<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Revisited &#8211; in More than 140 Characters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/</link>
	<description>Insights about online marketing, e-commerce and industry trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 13:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Falkson</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27940</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Falkson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 09:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27940</guid>
		<description>Facebook appears to be here to stay, I can&#039;t say the same about Twitter.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook appears to be here to stay, I can&#8217;t say the same about Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Errington</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27939</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Errington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27939</guid>
		<description>Out of all the people I know using Twitter, not one of them uses the Twitter web site to post tweets.
And when I look at the people I am following, it shows the client they used - maybe one in twenty are posting from Twitter. Most are posting from mobile clients or desktop software.
(Of course that&#039;s not forgetting that you can post to Facebook from third party software and mobile devices).
Until this usage is measured any data is suspect at best.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of all the people I know using Twitter, not one of them uses the Twitter web site to post tweets.<br />
And when I look at the people I am following, it shows the client they used &#8211; maybe one in twenty are posting from Twitter. Most are posting from mobile clients or desktop software.<br />
(Of course that&#8217;s not forgetting that you can post to Facebook from third party software and mobile devices).<br />
Until this usage is measured any data is suspect at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren Pearce</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27938</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren Pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27938</guid>
		<description>While there&#039;s clearly a difference in scale between the two sites, comparing visits to the website isn&#039;t an accurate way of measuring total Twitter use (as I&#039;m sure you&#039;re aware).
This report suggests a large percentage of users do their tweeting via apps other than twitter.com &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/&lt;/a&gt;
From the data presented by Hitwise, the unknown is whether the percentage of people using apps is increasing to take up the slack in website dropoff. I have no evidence to suggest one way or the other...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there&#8217;s clearly a difference in scale between the two sites, comparing visits to the website isn&#8217;t an accurate way of measuring total Twitter use (as I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;re aware).<br />
This report suggests a large percentage of users do their tweeting via apps other than twitter.com <a href="http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sysomos.com/insidetwitter/</a><br />
From the data presented by Hitwise, the unknown is whether the percentage of people using apps is increasing to take up the slack in website dropoff. I have no evidence to suggest one way or the other&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27937</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27937</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d also like to see trends of number of Tweets. Another stat that might be interesting is the rate of unfollowing. For example, early on I Tweeted a lot and followed a lot of people. But as I burned out and realized minimal return on time spent on Twitter, I started Tweeting less and unfollowing people who were &quot;junking up&quot; my stream. This of course naturally shrunk my usage, and therefore I imagine those two trends would provide some indication of usage for others as well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d also like to see trends of number of Tweets. Another stat that might be interesting is the rate of unfollowing. For example, early on I Tweeted a lot and followed a lot of people. But as I burned out and realized minimal return on time spent on Twitter, I started Tweeting less and unfollowing people who were &#8220;junking up&#8221; my stream. This of course naturally shrunk my usage, and therefore I imagine those two trends would provide some indication of usage for others as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixon Hamby</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27936</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixon Hamby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27936</guid>
		<description>If it doesnt count application traffic it is meaningless. Most people get on tweetdeck or something similar.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it doesnt count application traffic it is meaningless. Most people get on tweetdeck or something similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter_Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27935</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter_Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27935</guid>
		<description>Some data on users coming to Twitter via the API is publicly available, though not comprehensive. Shouldn&#039;t you at least mention it?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some data on users coming to Twitter via the API is publicly available, though not comprehensive. Shouldn&#8217;t you at least mention it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wir sprechen Online.</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27941</link>
		<dc:creator>Wir sprechen Online.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27941</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Facebook vs. Twitter&#160;IV.&lt;/strong&gt;

Hitwise: There is a competitive threat that Twitter (0.14%) may pose to a 6.10% Facebook reach (USA); http://j.mp/40Q0nX...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Facebook vs. Twitter&nbsp;IV.</strong></p>
<p>Hitwise: There is a competitive threat that Twitter (0.14%) may pose to a 6.10% Facebook reach (USA); <a href="http://j.mp/40Q0nX" rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/40Q0nX</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul Deshmukh</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27934</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul Deshmukh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27934</guid>
		<description>One of the hypothesis I have regarding the drop in traffic to twitter is the the number of applications that are enabling you to use twitter without logging into twitter.  What might be interesting to see is number of tweets over period of time. For me, I use 3rd party sites to follow, tweet, retweet and hardly log into twitter.
-rahul @thedeshmukhs
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the hypothesis I have regarding the drop in traffic to twitter is the the number of applications that are enabling you to use twitter without logging into twitter.  What might be interesting to see is number of tweets over period of time. For me, I use 3rd party sites to follow, tweet, retweet and hardly log into twitter.<br />
-rahul @thedeshmukhs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susannah Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.experian.com/blogs/hitwise/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27933</link>
		<dc:creator>Susannah Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experian.com/blogs/ilovedata/2009/10/29/twitter-revisited-in-more-than-140-characters/#comment-27933</guid>
		<description>Hi Bill,
Your data is always a tonic - thanks for sharing this and your earlier post, which includes the key caveat: &quot;the above chart indicates visits to Twitter&#039;s website, and does not include application and mobile traffic.&quot;
The Pew Internet Project&#039;s surveys also find that social network sites like Facebook still dominate the communications picture (about half of internet users are on a SNS vs 1 in 5 who are on Twitter). The on-the-go updates were really striking to me in our most recent survey - the more wireless devices someone owns, the more likely they are to tweet, for example.
We survey researchers have our challenges (low response rates, the expense of cell phone samples...) but now I&#039;m worried about how Hitwise and other traffic measurement firms will adapt to the ever-growing mobile market. Have you addressed that in a separate post? I&#039;d love to hear more since I count on your data to balance our own.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bill,<br />
Your data is always a tonic &#8211; thanks for sharing this and your earlier post, which includes the key caveat: &#8220;the above chart indicates visits to Twitter&#8217;s website, and does not include application and mobile traffic.&#8221;<br />
The Pew Internet Project&#8217;s surveys also find that social network sites like Facebook still dominate the communications picture (about half of internet users are on a SNS vs 1 in 5 who are on Twitter). The on-the-go updates were really striking to me in our most recent survey &#8211; the more wireless devices someone owns, the more likely they are to tweet, for example.<br />
We survey researchers have our challenges (low response rates, the expense of cell phone samples&#8230;) but now I&#8217;m worried about how Hitwise and other traffic measurement firms will adapt to the ever-growing mobile market. Have you addressed that in a separate post? I&#8217;d love to hear more since I count on your data to balance our own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>