss, denied claims leave patients with bills that should not be their responsibility to pay, causing confusion, frustration, and higher levels of bad debt. Garbage in, garbage out. Patient payment delays: A few years back, patients with health insurance represented about a tenth of bills marked as bad debt. Now, this group holds the majority of patient debt, according to analysts. The rise in high-deductible health plans combined with squeezed household budgets means patients are more likely to delay or default on payments. Providers must be on the lookout for ways to help patients find active coverage and plan for their bills to minimize the impact of these changes. How can AI-powered revenue cycle management solutions help? The Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare (CAQH) annual index report demonstrates how much time can be saved using software-based RCM technology. Case in point: switching from manual to automated eligibility and benefits verification could save 14 minutes per transaction. This adds up quickly when daily, monthly, and yearly transactions are factored in. Predictive analytics can be used to pre-emptively identify and resolve issues and support better decision-making, giving providers a head start on those elusive efficiency gains. Three specific examples of how automation, AI and machine learning can streamline the front-end and solve challenges in revenue cycle management are as follows: 1. Upfront insurance discovery to find and fill coverage gaps Confirming active coverage across multiple payers gives patients and providers clarity about how care will be financed. But this can be a resource-heavy process when undertaken manually. Coverage Discovery uses automation to find missing and forgotten coverage with minimal resource requirements. By unearthing previously unidentified coverage earlier in the revenue cycle, claims can be submitted more quickly for faster reimbursement and fewer write-offs.With Experian Health's recent acquisition of Wave HDC, clients now have access to faster, more comprehensive insurance verification software solution. The technology works autonomously to identify existing insurance records for patients with self-pay, unbillable, or unspecified payer status and correct any gaps in the patient's coverage information. The patient's details are updated automatically so that a claim can be submitted to the correct payer. 2. Real-time eligibility verification and coordination of benefits As it gets harder to figure out each patient's specific coverage details, it also makes sense to prioritize automated eligibility verification. Eligibility Verification uses real-time eligibility and benefits data to confirm the patient's insurance status on the spot.Similarly, Wave's Coordination of Benefits solution, now available to Experian Health clients through Patient Access Curator, integrates directly into registration and scheduling workflows to boost clean claim rates. It automatically analyzes payer responses and triggers inquiries to verify active coverage and curate a comprehensive insurance profile. This means no insurance is missed, and the benefits under each plan can be coordinated seamlessly for more accurate billing. 3. Predictive denials management to prevent back-end revenue loss Adding AI and machine learning-based solutions to the claims and denials management workflow means providers can resolve more issues pre-claim to minimize the risk of back-end denials. Use cases for AI in claims management might include: Automating claims processing to alleviate staffing shortages Reviewing documentation to reduce coding errors Using predictive analytics to increase operational efficiency Improving patient and payer communications with AI-driven bots All of these contribute to a front-loaded denials management strategy. While prevention is often better than a cure, AI can be equally effective later in the process: AI AdvantageTM arms staff with the information they need to prevent denials before they occur and work them more efficiently when they do.Whatever new challenges may pop up on the RCM horizon, AI and automation are already proving their effectiveness in helping providers save time and money. But more than that, they're giving busy RCM leaders the necessary tools to start future-proofing their systems for persistent and emerging RCM challenges. Learn more or contact us to find out how healthcare organizations can use AI and automation to manage current revenue cycle management challenges with a single click.

