<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Marketing Forward &#187; google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward</link>
	<description>Marketing insight and consumer trends from Experian Marketing Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 23:14:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google share of searches at 65% in September 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/18/hwgoogle-share-of-searches-at-65-in-september-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/18/hwgoogle-share-of-searches-at-65-in-september-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Tatham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experian Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=6247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google accounted for 65.26% of all U.S. searches conducted in the four weeks ending September 29, 2012 according to Experian Marketing Services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>One-word searches increased 14% versus 2011 and eight word searches increase 6% versus August 2011</em></p>
<p>Google accounted for 65.26% of all U.S. searches conducted in the four weeks ending September 29, 2012 according to Experian Marketing Services. The combined Bing-powered search comprised 26.58% of searches for the month, with Yahoo! Search and Bing receiving 13.77% and 12.81%, respectively. The remaining 58 search engines<a title="">[1]</a> in the <a href="http://www.experian.com/hitwise/search-marketing-intelligence.html?intcmp=emsblog">Hitwise Search Engine Analysis</a> report accounted for 8.16% of U.S. searches.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Search-Sep12" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Search-Sep12.jpg" alt="" width="630" height="190" /></p>
<p><strong>One word search queries increase 14% in September 2012</strong></p>
<p>One word search queries increased 14% in September 2012 compared to September 2011. In September 2012, one-word searches comprised the majority of searches, too, amounting to 30.28% of all queries. Eight or more word searches saw 6% month-over-month increase. Shorter search queries — those averaging one to four words — increased 4% from September 2012 compared to September 2011.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="keywords-Sep12" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/keywords-Sep12.jpg" alt="" width="483" height="299" /></p>
<p>Learn more about search here: <a onclick="s_objectID=" href="http://hitw.se/QsTuKV" class="broken_link">http://hitw.se/QsTuKV </a></p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/18/hwgoogle-share-of-searches-at-65-in-september-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Experian Marketing Services pinpoints rising social network sites</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/05/experian-marketing-services-pinpoints-rising-social-network-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/05/experian-marketing-services-pinpoints-rising-social-network-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 21:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Marshall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pinterest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=6148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Experian Marketing Services study shows niche social networks significantly increased market share of all visits to social sites. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Experian Marketing Services pinpoints rising social network sites in new study – Instagram and Pinterest lead the pack</strong></p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://press.experian.com/United-States/Press-Release/new-study-by-experian-marketing-services-pinpoints-rising-social-networks-stars.aspx" target="_blank">new study</a> by Experian Marketing Services, niche social networks significantly increased their market share of all visits to social sites, with Instgram and Pinterest leading the pack.</p>
<p>The following graph illustrates the global growth between July 2011 and July 2012, based on share of visits to all sites by country:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong>Social site </strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>North America</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Australia</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Hong Kong</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>New Zealand </strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>Singapore</strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong>UK</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="87">Instagram</td>
<td valign="top" width="89">
<p align="center">17,319%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="89">
<p align="center">362%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="78">
<p align="center">132%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="99">
<p align="center">843%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="102">
<p align="center">8121%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="78">2028%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="87">Pinterest</td>
<td valign="top" width="89">
<p align="center">5124%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="89">
<p align="center">798%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="78">
<p align="center">2373%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="99">
<p align="center">643%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="102">
<p align="center">623%</p>
</td>
