May
09
2008

Coldplay Compared to NIN and Radiohead

Last week we issued a news release titled Coldplay’s Free Single Propels Website to #1 Online Among Bands and Artists. We found that U.S. visits to Coldplay.com increased 19 fold on the back of the band’s new single, Violet Hill, being released for free online. On April 29, 2008, the day the single was released on Coldplay.com, the website ranked as the most visited website among the Bands and Artists category. A little more than 1 out of every 40 visits to Bands and Artists category went to Coldplay’s website that day.
My colleague, Ben Kelly, pointed out that Coldplay is just one of many bands testing the waters with free online downloads. The record industry is at a point of major change and several established artists are experimenting with creative means of distributing and making money from music.
Last fall Radiohead released their album In Rainbows online with consumers given the opportunity to download the album at whatever price they were willing to pay. Nine Inch Nails’ Trent Reznor produced an album for Saul Williams which was made available as a free download or a high quality version was available for $5. Nine Inch Nails have since released two albums online, Group I-IV in March and The Slip this week. Fans were able to download the first nine songs of Group IV-V for free and the new album is entirely free.
Radiohead’s release was much more popular than either Coldplay’s or either of the Nine Inch Nails releases, as measured by share of US Internet visits.
Radiohead NIN Coldplay.png
The other really interesting thing I noticed is that Radiohead’s website traffic has maintained a much higher average ranking since the release of their album than before. This indicates that the promotion worked to bring fans to the website and that they keep coming back. Radiohead.com has maintained a position among the top 100 Bands and Artists websites each month since the release of In Rainbows (with the exception of January when the site ranked 106). Compare that with the site’s ranking before the release – as illustrated in the chart below. In the past two years, the site never cracked the top 100, reaching highs of 147 in April 2007 and 106 in May 2006 and lows of 352 in October 2006, 360 in July 2007 and 359 in August 2007.
Radiohead Ranking.png
One of the key questions facing record labels and bands is how to make money in the face of peer to peer filesharing. Bands that build a direct relationship with fans may be better placed to make money from special offers such as limited edition albums and concert tickets. We’ll continue to watch Coldplay’s website to see if website visits remain higher after the release of the single than before.


    • Mike McCann
    • May 9th, 2008

    This is a bit flawed as a supposed measurable for a successful strategy in the digital era of the ‘new’ music business as it doesn’t account for the fact that part of Radiohead’s sustained web traffic can be attributed to their presales of upcoming concert dates.
    Nine Inch Nails are now doing the same thing so a spike would be visible for late April/early May that can’t be wholly attributed to the release of The Slip.
    If/when Coldplay choose to go that route and offer presales that are only open to registered members of the official site, then you’d be liable to see a corresponding jump there too.
    And it’s Ghosts I-IV, not Group IV-V…

    • Thirteenburn
    • May 13th, 2008

    This proves nothing regarding the popularity of the so-called “rock” bands Coldplay and Radiohead. NIN would have done a bit better if the music wasn’t totally instrumental and when bands such as Metallica come out, their “spikes” will be far higher and sustained longer due to being far more popular that either Coldplay and/or Radiohead.

  1. This One’s On Me: Reznor Just Gives It Away – Digital Music News

    Last week Trent Reznor came out of nowhere (once again) and offered a new NIN album totally free, a move that is undoubtedly meant to boost fan loyalty.

    • Nate
    • June 17th, 2008

    By the way, it’s “Ghosts I-IV” not “Group I-IV”.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

You must be logged in to post a comment.