Today, U.S. healthcare providers struggle with three significant challenges affecting care delivery—each resulting from chronic healthcare workforce shortages. Ultimately, these challenges threaten the fiscal health of the country's most critical care safety nets. Over 80% of the healthcare C-suite say the chronic staffing shortage creates significant risk for their organizations. The effects of healthcare staffing shortages are severe - Experian Health's recent survey of revenue cycle leaders found these executives unanimously agreed that staffing shortages impact cash flow, patient engagement, and the work environment of their current staff. Experian Health’s new survey, Short Staffed for the Long-Term, polled 200 revenue cycle employees to determine the effects of healthcare staffing shortages on patients, the workforce, and their facilities. What did these teams say about the healthcare workforce shortage and the state of care delivery? Find out by downloading the full report. Healthcare providers experience a vicious cycle, and the effects of healthcare staffing shortages can be seen in many different areas. For example, it makes it harder for existing team members to register patients on the front end of the encounter. On the back end, revenue cycle staff face higher workloads and stress leading to preventable reimbursement claims errors and missed collections opportunities. Ultimately, that stress leads to staff turnover, exacerbating the healthcare workforce shortage. This article dives into three effects of healthcare staffing shortages and how providers can combat them. Result 1: Short-staffed providers struggle with reimbursement and cash flow. 70% of respondents who say staff shortages affect payer reimbursement also report escalating denial rates. 83% report it's harder to follow up on late payments or help patients struggling to pay their bills. Costs are up, and cash flow is down. Claims denials are increasing by 15% annually. Reimbursement rates continue to decline even as denials rise and patient debt increases. These are the revenue cycle challenges healthcare providers face on top of the chronic healthcare staffing shortage. Healthcare organizations must look for new ways to improve reimbursements while engaging patients and staff to benefit everyone involved. Experian Health's Short Staffed for the Long-Term report noted two of the most significant revenue channels for healthcare providers, claims reimbursement and collections, are experiencing significant challenges. Reimbursement denials tie up cash flow in an endless cat-and-mouse game of revenue collection. HealthLeaders termed 2023 as, “the year of reducing denials for revenue cycle.” Their statistics further reinforce Experian Health data correlating increasing denial rates with the healthcare staffing shortage. Simultaneously, healthcare providers find it harder to collect from patients. High self-pay costs lead to lower patient collection rates. One study showed patient collections declining from 76% in 2020 to 55% in 2021. Providers desperately need a more patient-centered collections process that helps these customers understand their cost obligations and payment options. Integrating automated collections solutions can also help providers do more with less. Healthcare stakeholders must collaborate to devise innovative solutions that prioritize workforce augmentation and streamline financial workflows. Technology can solve these problems by automating manual revenue cycle processes that lead to delayed reimbursements. New solutions that use artificial intelligence (AI) software can help in other areas (like claims denials) to save staff time and reduce workloads. Result 2: A lack of staff directly impacts successful patient engagement. Surveyed staff say 55% of patients experience engagement issues at scheduling and intake. 40% say patient estimates suffer, leading to potential miscommunications in credit and collections. Experian Health's The State of Patient Access, 2023: The Digital Front Door reported patients and providers believe healthcare access is worsening. 87% of providers in the survey blamed the effects of healthcare staffing shortages. Earlier data from ECRI shows patients wait longer for care, and nearly 50% of providers say access is worse. Over 100 academic studies in the past two decades confirm the correlation between poor patient health outcomes and industry staff shortages. Existing staff members may take on heavier workloads to cover gaps in patient care. The resulting fatigue can impact the quality of care delivery. When healthcare organizations are short-staffed, each team member may spend less time with patients, resulting in rushed assessments and potentially missed diagnoses. Staff shortages can impact every phase of the patient journey, beginning with patient scheduling and potentially delayed essential medical services. On the backend, patients suffer when the pressure staff members feel to work faster causes preventable errors leading to healthcare claim denials. Collections suffer, as frustrations mount, and healthcare staff waste time on patients who are simply unable to pay. The adverse effects of staffing shortages in healthcare weaken with technology to improve the patient experience at every stage of their encounter. Better technology lessens the burden of care for staff by automating mundane administrative tasks so every provider can focus on serving patients—not filling out forms. Improving patient engagement starts at the beginning of the healthcare encounter. For example, patient scheduling software can create a seamless online experience that halves appointment booking time. More than 70% of patients say they prefer the control these self-scheduling portals offer, putting access to care back in their hands. Patient payment estimation software creates much-needed healthcare price transparency, improving satisfaction by eliminating financial surprises after treatment. These solutions, combined with automated revenue cycle management software, can streamline healthcare processes and improve patient experiences. Result 3: Overwork is the norm as staff work environments decline and turnover increases. 