<td valign="top" width="78">1489%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Other niche social networks that have experienced significant gain include Stock Twits in the US, Redidt in Australia, and FanPop in the UK.</p>
<p>According to Bill Tancer, head of Global Research at Experian Marketing Services, the growth of Instagram and Pinterest over the past year has been successful because they haven’t tried to be ‘another Facebook.’ Both networks are image based – something people love and relate to better than just words. For retail brands, sites like Pinterest present a great opportunity to promote products in a compelling and organized way to a wide group of people, globally.</p>
<p>Deeper functionally, combined with a lower technical barrier to entry, will result in new leaders in social media being created, accepted and used within a matter of days – compared to the rate of adoption happening now over the course of weeks and months.</p>
<p>Also included in the study for July 2011 to July 2012:</p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="4">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Country</strong></td>
<td><strong>Social network</strong></td>
<td><strong>Description</strong></td>
<td><strong>Percentage increase of market share of visits to All Sites between July 2011 to July 2012</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top">North America</td>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://www.skillwho.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">www.skillwho.com</a></td>
<td valign="top">Social networking community which allow users to find people with skills from friends, friends of friends, local area or the community.</td>
<td valign="top">7435% increase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://stocktwits.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">http://stocktwits.com</a></td>
<td valign="top">StockTwits is an open, community-powered investment idea and information service.</td>
<td valign="top">943% increase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Australia</td>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://www.reddit.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">www.reddit.com</a></td>
<td valign="top">Site where users vote for what is popular or not.</td>
<td valign="top">177% increase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Brazil</td>
<td valign="top">Google+</td>
<td valign="top">Google+ integrates social services such as Google Profiles, and introduces new services identified as Circles, Hangouts and Sparks.</td>
<td valign="top">5750% increase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">New Zealand</td>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://www.reddit.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">www.reddit.com</a></td>
<td valign="top">Site where users vote for what is popular or not.</td>
<td valign="top">107% increase</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Singapore</td>
<td valign="top"><a href="https://steamcommunity.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">https://steamcommunity.com</a></td>
<td valign="top">Community site that assists users in finding games to play, people to play against, and serves as a meeting place for friends and team mates.</td>
<td valign="top">124%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2" valign="top">UK</td>
<td valign="top">Google+</td>
<td valign="top">Google+ integrates social services such as Google Profiles, and introduces new services identified as Circles, Hangouts and Sparks.</td>
<td valign="top">476%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://www.fanpop.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">http://www.fanpop.com</a></td>
<td valign="top">Network of fan clubs for fans of television, movies, music and more to discuss and share photos, videos, news and opinions with fellow fans.</td>
<td valign="top">178%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>What social networks do you use most frequently? Do the results of this study surprise you at all? Feel free to share your thoughts with our readers in the comments section below.</p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/05/experian-marketing-services-pinpoints-rising-social-network-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google share of searches at 65% in August 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/02/hw-google-share-of-searches-at-65-in-august-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/02/hw-google-share-of-searches-at-65-in-august-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 21:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Tatham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experian Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=6141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google accounted for 65.28% of all U.S. searches conducted in the four weeks ending September 1, 2012. One word search queries increase 15% in August 2012.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Experian Hitwise data shows Bing-powered share of searches up 1% in July 2012; </em><em>1-word searches increased 21% versus 2011</em></p>
<p>Google accounted for 65.28% of all U.S. searches conducted in the four weeks ending September 1, 2012. The combined Bing-powered search comprised 26.96% of searches for the month, with Yahoo! Search and Bing receiving 13.97% and 12.99%, respectively. The remaining 65 search engines [1] in the <a href="http://www.experian.com/hitwise/search-marketing-intelligence.html?intcmp=hitwise" target="_blank">Hitwise Search Engine Analysis</a> report accounted for 7.76% of U.S. searches.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="Google share of searches at 65% in August 2012" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Search-Aug12.jpg" alt="Google share of searches at 65% in August 2012" width="653" height="208" /></p>