37% of survey respondents report issues with staff burnout. 29% list the departure of experienced staff as one of their top challenges. Whether in frontend care delivery or backend revenue cycle, overworked and stressed healthcare professionals are more susceptible to making mistakes, diminishing the overall quality of the patient experience. The attention to detail, a critical component in a complex, high-stakes business, may be compromised due to the strain on the existing staff. When a healthcare organization is short-staffed, it increases the stress on the existing employees. In turn, this contributes to higher turnover rates. Job dissatisfaction and increased stress levels create a challenging work environment, perpetuating the cycle of staffing shortages. Recruiting and training new staff to fill these gaps further exacerbate the strain on existing teams. One area that is critically impacted by staffing shortages is seen in claims management, as claim denials continue to increase, which cost American healthcare providers an estimated 2.5% of their gross revenues annually. Billions of reimbursement dollars logjam in the endless cycle of claims submissions, rejections, and manual mitigations. In 2022, the cost of denials management increased by 67%. Revenue cycle staff, stretched to their limits by staffing shortages, will likely continue to make preventable mistakes during patient intake and claims submission. However, automating claims management with a solution like ClaimSource® can help lower denial rates and ease this burden.  This solution delivers increased operational efficiencies and effectiveness by prioritizing claims, payments and denials so that users can work the highest impact accounts first. Other solutions, like Claim Scrubber, can improve claim accuracy before submission, by submitting clean and accurate claims every time. These technologies enable healthcare providers to reduce claims denials while relieving some of the terrible pressure felt by their financial teams to work harder and faster. By automating clean claims submissions, healthcare organizations free up their teams to focus on taking better care of patients—and themselves. Healthcare staffing shortages + manual revenue cycle = Unsustainability What happens to a process that heavily relies on human labor—when there aren’t enough people to go around? In the case of the healthcare revenue cycle, it means staffing shortages heavily impact a hospital's ability to collect revenue. Medical Economics reports that 78% of providers still conduct patient collections with traditional paper statements or other manual processes. In an era of talent shortages, these manual processes bog down the entire organization with no relief in sight. Overwork leads to burnout, a significant problem in the industry that also contributes to staff turnover. But this is exactly how digital technology can solve the healthcare staffing shortage. While AI and automation can’t help providers find the staff they need, it can eliminate manual tasks and reduce errors that lead to more work, staff burnout, and patient care disruption. McKinsey says automation can eliminate approximately half of the activities employees now perform. It could considerably improve the work environments for revenue cycle staff, allowing them to focus on high-value tasks, and engage patients in more caring and personalized experiences. Experian Health offers providers proven technologies to increase revenue, improve patient care, and lessen the strain on existing staff, to combat the effects of healthcare staffing shortages. Contact Experian Health today to get started.

Could common revenue cycle management (RCM) myths be preventing healthcare organizations from getting paid in full? Does what constituted best practice a few years back still apply to revenue cycle operations today? Many providers are embracing new technology to strengthen their RCM processes, using automations and software to create more accurate and efficient billing and claims management workflows. But if these processes are built on shaky assumptions, the results will be sub-optimal. As year-end financial reviews get under way, there is a prime opportunity to re-evaluate some long-standing beliefs about billing, collections and payments that, if not set straight, could limit financial performance in the year ahead. This article examines four of the most common revenue cycle myths and considers what providers can do to make financial growth a reality in 2024. Revenue Cycle Myth 1: All patients are equally likely to pay Reality: No two patients are alike – whether in their medical needs or financial circumstances. Providers know this, yet many rely on revenue cycle management solutions that lean toward a one-size-fits-all approach to patient payments. Instead, providers should consider RCM tools that use data and analytics to segment patients according to their individual financial situation, to create a more personalized and proactive approach to collections. This should take account of both the patient's ability to pay (i.e., whether they can afford their bills), and their likelihood to pay promptly, which may be enhanced by offering payment options that are convenient and aligned to their personal preferences. Collections Optimization Manager analyzes patients' individual payment history and demographic information so their accounts can be routed to the most appropriate collections pathway from the start. Patients that are likely to pay quickly can be sent billing information automatically and presented with self-service payment options. Alongside this, Patient Financial Clearance pulls together credit and non-credit data to help providers identify patients who may need a little more guidance and connect them to suitable payment plans. It catches any individuals who may be eligible for Medicaid