<p><strong>One word search queries increase 15 percent in August 2012</strong></p>
<p>One word search queries increased 15% in August 2012 compared to August 2011. In August 2012, one-word searches comprised the majority of searches, too, amounting to 30.21% of all queries. Three and four-word searches saw 1% month-over-month increases. Longer search queries — those averaging five to eight words or more — decreased 11% from August 2012 compared to August 2011.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="keyword search" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/keywords-Aug12.jpg" alt="keyword search" width="522" height="251" /></p>
<hr align="left" size="1" width="33%" />
<div>
<p><em><strong>[1]</strong></em></a><em>This does not include Google, Yahoo! Search and Bing.</em></p>
</div>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/10/02/hw-google-share-of-searches-at-65-in-august-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google share of searches at 66 percent in July 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/08/13/hw-google-share-of-searches-at-66-percent-in-july-2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/08/13/hw-google-share-of-searches-at-66-percent-in-july-2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2012 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Tatham</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experian Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=4621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experian Hitwise announced that Google accounted for 65.70 percent of all U.S. searches conducted in the four weeks ending July 28, 2012. The combined Bing-powered search comprised 26.95 percent of searches for the month, with Yahoo! Search and Bing receiving 13.83 percent and 13.12 percent, respectively. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>Experian Hitwise data shows Bing-powered share of searches increased 1% in July 2012;</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>One-word searches increased 21%in July 2012 versus the same time for 2011</em></strong></p>
<p>Experian Hitwise announced that Google accounted for 65.70 percent of all U.S. searches conducted in the four weeks ending July 28, 2012. The combined Bing-powered search comprised 26.95 percent of searches for the month, with Yahoo! Search and Bing receiving 13.83 percent and 13.12 percent, respectively. The remaining 65 search engines<a title="" onclick="s_objectID=&quot;file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/a00994a/My%20Documents/PR%20FOLDER/Press%20Releases/SearchE_1&quot;;return this.s_oc?this.s_oc(e):true" href="file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/a00994a/My%20Documents/PR%20FOLDER/Press%20Releases/SearchEnginesJuly12.docx#_ftn1">[1]</a> in the <a onclick="s_objectID=&quot;http://www.experian.com/hitwise/search-marketing-intelligence.html_1&quot;;return this.s_oc?this.s_oc(e):true" href="http://www.experian.com/hitwise/search-marketing-intelligence.html">Hitwise Search Engine Analysis</a> report accounted for 7.35 percent of U.S. searches.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Percentage of U.S. searches among leading search engine providers" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/searchengines07121.jpg" alt="" width="639" height="203" /></p>
<p><strong>One word search queries increase 21 percent in July 2012</strong></p>
<p>One word search queries increased 21 percent in July 2012 compared to July 2011. In July 2012, one-word searches comprised the majority of searches, too, amounting to 30.47 percent of all queries. Longer search queries — those averaging five to eight words or more — decreased 11 percent from July 2012 compared to July 2011.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Percentage of U.S. clicks by number of keywords" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/keywordsJuly2012.jpg" alt="" width="579" height="341" /></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><a title="" onclick="s_objectID=&quot;file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/a00994a/My%20Documents/PR%20FOLDER/Press%20Releases/SearchE_2&quot;;return this.s_oc?this.s_oc(e):true" href="file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/a00994a/My%20Documents/PR%20FOLDER/Press%20Releases/SearchEnginesJuly12.docx#_ftnref1"><em><strong>[1]</strong></em></a><em>This does not include Google, Yahoo! Search and Bing.</em></p>
</div>
</div>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2012/08/13/hw-google-share-of-searches-at-66-percent-in-july-2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google+ opens the floodgates to all, market share rockets</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/09/26/google-opens-the-floodgates-to-all-market-share-rockets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/09/26/google-opens-the-floodgates-to-all-market-share-rockets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 23:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hitwise Research</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experian Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experian Mosaic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?guid=7aa8deca44fadf3cd31bc9db1e3d58c4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google+ emerged as the third largest site in the Social Network and Forums category last Wednesday, a day after the site went from “invitation-only” to &#34;open access&#34; available to everyone.