or charity support. Staff get accurate, at-a-glance data to help them have sensitive financial conversations with patients, and can avoid losing time chasing collections from patients who would never have been able to pay. Case study: See how Stanford Health Care improved collections with a tailored, patient-focused approach to healthcare collections. Myth 2: It's hard to have meaningful pre-service financial conversations with patients Reality: Contrary to popular belief, most patients are receptive, and even eager, to have financial discussions with their provider as soon as possible. Doing so need not be challenging. In the past, providers may have worried that broaching the money question could deter patients from seeking necessary care, or simply not prioritized such discussions. Billing and insurance can also be highly complex, which may lead staff to assume that patients would find conversations about these issues to be confusing or overwhelming. But it is for these exact reasons that providers should have financial discussions with patients as early as possible. Experian Health's 2023 State of Patient Access survey found that almost 90% of patients wanted upfront pricing estimates so they could plan ahead for their financial obligations – yet less than a third received one. Tools like Patient Payment Estimates and Patient Financial Advisor can calculate cost estimates, taking account of the patient's claim history, deductibles and other insurance information, and automatically send these to patients before treatment so they know what to expect. These can also be combined with quick payment links so bills can be cleared before care. Giving patients consistent information through whichever digital channel they prefer means they will be better positioned to make informed decisions and discuss their situation with patient access staff if necessary. When patients are better informed and supported, they're also less likely to end up postponing care due to cost concerns. And with the same accurate data at their fingertips, patient access staff can serve as financial concierges, helping patients to understand coverage and copayments and check eligibility for relevant financial assistance programs. In addition to user-friendly data tools, providers should consider whether staff would benefit from additional training to bolster their confidence in leading compassionate financial conversations. Myth 3: It's impossible to know what patients owe across a system with a single look-up Reality: Thanks to data analytics and digital payment technology, it is now pretty straightforward to consolidate a patient's outstanding balance information from across an entire health system, and debunks common revenue cycle myths. Patient access staff can view a comprehensive summary of a patient's insurance status, estimated liability and open balances from multiple providers, enabling them to have meaningful financial conversations with patients. Even if these discussions do not lead to immediate payment, they can still act as a reminder to nudge the patient to act soon, thus accelerating the payment process. Selecting RCM tools from a single vendor makes it easier to integrate data from multiple workflows and generate a unified view of what a patient owes. When systems talk to each other, it's possible for a single tool to leverage the data and create a better experience for patients and staff. For example, PaymentSafe® automatically brings together data gathered throughout the revenue cycle to streamline what was previously a disjointed and time-consuming process. With point-to-point encryption, it accepts secure payments at any point in the patient's journey, using cash, check, card payments and recurring billing, through a single web-based application. Myth 4: Revenue cycle management is “set-and-forget” Reality: Revenue cycle managers may dream of setting up a system once and then forgetting about it, but the reality is that managing billing, claims and collections is an ongoing and evolving process that needs constant attention. Healthcare organizations must regularly review and adjust their RCM strategies to prevent missed revenue opportunities, manage compliance risks and promote operational efficiencies. That said, data analytics and automated revenue cycle management tools do make it far easier for providers to stay on top of RCM demands. These tools help providers with everything from monitoring payer policy changes and identifying billing errors to personalizing patient communications and generating monitoring reports. Artificial intelligence takes it a step further, for example, by preventing and predicting claim denials. In this way, these tools reduce the need for extensive staff input, so staff can spend more time focusing on the issues that need more human attention. With up-to-the-minute reports covering multiple RCM processes, staff also have the information they need to optimize performance and find opportunities to boost reimbursement that may have been previously overlooked. So, while RCM is not quite a “set-and-forget” process, automations and analytics can simplify it significantly, so it's less labor-intensive for staff and more efficient overall. Debunk revenue cycle myths and proactively challenge assumptions to increase profitability Debunking these revenue cycle myths is simple and achievable with tools that integrate a patient's clinical and financial data for a fuller picture of what that patient needs. This is crucial as changing consumer expectations, economic drivers, and new technology reshape how patients, providers and payers interact with one another. Checking underlying assumptions in any RCM process is essential to root out potential misunderstandings and outdated thinking. Not doing so leaves providers vulnerable to inaccurate financial projections, mismatched strategies and poor patient experiences. See how Experian Health's industry-leading Revenue Cycle Management Solutions make streamlined billing and collections a reality.