Opening access created a massive spike in market share of visits for the site, with a 1269% growth from the week ending September 17th to the week of September 24th. The site also received nearly 15 million total US visits last week.


In just one week, Google+ went from ranking as 54th most visited site in our Social Networking and Forums category to 8th place. 



The evolution of Google+’s audience composition from its launch in early July to last week illustrates how quickly the cycle from “Innovator” and “Early Adopter” phase, to the “Early Majority” and “Late Majority” can occur. 

In comparison to the online population, Google + continued to over-index for and win a high share of its visits from Mosaic USA 2011 Types which contain “Influencers”, “Early Adopters” and the internet-savvy, like “Bohemian Groove”, “Gotham Blend” and “Progressive Potpourri” ; this indicates that “Early Adopters” still account for a large share of Google+’s traffic. 



Yet the week of September 24th also saw a sharp increase in visit share from “Hispanic Harmony”, “Platinum Prosperity” and “Striving Single Scene”, amongst others, shifting the audience profile of Google+. Besides the outlier “Platinum Prosperity”, the unifying factor between these varied groups is their lower to middle income profile. This evolution in audience profile indicates that Google+ may be shifting into the “Early Majority” stage.

Note – the data does not include mobile traffic or traffic from the Google Notification Bar

Thanks to Margot Bonner, Analyst on the Custom Data &#38; Insights team for helping with today's analysis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://plus.google.com">Google+</a> emerged as the third largest site in the Social Network and Forums category last Wednesday, a day after the site went from “invitation-only” to "open access" <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/breaking/chi-google-open-to-all-hangouts-goes-mobile-20110920,0,5097702.story">available to everyone</a>.

Opening access created a massive spike in market share of visits for the site, with a 1269% growth from the week ending September 17th to the week of September 24th. The site also received nearly 15 million total US visits last week.
<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/G+_1.jpg" alt="G+_1.jpg" width="507" height="410" />

In just one week, Google+ went from ranking as 54th most visited site in our Social Networking and Forums category to 8th place.

<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/G+_2.jpg" alt="G+_2.jpg" width="628" height="278" />

The <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2011/08/google_plus_innovators_and_ear.html">evolution of Google+’s audience composition</a> from its launch in early July to last week illustrates how quickly the cycle from “Innovator” and “Early Adopter” phase, to the “Early Majority” and “Late Majority” can occur.

In comparison to the online population, Google + continued to over-index for and win a high share of its visits from Mosaic USA 2011 Types which contain “Influencers”, “Early Adopters” and the internet-savvy, like “Bohemian Groove”, “Gotham Blend” and “Progressive Potpourri” ; this indicates that “Early Adopters” still account for a large share of Google+’s traffic.

<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/G+_3.jpg" alt="G+_3.jpg" width="628" height="278" />

Yet the week of September 24th also saw a sharp increase in visit share from “Hispanic Harmony”, “Platinum Prosperity” and “Striving Single Scene”, amongst others, shifting the audience profile of Google+. Besides the outlier “Platinum Prosperity”, the unifying factor between these varied groups is their lower to middle income profile. This evolution in audience profile indicates that Google+ may be shifting into the “Early Majority” stage.

<em>Note – the data does not include mobile traffic or traffic from the Google Notification Bar</em>

Thanks to Margot Bonner, Analyst on the Custom Data &amp; Insights team for helping with today's analysis.
<div class="feedflare"><a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=EDsy7TOjLXE:Yimpws1ho-w:GbLVWyNk2Yo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?i=EDsy7TOjLXE:Yimpws1ho-w:GbLVWyNk2Yo" alt="" border="0" /></a> <a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=EDsy7TOjLXE:Yimpws1ho-w:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" alt="" border="0" /></a> <a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=EDsy7TOjLXE:Yimpws1ho-w:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" alt="" border="0" /></a> <a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=EDsy7TOjLXE:Yimpws1ho-w:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?i=EDsy7TOjLXE:Yimpws1ho-w:V_sGLiPBpWU" alt="" border="0" /></a></div>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hitwise/~4/EDsy7TOjLXE" alt="" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/09/26/google-opens-the-floodgates-to-all-market-share-rockets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impact of New Paywall on NYTimes.com: Pageviews Down Between 11-30%</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/04/11/impact-of-paywall-on-nytimes-com/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/04/11/impact-of-paywall-on-nytimes-com/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather Dougherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months of speculation, the paywall for The New York Times went live at 2pm on Monday, March 28th, which limits online readers (non-print subscribers) to 20 articles each month. For smartphone and tablet applications, only the top news se...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After months of speculation, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/18/business/media/18times.html">paywall</a> for <em>The New York Times</em> went live at 2pm on Monday, March 28th, which <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/28/opinion/l28times.html">limits</a> online readers (non-print subscribers) to 20 articles each month. For smartphone and tablet applications, only the top news section will remain free and access to other sections will need a subscription.</p>

<p>To understand the initial impact, we compared the total visits to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">NYTimes.com</a> for a 12 day period before the launch of the pay wall to the 12 days following the launch. For the majority of the days, there was a decrease in the overall visits between 5% and 15%. The one exception was Saturday, April 9th, 2011 where there was a 7% increase, likely due to visitors seeking news around the potential <a href="http://douthat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/04/09/the-shutdown-that-wasnt/">government shutdown</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/11/us/politics/11deficit.html">ongoing budget discussions</a>.</p>

<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/Sm%20Total%20Visits%20NYTimes%2004-09-2011.png" alt="Sm Total Visits NYTimes 04-09-2011.png" width="550" height="171" />

<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/Sm%20Change%20in%20Total%20Visits%20NYTimes%2004-09-2011.png" alt="Sm Change in Total Visits NYTimes 04-09-2011.png" width="550" height="370" />

<p>The effect of the pay wall has been somewhat stronger upon the total page views for the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">NYTimes.com</a>, with the same comparison of a 12 day period before the launch of the pay wall to the 12 days following the launch. For all 12 days, there was a decline in total page views which ranged between 11% and 30%.</p>

<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/Sm%20Total%20Pages%20NYTimes%2004-09-2011.png" alt="Sm Total Pages NYTimes 04-09-2011.png" width="549" height="168" />

<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/Sm%20Change%20in%20Total%20Pages%20NYTimes%2004-09-2011.png" alt="Sm Change in Total Pages NYTimes 04-09-2011.png" width="549" height="370" />

<p>One caveat to the 20 article limit is to access <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">NYTimes.com</a> through search engines like <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> and social networking websites like <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> and <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>. While using these sources could be a clever workaround for a reader hoping not to pay, to date there has not been a significant difference in the share of upstream traffic from both search and social networks to <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">NYTimes.com</a> before and after the launch of the paywall.</p>