The complexities of healthcare claims management are a widespread, costly issue. While the American Medical Association (AMA) blames prior-authorizations as the main cause, it's clear that hospitals struggle to collect on predicted revenues often for months after they provide the service. It's not a sustainable situation as the costs of care delivery increase, staffing shortages drive up labor overhead, and inflationary pressures stretch healthcare providers to their breaking point. There is no question the claims denial process is ripe for innovation – and that's where artificial intelligence (AI) comes in. A 2022 Experian Health survey shows over one-half of healthcare providers increasingly turn to AI-driven healthcare claims management software to reduce claim denials. Tom Bonner, Principal Product Manager at Experian Health, says, “Adding AI in claims processing cuts denials significantly. AI automation quickly flags errors, allowing claims editing before payer submission. It's not science fiction – AI is the tool hospitals need for better healthcare claims denial prevention and management.” Common reasons for medical claim denials Revenue cycle leaders place healthcare claims management as their number one issue in 2023. Experian Health's survey showed the three most common reasons for medical claim denials were: Needs more data and analytics to identify submission issues. Manual claims processing and a lack of automation. Insufficient training for staff. The sheer volume of changes to CPT codes is another issue affecting HCM or healthcare claims management. Experian Health identified more than 100,000 payer policy changes from March 2020 to March 2022. These shifts necessitate a never-ending cyclic need to train new staff, increase the risk of claim rejections, and slow down manual workflows in healthcare claims denials management. How can healthcare providers improve claims processing and overcome these challenges? Real-life ROI with AI in claims processing AI in claims processing solves these and other common revenue cycle problems. This technology is the innovation healthcare providers need to reduce denials and increase cash flow. AI can help at every point in the revenue cycle continuum, from improving the accuracy of payer data upfront to ensuring a clean claim and even targeting denials that yield the highest return. What real-life lessons does AI in claims management teach healthcare providers? Experian Health's new AI-powered solution includes AI Advantage™ - Predictive Denials and AI Advantage™ - Denial Triage, which is geared towards helping healthcare organizations reduce claim denials. Within six months of using AI Advantage, Schneck Medical Center reduced denials by an average of 4.6% each month. Claim corrections that formerly took up to 15 minutes to correct cut to just under five minutes. Even smaller ambulatory clinics like Summit Medical Group Oregon benefit from automating healthcare claims management. After implementing Experian Health's claims management software, the provider saw an immediate reduction in claims denials. Today, they boast a 92 percent clean primary claims rate. These results are typical across healthcare organizations that implement AI in claims processing. But what does the software do to clean up the complexities of claims management processing? How to avoid claim denials with AI In 2022, Experian Health surveyed 200 revenue cycle leaders around the country and identified technology shortfalls as a significant contributor to claims denials: 62% reported they lacked the data analytics to identify submission issues. 61% said manual processes and a lack of automation were significant problems. 33% suggested their healthcare claims management software was outdated or inadequate. Healthcare claims management upgraded with the inception of AI-driven healthcare claims management software. The benefits of these tools lie in their ability to predict potential issues before they occur by analyzing claims and providing a probability of denial that allows the end user to intervene and determine the appropriate collection. AI can also assist in identifying inaccurate claims, improving claims processing accuracy and revenue cycle management. By using automation and AI together, healthcare providers can gain better insights into their claims and denial data, resulting in improved financial performance and greater efficiency. Tom Bonner says, “AI in claims processing maximizes the benefits of automation for better claims processing, better customer experiences, and a better bottom line for healthcare providers.” How does healthcare claims denial management software work to improve the revenue cycle? AI identifies and prioritizes high-value claims after denial AI in claims processing goes beyond automating process-driven manual tasks. It also removes the guesswork from healthcare claims management. For example, staff is often left guessing which denied claims are the low-hanging fruit that they should process first. Staff must decide which denied claims have a higher likelihood of reimbursement and a higher dollar value to maximize their efficiency. Why would healthcare providers leave these high-value/high-return claims to a manual “best guess” estimation process? Yet that is standard operating procedure in most hospitals. AI in claims processing identifies and prioritizes high-value claims automatically. Experian Health's AI Advantage - Denial Triage goes to work when a claim is denied by identifying and intelligently segmenting denials based on potential value so that staff focuses on resubmissions