<img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/heather-dougherty/Sm%20upstream%20NYTimes%2004-09-11.png" alt="Sm upstream NYTimes 04-09-11.png" width="550" height="130" />
<div class="feedflare"><a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=tKv_IAQL__k:lLEGGYemu9U:GbLVWyNk2Yo"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?i=tKv_IAQL__k:lLEGGYemu9U:GbLVWyNk2Yo" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=tKv_IAQL__k:lLEGGYemu9U:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=tKv_IAQL__k:lLEGGYemu9U:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0" alt="" /></a> <a href="http://weblogsfeed.hitwise.com/~ff/hitwise?a=tKv_IAQL__k:lLEGGYemu9U:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/hitwise?i=tKv_IAQL__k:lLEGGYemu9U:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0" alt="" /></a></div>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/hitwise/~4/tKv_IAQL__k" alt="" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/04/11/impact-of-paywall-on-nytimes-com/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networks, Parasitic Hosts and the Case for Frenemies</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/02/23/social-networks-parasitic-hosts-and-the-case-for-frenemies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/02/23/social-networks-parasitic-hosts-and-the-case-for-frenemies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Tancer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital marketer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[display ad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=1480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social networks are not only the largest category of websites, they also can behave as parasitic hosts, taking more traffic from all channels than they supply back.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our upcoming <a title="The 2011 Digital Marketer: Benchmark and Trend Report" href="http://www.experian.com/marketing-services/register-2011-digital-marketer-preview.html" target="_blank">2011 Digital Marketer report</a>, due to be released in March, we’ll be discussing the continuing dominance of social networks, namely Facebook, to capture the title as most visited category of sites in our Experian Hitwise database.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b4_1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1482 alignnone" title="b4_1" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b4_1.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Beyond visit data; search volume of the top queries in the U.S. for 2010 versus 2009 demonstrates just how prominent Facebook has become in our Internet lives. Of the top 10 overall searches executed across the top search engines, social nets claimed five versus three in 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b4_2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1483 alignnone" title="b4_2" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b4_2.jpg" alt="" width="259" height="272" /></a></p>
<p>While Facebook continues to increase its lead over other acquisition channels, it is important to consider that social networks must still play in the ecosystem of online channels, and other channels such as portals must find a way to incorporate social into their future. In recent news, Yahoo! unveiled its plan to partner rather than compete with Facebook, reinforcing the concept of integrated channel marketing (social, search and display) in the online space by signaling that if you can’t beat them…</p>
<p>To reinforce the concept of frenemies in the online landscape, below is a simple network map showing the flow of traffic between the major acquisition channels from the social network category’s perspective.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b4_3.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1481 alignnone" title="b4_3" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/b4_3.jpg" alt="" width="371" height="364" /></a></p>
<p>Analyzing the network map above, it’s immediately clear that search, as a category, is the most significant driver of traffic to social networks, supplying over 28%. The other significant takeaway from the map is that social nets are not only the largest category online, they also can behave as parasitic hosts, taking more traffic from all channels than they supply back.</p>
<p>While switching costs in the social networking space may make any build-our-own-net a non-starter, partnership can also present some distinct dangers. Partnering with networks appears to make sense, but now the critical focus should be on augmenting return traffic from networks.</p>
<p>My apologies to Sun Tzu for butchering his landmark phrase from the Art of War, but when you consider traffic flow; search engines, portals and web-based email providers should keep their friends close, but their frenemies closer.</p>
<p><em><strong>Want to learn more about digital marketing in 2011? <a title="2011 Digital Marketer" href="http://www.experian.com/marketing-services/register-2011-digital-marketer-preview.html" target="_blank">Click here to request a copy of Experian Marketing Services highly-anticipated 2011 Digital Marketer Report</a>, launching in late March. The report features an editorial by Bill Tancer as well as unreleased data spanning email, social, mobile, search and more.</strong></em></p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/02/23/social-networks-parasitic-hosts-and-the-case-for-frenemies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Battles Google for Number 1</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2010/03/31/facebook-battles-google-for-number-1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2010/03/31/facebook-battles-google-for-number-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Fetto</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As recently reported on the blog of our sister company Experian Hitwise, Facebook surpassed Google in the U.S. to become the most visited website during the week ending March 13, 2010. The market share of visits to Facebook.com increased 185% during that week as compared to the same week in 2009, while visits to Google.com [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As recently reported on the blog of our sister company Experian Hitwise, Facebook surpassed Google in the U.S. to become the most visited website during the week ending March 13, 2010. The market share of visits to Facebook.com increased 185% during that week as compared to the same week in 2009, while visits to Google.com increased 9% during the same time frame. Together Facebook.com and Google.com accounted for 14% of all US Internet visits during the week ending March 13.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/facebook-battles-google-01.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-344" title="facebook-battles-google-01" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/facebook-battles-google-01.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="400" /></a></p>
<p>Experian Simmons DataStream found that while visitors to both Facebook and Google are making more frequent visits to each site in a given month today than they were two years prior, Facebook has seen its visitors&#8217; average montly visit count rise at a much faster clip. As of February 8, 2010, Facebook visitors made an average of 11.7 visits to the site in the previous month, an increase of 21 percent compared to February 11, 2008 when Facebookers made only 9.6 visits to Facebook.com a month. During the same time, Google experienced only an 8 percent increase in the average number of visits its visitors made to Google.com each month. As of February 8, 2010, Google visitors made an average of 12.1 visits to Google.com in the previous month versus an average of 11.3 visits that Googlers made to the site in the month ending February 11, 2008. With momentum on its side, Facebook may soon exceed Google in both traffic and average monthly visits.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/facebook-battles-google-02.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-343" title="facebook-battles-google-02" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/facebook-battles-google-02.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="450" /></a></p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2010/03/31/facebook-battles-google-for-number-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Reaches Top Ranking in US</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2010/03/05/facebook-reaches-top-ranking-in-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2010/03/05/facebook-reaches-top-ranking-in-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Heather Dougherty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experian Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=6528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook reached an important milestone for the week ending March 13, 2010 and surpassed Google in the US to become the most visited website for the week. Facebook.com recently reached the #1 ranking on Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, and New Year’s Day as well as the weekend of March 6th and 7th. The market share [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank" class="broken_link">Facebook</a> reached an important milestone for the week ending March 13, 2010 and surpassed Google in the US to become the most visited website for the week. Facebook.com recently reached the #1 ranking on Christmas Eve, Christmas Day, and New Year’s Day as well as the weekend of March 6th and 7th. The market share of visits to Facebook.com increased 185% last week as compared to the same week in 2009, while visits to Google.com increased 9% during the same time frame. Together Facebook.com and Google.com accounted for 14% of all US Internet visits last week.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6529" title="Weekly Market Share of visits to Facebook.com and Google.com" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/SM-WMS-Facebook-Google-3-13-10.png" alt="Weekly Market Share of visits to Facebook.com and Google.com" width="499" height="420" /></p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2010/03/05/facebook-reaches-top-ranking-in-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Maps Edges Closer To MapQuest</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2009/02/11/google-maps-edges-closer-to-mapquest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2009/02/11/google-maps-edges-closer-to-mapquest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hitwise Research</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Consumer Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Experian Hitwise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search intelligence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/?p=6541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few weeks ago I thought I was onto something very hot. I was getting ready to announce that Google Maps had caught up to MapQuest in share of US Internet visits. I decided to wait a week to be sure things held. Since then, MapQuest has regained its lead and is widening the gap [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few weeks ago I thought I was onto something very hot. I was getting ready to announce that Google Maps had caught up to MapQuest in share of US Internet visits. I decided to wait a week to be sure things held. Since then, MapQuest has regained its lead and is widening the gap on Google Maps.</p>
<p>The following chart provides an update from my October post on this same subject. Notice that in late December, it looked like Google Maps was ready to overtake MapQuest. Last week, MapQuest had regained an 11% lead over Google Maps, up from 1.6% in the week to 3rd January 2009.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-6542" title="Google Maps Edges closer to Mapquest" src="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/google-maps-edges-closer-to-mapquest.png" alt="Google Maps Edges closer to Mapquest" width="500" height="400" /></p>
<p>In October, <a href="http://blog.mapquest.com/2008/12/23/top-8-in-2008-a-mapquest-year-in-review/" target="blank_" class="broken_link">MapQuest rolled </a>out some new features. <a href="http://blumenthals.com/blog/2008/11/07/local-market-share-october-google-resumes-upward-swing/" target="blank_" class="broken_link">At the time</a>, it looked as though MapQuest had already lost the momentum to hold the #1 spot but now that those features have been available for a few months, perhaps they are helping MapQuest regain a foothold.</p>
<p>The ascent of Google Maps is a result of the shortcut in the search results on Google. 61% of visits to Google Maps came directly from Google last week. Yahoo! Search was the site’s #2 referrer of traffic and accounted for only 1.07% of US visits. Google Maps received visits from 72,074 unique search terms in the past four weeks, compared to 11,466 for MapQuest.</p>
<p>MapQuest receives most of its search traffic from searches for its brand name – in other words from people actively searching for MapQuest. In the past four weeks 8 of the top 10 search terms sending visits to MapQuest were queries for the brand name, such as “mapquest”, “map quest” and “mapquest driving directions”. These 8 terms accounted for 62% of visits from search to the MapQuest website. Contrast that to Google Maps for which only 2 of the top 10 terms were branded and these only accounted for 4.2% of the site’s search traffic.</p>
<p>As long as Google dominates search, MapQuest will face a tough battle for visits. However, if the past few weeks are any harbinger, there may be life in the old dog yet!</p>
<div style="height:33px;" class="really_simple_share robots-nocontent snap_nopreview"></div>
		<div style="clear:both;"></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2009/02/11/google-maps-edges-closer-to-mapquest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>