with the most significant bottom line impact. This intelligent segmentation removes the guesswork, alleviates staff burdens, and eliminates time spent on low-value denials. But the front-end work AI software completes during healthcare claims management may be even more valuable. AI can prevent claims denials from occurring at all. AI proactively stops claim denials from occurring AI Advantage - Predictive Denials uses AI to identify undocumented payer adjudication rules that may result in new denials. It identifies claims with a high likelihood of denial based on an organization's historical payment data and allows them to intervene before claim submission. Experian Health also has other automated solutions that help facilitate claims management. ClaimSource® helps providers manage the entire revenue cycle by creating custom work queues and automating reimbursement processing. This intelligent healthcare claims management software ensures clean claims before they're submitted, helping to optimize the revenue cycle. The software also generates accurate adjudication reports within 24 to 72 hours to speed reimbursement. ClaimSource ranked #1 in Best in KLAS 2023, precisely for its success in helping providers submit complete and accurate claims. This tool prevents errors and helps prepare claims for processing. Because the claims are error-free, providers can optimize the reimbursement processes and get their money even faster. AI optimizes the claims process Another Experian Health solution, Enhanced Claim Status improves cash flow by responding early and accurately to denied transactions. This solution uses RPA to give healthcare providers a leg up on denied, pending, return-to-provider, and zero-pay transactions. The benefits include: Provides information on exactly why the claim denied. Speeds up the denials process. Automates manual claims follow-ups. Integrates with HIS/PMS or ClaimSource Automation frees up staff to focus on more complex claims. Denials Workflow Manager integrates with the Enhanced Claim Status module to help eliminate manual processes, allowing providers to optimize claims submission and maximize cash flow. How to reduce claim denials with AI and Experian Health There's no question that healthcare claims denials management is an unwieldy, time-consuming, and ever-changing process. Reimbursement is complex on its own, but human error plays a large part in missed opportunities and lost revenue. With AI in healthcare claims management, the revenue cycle streamlines and transforms. Any healthcare provider seeking faster reimbursement and a better bottom line knows that improving claims management is critical to better cash flow. AI healthcare claims management software offers provider organizations a way to achieve these goals. Contact Experian Health today to reduce claim denials and improve your claims management process with AI Advantage.

Staffing shortages are the new normal in healthcare. Most news headlines focus on gaps between the supply of providers and the growing demand for care. However, a recent survey by Experian Health, released in November 2023. shows the massive impact staffing shortages have on back office revenue cycle where these functions intersect with front-of-house patient engagement. Strikingly, the healthcare staffing shortage statistics in the survey show revenue cycle executives are 100% in agreement—staffing shortages significantly affect reimbursement workflows to the detriment of patients and healthcare employees. Experian Health's report, Short-staffed for the long term, surveyed 200 healthcare executives responsible for revenue cycle functions. The goal was to gauge the impact of worker shortages on revenue cycle management and patient engagement. While the pandemic brought these shortages into the public purview, this new data shows most providers believe healthcare staffing gaps are chronic and here to stay. These results reinforce The State of Patient Access 2023 survey, where 87% of providers blamed staffing shortages for declining access to care. As the healthcare industry continues to struggle with an ever-increasing staffing shortage, it has become increasingly evident that if left unresolved, this situation can wreak havoc on revenue cycle management (RCM). The latest survey illustrates the need for new strategies to alleviate healthcare worker shortfalls. This article explores the most recent healthcare staffing shortage statistics and some key findings from the study to help determine how healthcare providers can turn these challenges into opportunities. Experian Health surveyed 200 revenue cycle executives to determine the impact of staffing shortages on reimbursement and patient engagement. Download the report to get the full results. Finding 1: Most revenue cycle leaders believe staffing shortfalls negatively affect payer reimbursements and collections. 96% of survey respondents indicated a lack of qualified workers has a detrimental impact on organizational revenue channels. 80% say turnover in their department ranges from 11 to 40%, much higher than the national average of 3.8%. When healthcare organizations lack revenue cycle talent, they risk missing performance goals. High turnover and the departure of experienced staff create information deserts within healthcare organizations. It forces new team members to train faster, handle bigger caseloads before they're ready, and potentially burnout from stress. The pressure to do more faster creates a higher volume of preventable claims errors that lead to denials. The survey showed all these factors at play, and their negative impact on reimbursement, collections, and the patient experience. While the traditional way to alleviate staffing shortages is to increase recruiting and retention efforts, these approaches no longer work when there simply isn't enough available staff to hire and train. Healthcare organizations must consider new partnerships with technology providers who offer automation tools to streamline human workflows. Revenue cycle management software eliminates repetitive tasks and lessens errors that lead to rejected claims. Digital technology can help solve labor shortages by reducing staff workloads and improving operational performance. Automation can streamline collections by prioritizing the accounts most likely to pay. These tools help existing revenue cycle teams work more efficiently while enhancing patient encounters. Finding 2: Healthcare staffing shortages roadblock a positive patient experience. 8 of 10 survey respondents say patient experience suffers due to gaps in staffing coverage. 55% report the patient experience is most heavily affected at intake, and 50% say at appointment scheduling. Staffing shortages and turnover cause an undue burden on the healthcare workers left behind. The survey asked respondents to indicate the top pain points experienced by revenue cycle professionals, and one of the major challenges was staff burnout. Stress has a detrimental effect on patient interactions throughout the revenue cycle. The survey shows staffing shortages impede patient satisfaction in critical areas within revenue cycle functions, including: Scheduling appointments Patient registration Prior authorization Insurance coverage confirmation Patient estimates Revenue cycle interactions can be delicate, requiring extreme patience and clear communication. Healthcare organizations must provide the support their revenue cycle teams need to handle these crucial conversations appropriately. To improve the patient experience, organizations must first improve the workflows and workloads of these critical back-office teams. When healthcare organizations have the right tools to eliminate manual tasks that bog down revenue cycle staff, these professionals can spend more time on the compassionate handling of patients and their accounts. Providers have the opportunity to solve these challenges with digital patient engagement solutions that improve workflow efficiencies at every level of the revenue cycle. Patient scheduling software creates a self-service environment that 73% of healthcare customers prefer. Patient intake improves with online software that automates the tedious paperwork that tie up staff. Better technology can create price transparency without manual effort, ensuring patients understand their responsibilities up front instead of facing surprises during or after care delivery. Finally, a frictionless online payment platform allows patients to handle their obligations seamlessly without staff intervention. Finding 3: Errors arise when healthcare providers are short staffed, leading to claims denials. 70% of survey respondents say staff shortages exacerbate denial rates. 92% of survey respondents said new staff members make errors that negatively impact claims processing. Some of the most common reasons for healthcare claim denials include: Incomplete collection of claims data Coding errors Billing errors Eligibility verification errors Missed insurance verification Healthcare operations and revenue cycles are full of manual processes. RevCycleIntelligence reports one-third of prior authorizations are completed manually, and two-thirds of hospitals haven't automated any part of their denials management processes. Yet technology has made significant strides toward reducing these error-prone manual tasks. Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI), with solutions like AI Advantage™, within the complexities of claims processing could cut provider spending by up to 10% annually. Eliminating repetitive tasks with automated claims management solutions improves the lives of staff, cuts manual errors that tie up cash flow in reimbursement wrangling, and creates a better, less stressful environment for customers. Reducing the impact of healthcare staffing shortages with revenue cycle automation and technology Sometimes, 100% agreement isn't the desired outcome. In this case, the healthcare staffing shortage statistics found in the survey shows healthcare providers agree unanimously that chronic staffing shortages create a problematic environment for employees that costs revenue and patient engagement. While technology exists that can maximize revenue staff workflows to extend the reach of overburdened employees; survey participants suggest that healthcare organizations continue to approach solving these issues by adding staff.  But healthcare's staffing challenges are not new. While organizations have historically invested revenue in higher salaries and sign-on bonuses to attract staff, technology offers a new opportunity for history to avoid repeating itself. It's time for healthcare organizations to support their teams with automation. These tools alleviate mundane, error-prone tasks that tie up staff. Experian Health offers these organizations a way to improve the lives of everyone within the revenue cycle by allowing back and front-office teams to focus on patient care, rather than filling in forms. It's a more humane way to handle a very human staffing crisis. Download the survey or connect with an Experian Health expert today to learn how we can help your healthcare organization combat staffing shortages.